Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Autumn is definitely very attractive. (Though, I HATE tatoos, and she's got some -- but they aren't too horrifying. And I don't like glasses, which she wears in some sets, never taking them off.)
There is at least SOME content here.
There is SOME high-resolution content.
There are now links to zip files you can download for MOST photo sets.
There are links to download MOST of the video files.
I give this a "Don't waste your money" rating.
In fact, I consider this an "insulting to paying customers" site.
The problem is that about 20% of the videos DO NOT HAVE DOWNLOAD LINKS. And it doesn't look like they will ever be added.
The videos are BORING: They are all of the "For crying out loud, if you could take your hands off of your body for TWO SECONDS, perhaps WE could see it" variety. Usually one minute with some clothing on, hands all over body, one minute with clothing off, hands all over body, then down to masturbate, then done. They sure don't float my boat very much.
Posting has been very irregular -- only FOUR videos have been posted in 2012, as I write this.
Photo sets at 4000 pixels are very good, but perhaps only half are at that size. Many others are at only 2000, and some are 1200.
Apparently new photo sets don't get zip files you can download for some period of time. I've seen one "new" set, and no zip files, so far.
The bottom line is simple: DON'T WASTE YOUR MONEY. There is a LOT of Autumn Riley content on the free sites -- if it's not "most" photo sets, it's a very substantial cross-section of them. Obviously, though, you don't get the "full nude" shots. But I would call most of those "boring," anyway.
I consider the lack of downloading links to be "customer hostile" -- dang it, I PAID FOR THIS CONTENT, and it's downright insulting to find no downloading links for a substantial amount of the content.
Yes, you can muck about and download stuff without links, but, "dang it, I PAID FOR THIS CONTENT" and so on.
As I write this, there are 29 videos. 7 lack download links, and 1 is broken -- it stops halfway through. Notably, the videos without links are substantially lower-quality than the ones with links.
The "new" photoset without zip files proved that going through the gallery to download files was TEDIOUS at best -- most of the pictures wouldn't actually load until I hit the "stop" button on my browser.
So, what's worth paying for? If you MUST have videos, you can download the lame videos.
If you MUST have the "full nude" shots, you can get those. But, many tend to be "close-up shots of vibrators." Doesn't float my boat. And for those without vibrators, well, "you've seen lots of these before."
If you MUST have everything you can find, or if you MUST have the high-resolution 4000 pixel files, well, you can get those.
In any case, if you're a competent downloader (equipped with a fast connection and productive downloading tools) it really shouldn't take you much more than a couple of hours to download the entire site. There's just not a lot of content here. And again, you can get a very good taste of Autumn Riley on the free sites.
Technically, I used the Opera browser's right-click "save to download folder" for efficient zip file and video downloading. But, for scientific purposes and to report in this review, I just fired up my favorite auto-downloader, "NeoDownloader," and it's cranking away on the site just fine. So, downloaders will work, but it remains to be seen whether I'll suffer any consequences. Doesn't matter, since "I'm done" with the site at this point, anyway.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
+British Columbian dynamite beauty Autumn Riley, a sexy model who has a lot of presence in front of a camera
+Photos are quite professionally done in image quality
+Photo galleries are at least 2000 pixels on the long end, if that’s the only size
+Most shoots are done indoors where the lighting is easier to control
+Videos are H264 mp4’s at 1920x1080, and are downloadable, but see the cons
+Fast download speed for videos (around 4-500 kbps)
+Navigation is easy and intuitive
+Fairly simple and straightforward design
-No zips for the photos
-Doesn’t allow download manager to grab pic batches
-Photo size selection varies a lot depending on the gallery. Sometimes they’re only 2000 px on the long end. A small handful are only 4000. A few have 1200, 1600, 2000, and 4000.
-Videos are jerky on playback, at least on my system, both streaming and downloaded/offline
-Videos come in only one humongous size
-Updates content once a week; it’s growing slowly, currently with 36 photosets and 20 videos
-Calendar doesn’t indicate when future updates will be posted
-Blog hasn’t been updated since May this year
-Visitors don’t really get enough of a preview of the site content
Autumn Riley is both the model and, from what I can tell, the webmaster of this site. She’s also really busy, it seems, going to college at the same time. AND she’s a smokin’ beautiful 18-year-old with lustrous dark hair and dark eyes; as for the rest, I don’t believe it’s possible to be disappointed. She’s a got a couple of small tattoos, but they are placed tastefully.
She poses mostly in bathrooms, on living room couches, in beds, in the kitchen, and on a boat. She often gets completely naked in the photo galleries, but not always. Usually, she poses solo, but there are a couple of photosets and videos with a female friend.
For a site that is amateurish and inconsistent in some ways, the quality of the photo content is really high. It is better-looking content than I’ve seen at some of the more “professional” sites, with no shirking on file sizes, either. The 59 photos I saved of her “Blue Tank Top” strip in a kitchen take up 287 megabytes of storage space; that averages 4.86 megabytes each; it was one of those that was only available in the 4000 pixel size. And the 2000 pixel photos will average over a megabyte.
I’m not complaining (my hard drive can handle it), but prospective members might want to know.
So what’s to become of Autumn Riley? Will she continue modeling? Will she start appearing at other sites? (I’d love to see her at TorridArt, for instance.) Will her own site get a new infusion of energy and attention, and start flourishing?
Or will Autumn keep her glasses on, not to take off during a photo shoot, but to study even harder and get through college and on to a career doing something else, and live on in Facebook/Twitter obscurity? Could this be one of those sites that comes and goes, the kind that winds up with that “no longer active” notice at PU?
It’s anyone’s guess at this point, I’d say, along with “Might Recommend,” as long as you don’t mind saving the photos of Autumn one at a time.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.