Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
By Company TAJ Design, Inc.
[ Remove ]
Option only available from company page.
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-2 of 2  

Visit VIP Area

1. VIP Area (1)

wally (8) 10-11-14  11:50pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Some of the best solo or lesbian erotica you can find anywhere. Quality of the photography is rarely equaled.

Models look stunningly beautiful

Current updates have many download options, including 1920x1080HD

Update frequency has been great for the past several months

Access to a sister site "ikissgirls.com" featuring lesbian erotica of similar quality
Cons: Streaming and downloads are slo-oh-oh-oh....

Sets may be exclusive to the net, but some may be available on DVD as part of Girlfriends Films Glamour Solo series (not much of a negative considering the series has won AVN awards three years running)

A nitpick: would love it if updates were more frequent.

An odd nitpick: is it possible to be too perfect?
Bottom Line: In the field of females-only erotica, Tammy Sands may be the best photographer working today. I was familiar with her work from Twistys, where her solo sets were always great, often my favorites. She's quoted as saying "I believe solo movies are the most intimate of any adult genre" and I think this belief in what she's doing is reflected in her work - these scenes are put together with loving care, with sumptuous settings and exquisite lighting. The women all look gorgeous - don't know if it's great lighting or tons of well disguised makeup, but I don't think any of the models have looked any better anywhere than they do on this site.

That said, understand that the style is very much in the glamor category, fully explicit but with a fairly soft sensibility - there's more of a focus on sensuality. For my taste they strike a nice balance - they're more explicit than the "no close-ups, please, let's not be vulgar" style of some of the out-and-out softcore sites, but something short of the gynecological "camera always two inches from her clit" approach of a site like In The Crack. A nice mix of full-body long shots and up-close-and-personal shots. Plus, the women all seem to be having a good time doing something pleasurable and natural - masturbation and cunnilingus have never seemed so healthy.

But this whole glamor approach relates to my odd negative about being "too perfect". The portrayal of sex here is so idealized that it can sometimes seem a bit remote - something reserved for these goddesses but not available to mere mortals like me. It can lack some of the charm of a good amateur scene with a cute but seemingly more attainable model (a la Abby Winters) - if you prefer the girl-next-door type of model you will likely be disappointed [and it almost goes without saying that if you like your sex scenes to be "hard" and "nasty" you should look elsewhere].

In earlier years the update frequency was not the best, with maybe one new scene a week and occasional gaps of two weeks, but for the past several months the frequency of updates has been great, with three and sometimes four a week. (Speculation: this may have to do with the fact that Tammy quit producing for Twistys in the wake of the Twistys Treat controversy - possibly scenes that used to go to Twistys are now going to this site).

So if you like seeing beautiful women pleasuring themselves and occasionally each other in beautiful surroundings then this site would be a great choice.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit VIP Area

2. VIP Area (1)

Drooler (220) 10-01-10  04:24pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (82), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Great photo and video quality
+Over 130 exclusive photo galleries, mostly of well-known attractive American models and porn stars, by photographer Tammy Sands
+Additional over 44 non-exclusive galleries
+Galleries are labeled in the site as exclusive when they are (except for a few of Kayden Kross)
+Most photos max at 2000 px; a few galleries max at 3000
+Zips in 2000 px, and with a few galleries 3000 (“HQ zip”)
+Photos can be viewed and saved individually in 3 different sizes (800 px long, 1200, or 2-3000)
+Over 58 exclusive videos downloadable in three quality levels each for wmv, mov (Quicktime), and mp4 (iPod) formats: low (480x272, 1646kbps), medium (1024x576, 4278 kbps), and high (1280x720, 10624 kbps). Even “low” sets the bar kind of high.
+Excellent flexibility in navigation and viewing
+Search box feature works well
+Good trial and monthly prices
Cons: -Visitor’s area browsing by updates shows only the most recent
-Visitor’s area browsing by model doesn’t show all of the updates for each model
-Rate of updates is somewhat erratic (12 to 18 per month for photosets; 3 to 8 per month for videos, and usually closer to 8)
-Photo zip download speed is between 300-400 kbps, which isn’t criminal, though it’s getting toward the lower end of “acceptable” these days
-Video downloads for the highest quality are slow (around 200 kbps for a 700 MB file takes quite a while)
-Mic noise (pops and clicks) occurs sometimes in the videos and can be a bit distracting
Bottom Line: I thought I’d pretty much seen all of the exclusive stuff I could find of girls like Adrienne Manning, Georgia Jones, Valerie Rios, Ashlyn Rae, and Sabrina Marie. But there’s more here!

I really don’t have a lot to complain about regarding this site. The points about the visitor’s area are not only a concern for potential customers, but for the site itself. If visitors had a better idea of what’s inside, they might be more likely to join.

Some scenes have toy play and some are girl/girl, neither of which I personally care for, but there wasn’t so much of either that they became “issues” for me. Well, whatever! Watching Capri Anderson and Adrienne Manning masturbate each other with a glass toy is a hell of lot better than watching a lot of other things, I’ll have to admit!

Really, this is one of the better sites to have come along recently, if you’re into basically into softcore and glamour style material. And most of it is exclusive now.

So yes, just ignore the comment I made about it earlier here at PU. The site has turned out to be a lot better than I at first thought it would.

I joined for a month, not for the trial term, and I’m happy with what I’ve gotten from it.


PS: I should point out that a few of the Kayden Kross galleries are labeled at VIParea as “exclusive” even though they also appear at clubkayden. But the good news is that the pics are better at VIParea. They’re 2000 px (not 1600), they only have one watermark (not two), and they are better in quality as well.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-2 of 2  

Easy Site Search
Advanced Search

Most Reviews
1. Babes Network.com (6)
2. 21Sextury.com (6)
3. 18X Girls (4)
4. Bangbros Network (4)
5. Twistys (4)
6. Blacked.com (3)
7. Wow Girls (3)
8. Team Skeet (3)
9. DDF Network (3)
10. X-Art (3)

View All : Most Reviews

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.04 seconds.