Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
By Company Zemani Ltd.
[ Remove ]
Option only available from company page.
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-4 of 4  

Visit Zemani

1. Zemani (0)

Pay
Newbie
55*
greg909 (2) 06-21-11  06:26pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Attractive collection of girls
- Good lighting and composition in most sets
- Site navigation is fine
- I guess the videos are OK, although check out other reviews for those... it's not my scene
- Pictures look OK at 1200 pixel resolution
- A few natural bushes, in addition to the usual dominance of completely shaved models.
Cons: - So-called "poster size" images (the "big" size option) are horrible quality with no fine detail in the vast majority of photosets.
Bottom Line: Sorry, but I just had to blow the cover on this site. The Best Porn gave Zemani's image quality an "A+" which is so, so misleading. (Misleading enough that I signed up in the hope that things were good there now, but I was very disapointed.)

You guys at The Best Porn should take a second look -- you said the images are so sharp even when you zoom in on the big images (which are 4000 pixels or higher.) Well that's because they've applied HEAPS of false sharpening. Maybe 1 or 2 percent of sets are OK, but the other 98% are full of digital artifacts like jagged edges and pixelation in the model's eyes that look like they upscaled the image from a smaller size. Last year I commented on the full-size sample images, and they have taken them off the site now, only offering small samples in pop-up boxes. I'm not surprised. Beware!

It's a shame, because if the images were high quality like Met-art (which they're not) then they'd have a great site because the girls, settings and compositions are just fine.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Zemani

2. Zemani (0)

Pay
Active
85
lk2fireone (194) 04-04-10  07:31pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (74), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -3 sizes for photosets: 800, 1200, 4000 px.
-zip file for each size px for each photoset.
-Online slideshow for photosets.
-Can download the videos or view as streaming.
-Material is exclusive.
-Tiny, unobtrusive watermark bottom right hand corner of photos.
-Vids have a larger watermark than the photos, small but not tiny, placed at bottom right corner of the picture.
-No DRM.
-No timeout from site.
-Can rate the model, photoset, and video. But this is a matter of personal taste, and I don't agree with a lot of the scores.
-Simple site navigation. Easy to get to the sets and videos of each model.
-One update per day (photoset or video).
-Most photosets have 100+ pictures each.
Cons: -Videos download as avi files. No other choice of format.
-Videos download as one file size only (no choice of high, medium, low resolution).
-Downloaded files have no descriptive name. Instead, the download file name is a number with "big", "medium" or "small" attatched, depending on whether you are downloading the big, medium or small px set. Downloaded videos are named with a number and the prefix "zemani-v".
-Search is basic but adequate. Can search by model name, age, or hair color. There is a limited number of models and photosets and videos, so this is not a big con.
Bottom Line: I resisted joining zemani as long as I could. But some of the models at this site are absolutely mouth-watering. I want to sink my teeth and other
body parts into these gorgeous creatures.
Although there are a nice number of photos and photosets for a site that started in 2006, I can't help wishing there were more photosets for my favorite models. Most models only have 1 or 2 photosets.
Site stats (April 4, 2010):
photos 64,806
galleries 471
videos 130
130 videos sounds like a lot of videos. But like many other softcore sites, the videos are short, most less than 10 minutes in runtime. Even
though the videos might have a gorgeous model as the subject, like most softcore sites, the videos are mainly forgettable. The real value lies in the photosets.
The photographic quality of the videos is good to high, but the videos are just ok. I'm much more into softcore than hardcore, but at most softcore
sites, the videos are just plain boring, no matter how attractive the model is. I don't really understand the psychology of why softcore
photosets of a model can be arousing, but a softcore video of the same model is usually boring. That is my reaction to the videos at softcore teen mega-sites.
The TBP review of this site, release date 6 Mar 2010, states the video "content ranges from softcore nude portraits to pussy spreads, girl-girl erotic posing, and more." I saw a number of videos, not all, and the only
content I saw was strictly softcore: no pussy spread, no girl-girl interaction that went beyond two girls that were nude. I found no solitary
or mutual masturbation, no toys, nothing that remotely approached hardcore porn.
There are some videos where the model performs a strip-tease. But you get better, more exciting strip tease at college night at a bar, where the
strippers are non-professional, probably less attractive than the zemani models, but they put on a much better show than the zemani models.
Also, the canned soundtrack on the videos is obtrusive; it adds nothing to the video, and often sounds annoying.
The models are 18 to very early 20s. Almost all Caucasian.
There is a nice mix of different settings/backgrounds for the photoshoots and videos: interior in a house, in a field, a stream, a lake or sea. Most photosets make nice use of colors in the background, the photosets are mainly nicely focused, the model is nicely featured in the shots. Not all shots are perfect, of course, but the photosets are equal to what you find at met-art, mplstudios, high quality glamor-style softcore photosets.
If you are looking for something more explicit than very softcore nudity, go elsewhere. If you are looking for softcore tease or strip tease, you are better off at a different site.

On a value basis, because the softcore teen mega-sites have far greater content, you are better off joining them first. But this is a nice
addition to the category, and the content will build over time. And the site does feature some absolutely yummy girls.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Zemani

3. Zemani (0)

Pay
Active
75
roadie (11) 02-06-10  06:50pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (19), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Regular updates and the models are both numerous and generally gorgeous. You only have to go to the samples or look at the models thumbs to see the quality of the models.
Pics available in 3 sizes with the largest being 4000px. There is a settings section which among other things allows you to choose a default size that each thumbnail will open at.
Cons: Inconsistent quality of the photos. There are far to many poor quality pictures. My main interest is pictures rather than video and in this area I was greatly disappointed. There is too many out of focus / soft and badly photoshopped pictures. Kate (sentiments) being a perfect example of grainy photos and not what you would expect from a high quality photo shoot.
The videos are only vailable in AVI and being honest I have nly downloaded 2 so far and both are not of a quality I would have expected. I can only assume they were videoed hand held by someone that hasn't the steadiest of hands. But please bear inmind I have only checked a small sample of those available.
Bottom Line: Not for me. I have been here less than a week and am already choosing which site to go to next.
The models are some of the best I have seen but generally speaking unfortunately the photographers have let them down either in the photoshoot or in their use of photoshop. I Would much rather see smaller sets of photos and even lower resolutions if the quality could be improved upon. But make your own mind up as the free HQ samples are typical of the members.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Zemani

4. Zemani (0)

Pay
Active
84
Drooler (218) 06-17-09  01:02am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (85), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Daily updates ... but only from June this year
+144 Slavic models; quite a few never seen before, and some of them are darlins’!
+All exclusive material
+Mix of indoor and outdoor shoots
+236 galleries (avg. 126 pix each)
+Pics at 800px. 1200px, and 3-4000px
+All three pic sizes available under each photo thumbnail for individual pic saving
+All three pic sizes are zipped and linked on each page of each gallery
+Good visitor’s preview with demos of those pic sizes, a face shot of each model, and a “calendar” of updates you’ll want to familiarize yourself with before making that “buy” decision
+Good, consistent organization of content within models and galleries
Cons: -A fine mess of a model index. If there’s any organization here, damned if I know how.
-A few models are too low in body mass index, and a few others are easy on the eyelids.
-A few photosets are 2 from one shoot
-In case you were wondering, it has not updated every day since 2006. Scan those dates carefully. (The year 2006, btw, will take very little time!)
-50 videos, which might not suffice for those who crave photos in motion
-All vids are only in avi -- the gold standard for nude art, no? But they’re not “HD.” Specs of the sample I suffered through: 656x496, bitrate of 1744. Kind of amateurishly done, too.
-Vid audio is teckno muzik – the gold standard again!
-Occasionally has one or more of the problems typical of soft nude sites: excessive shadows, blurriness, lack of light, and models being made to be anti-photogenically “not really there.”
-Downloads kind of slow at around 280 – 340 kbps or so, but that means you can grab a beer! (hic)
Bottom Line: Pro or con, your call: Lots of models have only one gallery up, at least so far.
------------

Not sure who Zemani is, if anyone. Have seen theories that, if it’s related to “Zeman,” it’s either Spanish, from “Zamora,” or Czech, meaning “small landowner.”

Maybe it’s a line of haute couture? Whatever.

There’s no “Master of Nude Art Zemani” here that I’ve been able to lay my finger on. Fact is, this site shows the work of various photographers and, as one might predict, variations on satisfaction are guaranteed.

Some of the girls seem very amateurish in both attitude and looks, so what you get are nude photos of average girls looking pretty ordinary.

Generally, though, I’d say I’m pretty OK with this site. Found some new material of Vika H, Lena, Rudi, Lolli, Jasmine, Jozel, Hannasya, Lenusya, Alena, and Alsa. Those are their names here. At MetArt, MetModels, etc., they’re nymed otherwise, of course, as is typical for Russian models.

But what have we here?? Lika, Mara, Evzha, Vita A, and Allana, who’s the cutest, jail-baitiest-lookin’ honey I think I’ve ever seen! Now mind you, I like ‘em skinny if they look healthy and have a nicely formed orb ‘round back. Anyhow, those are some of my never-before-seen choice babes. With so many amateurs, some are bound to be winners.

Well, I didn’t think I could possibly find another site in the soft nude genre, but here it is. And this one’s off to a good start with the now daily updates and its considerable “back” catalogue (yuk-yuk).
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-4 of 4  


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. 21Sextury.com (10)
2. VideoBox (8)
3. Babes Network.com (7)
4. Naughty America (7)
5. DDF Network (6)
6. X-Art (6)
7. Reality Kings (5)
8. Bangbros Network (5)
9. Evil Angel (5)
10. FTV Girls (5)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.03 seconds.