Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
By Company Top Web Models, LLC
[ Remove ]
Option only available from company page.
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-4 of 4  

Visit Top Web Models

1. Top Web Models (0)

Network
Newbie
88*
Do Not Bite It (0) 02-13-24  06:29pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Lesser-known network that has some strengths
Access to 6 other sites
Solid navigation between the 6 sites
Video downloads top out at 1080p
You can download pictures
Bargain price through Porn Users ($9.95)
Cons: Blowjjobs are one of my favorite niches in porn and this network delivers, if you prefer more than blowjobs, you may be disappointed.
Download limit that limits new members to 3 downloads per day
Bottom Line: Being older when I got into viewing online porn gave me a slight problem. Oral sex, while relatively common when I was younger, was not near as prevalent as it is today. Big Gulp Girls was one of the first oral fixated sites I ever joined and it’s on this Top Web Models network.

The sites you receive with Top Web Models are: Big Gulp Girls, Deep Throat Sirens, Facials Forever, She’s Brand New, Cougar Season and 2 Girls One Camera. Joining through this Porn Users page will get you a $9.95 bargain priced subscription. Don’t worry about the download limit. It’s there whether you pay $9.95 or $29.95.

You’re not likely going to find anything groundbreaking on this network, but it is worth at least one membership. I think the strongest site on the network is Deep Throat Sirens. It’s a niche that a lot of sites claim to do, but don’t really fulfill the deep throat promise. Deep Throat Sirens does on most scenes.

The download limit is definitely restricting. They have three levels of membership. Once you have been a member for a year, you achieve silver level and after two straight years, you are made gold level. Silver level can download 5 videos a day. Gold level can download 10 videos a day. Even though I consider myself a fan of this network; I’ve never stayed longer than one month. Your download limit as a new member is 3 videos per day.

The models are semi-professionals to porn mega stars. I prefer amateur, but the niche is the selling point for me at this network. Navigation is always a concern for me with networks. But, this one is good. The sites seamlessly link together and everything is easy to find.

The con I mentioned is the important part for anyone considering joining for the first time. The majority of this network is dedicated to women giving men oral sex. There are some scenes with full sexual intercourse, but you will have to look for those to find them. My own memberships on this network show that even I get bored with just oral. I join Top Web Models about once every 18 months and am satisfied.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Deep Throat Sirens

2. Deep Throat Sirens (0)

Pay
Newbie
78*
KayTBuffs (0) 03-10-21  01:18am
Rookie Badge  Female Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A site on Top Web Models that doesn’t just have blowjobs, which is strange since the name of the site sounds like it would be all oral.

A large site with 478 scenes and some very cute, younger female models.

Very long scenes, some nearing an hour each. The videos are downloadable with no limits.

The picture sets are some of the biggest (in quantity) I have seen with some having 700 photos. They are also downloadable.

There are other sites included that I feel are better overall than the sites they focus on.
Cons: Probably not for the newer porn viewer. There’s gagging, choking, some degradation.

The download speeds on the biggest video files are very slow compared to the download speeds on the smaller files. I can’t even differentiate between the different options since the file takes too long to download.

The photosets are also way too large to download.
Bottom Line: I decided to let this review kind of be for the whole network since this site seems to be the flagship site. If you can’t tell, I didn’t like this site very much. Most of the scenes start off with the guy seeing how far he can stick his penis down the woman’s throat. This includes forcing her head to hold in position, even if she’s gagging and I’m just wondering how I ended up joining a site like this. I was looking for something different. It’s different, but not the direction I was looking for.

They have a site called 2 Girls 1 Camera that I really liked. It is rough too, but it includes scenes with one woman masturbating while watching the other woman and the man have sex. It looks like they were on the right track to creating something fairly unique, but it only has 31 scenes on it.

Deep Throat Sirens with 478 scenes of all forms of sex. There’s anal, there’s vaginal, there’s a lot of choking and gagging too. I realized after joining this network, thanks to Deep Throat Sirens, I was thinking I was joining Net Video Girls.

There are technical problems too. Deep Throat Sirens also lists their two top video download resolutions as 1920x1080, but one is twice as big as the other. I have learned about bitrates and thought that’s probably what the difference is, but when I go to download the “Original” it is 4GB and it downloads at 3.5 MB/s. When I download the “HQ” it is 2GB and also listed as 1920x1080, it downloads at 40 MB/s. When I download the photo sets, some of which are 2GB, it downloads at 40 MB/s. I don’t know why the Original is twice the size of the HQ even though their resolutions are listed as the same. They also offer a 540p and 270p download too. The tagging system does not seem to be accurate. They have 72 tags, but some of them don’t seem like they should be tags like two different ones for “pig tails” and “pigtails”. Or the ones that I don’t see the point of like, “Halloween”, “Christmas”, “Valentine’s Day”. There’s a feeling that they are trying to do too much, but not doing any of it that well.

The network as a whole has 1,258 models and 1,870 scenes so it is a good-sized network especially for the price. It’s also not all oral, besides Deep Throat Sirens having all forms of sex on it, the site Big Gulp Girls also has more than oral even though it’s another one that is named like it should be just oral. You see what I mean by trying to do too much? The sites that sound like they may have more than oral only have oral.

I should also mention the older videos including all the videos on three of the sites only have 480p as the highest download resolution. I am going to have a hard time recommending it to newer porn viewers. Some of the scenes on Deep Throat Sirens are more hardcore than anything I’ve seen on Evil Angel or Kink. I would recommend it to those who are into rougher sex and would even highly recommend it since it the size of the network is good for the price. Maybe the tech problems will get worked out and that would also help my view of it. I am just getting the feeling I’m on a network that there isn’t much attention being paid to it or it’s maintenance. There still is no way to know if it’s updating. I can say the newest videos showing up haven’t changed in the 2 weeks I’ve been a member.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit She\'s Brand New

3. She's Brand New (0)

Pay
Newbie
74*
KayTBuffs (0) 03-10-21  01:13am
Rookie Badge  Female Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Blowjob, swallowing, and most of the women are supposed to be shooting their first scene.

Pretty women, some variety as well.

The scene count on the site is 241 which compared to Rear Admiral’s review from 4 years ago means they don’t update much, but 241 scenes is a lot.

They use Epoch and the price is cheap through Porn Users at $12.50/month.

Some of the scenes do seem to be “new” as the two newest ones are Valentine's Day themed.
Cons: This is probably the least rough site on Top Web Models and it’s rougher than I was expecting. The name, to me, is very misleading.

No 4K videos and the 1080p seem to have very high bitrates with the scenes topping the 2GB mark in size.

I normally wouldn’t consider this a con, but some of the scenes are just too long for the niche (some nearing 40 minutes)
Bottom Line: I still consider myself in the exploratory stage of hardcore porn sites. Top Web Models sounds like a softcore site, maybe some lesbian, some solo scenes, but nothing doing. The content on this site isn’t as hardcore as their other sites, but it’s still more hardcore than I normally would join. I am sure there is a market for this site especially since I will estimate 60-70% of the scenes say it’s the model’s first time. I think they should update it and tell if it was their last scene too.

This site does have introductions to the model. This includes typical questions asked by porn producers. The model also teases a little including stripping and that’s when things fall into a similar pattern from scene to scene. They do include downloadable photo sets that focus just on the female model for the first 40-60 pictures and those pictures are 2808x1872 in resolution.

Once beyond the focus on the female model the scenes become POV of the female giving the man a blowjob. These blowjobs vary from scene to scene. Some are rougher, some are more gentle, but all I have watched end with the guy cumming in the woman’s mouth. He then taps her chin so she opens her mouth to show the cum is in her mouth and she swallows. The introduction gains this site some points since the action part is very repetitive.

The newer videos can be downloaded in what it says is “Original” 1920x1080 or “HQ” which is also 1920x1080. These files are the same size. I don’t see the difference. They also offer an odd “Stream” download. I haven’t ever seen a site call a download a stream quality. It is 960x540. There is also a “Mobile” download that is 480x270. There’s too much disparity there. The first two are 2 GB each, the third drops down to 540MB and the fourth is 271MB. Very few of the scenes are worth a 2GB download. I like some of the scenes, but it doesn’t make much sense to me to have 4 different video formats with 1.5GB difference between the two highest and two others.

All in all, I would recommend this site itself to those maybe interested in rougher blowjobs, but not the violent, punishing kind. A few of the women on this site do get their makeup smeared, but this is the tamest of the sites on this network. It doesn’t stand out in any way other than I haven’t seen hardly any of these women before and quite a few are very pretty.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Top Web Models

4. Top Web Models (0)

Network
Newbie
83*
rearadmiral (0) 05-14-17  05:25am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Large network with several sites
- Some good oral-themed porn (though not an oral-only network)
- Mix of A-list and relative unknowns
- Photos available
- Allows download managers
Cons: - Updates not dated
- No meaningful search function
- Photos available
- No TBP Discount
Bottom Line: I stumbled on this network while looking for an oral-themed site to join and this looked like it would fit the bill. It turns out that it is a pretty good network that offers a lot of good porn. While several of the sites on the network are oral-themed, prospective members looking for sex scenes wont be disappointed either as the network offers a lot of variety.

Its fair to say that the network doesnt offer anything unique and it doesnt fill an under-served niche. Thats not a bad thing though because even though the porn is aimed at the middle of mainstream it is still good at what it does. Just dont come here looking for hardcore BDSM or face-fucking because you wont find that here.

The site currently has 1435 scenes spread across nine sites. Ive added a list of the sites and how many scenes each has but theres a caveat: the scenes arent dated so I cant give concrete answers on an update schedule, but using the comments to the scenes (if any) I can get a pretty good estimate of when each site updates. The sites are:

2 Girls 1 Camera: B/G/G threeways, 28 scenes, not updating regularly, most scenes are relatively old judging by the stars in them

Big Gulp Girls: oral with swallowing, 249 scenes, appears to add one scene approximately every three weeks

Cougar Season: MILFs, 162 scenes, appears to add one scene approximately every three weeks

Deep Throat Sirens: 312 scenes, appears to update approximately every 10 days

Facials Forever: oral with facials, 192 scenes, appears to add one scene approximately every three weeks

Pounded Petite: sex scenes with petite models, 79 scenes, no longer updating

Shes Brand New: new models and some scenes touted as firsts, 222 scenes, seems to update every two weeks

TWM Classics: remastered scenes, 75 scenes, cant tell about the update schedule since there are so few comments posted, but it does appear to add a scene occasionally

TWM Interviews: pornstar interviews, 116 scenes, not updating

In keeping with the fact that one of the sites boasts a lot of first scenes, the network has a good mix of known models (many of them A-list stars) and relative unknowns. I cant vouch for a lot of the claims to first scenes, but as someone who buys and watches a lot of porn they are definitely new to me. On a mostly-unrelated note, as a fan of redheads I found a higher proportion of them here than on many other sites, especially ones Id not seen before. This is definitely not a site that features redheads specifically, but there are quite a few here.

The network appears to have been around for a while but without scene dates I cant give a definitive answer. But judging by some of the earlier stars in the scenes its been around close to 10 years at least. Because of that there is some variation in the scene resolutions available. All scenes are available in at least two resolutions and most in three. (There are always three available options but on many of the scenes two of the options are the same for some reason.) The resolutions youll find are 320x240, 480x270, 940x560, 640x480, 720x480, 960x540 and 1920x1080. I downloaded the 1920x1080 scenes and those are 6000kb/s and 29fps. I also downloaded a few of the 640x480 scenes and those are 2000kb/s. All scenes are only available as mp4s.

Video quality is good, but not great, on a 24 monitor.

Most of the scenes are shorter than average (thats not necessarily a bad thing) with most coming in under 30 minutes. The advantage to that is that the file sizes arent huge, even for the 1080p files.

Photos are available too, as either singles or zips, but this is really more of a video site. Photo resolutions arent great with the latest coming in at 1200x800.

The site allows download managers and I found download speeds to be on par with other major sites. I didnt find that download links timed out unreasonably quickly. I also didnt hit any daily download limits.

The site is laid out logically but sorting scenes and searching for niches doesnt work well. For example, I searched for anal scenes and that returned oral scenes where you couldnt even see the models ass. I lost faith in the search function after that.

Back in 2012 Bibo wrote a comment that TWM is a clone of My XXX Pass (which has sites like Throated and Only Teen Blowjobs). I cant completely confirm or deny this but Ive been a member at My XXX Pass several times and Ive compared the scenes there to ones at TWM and I havent found any overlap between them. Maybe back four or five years ago there was some commonality but that no longer appears to be the case.)

Ill definitely recommend this network as it offers a lot of mainstream porn. The site could improve in several areas but overall these shortcomings are minor and can be overlooked. The biggest improvement that the network could make is to offer a TBP discount. That would take it from a good value and make it a great value.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-4 of 4  


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. None

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.