Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
By Company Coute Enterprises
[ Remove ]
Option only available from company page.
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-18 of 18  

Visit Exploited Teens

1. Exploited Teens (1)

Pay
Active
75
rearadmiral (328) 04-27-14  12:55pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (70), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Large site
- Beautiful models
- Mostly quasi-amateurs
- Some models have gone on to big porn careers
- Supports download managers
- Good download speeds
- Appears to update weekly
Cons: - Good porn let down by a weak website
- No preview pictures (though many scenes have a short preview video)
- No options for file types or resolutions
- Low resolution for 2014
- No photos
Bottom Line: Iíve often written that for a site to be great there needs to be three things happening: the porn has to be good, the site has to be good and the scenes need to be easily accessible in a way that members can use. This site is a case of only getting one out of three right, and thatís having good porn. But since thatís subjective your opinion might be different. Iím fairly confident that no one will disagree with my objective assessment that the site needs some work.

The genre that the site fits into is the quasi-amateur site where fresh-faced models come to perform a rare scene. The models are all relatively young (18-22), almost all are Caucasian, body types can vary a bit but most of them are petite. Some of the models have gone on to become big porn stars, but most are more obscure than that. While many of the models have other scenes (often on similar sites), most have little exposure if thatís something that you like.

This is a large site that started in 2000. There are currently 570 videos available and it appears that there is a new one added weekly. I say that it Ďappearsí that it updates weekly because I canít be certain since none of the scenes are dated. All of the scenes follow a formula, which some will take issue with. Iím indifferent to sites that offer formulaic porn as long as the formula works, and in this case it does. The formula is simple: the POV camera pans up a bed to the model and she is introduced and interviewed. There are some poses with clothes, the clothes come off, there is oral on the male cameraman, there is usually (but not always) vaginal sex, and the scene always concludes with the POV cameraman jerking off on the modelís face. Iím no fan of watching a guy jerk off on a womanís face (the jerking part, Iím fine with facials) but itís so common in porn now that thereís really no point in complaining.

The cameraman (and presumably the site owner) is good at POV work but not the best Iíve seen. One thing he does right is recognize that the scene isnít about him so he doesnít try to upstage the models. Some will complain that he talks too much, but I find that doesnít detract from the scene and probably helps it by keeping a connection between the performers.

As with many similar site, the main strength is the models who appear. Many are really good looking and worth watching.

One thing that I really like is that the models begin the scene in street clothes. I really prefer this over a sleazy porn outfit. The site made the right choice in this.

Apart from the good porn this site really has little else going for it. The site design is less than simple: itís outdated. And apart from being outdated, some of the choices the designers made are just bad. For one thing, the site is backwards. When you enter the first page with scenes youíre on the page with the oldest videos. Once youíre on a page you want the only way you can decide if you want to download a scene is from a small thumbnail. If you like a particular body type you may be disappointed with what you download. There is no search function, there are no tags and there are no links if a model has more than one scene on the site.

The downloads themselves are well below industry specs. There are no options for file types or resolutions. WMV is the only type available. The two most common resolutions are 640x480 and 704x396. There are a few at 720x480. Bitrates are 3200kb/s. Iím willing to accept that older scenes wonít be available in better resolutions, but in 2014 these resolutions donít cut it. At a minimum the scenes should be 1280x720. They donít look bad, but they still need to improve.

Download managers are allowed and I had no problem with links timing out. Download speeds were the same as I get elsewhere.

When I joined many of the scenes (maybe a year and half of them) provided no model name at all. The site explained this choice as an attempt to reduce piracy since a search for the site name a model name would bring up tub-site links. While this is better than streaming-only or DRM, I found it annoying since I prefer to sort the scenes by model name and if I like the model I might be able to find more her elsewhere. Sometime in the past two weeks the site has reversed this policy and now includes the modelís name on page, though the download still has a generic name. I can live with that now that I know the modelís name and can change the file name.

So would I recommend this site? Yes, with some caveats and reservations. If you like this kind of porn (quasi-amateur, casting style) then itís worth joining as long as you recognize that the site needs a lot of work and even the newest downloads arenít up to standards. What baffles me is that the site owner obviously puts a lot of work into shooting the scenes and then drops the ball by having a website that has been past its Ďbest beforeí date for several years.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Mouth Target

2. Mouth Target (0)

Pay
Newbie
65*
NoHagsHere (Disabled) 12-05-13  08:00pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Some of the girls are very cute and even natural.
Cons: The videos are tiny (320 X 240), which is laughable in this day and age but I have a feeling this is all very old content that they are milking for revenue. Many of the girls in the videos are fairly skanky and some fairly ugly. The male component in the videos talks too much.
Bottom Line: I only signed up because I have a hardon for one girl on their site. I certainly will not be renewing my subscription.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Exploited Teens

3. Exploited Teens (1)

Pay
Active
75
shooter (11) 01-29-12  01:59pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Amateur teen girls in hardcore scenes.

Plain yet simple site navigation.

Lots of past models to watch.
Cons: Very plain site with lack of options.

Expensive for a site only updated once a week.
Bottom Line: Exploited teens is nice if you like to see real amateur teens in action. All the scenes are generally the same. They are all shot in pov style and have the same guy/camera man in every scene. It gets redundant but you know what you'll get with every scene but with a fresh new teen model. Scene starts off with an interview, then the girl getting naked, before sucking his dick and taking him in her pussy. Most scenes end with a decent facial and a lot have the girl take the load in her mouth and some swallow. The guy can get annoying and says the same cheesy jokes in evey scene. 'Wow what do I have three nuts,' and 'I was a good squirel and saved up my nuts' he says to every girl while ejaculating on their faces. Every girl. His loads are decent but by no means as large as he tends to brag about in porn world.

There are videos only. There are about ten pages of 'hi-def' videos and 16 of regular past videos. You can doenload the whole video or break it in six smaller parts. The only format is wmv 640X480. There is no search funtion at all. You simply have pages with the models picture and name and click on it to bring up her simple download page. There is no comment or ranking system either for the videos.

This is a fun site to see amateur teens in action but quickly gets boring. For the price of $30 a month its a bit much for only one new model a week but you do get several hundred past updates to check out.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Exploited Teens

4. Exploited Teens (1)

Pay
Active
85
247skizia (5) 07-11-10  01:40pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (14), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: -Cute models, there is a good mix of one timers and pro-ams on the site. Some of the girls who have only done it once are very cute.

-All vids shot in POV style, which is the style of shooting that I like the most.

-Newer videos are shot in HD.

-Nice big archive, the site has been around for a decade or so, there are hundreds of videos and new ones still being posted.

-Facial/Mouth cumshots are great.

-No DRM on videos

-All content is original, I've never seen any exploitedteens stuff on another website, nor does he buy/rehash content from other sites.

-All hardcore content, some of the older videos don't have sex in them (bj/hj only) but he's moved away from that.
Cons: -Sometimes it is better to watch these videos on mute, the guy can be a little annoying sometimes. Same jokes at the same time in each video.

-Pic sets aren't available, videos only here folks.

-Occasionally a video will be posted in the preview section and won't show up in the members section for a few days/weeks.

-Uses WMV9 codecs for newer videos which makes playing videos on computers that don't run windows kind of difficult.

-He used to have a "blog" where he would post information everytime he uploaded a video, it seems to have disappeared though, which makes me sad. Not really a con, I guess, but it was pretty cool.
Bottom Line: Well, if you like POV porn and you don't mind the guy gabbing on it's a great site. If you're not a huge fan of POV style porn the though this site is probably not going to appeal to you.

Personally I join the site ever couple of years. I like it's content and I honestly don't mind the gabbing like he does.

Taking into account the above, the simple answer is that I recommend this site.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Exploited Teens

5. Exploited Teens (1)

Pay
Active
50
MargulisAZ (84) 05-02-10  09:04pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (44), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Exclusive content with exclusive girls, 75-85% not seen anywhere else.
+ Many of the models are very attractive.
+ 427 updates to this point
+ Consistently updates once a week
+ No DRM
Cons: - The most annoying male actor ever in porn (explained below)
- Often times terrible camera work
- No picture sets at all
- Terrible site design
- Not remotely worth 30 dollars a month
- Models rarely seem into the scene (usually because the guy never stops talking to them)
- No model directory or search function
- Minimal screen caps per movie (new movies have 5, older movies have about 20)
- No movie trailers (they are in the tour for non-members, but no trailers in member area)
- Poor movie quality (old movies are around 320 x 240 mpg, newer just slightly larger than 640 x 480 wmv)
- Only 1 movie file download option per video
- No response to e-mails from webmaster
- Slow download speeds (averaged around 150-200 kbps)
- Wrong video file posted in most recent update, e-mailed site, week later still not fixed.
Bottom Line: In all honesty this has to be one of the worst porn sites I've ever visited. It's amazing to me this site is still going after all these years. Yes the girls are hot and the premise of unseen teen girls getting fucked is way hot, but the guy in charge of this site seems to have done every single thing possible to ruin it. Let's break down what makes this site so god awful:

1. I cannot stress enough how bad the guy in these movies is. I'm not one that typically gets annoyed by the guys in scenes, but this is an atrocity to all of porn that he is STILL making and ruining scenes the exact same way for over 4 years. He never, and I mean NEVER, shuts up. NEVER!!! Throughout the entire scene, in every scene, through 427 updates, the same guy says the same super corny comments over and over and OVER again. It's not just at the beginning of the scene or end, it is throughout every position of fucking as well. Literally, there is probably never more than 5-10 seconds that go by without him saying some corny cheesy comment to the model. The models rarely seem to be enjoying themselves or into the scene, because they are always too busy responding to what this idiot is saying to them. It is gonzo style as well, so the guy is in charge of the camera, and is terrible at it. Multiple scenes result in the camera just shooting the wall or the bed because he isn't paying attention to what's in view. It's maddening and at the same time almost unbelievable that he hasn't tried to improve in 4 years of work.

2. The site design and navigation are offensively terrible. There are 427 updates to this point with no way to search for a model or a particular scene other than to press "next" over and over again as you cycle through the pages of updates trying to find what you are looking for.

3. There are only movies on this site, there are no picture sets to browse through or download. Also, since each update only consists of 1 single movie to download you would think we would at least get a preview trailer or a good amount of screen caps to look at to help us decide if we should download the video right? WRONG! No previews in the member section (even though they are in the tour area of the site for non members) and each movie has only 5 screen caps. Funny, because the old movies have about 20-30 screen caps (movies over 2 years old) so the site seems to be regressing actually, or getting more lazy, however you want to look at it.

4. The movies have 1 download option and that's it. The first 3/4 of updates is a tiny sized mpg file that you will be squinting at, and the newer "HD" movies are on par with what the normal movies of 4 years ago were (around 640 x 480)

I'm still kicking myself for joining this site again after a couple of years but I thought that things must have improved at least somewhat. Boy was I wrong, if anything they have gotten worse. I feel sorry for every model that is a part of this site.

** Please also see reply update
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Exploited Teens

6. Exploited Teens (1)

Pay
Active
50
ramscrota (12) 12-28-08  04:32am
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Nice girls (how he got them on this dog of a site I don't know)
Cons: - Guy is a complete dropkick who talks too much
- Far too long taken to get to any action
- POV site. POV is trash. I understand it has a place in porn, but what that place is stuffed if I know.
- Guy sound totally bored. As he comes, he talks to the girls like he is giving a maths lesson.
- Guy's flop is exactly that - a flop. No raging horn here, but a bored, floppy piece of flacid meat, even when he cums. I would have thought a nme like Exploited Teens would convey a lusting, horny guy who can't wait to fuck 'em. Scarcely.
- Models look more interested in sex than the guy.
Bottom Line: A total rubbish site, the title being a complete misnomer. It's a pity we can't score lower that fifty - this site deserves it (zero would be about right). It galls me that jerks like this are making money out of this rubbish.
The only funny bit is at te end when he does the dirty on them, tells them he's not paying them, and they react accordingly. All staged, of course.
I notice that in the guidelines below, hey tell us to mention what site do well, and how it could be improved. This site doesn't do anything well, and could only be improved by wiping it completely.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Exploited Teens

7. Exploited Teens (1)

Pay
Active
50
blaze588 (5) 11-07-08  12:12pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (9), NO (3)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: the girls are hot and young,
Cons: - all first person video.
- hardley ever see the whole body of the girl, if you do it's only a quick pan shot.
- the guy is a dork and ass to these girls.
- same corny jokes and same lines get old quick
- webmaster never responed back, sent 3 emails, site suckssss
Bottom Line: i use to like this site. very hot girls, hard to find true young hot amatuers. some are pros' but majority are amateurs.

after joining for like the 3 rd time i got tired of his corny jokes and how he treats the girls. same old lines, same POV shots etc..... it's old and needs a change.

i joined with the intention of getting a free member ship to exploited black teens. my password didn't work for the black site. after repeated emails to webmaster he never answered. screw them NEVER JOIN THIS SITE.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Exploited Teens

8. Exploited Teens (1)

Pay
Active
60
2 Free K (11) 08-12-08  02:30am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (19), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Super cute girls, many amateurs.
- Been going for a long time, decently-sized collection (maybe 200-300?).
Cons: - Horrible, unresponsive customer service.
- Fraudulent extra site - login didn't work, email box was 'full'.
- Slow downloads - about a third of my maximum speed.
- Dude talks too much. If these weren't new, cute girls, the site would be worthless.
- Spends too much time zoomed in to his dick, rather than getting the bigger picture (such as the girl's face).
- I cannot access the sister site, which equals RIP OFF. I don't like people fucking around with my money.
Bottom Line: I had joined this site a two or three times before over the last two years, and got access to exploitedblackteens.com and exploitedmoms.com (which are both hot sites, in my opinion). This time, I got access to neither, EVEN THOUGH there is a link to exploitedblackteens.com on the main page, saying that membership is included.

The username and password were invalid, and I got no response from emails I sent (one, unfortunately, was to an AOL account!).

If I'm promised two sites from the beginning, and I pay the agreed price and only get ONE, what else is considered, other than RIP OFF (I'll leave out exploitedmoms.com for my case, because it wasn't explicitly stated, though it's always worked before).

If you've never joined before, join once, get all the girls you fancy from the site (many are exclusive to the site, yum), then bail.

The people need to learn something about customer service.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Mouth Target

9. Mouth Target (0)

Pay
Active
60
blaze588 (5) 01-16-08  05:14pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (9), NO (3)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: good looking girls,
just like exploited girls, same set up
the only difference is not all POV shoots.
sometimes the camera is on the table.
Cons: only one cameraman
they need to get someone to hold the camera. one camera shot sucks.

not all video is easy to see. lighting is bad on some shoots.

you only get about 50 girls

not bad quality, not great, need improving
Bottom Line: if u like exploited teens, then u should like this site. you get about 50 girls. compared to exploited teens. some are the same girls

i won't renew my membership.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Mouth Target

10. Mouth Target (0)

Pay
Active
78
qualsite34 (33) 09-12-07  02:15am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (29), NO (2)
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: Cute girl next door types. Some seen before on "Exploited Teens" partner site.
Regular updates (At least there was when I joined)
Cons: Only average video quality
Newer site with limited selection of videos at this time.
No way to view all past updates which is key to determining if you want to join or rejoin.
Bottom Line: If you like "Exploited Teens", this site gives you more of some of the same girls in a different setting and a different guy behind the camera. The real achilles heel of this site right now is that it does not offer a way to view past updates. Before rejoining I would want to see a list of the updates which have occurred since I last was a member.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Exploited Teens

11. Exploited Teens (1)

Pay
Newbie
50*
Doug (3) 05-30-07  03:46pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: 1. Some really hot girls.
2. Clarity/resolution is decent.
Cons: 1. The guy who films/fucks the girls is super-annoying.
2. His camerawork sucks.
3. He talks way too much.
4. He rarely gets the girls off, because he's too preoccupied with his own pleasure to fuck them right.
Bottom Line: Hot girls, terrible site. It's too bad that these girls chose to be on this site instead of a better one. If the guy shut up, then the site might be tolerable. He should fire himself and invest in 1) a competent cameraman, and 2) a dude who can actually please these ladies.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Exploited Teens

12. Exploited Teens (1)

Pay
Active
70
roseman (253) 03-13-07  09:55am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Lots of content for download.
- Bonus sites.
- Videos can be downloaded as full length movies.
- Fast downloading.
- Weekly updates.
Cons: - Website design is too simple, could be better.
- Hard to navigate.
- No photos, screenshots.
- Would prefer better video quality.
- No personality.
Bottom Line: A good website with interesting content.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Exploited Teens

13. Exploited Teens (1)

Pay
Active
95
qualsite34 (33) 03-07-07  04:42pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (29), NO (2)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: Probably the best site on the net right now for viewing videos of genuine girl next door college type girls. These girls really look and sound as if they just stepped off a college campus. How this guy gets these type of girls to do what they do, and appear to enjoy it also, is a wonder to me. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED!
Cons: Unfortunately the quality of the video does not match the quality of the girls. The video only appears sharp and clear in a small Quicktime window.
No photos. Video only.
Bottom Line: One of the top amateur sites on the net. If you like girl next door college girl types, this is the best out there for videos.

Follow-Up:
I just rejoined the site and there is a major change to report. It seems "Mike" decided to discontinue offering High Definition format videos after just 3
episodes. All of the newer videos are the same as before. The good news is there is no change in the quality of girls "Mike" is getting to do these videos. They are still as cute as ever.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Exploited Teens

14. Exploited Teens (1)

Pay
Active
80
uscue (39) 03-01-07  01:41pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (32), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: More videos than you can count, about 99% of the girls are true amateurs (never seen them before or after) and they are all 9's or 10's.
Cons: About 99% of the girls are true amateurs (some of them I want to see again with more hardcore stuff but they're one-time amateurs). Each scene is the exact same except the girl is different.
Bottom Line: The only reason I gave it an 80 instead of in the 90's is because all the scenes are the exact same setup from beginning to cumshot. Spice it up a little...and do a follow-up shoot with the favorites like Angel or Ally or Rion.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Exploited Teens

15. Exploited Teens (1)

Pay
Active
92
4nic8 (14) 02-08-07  12:27pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (15), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: excellent pov site. it's the closest thing to how it would be if you were having sex with her. defines the word "reality". the girls are in thier mid 20's, white (most) and on average about 7-8 on a scale of 1-10. no music or anything goofy. you see everything and hear every sound. updated every week, nice size archive, downloadable to HD, pretty good lighting and video quality. He starts with an interview, then finger play w/ lube (nice camera shots), bj, strait sex and cumshot. nice!
Cons: some girls are average looking. can't download whole clip in most cases. talks too much. high price and not much in bonus content.
Bottom Line: the best pov site IMO. He's got the niche down cold. In time the girls will get better and the site will improve & expand, IMO.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Exploited Teens

16. Exploited Teens (1)

Pay
Active
90
Thagnut (12) 01-20-07  06:25pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: This guy actually puts the ad in the paper and somehow finds Gorgeous, American New Teen Talent ready to bang on camera. It's not just the same skanky girls that go to every other website in America - this is the real deal. Genuine amateurs who are young and nervous and horny - all at a POV angle. And you can download them all and keep them forever.
Cons: The videos are high quality, but their dimensions are relatively small.
The filming guy/director is kind of annoying - he always talks too much and tells the same stupid jokes. He could shut the hell up for a while and just enjoy himself, but Noooo! He's just too damned chatty.
He doesn't have much imagination. The scenes are very repetitive.
Bottom Line: There are hundreds of sites out there but I know of less than 20 that actually introduce new talent. For all the irritation this guy gives me, Exploitedteens has excellent girls - real stunners who never appear anywhere else. And he's really having a great time here. It's a great show.

Worth it at twice the price.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Exploited Teens

17. Exploited Teens (1)

Pay
Active
75
bjorn7 (19) 01-13-07  09:23pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (24), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: Lots of content.
Variety of girls.
Most appear to be actual teens.
Girls treated with respect.
Cons: Video quality, especially older as you would expect.
Too much repetetion in episodes.
Bottom Line: A very large collection with access to a few
other sites as well including Exploited Black
Teens, which I prefer. The only real problem
is the lack of imagination on the part of
the main guy doing the shoots. Lots of cute girls
not 10's but 7's or 8's.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Exploited Teens

18. Exploited Teens (1)

Pay
Newbie
98*
FrankM (3) 01-10-07  10:19pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Definatley has the hottest hardcore 18+ year olds on the net. New video every week, and is very amateurish which I like. It's not the regular hardcore porn. These videos you can see that a lot of these girls were never shot anywhere else before. I've been searching porn a long while, and they seem to have a lot of exclusive girls. Very realistic, good interviews with the girls.
Cons: Gets boring the same scenarios. He always ends the videos the same way. He jerks off on their face. I'd wish for a change the girls would jerk him off or do some of the work. (it gets old quickly) but dont get me wrong, def one of the hottest sites
Bottom Line: If you like amateur cuties, then this is the site for you!
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-18 of 18  


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. 21Sextury.com (9)
2. Babes Network.com (7)
3. DDF Network (6)
4. VideoBox (6)
5. Naughty America (6)
6. Bangbros Network (5)
7. FTV Girls (5)
8. Wow Girls (4)
9. Team Skeet (4)
10. X-Art (4)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.09 seconds.