Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Access to 8 bonus sites (6 solo models, 2 multi-model sites)
- Slick navigation – easy to filter by girl/site/keyword etc
- All content downloadable with no download limits/DRM
- Lots of download options for video (by size/format/scene)
- Photos downloadable as zips with lots of different options
- Extremely high quality content covering a lot of different genres
- Ivana is an absolutely fantastic performer
- Long history of updates, all of which are dated
- CCBill – with non-recurring option, no pre-checked cross-sells
- You seem to stay logged in without username/password prompts
- Great value for the amount of content available
- Active Diesel Access forum and visible member support
- Webcams available on bonus sites to suit various timezones
Cons:
Mostly minor. Points marked with * don't personally bother me:
- Ivana is no longer posting hardcore boy/girl updates
- Ivana hasn’t done a webcam since February 2013
- Out of the 8 bonus sites, 4 are no longer updating
- Automatically generated password*
- She's bulked out a little bit – still slim but looks quite different*
Bottom Line:
An incredibly slick website, part of a very polished network. You can join with recurring membership (pre-checked), but also a non-recurring, and also a 5 month membership to all 13 of the network sites.
CCBill confirmation and username/password arrive in separate emails. Inside, you can see updates for all the Diesel member sites that you have access to. These are:
You can click on any of the above to be taken to that specific member’s area, and once inside you see all updates (video and photo) chronologically presented as thumbnails with the title, date, keywords, and who the video stars.
You can also view just galleries or videos by clicking the option on the navigation bar at the top. Pages have two views; ‘Normal’ which displays just the updates, or ‘Advanced’ which allows you to sort by date, rating, most popular or most commented. You can also filter by site, or by keyword (eg, anal, blowjob, cum in mouth, cum on face etc). A good feature is that you can select multiple tags (eg, ‘blowjob’ and ‘outdoors’ for all outdoor blowjobs).
VIDEO:
Content across the site is high quality with older updates having fewer options and are lower quality.
Formats available include MP4 at 1080p (since around May 2012), 720p (since around February 2009), 480p (since the site began), and 360p (throughout most of the archives). A WMV of the largest video size at the time is also available with each movie update.
You can also view the video embedded as a Flash file which you can skip to any point in while it still loads, and even on the Flash video you can select the video quality.
You can also select scenes in a video to play or download. You simply toggle the scenes you want, then can play the selection, or download in various different qualities – I’ve never seen this amount of versatility and customisation on any other website. This is available on all videos.
GALLERIES:
Almost infinite amount of customisation options. On the majority of galleries you can view a slideshow, change the size of thumbnails (with a slider), download as 1000px resolution or the original sized images. In the last week or so, new galleries have the option of downloading images as 1000px, 2000px, 4000px or the original 6000px resolution.
The best feature is customisable zips – you select the photos you want to download (or click the link to select all images) and you can download them in a zip. It suits literally everyone.
THE CONTENT
Ivana is versatile and caters for lots of niches. Earlier content was mainly sex and masturbation. Her sex scenes were all with the same guy, but together they put on a great performance with a perfect balance of sex being hard but romantic. Scenes have her contorted in excitement before ending with a passionate embrace.
Her masturbation scenes are something to behold – Ivana puts everything into each scene and writhes around in excitement.
Later scenes include anal, and there is also a lot of lesbian content too. However, since May 2011 there is no boy/girl content.
Scenes take place in lots of locations – bedroom, bathroom, gardens and pools, and also in outdoor locations such as abandoned buildings and even in public. Most have multi-angles, both POV and from multiple other angles.
UPDATES
Updates on Ivana’s site are weekly with bias towards two galleries for every video posted. There’s normally around three updates every day across the bonus sites included. In the last few updates Ivana has put on a bit of weight – she’s still slim, but her face has filled out in particular and she’s not as boney around the midriff (I could understand people thinking she was too skinny before) and honestly looks very different – I had to double-take to see if it was still her.
WEBCAMS AND BONUS CONTENT
The webcam is exceptional. There is a weekly schedule and comprehensive archive of shows. Ivana’s last show was in February, and is not on schedule to reappear soon. Shows are spread throughout the day, so no bias towards Americans time-wise. Each show is a couple of hours long.
Exceptionally slick member's area like nothing I've ever seen. Updates are not as exciting as they used to be now that she no longer does hardcore. The huge archive will entertain most members.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Hundreds of incredibly beautiful young women. All of which I've never seen before, and most I suspect who are from eastern Europe.
Outstanding quality. The camera zooms in on a scene and you can see some incredible details down to the tiniest hairs on the models beautiful skin.
Website is clean, colorful and nicely done.
Links work. Extras include 18 Only Girls, and various model pages.
Very real feel to the movies and natural.
Huge film and picture collection.
Best variety of positions I've seen to date. They don't focus exclusively on anal, big plus for me. All positions receive equal time unless anal is in title.
Cons:
Search tool works until you hit back, where you have to start all over again.
Downloading is fast, but still eats up lots of time.
A little pricier than the competition.
Does not support Roku.
Seems to have more picture sets than films. I'd prefer all film. Especially when you see a beautiful model and all you see are her in pictures.
Seems to have more masturbation than male/female.
Updates to sister sites few.
Bottom Line:
The variety and beauty of the young porn stars are the site's biggest asset to me. It's hard to find so much beauty in one site.
For me the down side was too many scenes/models offering masturbation only, or offering pictures only. But that's just me as I lean toward movies as my favorite medium.
The additional sites like 18 Only Girls is an added bonus bringing more beauty to the screen.
The picture quality was outstanding. I recommend this site even with its higher than average price.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- She is cute.
- Videos avail in at least 720p (h264 or wmv)
- Photo sets download in Zip files
- Updates about 1 or 2 times per week.
- Navigation & Use of web site is easy.
Cons:
- SHE is cute - the operative word is SHE, this site is based on one young lady only.
- Updates, appear to always be a set of photos as a “movie teaser” followed by a video. Thus maybe 2 updates per week.
- not much variety here.
Bottom Line:
This is the “bonus” site which one receives with a subscription to Young Legal Porn. Both of these sites are controlled via Dieselaccess.com. Their advertising suggests that the longer one keeps re-subscribing, the more bonus sites that will be added, I have not been a member long enough for that to happen, and following my usual pattern I am dropping my subscription after only one month. Nothing wrong with the two sites, but I just want to move on.
As of Nov 2012 there were 77 videos available on this site, all featuring Gloria, a cute and quite skinny young lady. Most vids are Solo, Striptease. There are 87 photo sets, also of Gloria. A few videos were lesbian, and I found one photo set with Gloria and a man.
The site also links to the same live shows that one can access from Young Legal Porn. While they are live shows, I found the video of the shows to be very small, and difficult to see.
Billing for this (as for Young Legal Porn) is through CCBill, and as I have found with other sites using CCBill, signup and cancellation proved easy.
Diesel Access provides you with a password of their choice at signup, 16 random characters and numbers, so you must save the email or password somewhere, as it is virtually impossible to memorize. This does provide good security, but is difficult to remember if you don’t let your pc remember passwords for you. There has been discussion of this topic in the Porn Users Forum.
Over all thoughts and score: As a bonus site, this is worth looking at for a day or so, but that is the end of it. As a stand alone site, I wouldn’t find it worth the price of admission. There is just too little content here to make it valuable. I am giving it a 60 because it is technically good. The lack of variety and content cause it to get a low score.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Brief description given for each video and photoset to explain what is happening.
-The photosets are dated by the date they were posted to the site.
-Zip files for the photosets.
-Photoset zip files download with the default filename of the date the photoset was posted at the site. E.g., 03-09-07.zip or 11-09-2007.zip.
Cons:
-Archive site. No updates since September 2007.
-Small site. 44 videos, 57 photosets.
-Only 2 models at the site: LayTheKat and her girlfriend.
-More models would add variety. More locations in the shoots would add variety. All the videos and photosets are basically shot in a house or apartment.
-Not much variety in what the photos and videos show. You have 1 or 2 girls, undressing, touching themselves or each other.
-The videos are not dated.
-No search function.
-No model bio.
-No streaming option.
-Videos download in one size only, one format only. No choice of low, medium, high for videos.
-Photos download in one size only. No choice of low, medium, high definition.
-Default filename for videos is "video.wmv". So have to rename video files, or you will overwrite the previous video you downloaded.
Bottom Line:
The site is part of the Diesel Access network.
The site only has 2 models: LayTheKat and her girlfriend and sexual partner, a slender, slightly taller brown-haired girl. The site contents are videos and photos of LayTheKat and her girlfriend, exploring themselves and each other. They show nudity, masturbation, lesbian sex. A few brief videos of LayTheKat or her girlfriend peeing. LayTheKat is a small, very slender young teen. She is a cute girl. She seems like a girl who is new to porn, a little embarrassed to be performing in front of a camera, but giving a good performance. And her emotions seem real: the embarrassment, the smiles, the sexual excitement she is feeling. Which adds a lot to the simple scenes, compared to the fake moans and groans of many porn models. The same is true for her girlfriend.
LayTheKat has additional photosets and videos at other sites in the Diesel Access network:
At Young Legal Porn, she is listed under the name of Kat, where she has 3 videos and 20 photosets.
At 18 Only Girls, she is listed under the name of Kat, where she has 17 videos and 33 photosets.
Site design/navigation is very basic. But because the site contents are so limited, it's fairly easy to look through the site contents. The contents are split into two groups: videos and photosets.
Video stats:
Number of videos: 44
Each video has only a single file for download, or is split into 2 parts for download.
Sample dimensions:
Height x Width: 852x480
Total bitrate: 4258 kbps
Photos stats:
Number of photosets: 57
Number of photos per photoset: 80+
Width x Height: 799x1200
or
Width x Height: 1198x1800
Considering that the latest videos were probably posted by 2007, the video quality is surprisingly high. There is good definition, excellent lighting, good colors and skin tones, good camera work, good focus, good framing, etc.
The photos were also well shot, by someone who knew how to use a camera. They are far better than screenshots. This is not glamor-style photography, but the images of the girls are clear and well-focused.
Bottom Line:
Unless you are a real fan of the model, LayTheKat, it's probably not worth getting a
membership to this single site. For one, the site hasn't updated since September, 2007. For another, it's a small site, with only a small number of videos and photosets, and even though the videos and photosets are good considering they are 5 years old or more, they were not the highest quality even when they were first posted.
However, if you get a general pass to all the sites in the Diesel Access network, it's worth looking the site over, to see if you can find any contents that you might like.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Very high quality video and photos - extremely clear.
- Most recent videos (2012) are 1080p, either h264 or WMV format.
- Videos also avail in sd480 and ld360 format
- Variety: Solo, Boy-Girl, Girl-Girl
- Daily updates - usually both video and photo set, although occasionally only one or the other.
- Fairly fast downloads (this depends so much on your ISP that I can only say it felt fast to me.)
- Very cute girls
- Search by “topic”, for example - 69, Bathroom, Dildo, Hardcore, Small Tits, allows selection of multiple criteria.
- Photo sets download in zip files.
Cons:
- I could not get download to work with Free Download Manager.
- Vids have advertisement, short but annoying, for another site.
- Older content, as one might expect, is lower quality / resolution.
- The “ratings” tabs at very top of screen are confusing.
- Photo sets in zipfiles all have the same file names. 001.jpg, 002.jpg, etc.
Bottom Line:
Where to begin? The girls are lovely, beautiful, young! The name of the site is a clear indication of what you may expect. A quick review of the model list shows virtually all are 18 or 19 years old, and European.
In those videos where it is a “boy/girl” scene, even some of the boys are very cute, although I don’t usually focus on the guys, the ones here are worth watching.
Statistics:
- I counted 12 videos listed in a single screen, with the ability to step through 91 screen loads, so that would be about 1092 videos available.
- "The Girls" section had 21 models listed per page, and 17 pages, so about 147 models.
- Photo galleries were 12 per page, and 106 pages so that's about 1272 photo sets or galleries.
I like to save the photo sets in a single directory after downloading, since each file set re-uses the file names of 001, 002, 003 etc within each set, it is an extra bother to have to batch rename each set so that I can store multiple sets in a single directory. I have seen this type of naming at other sites as well, and it may discourage photo set downloads. I would prefer a naming convention of “girls-name, shoot-id, then photo number. For example Karen-02-001.Jpg. But every site has their own methods, this is just a pet peeve of mine.
Another reviewer commented on the relative scarcity of anal sex, and listed this as a negative, it may well be for some viewers, but for others of us this is a positive. Therefore I have listed it in my comments section, as I believe such things are much more in the eyes, or should I say fantasies, of the beholder, rather than attributes of the site. I personally prefer less anal action and more “pussy”.
This site also has live shows, which are clearly scheduled and easy to access. However the video that goes with the live shows if SMALL. If you enjoy the banter and chat, with a number of other guys and the one lady, then you may like this. I found it less than exciting.
I don’t have a very objective scoring system for sites, maybe someone else can suggest a consistent scheme for scoring, so I am going to give this site a good rating simply because I like the videos and found the site fairly easy to navigate. The only real problem that I have had has been the inability to use FDM to control my downloads. BTW it seems to work, but then downloads a very short video that says I am not authorized to download.
The site lists one "bonus site", which contains one girl. There are comments to the effect that the longer you keep your membership, the more bonus sites you will get, but at this point I don't have the benefit of this feature. And if the other sites are like the one bonus that one gets initially, it may not be of particular benefit.
Billing for this site is through CCBill.
Bottom line: The site holds my attention with high quality videos and photo sets. I can let my mind wander, enjoy the beauty of the models, daydream myself into being with them, enjoy a long slow porn watching session. What more could an old guy expect from any site with lovely young ladies.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Sasha is cute blonde, with fun-loving personality.
-Credit card processor: CCBILL.
-Sasha sometines appears on the Diesel Girls Live, a live chat show. Not only is it free, but you get some nudity, often get to watch the girl
posing and masturbating. Some of the shows are worth watching.
-If you are a member of the Diesel network (instead of being signed up to just one site of the Diesel network), you can switch between sites by clicking on the hot link for a video or photoset at another site. You don't have to log in to each site separately.
-Recent update rate is one video or photoset per week.
-Long time before site timeout.
-No DRM.
-Good download speeds. I get 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Zip files for photosets.
-Can stream or download videos.
-The content (videos and photosets) are dated.
Cons:
-If the model Sasha does not appeal to you, the site will have little value.
-Some of the videos appear to be re-mastered from older material. So the quality doesn't match what you would expect from the definition. The video can be poorly framed, sometimes out of focus, poorly lighted, like an amateur video that's poorly shot.
-No model bio. Even though this is a single-model site, and Sasha appears in every video and photoset I saw, you would like to see more of Sasha's personality come through. Instead, you get a collection of her videos and photosets, but not much feeling.
SashaBlonde is a cute skinny blonde. She's been doing porn starting in 2005, but she still looks like a young teen. She's featured at Metart, MetModels, Femjoy, the Diesel network, and other sites.
Most videos have several download options:
WMV 1080p
MP4 1080p, 720p, 480p, 360p
Videos run from 4 to 20 minutes.
Photosets have from 40 to 80 photos per set.
Most photosets have 2 zip file options. 1000 px definition, and an original definition, which is a higher definition size.
Some photosets have 4000 px, 2000 px, 1000 px, plus an original size px.
You get this site if you sign up for the entire Diesel network. But unless you are a strong Sasha fan, it's probably not worth subscribing to this site by itself.
I was not impressed by the videos and photosets at this site, even though Sasha is a cute model.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
NOTE: I joined this site for the hardcore videos. I'm not a softcore guy or a photo guy, so I'm writing this review from the perspective of a guy looking for hardcore video scenes.
- A lot of hot girls. If you are familiar with the slender, tight look of European porn girls, then you will know the type of girls they feature. Many of the well known European porn girls can be found here...but this may be a bad thing if you're tired of seeing the same European girls from other sites.
- Very functional site design with all of the features you would hope to find on a modern porn site (streaming for each scene, nice search options, clean attractive layout).
- Downloadable files are offered in a nice variety of sizes and the video quality of the downloadable files is quite good.
- Fairly frequent updates...however, there is a problem with the updates, which I will cover in the "cons" below.
Cons:
- There can be frustrating camera work (too many closeups and odd camera angle choices that prevent you from seeing the girl or the action).
- Not many hardcore scenes...a large portion of the scenes are softcore masturbation vids.
- They update with new content often, but the problem is that many of the updates are just a photo set with no corresponding video. I have read that Diesel Media often posts the video on their other site Young Legal Porn. This seems like an attempt to get people to subscribe to their other site in order to access the video that goes with the photo set.
- I joined this site hoping to see more "artsy" filming style advertised in the tour, but upon joining I found that many of the hardcore scenes did not have this style. Many of the hardcore scenes on 18onlygirls.com have a VERY similar look to other sites like Teen Mega World, Euro Teen Movs, and First Anal Quest - Same male actors, same girls, same camera work, etc.
Bottom Line:
The hardcore scenes on 18onlygirls.com come in 2 filming styles: "artsy" and "traditional". The "artsy" scenes are filmed by 2 directors named Ray Man and Dirk Milton, while the more traditional style porn scenes are filmed by a director named Anton Rusakov.
If you check out the tour, it is clear that 18onlygirls.com advertises itself as an "artsy" site with professional, high-end camera work...but once you join you find that only a portion of their hardcore scenes feature this type of camera work. Once inside, you realize that a lot of the hardcore scenes on 18onlygirls.com are more traditional and appear to come from the same people who film scenes for other European sites like Teen Mega World and First Anal Quest - I can't confirm this, but the scenes look VERY similar to other Euro sites. On 18onlygirls.com, the director of these more "traditional" porn scenes goes by the name of Anton Rusakov. If you're at all familiar with European porn sites, you can instantly recognize the same camera work, same lighting, similar sets, and same males actors from the other European porn sites. I'm starting to wonder if all of the various European sites have their scenes filmed by the same people, then they just lease the content out. At this point I have joined a few different Euro porn networks, and most of these sites look like their scenes come from the same director and crew (scenes on 18onlygirls.com, firstanalquest.com, euroteenmovs.com, & Teen Mega World all look EXTREMELY similar). Many times I have seen the same scene duplicated on completely different European networks. One of the only Euro networks that seems to have their own unique filming style is the Teen Core Club Network.
So, if you have joined some of the popular European porn sites before, the Anton Rusakov scenes will look very familiar. I wouldn't have a problem with all of these European sites looking the same if the camera work were better. Most of these Euro sites suffer from the same frustrating camera angles. If you have read my reviews before, you know that I place a very high importance on camera angles. Camera angles are the most important part of any porn scene, because the camera angles determine if you can clearly see the sex and the girl's body...and I think we can all agree that the reason we watch porn is to see sex and girls' bodies. There's nothing worse than clicking on a new porn scene with anticipation only to be disappointed when the camera man spends large portions of the scene zooming in on just the girl's crotch and stomach, or just focuses on her ass. Then there's the dreaded face closeup. Seriously - what is the point of zooming in on a girl's face in a porn scene? I can see a girls face any time I want by just walking outside of my house. When a naked girl is having sex, I WANT TO SEE HER BODY, NOT JUST HER FACE! Why can't they zoom the camera out to show me her body AND her face at the same time? For some reason most camera men in porn still haven't figured this out. I wish all porn producers would eliminate face closeups completely. Another thing that bothers me is when a girl gives a blowjob, the camera man always feels to need to zoom in on girl's face - why not zoom out and use this opportunity to show off the girls body as she gives the blowjob? (the only site I have seen that zooms out during blowjobs is tryteens.com, so I applaud them for that). So there is some annoying camera work in the Anton Rusakov scenes. Most of these scenes are decent, but not great. There are a few gems, however, where they really nail the camera work.
So I had some frustration with traditional style "Anton Rusakov" scenes, but I found that the "artsy" scenes were actually more frustrating. The solo scenes and "artsy" hardcore scenes are filmed by 2 directors who go by the names Ray Man and Dirk Milton. I was very disappointed by the camera angles in these scenes. The film quality and lighting were excellent, but the annoying camera angles made these "artcore" scenes virtually unwatchable. I found that in these artcore scenes the camera would always be zoomed in and only focused on one part of the girl's body...so you rarely got a good view of the girl's entire figure. This was maddening to me - here you have these beautiful naked girls and they're only showing you her legs or her stomach. What the? In the artsy style hardcore scenes, the camera would often just take a side view and zoom in on just the 2 pelvises of the actors...no view of the penetration and no view of the girl's body. Ugh. You can have all expensive cameras in the world, but if you don't show the viewer what they want to see you are wasting megabytes on these scenes.
There are some decent Anton Rusakov scenes to be found here which are filmed in a more traditional style found on other European sites...but the "high-end" solo scenes and artsy hardcore scenes are almost unwatchable due to the frustrating camera work and baffling camera angles
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Long interval before site timeout. Useful if you want to browse site, or download files, and you pause between downloads.
-Tiny, unobtrusive watermark occasionally appears in videos at bottom right corner.
-Tiny, unobtrusive watermark at bottom right corner of some photos. The watermark is so small, you have to examine each photo, to see if it's there or not.
-Soundtrack on most videos, especially the recent ones, is clean, without a lot of extraneous sounds.
-The video quality is some of the best I've seen: great focus, crystal-sharp video, good tracking of the sex action, professional lighting, excellent colors: skin tones, etc.
-There is an alphabetical listing of the models, with a nice-sized thumbnail to show what each model looks like. A really helpful feature that makes searching through the model list so nuch easier.
-Easy site navigation. Helpful, useful hot links to get a model's appearances (videos and photosets).
-The member pages are clean, with no ads.
-No DRM.
Cons:
-The cons are basically minor.
-No model biography.
-Occasionally they change the name of a model, but forget to change the title of the video or photoset she appears in. For example, the photoset named "Beata and the mirror", features the model currently named Belka, who was, evidently, named Beata earlier.
-When the models speak in a foreign language, there are no subtitles to translate. But the words spoken don't have a lot of value, anyway. The sex is what counts.
-If you post a comment, I don't see any way to edit it, for typos or whatever.
-The high-quality file size can be large. A video with a runtime of 23 minutes 12 seconds has a high-quality (1080p) size of 1.6 GB in MP4, and
1.9 GB in WMV. So you need a lot of hard drive space if you want to keep the high-quality files.
-The model page is clean, with no ads. But it would be even better if they simplified the layout. Don't post 2 different thumbnails of the model's last appearance. That's just confusing.
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
A single listing of each appearance would be more intuitive and easier to understand. Also, don't put two hot links for posting a comment on tha model page. Keep the comment link at the bottom of the page, but don't put a second comment link near the top of the page: it's not needed, and just gets in the way. Keep the model page simple.
-Some of the photosets and videos may be at other networks. 2 photosets and 1 video from Nubiles were posted at 18OnlyGirls in some sort of cross-
advertising deal.
Also, some photos and videos at 18OnlyGirls were posted earlier at the Teen Mega World network. This is not cross-advertising, but 2 different networks buying the same content from the same supplier.
The video titled "Waiting To Be Ravaged", featuring Anisiya, was posted 2012-06-10 at 18OnlyGirls. The same video was posted on 2011-02-17 at teensexmovs, a Teen Mega World site. At teensexmovs the video is titled "Anisiya". The video at 18OnlyGirls has more definition choices for download, and the runtime was chopped from 24:46 to 23:12 minutes:seconds.
But the video is basically the same.
However, the model is so cute, and the scene is so hot, that I didn't mind getting a higher-definition version of the same video. And they also made the 18OnlyGirls video have better lighting, better colors, in addition to the higher definition.
So I don't think the duplicated content is bad, especially when the content at 18OnlyGirls is better quality.
BOTTOM LINE:
Site statistics:
Number of videos: 1032
Number of photosets: 1278
Number of models: hundreds
The site preview gives the following statistics:
Number of films: 8,545
Number of images: 384,314
Number of models: 507
I don't know where the site preview is getting it's figures, because I counted the number of videos (movies), and it's far smaller. Also, based on the number of photosets, and the average number of photos in the ones I counted, the number of photos at the site in photosets is far smaller.
Having said that, you still get 1,032 videos, and 1,278 phosets.
-There are two types of live shows: "Diesel Girls Live", and "24/7 Live Channel".
"Diesel Girls Live" features Diesel models who put on a live show. The show is free, and worth watching. Only a few of the Diesel models participate, each show lasts 2 hours, and you get 1, 2 or 3 shows per day.
The "24/7 Live Channel" is a link to models who chat in both public (free) and private mode (paid). The public or free mode is basically worthless. The private (paid) mode is expensive. It's probably cheaper to go to a strip club than to pay for the private shows.
-This is a hardcore teen site. Many of the models are as cute, attractive, even lovely, as you will find anywhere. In the last few years, they have
offered excellent quality videos. The older photosets were not excellent, even when the models were attractive or cute. But the photos I've seen recently are really outstanding, and compare to what you get at Metart or MPL Studios, two sites that specialize in high-quality photos. This is mainly a video site. But if they can post outstanding photosets in the future, as they seem to be doing now, this will be a photo site as well.
I'm giving the site a score of 95. You have some of the most attractive teen models you can find. You have outstanding quality videos. The recent
photosets have improved greatly. The site is easy to navigate. You have fast download speeds. And you don't have to wade through a bunch of junk
to find the worthwhile content: you have great videos and photosets of lovely girls all over the site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
* True HDTV videos
* A lot of content
* Great looking girls
* Fast download speed
* Lots of updates
* Free access to live shows
Cons:
* Some bugs on the site
* Video quality could be better at times
* Ad watermarks in the videos (very short, but still...)
* Many dead sites in the network
Bottom Line:
The network gives access to 14 different sites. Ten of which are individual model sites, the remaining four have a variety of different girls to offer. Four of the individual model sites and two of the multi model sites are dead sites with the last update from 2007. The rest of the individual model sites are more or less active. I'll concentrate on the multi model sites in this comment, simply because they seem to be the core sites of the entire network.
younglegalporn and 18onlygirls are both photo/video hybrid sites with 1-2 updates per day. The videos are about 30 minutes per scene and are coming in
mp4 640 * 360 1000kBit/s (about 200MB per scene)
mp4 852 * 480 1500kBit/s (about 250MB per scene)
mp4 1280 * 720 3000kBit/s (about 500MB per scene)
mp4 1920 * 1080 9000kBit/s (about 1.2 - 1.6 GB per scene)
note: The video upgrade to 1920*1080 happened recently and the availability of true HD scenes is quite inconsistent. Even some of the latest updates (26/05/2012) are just 720i instead of 1080i.
Pictures are available in
up to 6000px resolution
You can download complete picture sets in one zip archive.
The entire network is featuring young, european amateur or semi-amateur girls who are all sharing a tendency to the skinny side. Occasionally, you'll also find a US model (Sasha Grey, Tori Black), but the overwhelming majority of the girls are from Russia or at least eastern Europe. You will find all kinds of scenes, solo, g/g, b/g, group. The models are fresh and good looking, no tattoos, no fake tits. If you like your girls natural, then you'll be pleased with this site. If you prefer XXL boobs and saussage-lips, I'd recommend to stay away.
The ammount of content is overwhelming. Over 2000 videos are available on 18onlygirls and younlegalporn alone. Enough to keep your ISP and your hdd busy for quite a while.
Most of the scenes are exclusive. However, there are also some non-exclusive scenes. I've spotted one shot from nubiles.net, they didn't even bother removing the nubiles intro logo screen.
From the technical side, the 1080i movies are of pretty good quality, although not quite as crisp and colorful as the movies from brazzers or realitykings. For some reason, this seems to be a general trend in EU productions.
The site offers live shows on a daily basis, featuring some of the girls from the movies. The shows are usually from 6-11PM European time. In addition, you also get free access to seventeenlive.com.
Navigation of the sites is quite ok. However, the sites are suffering from some annoying bugs. Just to name two of them:
a. There is a filter function for "Everything" "video" "Photo" which is set to "Everything" by default. If you change it to "Video", browse the site and change the page at the bottom, the filter will reset to "Everything."
b. When streaming the videos, the scene is split up into small bits, allowing you to click and combine parts of the scene and watch them directly. Sounds like a nice feature. But when you skip parts of the selected videos, you get stuck in the first selected bit. (Sounds a bit complicated, I know).
Watching the videos, I noticed that sometimes during the scene, an advertisement watermark pops up richt at the bottom of the screen. This ad only lasts a few seconds, but it's still something I don't want to see in a video I payed for.
Download speed is very good. I'm using IDM and got full speed downloads (1800KB/s).
Bottom line:
A solid network with a decent ammount of content for a fair price. If you like young and skinny girls, you'll enjoy it.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Amazing Looking Model who looks like she could be a catwalk model.
Great sexy masturbating videos of her here, not usually much of a fan of solo stuff but make an exception when they are stunners, Gloria is certainly that.
You get the site as part of the great network at Diesel so for me was a bonus site but the site is worthy the $29.99 alone, she is my new Lay The Kat who I also loved.
New Site but already 41 vids on her site so not too bad and then there's the photos and extra vids on the other network sites of her.
Good software interface for downloading
Plenty of downloading options.
Cons:
Maybe wished for more lesbian content of her as I prefer my videos with some interaction, I don't think she will do boy/girl stuff, who knows , here's hoping but wish they post more girl/girl stuff in the future.
Yeah still very much a smallish site so those purchasing it as a site alone might be disappointing there isn't more material.
Would of been good with some interviews and maybe her interacting more with her fans, maybe that's something they could bring in, like to see her do a live show.
Bottom Line:
The bottom line for this site for me is she is simply stunning and was the reason I joined the network before Christmas as what I intended of doing but just seeing her on the promo pages drove me to click join, she is incredibly yummy and has a body that I find my ultimate.
Its all very new here with choices of movies to go for and they are very much similar to each other with Gloria first clothed then strips then masturbates but with solo sites I guess its hard to get variety down much.
I won't go to much into the technical side of the movies and picture resolutions as Rearadmiral's great review covers those and things haven't altered since that review was posted.
Overall I recommend the site as a bonus site to the Diesel network join on Younglegalporn.com joining page for $29.99, cause as a bonus sites its great and if you like her which I'm sure you will she would be soon when there a few more vids be worthwhile as a join alone site.
If you like softcore stuff and like your ladies that look like they are professional catwalk models with the sexiest legs ever then I'm sure this site will appeal if you like you solo sites with more hardcore elements then you may want to look elsewhere.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Right here is my review of this site and its network, its nearly perfection.
Almost faultless interface, I think its its called Lioness and seems to be very good and modern certainly better than most of its competition.
Great size choices of movies to choose from All new movies are 1080p, 720p, 480p and even get 380p. Most older vids will be 720p with movies back in 2008 some were just 480p. Certainly good enough though, so good choices of movies now anyway.
The network seems to update 4 movies or photos a day, which seems to be random but at least 1 movie a day and sometimes 2 or 3, but always a total of 4 updates a day altogether.
The quality of ladies is simply superb and they are some girls that could easily pass for catwalk super models, Gloria, Stasha and Nadin being just 3 that spring to mind.
They seem to treat the girls really well and the network seems like a community with some girls having their own sites, I like that and think other sites should take note.
Cons:
Not too many negatives and more really nit picking but for me these sorted would make the site perfect.
The annoying thing was with the interface when looking through a girls say movies and you had them filtered to just movies and then click on a movie when you click the back button the filters had gone and you had to do a search again, gets annoying when lots of vids.
Not major problem but some girls only had photos and me being a movie fan was slightly disappointed to find out she only had pics.
Some hefty file sizes noticed for movies not too long with not much showing nudity, I can live with the content not being full on sex but some file sizes seemed extra large, luckily not many.
Tends to be pussy sex as opposed to anal scenes, I'd love there to be more anal and they didn't have many anal lesbian scenes which I love.
These are very minor and not really bad at all, just me being nit picking.
Bottom Line:
Bottom line is the network is awesome and well worth my money to join back, all in all I have thoroughly enjoyed the sites and rate it in my top 5 sites now (as a network of course), they are moving on to be making some high end erotic movies and if I just saw a few more anal movies I'd give it full marks.
Some of the young ladies here are truly breathtaking and this sites seems to have a rather high number of good looking girls compared to its competition, I would say its on par with teenmegaworld and you see lots of the same girls, which I love as I collect my favs so great to see more of my favs here.
Would I ever return, you bet I will be doing, I hope they carry on doing what they are doing and continue to produce high end erotic porn with these angels they have there and I'm sure this site will go from strength to strength. It certainly has improved lots since I was last a member in early 2011, you could see it was heading in the right direction then with some of its newbies like Stephanie and Nadin but now there's many more new hotties on here.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
TBP/PU discount price of $19.99 makes the site excellent value
Billing by CCBill with no regional pricing.
Daily updates usually alternating between a photo shoot and video
Mostly exclusive content
Most recent photo sets have 3 size options, 1000, 2000 and 4000px
Zip downloads in each size
No watermark/site name on recent photos
Videos usually have a choice of 720p wmv or 720p, 480p and 360p mp4. A few of the latest videos also go up to 1080p full hd.
Videos can also be streamed in 3 resolutions and they also have them split into 1 minute long clips for streaming or download which is useful if you want to preview part of the video before deciding if you want to download it.
Run times and file sizes all displayed
It’s nice to see a site that actually takes the trouble to give the zips and video downloads proper file names matching the name of the scene and now also has the model name included since rearadmiral mentioned it in his recent review.
Responsive webmaster.
Cons:
Upgrading your membership to include the All Sites Access from within the member’s area is expensive at $69 so if you think you might want network access better to pay the extra $10 upfront (see my previous comment and webmaster explanation on this topic)
Download speeds were below average for me.
I found their photo browser awkward to use, i couldn’t move around the photos using my scroll bars or keyboard direction arrows, not sure if that was me doing something wrong
Much of the photo content only has a maximum resolution of 1000px
The oldest videos don’t have the HD option as you’d expect on any site that’s been around a number of years
Nothing much in the way of model info or bios, name and age is about all you get.
Some video files seem unnecessarily large e.g. a video of Beata I downloaded had a bitrate of 33,000 kbps and came in at a whopping 911 MB for an 11 minute video
Bottom Line:
Being a fan of softcore glamour/nude art style photography based sites such as Met, MPL, and W4B it was with some trepidation that I signed up here not really knowing if they had the kind of content that would be to my taste but I was tempted in by the collection of stunning fresh looking young models in the tour. There’s little information on the models in the site apart from a name and age but I’m assuming most of them would be Russian or Eastern European. Most of them have their ages listed as 18 or 19 and to be fair most of them do look teen to early 20s and the site does pretty much stick to the young theme throughout in the way of clothing and scenarios.
Although the site has been around several years with content dating back to 2006 online it’s only really in the last 12 to 18 months that they have been taking the addition of high resolution photo shoots to the site seriously so from my point of view they have some way to go to catch up with my favourite photography sites. I did find plenty of models and photo shoots that I liked but about two thirds of what I downloaded only had a resolution of 1000 x 665 with the rest a mixture of 1500, 2000 or 4000px on the long side. There is a mention on the site that they have plans to increase the photo resolution to 6000px but I’ve not seen any in that size yet.
I found the layout and presentation of the site really nice here. When browsing the model index the models had nice big preview pictures and when browsing the photo galleries the thumbnail previews were a good size and also included a slide control to increase or decrease the thumb size which was a cool feature I’ve not seen before. Each photo set and video also comes with a selection of clickable tags to allow you to easily find similar type content, e.g. solo, striptease, lesbian, hardcore, anal, cum in mouth etc.
If it’s videos you’re after I don’t see how this site can fail to impress, well as long as you’re not looking for busty milfs that is. You can find these hot young models in most types of action including solo, masturbation, toys, lesbian, hardcore B/G, threesomes with niches such as anal, peeing and fisting covered. I’m not hugely into videos but from what I’ve seen the quality throughout the site is pretty decent overall. You’ll need a lot of disk space to save these HD files as they can often be up to 2 GB in size. The only slight downside to these large files is that I found the download speed below average and on a couple of occasions so slow that the site was virtually unusable although it appears that may have been a temporary problem.
Overall a highly recommended site if you’re into the “teen” niche and one I’ll probably come back to again in the future if they keep on growing the amount and quality of the photo sets.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Approximately 800 videos
- Over 1000 photo sets
- Photos zipped
- Each scene usually has a video and a photo set
- Excellent mix of material (solo, girl/girl, b/g, some multiples, vaginal, anal, toy play, peeing, fisting, indoor, outdoor)
- Naturally beautiful models (some natural imperfections)
- Not a lot of variation in models – Caucasian, young, petite. Some larger breasts, but most smaller, proportional (I’m listing this as a pro because I share the site’s taste in women. If you prefer a different look, it might be a con for you.)
- TBP/PU discount
- Excellent value
- Updates daily
- Some photo sets in HD, most lower res
- Helpful webmaster
- Photos and videos are well done – well lit, sound is good
- Models aren’t heavily made up – naturally beautiful
- Didn’t have timeouts with download manager
Cons:
- Download speeds can be slow sometimes
- Some trouble with Free Download manager, but it seems to be resolved and no one else reported it
- Wish the scene names included the model name
Bottom Line:
This site has been getting some attention lately, with a review just last week, so I hope I can add some new information to what’s already here.
I have no idea why I had never heard of this site before because it is large and very well done. It offers a great value at the TBP/PU discount price. I went into it thinking it was a mostly solo girl site but I was wrong. Unlike many other sites that might claim this, this site really does offer something for just about everyone. There are solo, g/g, multiples, toys, b/g, anal, peeing, fisting, indoor and outdoor scenes. One consistency is the models – they are almost all young, Caucasian (Easter European and Russian) and petite. There are a few models with larger breasts, but the majority are petite and proportional. Not all models do g/g or b/g. The site has material for about 300 models. Some of those have only a handful of scenes / sets, but many have a large library.
Each scene usually has a video and a photoset with it, but this site splits material with other sites on its network so the photos may be here and the video on 18 Only Girls, or the other way around.
Videos are offered as WMV (Codec 9) and mp4. WMVs are usually offered in one resolution with 720p being the most common. Older videos are obviously lower. There are some scenes at 1080p. Mp4s are usually offered in three resolutions with the highest usually being 720p, though there are some with 1080p. Bitrates are very high, with most over 10,000kb/s. File sizes can be large with most being near 1GB, but there are some that are bigger than 2GB. Obviously, selecting a lower res will reduce the size. There are about 800 videos on the site now, most average between 20 to 30 mins. Subjectively, the videos look clear and crisp. Lighting and sound are very professional. This is not an amateur operation.
Photos are also available and are usually shot on the same set as the videos. The photos are usually offered in multiple resolutions. While there are some at 2666x4000, most aren’t that high. Subjectively, they look good, with the higher res looking the best, obviously. Zips are offered. Number of photos per set varies.
The site updates daily with a new video or photoset being added. Some days see two updates.
There is a search function (though I didn’t find it all that accurate), and each scene has links to themes. You can also sort by model.
For me, the big selling point of this site has to be the models. I’m usually more into U.S. models doing mainstream hardcore, so this site was a real eye-opener for me. The models are stunning. They are all naturally beautiful and many have slight imperfections that don’t get hidden, which makes them more appealing. Makeup is understated too. Some of the models have a unique look – wholesome even. Whoever lines up the talent deserves a pay raise.
There is a TBP/PU discount offered, and you can buy a membership to this site or for an additional $10 you can add the whole ‘network.’ I strongly recommend spending that extra $10 for two reasons. It makes the membership an excellent value, and the same models appear on the other sites so if you like a particular model you’ll be leaving material behind without access to the other sites. The other sites are Ivana Fukalot, Skinny Super Girl, 18 Only Girls (this is the other large site here), Alice Wonder Bang, Lay the Kat, Sasha Fucks Dasha, Natasha Shy, Vika Nymph, Sasha Blonde, Beata Porn, Kamilla 18, The Sperm Lover and Policeman. I’ll post some stats and a brief review as a comment on some of those that might help you decide whether you want to get full access.
The site isn’t perfect, but it is close. This may be nitpicking, but I wish the scene / set names included the model name. These models are all new to me it was frustrating to see a model I like and not know who she is. I resolved that by being careful to catalogue them by model, but some indication would be helpful.
I also had some membership problems that you can read in the comments, but those were all resolved thanks to a helpful webmaster. And to be fair, with most of those issues it seemed to be only me who had the problems.
If the site has an Achilles heel, it is that many PU members report that download speeds can drop during peak times. I experienced that too. From a comment made by the webmaster, it sounds like the problem is with their third-party network supplier and not the site.
The site is technically very well done. It looks good and it isn’t overly busy. It’s simple, and I mean that as a compliment. The material on the site is also well done. And the models are some of the most beautiful women I’ve ever seen. Not only would I highly recommend this site to anyone who likes models who look like this, I’m going one step further: this will be a site that I come back to regularly.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Lovely young teen models.
-The videos have crystal sharp definition, good lighting, good sound control (no random, loud, extraneous background noises). Some of the older
videos have some extraneous background noises and the photography is not always sharp. But the newer videos are well shot photography.
-No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Easy login to the site - with the DieselAccess network.
Cons:
-The cons are minor. rearadmiral and tangub have reported problems with the site (such as poor downloading speeds occasionally), but I have not.
-They should have some posting if the Live Diesel model is late for a public show, or if the show has been cancelled. A simple notice stating
the model has been delayed, and when she might appear online. Or if the show has been cancelled, simply stating that.
-A few videos or photosets might be from years ago, but you couldn't tell it from the posting date. For example, the model Odessa is familiar from years ago. She is also known as Priscilla, Anna, Lily, Yana, Chrissy, Lusy, and Melissa. And she has appeared on more than 25 pay sites.
Anyway, in a video on 18OnlyGirls (a network site to YoungLegalPorn), Odessa states her name as Anna, not Odessa. And she says her age is 18.
She has been doing porn since 2002. The video is dated/posted as 2009-10-07. So the age she states is wrong, or the videos is from years ago.
Bottom Line:
Cons (continued):
But the posted date is a minor problem.
-Some photosets have only one option for downloading, others have 3 options for downloading: 4000 px, 2000 px, 1000 px.
-In the updates section, I wish they would clearly identify each set as "video" or "photo set". Instead, you have to click on the set to find whether it's a video or photos.
-The search (or listing for a model) is specific to each site only. The model Samantha, for example, shows as one set on YoungLegalPorn. You have to transfer to 18onlygirls to see that she also has a set at that site. It would be easier if a single search returns all the sets for a particular model at that network, with each site being listed with the sets for that model. Instead, you have to visit each individual site and do a search to see if the model appears at that site.
-The rearadmiral reported that he had a problem gaining access to all sites in this network even though he paid for all network sites. But that was straighten after a few email. I did not have that problem.
-Also, rearadmiral reported that he connection to the network was very slow at times. My download speed maxes out about 630 KB/s, and I did not have any problems with my download speed. But admiral has a faster connection than my own. And he was using the connection longer than I was. But rearadmiral saw sustained download speeds of less than 20 KB/sec. The Webmaster replied to rearadmiral's comments on PU, and said there was a technical problem and the problem seems to be fixed.
The Webmaster should be giving credit for responding to PU comments so fast, and with an open attitude of trying to fix those complaints.
-Bottom Line (summary):
-Web site features teen girls. Doing masturbation (1 or 2 or more girls). Doing lesbian sex (2 or more girls). Doing sex with a boy (1 or 2 girls, 1 boy). The girls are OK to very attractive.
-videos:
high quality:
width x height: 1280x720
total bitrate: 11013 kbps
802 MB/13 min 46 sec runtime
The newer videos have a high definition option, 720p, along with 480p and 360p.
The older videos from several years ago only have a standard definition option 480p.
photosets:
4000 px, 2000 px, 1000 px on some photosets. But the file size for the 4000 px photoset can be 148-250 MB.
-There are live chat sessions with Diesel models that are free with a paid membership, named "Diesel Girls Live".
There are also, separately, chat sessions with other models. The chat sessions with other models can be free. There can also be a charge for the other model chat sessions, in one of two modes: a non-public mode which is open to all members who pay the fee; a separate private chat which would be a one-on-one session with yourself and the chat model.
I think the site is worth a 90. But if you have the problems that rearadmiral or tangub are having, the site is worth far less. The sites has some great looking models. The recent videos are crystal sharp. The photography is ok, showing improvement over time, but not up to standards of MetArt or MPL Studios.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Incredibly beautiful model
- Can include the site as part of a network
- TBP discount
- Pics and video available
- Pics available as zips
- Videos available in multiple resolutions
- Some pics and video offered in HD
- Supports download managers (I use Free Download Manager)
- Excellent customer support
Cons:
- Small site (but growing regularly)
- Site name could be better – it isn’t really flattering
- If purchased as a stand-alone site the value isn’t great
- Some sharing of material with other company sites
- All softcore
Bottom Line:
This site is a Diesel Access site dedicated to the model Gloria. Gloria started at Young Legal Porn and there is some of her material on that site too.
The oldest material on the site is dated from June 2011 so the site is quite new. The downside to that is that it is also still quite small, but it is growing. Currently there 34 videos and 34 photo sets posted. The site appears to update every three days with the update alternating between a video and a photo set.
The site can be purchased as a stand-alone site at $30 ($20 price with TBP/PU discount) or as part of the Diesel Access network at $40 ($30 price with TBP/PU discount). As a stand-alone site at full price it isn’t a very good value yet, but as the site grows that will obviously improve. My recommendation is to pay the extra $10 to get the network access. I did that but didn’t immediately get the full network access and customer support wasn’t all that helpful even after I sent them a screenshot of the TBP discount page. The webmaster stepped in and resolved the issue so there should be no problems now. And no other PU members reported the same problem.
Video quality varies from good to excellent. About half of the videos posted are true HD at 1920x1080. Bitrates (which I don’t fully understand) are the highest I’ve ever seen with rates hitting over 15,000kbps on some videos. The other half of the videos are available at 1280x720 with bitrates around 10,000. All videos are offered in multiple sizes and two formats. Wmv files (codec 9) are offered at either the 1080p or 720p, and mp4 files are offered in multiple sizes ranging from HD to lower resolutions for mobile devices. Download speeds are slightly above the average that I usually see with porn sites. I use Free Download Manger and it worked well with the site: there were no timeout issues.
The picture quality also ranges from good to excellent. Most sets are at 1000x556 but there are several that are 2666x4000. The quality of the lower resolution photos is good, but they pale in comparison to the higher res photos. The hi-res photos are amazing quality.
The site certainly does the technical bits right, and they do the artistic things well too. The lighting is always good and the photographer and videographer are obviously professionals. There is definitely NOT an amateur effort.
The site is pure softcore – mostly solo girl posing and some masturbation. There are a couple of girl/girl shoots but these are non-sexual. The girls may rub or touch each other a bit but there is very little contact. Kissing is even rare. There are no boy/girl shoots at all.
The model, Gloria, also appears on the Young Legal Porn site where she has 8 videos and 12 photo sets. My preference would be to see all her stuff migrated to SSG just to have it all in one place, but that isn’t a deal breaker and not really even an issue if you have full network access.
One issue that would be solved by having all Gloria’s material on one site is that there is some sharing of material between SSG and YLP. It isn’t sharing in the sense that the same videos or photos are on both sites, but the video of a shoot may be posted on YLP and the photos of the same shoot may be posted on SSG. Again, this isn’t that big a deal if you get network access.
This is nitpicking, but I really don’t like the site name. To me, calling a girl skinny is a negative. It’s criticizing her. Yes, Gloria is petite, but she’s wonderfully proportioned and definitely not malnourished like models posted on sites that feature truly skinny, even anorexic, models. Gloria is definitely not malnourished or anorexic. But at least the ‘super’ part is accurate.
From a technical viewpoint, the site is great. There is a search function, but none is needed while the site is small. You can sort by photos or videos, and each set has tags that can help sort further.
The value of the site, then, really comes down to your subjective opinion of Gloria. I’m not normally given to hyperbole and flowery language, but my life as a porn user can now be marked in BG and AG. Up to September 30, 2011 is the “Before Gloria” era, and October 1, 2011 marks the “After Gloria” era. You may not share my opinion, but I now have a new #1 model. Gloria is absolutely stunning – a beautiful face with incredible eyes (that the professional staff show off well) and an incredible body. I don’t know why she started doing nude shoots, but I’m sure grateful that she did.
I’ve scored the site high, which some may question considering that it might be relying too much on my subjective reaction to Gloria. But I think the score is warranted because the only flaw on the site is that it is new and needs to grow. It is updating so that flaw will fix itself. Otherwise, the site is really well done and has some great material. If you like Gloria’s look, I’d highly recommend getting a network membership.
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros:
I'd say the major draw here is the quality of girls, very cute and some absolute stunners. Stasha is one to join the site for especially.
Some videos are hardcore done softly which I really like, kind of like x-art style with erotic soft setting and fly on the wall camera shots with professional quality camera work.
The network sites caters for most tastes, softer solo stuff, lesbian, group of girls naked (one of my favs), hardcore and also kinkier stuff like peeing too, one of the previews of this looked awesome but wasn't available sadly when I was a member.
Some really great photography too here, seems to be getting better.
Nice blog site to keep you interested when not a member which is important I feel.
Cons:
Not too much to moan about but if I had to here it is.
Price could be cheaper for the network $19.99 would be great.
The search and navigation could need some improvement but I've seen worse.
Would be nice to have each girl with a profile page to say what stuff they have done and even non members could view, that would be a good edition, maybe even interviews and backstage stuff, its nice to find more out about them and this site has lots of regular girls exclusive to this network.
Bottom Line:
Its been a few months since I was a member, I feel a new join is around the corner, maybe for Christmas as their new stuff looks very hot indeed. I haven't checked out the previews for this site for some time and the blog site 18onlygirlsblog.com but must say they really have come along way and I think this site may not get the credit it deserves.
Only sort of went on the site last week after seeing Lets Wake Him Up movie with Adria and Mia and never watched it yet since I downloaded it when I was a member and was well impressed. Very erotic and high class camera work. the site has these 2 ultra cuties Gloria and Stasha who look as though they have stepped right off the catwalk. words can't describe how cute Stasha is. Anyway in-case it may of missed you or gone under your radar I totally recommend this site, it is up there with my top ten sites. Check out the blog beforehand to see if it's the type of material you'd be interested in anyway.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The site admin is responding to it's members demands and suggestions. Ask for a tag to be added for the search engine, and they might add it.
They have a very good chat where you can chat with the porn stars of the site and ask them about basically anything, even have them play with toys and such.
You can write requests for the site, in the forum. I've seen a few of the "be a director" videos, and I so need to write some good scenes up for them.
Exlusive videos, and a lot of them.
Cons:
Not so many pictures as I would like, but the ones they have are good.
Bottom Line:
Exlusive content, and one of the best sites I ever joined. In my opinion, the perfect site if you love teen porn with fresh and sexy models.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Easy login.
-Long period before site timeout.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Zip file for photosets.
-Content is dated.
-Photosets and videos default filename for download is the posting date.
Cons:
-No streaming option.
-Only 1 definition for video download, a low-quality.
-Only 1 definition for photoset download, a low-quality.
-Very few models at this site. You have Sasha and Dasha, and a very few other models.
-Archive site, no updates since July 2007.
-No search.
Bottom Line:
This site is part of the Diesel Access network.
This is an archive site: the last update was July 2007.
Most of the content features two models: Sasha and Dasha. There are a few other models also featured. The contents are videos and photosets that show the models in an amateur home-style shoot: one or two girls relaxing or playing with each other. The feel is strictly amateur: the site is an example of amateur home-style photo and video capture of two girls relaxing, playing, taking a shower, making out with each other.
Number of videos: 120.
Number of photosets: 210+
-Video updates: last video update was July 2007.
-Photoset updates: last photoset update was July 2007.
Videos only have 1 definition download option: a low-quality WMV file.
Photosets only have 1 definition zip file option: a low-quality photo.
The sex action is solo girl, or girl-girl. No boys at this site. There is very little sex action. What you get is brief nudity. Some kissing (is kissing or nudity sex action?).
The videos are short runtime, maybe 5-10 minutes.
87 MB for a 5 minute 30 second clip.
Frame width x height: 852x480.
Total bitrate: 4258 kbps.
The bitrate would support high quality video. But these are strictly amateur-style videos: poor definition, view often slightly out of focus,
no attempt at glamor-style shoot, the videos and photosets are a real home-style shoot of one or more girls just playing around.
The photosets are small, about 30-40 photos.
Individual photos are about 50-70 KB in size.
Width x height: 852x480 pixels.
The photos are more like screen caps than professionally shot photos.
Many of the photos are out of focus. The framing is poor. The photosets are a photo record of a video shoot. And the video shoot is very free-
form: the video guy just turns a video camera on one or two girls and captures whatever they happen to do. There is nudity involved, but it's a really amateur home-style shoot, in style and content.
Does the site have any value? Maybe for someone who is desperate to see one or two girls who are naked sometimes.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Easy log-in.
-No DRM.
-Actively updating.
1 new video every 10-14 days.
1 new photoset every 3, 4, 5, 8, or 15 days (very erratic update rate for photosets).
-Very nice quality for videos and photosets.
Good lighting, good camera-work, good sound control. Sometimes you will hear extraneous noise like an overhead airplane or hiss/rumble, but the soundtrack is basically the sounds the models are making as they make love. No annoying music soundtrack.
-watermark on videos: small watermark, bottom right corner, appears intermittently, not intrusive.
-No download limits.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Zip files for photosets.
-Navigation is easy.
-Can stream or download all videos.
-Choice of WMV or MP4 format for downloading.
-Search engine.
Cons:
-Photosets and videos do not name the models.
-There are no model bios.
-Search engine could be improved.
-Only 1 size for photos.
--The photosets are ok to good quality, but they have a tendency to appear washed out in color (the colors need to be stronger, brighter, and you would have much more attractive photos).
-The HD video files can be large, 1+ GB for a 15 minute clip.
-Photosets download with the default filename of "photos.zip". So you have to manually rename each photoset to identify what the photoset is. And since the models are not named, trying to organize the photosets into some kind of order is not simple.
-Slow software system for viewing individual photos in a photoset.
Bottom Line:
Site is loosely based on the solo teen model idea. The main model is Vika. But there are plenty of sets and videos without Vika.
The action is varied: stripping, masturbation, solo girl, girl-girl, boy-girl. There is also very mild group sex, some kink (peeing). By group sex, I mean you have three or more people having sex. It's not a rough gangbang where you have a bunch of guys pounding away on one girl at all her holes.
The site (and the parent Diesel network) takes a casual, softcore approach to porn. By softcore, I don't mean limited sex; instead, I mean the sex
is presented in a basically gentle or friendly way. You don't get gonzo hardcore where the action is rough, abusive, or contemptuous. This site/network shows sex as good, clean fun to be enjoyed.
The peeing videos are very short, about 1-3 minutes runtime, which is great for that niche (which I'm not a fan of), because it's right there, wham bam, pee! No waiting around for the action to start. You can see a girl peeing. I guess that's porn, but it's just a girl peeing. She's not masturbating or having sex or anything, she's just peeing.
The search could be improved. You enter "peeing" as the search term, and only get 1 video. There are other pee videos at the site. You can find
another pee video by entering "urination". Someone who is into this niche can search more extensively and report their results to the PU members.
number of videos: 155
Most videos have a short runtime, 10-20 minutes.
Download formats for videos: High quality WMV file, medium quality MP4 file, low quality MP4 file.
The high definition WMV video files go up to 1280x720, 19160 kbps total bitrate.
Number of photosets: 176
Number of photos per photoset: about 80-112.
Can view individual photos, or download the entire set as a zip file.
Zip file is one size only (no choice of which photo resolution).
Maximum resolution of 1333x2000 pixels.
I really wish the site listed the models in the videos and photosets, because it would make organizing the contents so much easier. What
collector wants a large bunch of photosets and videos where you don't know who the models are?
The models are real teens, mainly attractive, very little tattoos or piercings. The girls are from Eastern Europe. Most girls are small-
breasted, as usual, but there are some models with medium or large natural breasts. You don't see the oversized, plastic breasts found at Playboy or many adult porn sites.
As part of the Diesel network, the site is definitely worth looking through to see which videos/photosets appeal to your tastes. But if the site were a standalone, at $29.95/month, it would be overly expensive.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Easy site log-in.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Zip file for each photoset. (The site has 2 photosets total. That is not a joke.)
-Small amount of site contents. With a fast Internet connection, you can download the entire site contents in 1 day. And then review the contents at your leisure.
-Some attractive models.
Cons:
-Archive site. No updates since 2006.
-Small site.
-The site has only 2 photosets, which are a low-quality photographic record of a video shoot. Even though you can download a zip file for each
photoset, I don't know who would want to keep a zip file of these photosets.
-Site contents are not dated, except for the two photosets, which are from 2006. Apparently the last update for the site was in April, 2006.
-Most videos have only one download option, a low-quality WMV file. A few videos have a choice of download as low-quality WMV or low-quality MPEG file.
-The default option for filename of each video downloads as 001.wmv, which means you have to manually rename each file, to avoid overwriting with the next download. And also to separate the files from one another, because a bunch of files with the filename of 001.wmv are hard to distinguish from one another.
-No bio for the models. They don't even bother to name the models.
Bottom Line:
CONS (continued):
-Navigation is basic. You get a list of the videos, in apparent chronological order (but no date is listed). That's it.
-No search feature.
BOTTOM LINE:
Site contents:
This is a small archive site that has not been updated since 2006. It has 25 videos, and 2 photosets.
The 2 photosets are a photographic record of 2 video shoots. The photosets are poor quality photographs, more like screen captures (or maybe they are screen captures).
videos: 25
Sample video file size: about 250 MB, for a runtime of 34 minutes.
Total bitrate: 1017kbps (very low bitrate, indicating poor quality of video).
Frame width x height: 400x300.
photosets: 2
photoset 1 has 115 photos.
photoset 2 has 100 photos.
Individual photos have a file size of about 60-80 KB, 1024x576 pixels.
This site is supposed to be a reality porn series. The site theme is 2 cops who play practical jokes on women who are applying for a driver's license. The two cops, one who is dressed as a doctor, make the women applicants undress and then have sex as part of the medical exam. This is a very stupid idea, and the two "cops" are sort of acting like an updated
version of the three stooges. But the women go along with the idea, and have sex with the two cops: bj, vaginal, maybe anal, whatever. At the end, because the women had sex with the two guys, the women are told they passed their medical exam needed for a driver's license.
One model asks: What does a gynecological exam have to do with a driver's license?
The cop dressed as a doctor answers: We have to make sure you don't wiggle around on the seat when driving.
(There are subtitles, because the models are speaking whatever European language they use.)
Some of the models are attractive. I wish the quality of the videos was better. The camera-work is ok to good, the lighting is ok to good (these
are indoor scenes shot in a small room), but the definition/clarity of the videos could be greatly improved.
This is part of the Diesel network. If you joined this site by itself, you would feel that not only the models were getting screwed, but that you had been screwed as well.
But if you get this site as part of the Diesel network, then the site is worth glancing over. Many of the models are cute. I only wish the videos were better quality (higher definition, mainly).
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-DRM: none.
-Site timeout: Very long period before timeout.
-Download limits: None.
-Model listing is name of model with a nice-sized thumbnail and a listing of her photosets and videos.
-Many of the newer videos are nice quality: clear video, good focus, good lighting, good sex action, very attractive models,
great skin tone, good color of background and foreground, good sound control.
-Most videos have a choice of 3 download qualities to choose from: low, medium or high quality.
Cons:
-Navigation is basic. For a relatively small site, the navigation could be
easily improved to make moving around and finding the photosets/videos of each model faster and simpler.
-Search is limited. You can search by model's name, but for little else.
-They should junk the software system they use to view individual photos.
-No model bios or other information on the models.
-Many of the older videos are very poor quality in terms of clarity, lighting, colors, annoying background music.
-The content is posting dated, but the significance of the date can be low.
Some material was made years before it was posted at this site.
-The free live webcam chats with models are a waste of time. The models basically do nothing
on-screen except wait for someone to pay for a private chat.
Bottom Line:
Site stats:
-Number of models: 303+
-Number of videos: 1,000+ (No easy way to estimate number)
-Number of photosets: 1,000+ (No easy way to estimate number)
The newer videos are mainly good quality: good lighting, good colors (skin tone, background, foreground), ok to good camera work.
video stats (newer videos):
frame width x height: 1280 x 720
total bitrate: 8572 kbps - 15459 kbps
frame rate: 29 frames/second
photo stats:
photosets: 30-100 photos.
file size: 200-400 Kb (newer photo size).
width x height: 2250 x 1500 pixels.
resolution: horizontal x vertical: 96 dpi x 96 dpi.
Photosets can have from 30 to 100 photos. The file size of an individual photo can be large, up to 400+ Kb, but the photos are not high quality in terms of appeal or photographic technique.
The photosets are more in the style of an amateur-shot photo series done at home, except that I have seen many amateur photos that have much better photo technique than the photosets at this site.
The two primary sites in the dieselaccess network that have the most value are YoungLegalPorn and 18OnlyGirls. There are some other sites in the
network that are also worthwhile, but the most value is in those two sites. YoungLegalPorn and 18OnlyGirls are very similar sites: same type of content, same layout, same models, etc. And it appears that some content is shared between the two sites. YoungLegalPorn takes a softcore approach to porn. By this, I mean that the sex is gentle, not rough or abusive. The sex is caring, affectionate, or friendly, with no slapping, spitting, hitting, name-calling, etc. The sex can be hardcore in the sense there is female masturbation, lesbian activity, boy-girl sex.
I appreciate the overall quality of many videos at this site. But some PU members might think the site is too tame, and would rather watch a harder, edgier type of sex that is featured at many hardcore sites.
The free Diesel cam shows are not shows, but a waste of time where the model does almost nothing except sit or lie on a bed, waiting for someone
to pay for a private show. There is also a mode where the "public free show" turns into a show which is still "public", but you have to pay 1 euro per minute to watch. Supposedly there is some stripping or other action in the non-free public show. The private chats are 3 euros per
minute. So it could get very expensive to watch.
It would probably be cheaper to go to a topless bar to see some stripping, instead of watching it over the internet.
Note: hugow wrote a review of this site on 2011-01-02 and gave it a 50 score because he said the servers were very slow. Most of the files I downloaded from this site (and the other sites in this network) had speeds of 620-630 KB/s, which is my maximum download speed. So I did not experience the poor download speeds hugow reported.
(I recently upgraded my DSL connection, which used to have a maximum download speed of 150-160 KB/s.)
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Videos: Small watermark appears briefly at different times in a video.
Not obtrusive.
-Photos: Small watermark.
-No DRM.
-Videos and photosets have posting date.
-Site has a models list, which is a an alphabetical list/pages of the models, with a nice-sized thumbnail of each model, with the number of photosets and videos for each model.
-Very long period before site timeout.
-Can watch videos streaming or download. The streaming option is not very good. You get a small window to watch the video. Much better to download the video and watch it on your PC. Streaming option is OK to watch briefly to see if the video will be of interest. But trying to fast-forward the streaming video does not work well: the video stops playing, and it's hard to get it to resume at the place you want to try next.
-Zip file for photosets.
-Large number of models (320+).
Cons:
-The software for viewing individual photos is clunky. There should be an easier way to view individual photos.
-Navigation is basic. It should be easier to browse through the photosets and videos. The videos and photosets are split into two separate sections, but it should be easier to browse through the site contents.
-The search is basic, and could be improved by being able to search for the title of a photoset or video, or being able to search for a specific
type of content such as type of sex action, etc.
-No model bio or information on the model is offered.
-One size only for each photoset. No choice of low, medium, high quality photosets.
Bottom Line:
There are a number of attractive models at this site. The site theme is young teen girls who are amateurs. These are not girls being naughty, but
attractive young girls who are filmed on camera enjoying their sexuality: by themselves (masturbation), with their female friends (lesbian), less often with a boy. It's good clean enjoyment and fun, not dirty, not abusive, not rough.
-Large number of models (320+). The models are teen or early twenties, white Eastern European girls. Mainly slender, mainly small-breasted.
Number of models at this site: 320
Number of photos per photoset: 40 - 100 photos.
videos:
number: 800+
runtime: 15-20 minutes
size: 200 MB - 1 GB+, depending on which quality you choose.
Format: WMV
Definition/quality: medium, high, HD (the best, highest quality)
Photosets:
number: 1,000+
Photo dimensions: 1000 x 1500 pixels width x height.
Photo size: about 200 KB.
-Update rate:
1 photoset per day, average.
1 video every 2 days, average.
I don't know why the the photosets at 18 Only Girls are so unsatisfying.
The quality of the photosets is far below what you find at a glamor-style site like Met-art or MPL Studios, in terms of definition, appeal, etc. The style of the photosets is like what is shown at sites like Teen Stars Magazine (an archive site) or My Precious Virgins. Except that what
is shown at Teen Stars Magazine and My Precious Virgins is done much better. The photosets at 18 Only Girls are like a pale imitation of the
much better photosets at the other two sites. And compared to glamor photo sites like Met-art or MPL Studios, the photosets at 18 Only Girls are
almost worthless. The photosets are like snapshots from the 1960s or 1970s. Even though they are nude photosets, the 18 Only Girls photosets lack sexiness. My guess is that the lack of sexual appeal is due to the washed-out appearance of the colors in the photos.
Content appears to be shared between the 18 Only Girls site and the Young Legal Porn site. This is true of photosets and videos. I am looking at a
recent photoset at 18 Only Girls, titled
"Horny_coed_girl_striping_and_toying_her_snatch_1295819441_only_674", with the model named Drew. But even though the photoset is posted at 18 Only
Girls, each photo has a YoungPorn.net watermark.
There seems to be some confusion in naming The Young Legal Porn site: The Young Legal Porn site is called both Young Legal Porn and is also called Young Porn. The site is advertised as Young Legal Porn, but the address bar of the site itself uses YoungPorn instead, and the watermarks on the photosets show YoungPorn.net.
The videos, unlike the photosets, have value. The videos are professionally shot, and are very high quality: Good to excellent lighting, focus, definition, camera-work. There are a large number of videos at this site worth watching, as long as
you are satisfied with a softcore approach to pretty young teens: the sex is solo, or lesbian, or some boy-girl, but it's not hard-edged or abusive.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Easy login.
-Long period before site timeout.
-No DRM.
-Zip file for photosets.
-No download limits.
-No watermark on the videos.
-Videos are short runtime, often split into 5-minute clips.
Cons:
-Archive site. Last update January 2007.
-Quality and feel of individual photos is amateur. More like a home-shot photo than a professionally shot photo. Nothing approaching the photo quality available at a glamor site like Metart or MPL Studios.
-Medium sized, obtrusive watermark on photos. Only a true fan of site model would want to keep any of these photos. Or someone who wants a very
complete collection of any of the models that might be a visitor shown in the photos.
-OK to low resolution on the videos, which are shot like amateur videos.
-No search engine.
-Very basic navigation.
Bottom Line:
-This is a small, solo-model type site. A waste of time and effort. If they had kept the site alive with updates and improved the video and photo quality, the site might have had some value, but it's hard to see any value in this site.
Anyone paying a site membership fee for access to this solo site will probably kick himself for stupidity or carelessness.
-This site is basically a waste of time and hard drive space. I didn't save a single video or photo from this site.
Small site.
Videos: 47
Photosets: 73
Short runtime: Videos run 10-20 minutes, often split into 2 clips.
Frame width x height: 852x480
Total bitrate: 4258 kbps
With that high a bitrate, you would expect much higher definition video and sharp focus. But the camera-man does not take advantage of the large data-size of the file: the focus is not sharp and clear and is not often centered/framed on the action. The lighting is not sharp and crisp.
The site is designed as a solo-model site of a girl who has friends (male and female). The sex action is spread around: The main girl masturbates, has sex with 1 or 2 boys, has sex with some of her female friends. The female friends have male-female sex and female-female sex.
-If you get access to the site through the network, you can glance through the site contents (videos, photos). But it's doubtful you will find
anything of interest. Unless you happen to be a true collector of a few of the models that visit the site briefly (such as Dasha or Lay the Cat). But the visiting models are not clearly identified in each set they appear in, so you have to study many of the sets to guess the identity/name of some of the models in some of the videos and photosets.
The number of visiting models at this site is very small, less than 10. Few of the visiting models are well known.
None of the photos or videos are worth keeping. This site is of slight to no interest. A true collector of some of the visiting models might want to have some photos and videos where their most favorite models appear, but no one else would be interested, except to see an example of the low quality that porn sites have tried to sell online to members.
The site is like a an amateur, home shot photoset and videolog of some amateur girls who are playing at sex. It appears they are having fun at times, and really enjoying the sex as well. If you are a true fan of the girls/models, that would add some interest to viewing the photos/videos. But otherwise, the site is boring.
Very basic navigation. Files are divided into two groups: photosets and videos. The files in each group are listed in descending chronological order, most recent listed first.
A nice-sized thumbnail shows you who the model(s) in the photoset/video are. Many of the models are not specifically listed for many of the photosets and videos.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The girls are still beautiful. They focus on Ivana, Masha, and a few others.
Cons:
I wrote a previous review for this site when it was youngporn.net and I thought it was so good I needed to terminate my membership early because I was spending so much time there.
This time round, I'm quitting early for a completely different reason. The servers are so slow this site is unusable. Every page takes forever to load.
On top of that, they have a "100% satisfaction guaranteed" sticker on their join page. Of course, two requests that they terminate my membership and refund my money went unanswered. I'm cutting my losses and just terminating.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
