Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Choice of CCBill or Epoch for sign up
Exclusive content
Updated 4 times a week (Mon, Wed, Sat, Sun), usually 3 photo sets and 1 video per week.
All content is high res and hd
Photos have a choice of 4 sizes available; standard 711x1066, extra-large 1365x2048, ultra large 2000x3000 and super large 3744x5616.
Downloadable zips in all 4 sizes.
Video download options are hd 1280x720 wmv (20000+ kbps), 640x360 wmv (6000 kbps), 640x360 mp4 (1000 kbps) for smartphone or tablet. There is also a high def and standard def streaming option.
File sizes and run times of videos displayed.
All content date stamped.
Excellent navigation, browse options and search engine
Cons:
Regional pricing with CCBill (Epoch was about $2 cheaper for me).
Site has only been online since September 2011 so not a massive amount of content yet; 198 photo sets (26,000 pics) and 53 videos at the time of writing this.
Hardly any full nudity, mostly just topless.
Videos are short, usually only 5-6 minutes.
No model info or bios
Poor preview area; click on a model in the tour pages to try and see what photo sets or videos she has and you are taken straight to the sign up page.
Bottom Line:
This site features the unusual theme of girls wearing both stockings and tights (pantyhose) at the same time. I’ve always been a fan of girls wearing stockings and heels but have never really liked tights so couldn’t quite decide where I stand on this unusual niche. This site wasn’t really on my radar but a cheap email offer tempted me to take a look. This site is run by the same company that runs Only All Sites, Only Tease and Art Lingerie so quality was pretty much assured.
There’s currently 79 models on the site, most of them being the same British models that can be found on the other company sites. Many of the popular OT models like Carla, Melanie, Hayley Marie, Lucy Anne and Daisy Watts can be found here. A few Euro models such as Eufrat and Cikita are also present.
The photos are pretty much in the same style you find at Only Tease and have the same natural look to them; thankfully they have avoided the photo-shopped style that was prevalent at Art Lingerie. The photo sets usually start with the model fully clothed before they strip down to their tights and stockings. Those who like a full striptease will be disappointed since the tights, panties and stockings rarely get removed. As a result you will rarely see any full nudity within the site with only occasional glimpses of any pussy and quite often that glimpse is only through sheer tights if the model happens to be wearing them without any panties underneath. To all intents and purposes it’s really just a topless site.
I’m not really interested in videos so only checked out a few. The HD videos look nice and sharp whether downloading or streaming. They provide a screen cap gallery of 18 photos for each video where you can get an idea of the content before deciding if you want to download it. The video style is pretty much the same as I experienced at Art Lingerie. There’s no background music and usually no chat from the model apart from a brief introduction at the start so they have that same awkward silence. I guess the idea of that is so you can hear the sound of the model running her hand up and down her nylons or twanging her suspender belt.
The navigation is the same as at other “Only” sites, a choice of browsing photos or videos by year and month listing or an alphabetical model index. Under “My LN” you can set your browsing preferences like default photo size, number of thumbnails per page etc as well as managing your favourites. There’s also an extensive search engine with several filters which will be great when the site gets a lot larger but for now it’s hardly needed since the site is still quite small, in fact it only took me 3 or 4 days to download and view everything I wanted here. Overall I enjoyed the high quality content in this unusual niche but I feel the site needs some more growth to make it worth the regular price.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Large amount of content
-Attractive models
-Fairly wide variety of video styles
-fairly easy to bulk download
-Uses CCBill so it's trustworthy.
-Frequent updates when considering it a consolidated site.
There are a wide variety of sites ranging from pantyhose to shemale to gay to mature. Pretty much something for everyone.
Cons:
-Way too many fake cumshots- at least 50% based on a pretty large sample I downloaded. This is always a problem with Russian/Eastern Block videos but it seems more common on Ferro sites. The fake shots annoy me more than if they simply didn't have one at all. After watching quite a few videos you begin to detect when they use a male actor for multiple videos in a one day shooting schedule.
-cost is a bit high for the full package but the content makes it more reasonable.
-I hate the random username/password. I can understand the security issue but it's a pain to keep typing in at various points. Eventually all 50 sites have the password saved. God help me if my browser loses them...
Some of the individual sites aren't updated very often and it's not easy to tell which are/are not before you pay for access. Some of them also have very few, if any, videos- just photos. www.foot-orgies.com is an example of that.
Bottom Line:
Overall it's worth the price for the first month at least. I don't know if I would continue multiple months once I've downloaded the material I'm interested in. I may sign up once every year or two and get new material.
If you use Free Download Manager turn off the connection attempt limits and uncheck the "stop on error" boxes on the Misc. screen. Once I did that the bulk downloads worked fine. You will still have to right click each video though to get it started.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Choice of billing by CCBill or Epoch
Reduced price $20 cross sale to Only Tease offered through CCBill which I was happy to take advantage of. (Not pre-checked)
A stunning collection of well known top tier models
A paradise for stocking lovers.
A new photo set or video added 7 days a week. (Every 3rd or 4th update is a video)
Photos in 3 sizes, Standard (711 x 1066), Extra Large (1365 x 2048) and Ultra Large (2000 x 3000)
Zips available in each of the sizes
Videos downloadable in 1280 x 720 wmv, 640 x 360 wmv and an ipod version. Streaming also available in HD and standard resolutions
The above stated resolutions apply since the site started so there is no drop off in quality as you go back through the archives.
Easy navigation with customizable browse options and an excellent search facility.
All file sizes and run times listed
User comments and ratings for model and lingerie
Cons:
Regional pricing
No model info or bio, a name is all you get, not even an age or country which is the bare minimum I like to know.
Some may find the site too softcore
Awful file naming, just seems like random numbers and letters.
Too much air brushing of photos but hopefully this will change in the future as webmaster appears responsive to customer’s wishes.
I’m afraid this photo lover found the videos here mind numbingly boring.
Few fully clothed sets. I appreciate the theme is lingerie but it would be nice to see more fully clothed sets before they strip down to the lingerie.
“Lingerie” doesn’t always mean bras and panties here. Too many sets start with the model already topless or bottomless or both, wearing only stockings and suspenders
Bottom Line:
Art-Lingerie provides an impressive collection of 122 models in a collection of softcore mostly solo photos and videos with the main theme being lingerie with a particular emphasis on stockings. In fact I would go as far as to say every single update involves the model wearing stockings. The site is very softcore and features nudity but doesn’t go as far as spreading or masturbation. When I say “nudity” what I mean is that the models show boobs and pussy but they are never totally naked because the stockings never come off.. The site has been online since May 2009 and with daily updates has already grown in to a decent sized collection with 732 photo sets (58,000+ pics) and 256 videos to date.
Although as I mentioned in the cons they provide zero information about the models I think most regular subscribers to softcore glamour sites will instantly recognise many of the models here. I found many of my favourites here from the US (Celeste Star, Carli Banks, Faye Reagan, Georgia Jones, Shay Laren) and Europe (Ariel, Cikita, Eufrat, Jenni P) as well as some of the popular British models from Only Tease such as Bryoni-Kate, Carla and Hayley-Marie.
The navigation makes it really easy to get around the site and download the content. Browsing via the model index will display all of a model’s photo shoots and videos on one page and what I like is that all the download links for zips and videos are right there on the page, all you have to do is scroll down and click, click, click to grab all the zips, no need to mess around opening every single gallery. If only every site made downloading content this simple. If you are more selective about what you download you also have an excellent search engine allowing you to search not only by model’s hair colour or breast size but even down to the style and colour of the stockings she is wearing.
With regards to the photos I won’t go on about the photo-shopping too much here as plenty has already been said on that subject in previous reviews and comments on this site. Although my preference is for natural looking photos I’m probably more tolerant of the airbrushed look than messmer and didn’t really let it spoil my enjoyment of the models and lingerie too much. In fact I quite liked some of the sets where it looked like they filtered out some of the colour to give them an almost retro look. My main complaints would be too few fully clothed sets and possibly too many that start wearing nothing but stockings. As the theme is lingerie I also think it might be nice to see some photo sets where the model starts naked and then dresses up in her lingerie and stockings which is something I enjoyed seeing at Petites Parisiennes.
The HD videos here are excellent quality and even the lower res 640 x 360 ones I checked out had an average bit rate of 6-8000 kbps so looked fairly decent even when on full screen. Unfortunately as my preference is for photos I found it difficult to appreciate the videos here and the ones I have watched so far nearly sent me to sleep. The videos I’ve watched pretty much all take the same format, you have a model dressed in lingerie, sometimes only stockings and suspenders, the model doesn’t speak, there’s no background music, the only noises you here are the sounds of the sofa or bed creaking as the model moves around on it or the sound of her heels on the wooden floor as she’s walking around. It almost seems like an awkward silence in my opinion. I know a lot of people don’t like background music in their videos but for me if the model is not going talk or interact in any way then some music would help create a better atmosphere. And of course there’s no sexual action to get excited about either. The model will just sit or lay there caressing her hands up and down her stockings and over her breasts, she might remove her shoes, then perhaps her bra or panties if she’s wearing any to start with, you might get the odd close up shot of a pussy and her hand glancing lightly over the top but nothing even close to a masturbation scene. Videos usually range from 5 to 10 minutes in length.
Overall I enjoyed the site and would recommend it for fans of softcore glamour and stocking lovers as long as you can tolerate the photo-shopping.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
This site has maintained its emphasis on beauty since my last review. Not one bad looking model to be found.
Videos can be downloaded at 720p and lower. 720p would be my preferred size as the picture is good (albeit not as crisp as I would like it) and the file size is relatively small.
Picture sizes available in three resolutions. This review will have to be a one pointer because I have not downloaded one single set so far, therefore I cannot quote any picture dimensions.
Downloads have been at my top speed.
Daily updates. Usually two - three picture sets in a row, then a video.
If you are near the end of your subscription it might be worth your while to look at the coming updates because you can get five freebies (fast tracks) of material that has not yet been published, A very nice and generous touch.
Very nice, user friendly, lay out. Models and outfits can be rated, comments are possible and are not censored, to my knowledge.
Cons:
It could be such a terrific site if only they put away the air brush, body make-up and photoshop for good and went with natural! For an ultra high resolution fan this can be so aggravating. I look at the models' faces and bodies, and all the small imperfections that make them the persons they are have been carefully removed until they look like someone from Madame Tussauds' Wax Museum. One can admire them but they are not erotic.
Bottom Line:
Because the choice of lingerie sites is so limited I subscribe to Art-Lingerie now and then. I am limiting myself to the download of videos to escape the "improvements" in the picture sets, even though I am a collector of both.
To those who like the Only Tease, Only Satin etc. sites (and their picture sets) this site is highly recommended. You will find some more of the same, except there's more nudity here, but with none of the raunchiness found on other, similar sites. You will also find the same, user friendly home page and search engine as in the "Only ... " sites.
To the 58% who, like me, are craving something more crisp, more natural in their picture sets and more natural coloring (a bit too warm for my taste) in their videos, I would recommend waiting for a while before subscribing, just to see if the webmaster will give serious consideration to their preferences.
Until the unnatural softness and coloration of the pictures is fixed I can give this site no more than a 75.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
06-18-1202:56pm (Update History) Reason: After a brief mental struggle I upgraded this site from 82 to 89. It should be rewarded for being different in a conformist world!
Pros:
Beautiful British Ladies in alluring retro lingerie and doing a lot of erotic talking. Nice!!
Improved search since my last review.
Excellent streaming is available for those who like to preview a scene or watch it on line.
Updates appear to be steady with one update every 5 – 8 days, containing one picture set, plus screenshots and video of a given model).
Picture sets are available in High Resolution up to 2390x1600.
Videos are available in 720p HD wmv. Lesser sizes and resolutions also available.
Still a very basic outlay since my last review. No model bios, no member forum, pictures are designated as “small” “middle” and “regular” (leaving one guessing as to their dimension until a set is downloaded and studied.) The individual sets are marked “pictures.zip” and nothing within the zip gives any indication of who the model is. So make sure you memorize a model's name before you download and then rename the zip.
Medium watermark on pictures (upper left of the photo.) It is not too intrusive except that I prefer my watermarks (if I have to put up with them) at the bottom right where they are less visible to most.
The tour promises 1920x1080p HD videos but I haven't come across one yet. BTW, I wish the lay-out of the member's page were as clear as that of the tour.
Navigation within the site is awkward with each bonus site requiring a separate sign-in. I am using Firefox to save my user names and passwords between visits to a site, so this was only a problem first time around
Bottom Line:
Okay, here it is: I have looked at many sites over the past few years and being a lingerie lover have not found any that would suit me better than this one. The ladies are great, the talk is great, the retro lingerie is great and taking this into account I was prepared to return to this site over and over but there is one big con for me:
Strangely enough I didn't notice last time around or maybe the handful of videos I have looked at are no indication of how things are but all the videos I have looked at during the past three days were way too softly focused for my taste despite the fact that they are shot in 720p HD.
I have been to many other sites in the meantime where the picture in full screen was crystal clear and crisp even at the lower end of HD (720p).
Some members might actually prefer a slightly diffuse picture, so might the webmaster, but my taste runs to “crystal-clear” where every pore can be counted so, until that changes, I am afraid that, once again, I will have to resume my search for the perfect lingerie site.
This one is good, make no mistake about it, you have a choice of 567 picture sets (54410 pictures), 407 videos and 155 beautiful mature models (25 – 40?) at the moment, but it could be much better with sharper videos, renamed picture sets, and an easier way of getting around within the site.
Recommended to all vintage lingerie lovers despite the personal drawbacks I listed.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No DRM.
-Content is dated.
-Because it's a small site, easy to navigate.
-The nylons the girls wear add dash of color to their costumes.
-Member pages are relatively ad free.
-Can watch videos streaming or download.
-Download speeds are good. I regularly get 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
-Zip files for the photosets.
-Has a link to "free" live cam shows. But these are mainly a waste of time.
Cons:
-Small site. Only 25 videos.
-No regular updates. Last update was 2012-04-05. So it's more like a small archive site.
-Needs more stunt cocks. Only 3 or 4 stunt cocks featured.
-Videos can be streamed, but only one definition: no choice of high, medium or low quality.
-Videos can be downloaded, in high or medium quality. No low quality option. Also, judging from the file size of the download videos, the
quality of the "high quality" files is really more like a medium quality video at other sites. And the file size of the "medium quality" videos is more like a low quality video at other sites.
For example, a video with a run time of 15 minutes has a high quality file size of 558 MB. And the medium quality file size is 170 MB.
-Only one file size for the photos. And since the photosets are a record of the video shoot, the photos themselves have little artistic or erotic
value. But if all you want is photos of naked girls, the pics will do the job.
Bottom Line:
CONS (continued):
-Photos have a medium-sized watermark on lower right side.
-No biograhical data on the models except for age. But the age given is not tied to any date or video the model appears in.
BOTTOM LINE:
-Theme is girls wearing nylons having sex.
-Small site catering to people with a fetish for nylons.
There is the normal variety of sex shown: masturbation, boy-girl vaginal and anal sex, blowjobs.
Site stats:
Videos: 25
Photosets: 25
The photosets are a record of the video shoot.
Most of the sites in the Teen Mega World network are integrated. So can search for a single model, and the results will include her appearances at all the network sites. Can also search by top rated scenes, your personal favorite scenes, type of sex scene (lesbian, anal, group, squirting, toys, etc.).
Join through the Teen Mega World site for $19.95/month, with the PU discount, which gives access to the NylonsX site.
Joining directly through the NylonsX site costs $29.95/month, and does not give you anything more than the Teen Mega World membership.
-Most valuable feature is that access to this site is included with a Teen Mega World membership. Teen Mega World, with a PU discount of 19.95/month, recurring, offers a huge network of hardcore teen videos. Many of the videos are good quality, and the network has hundreds of Eastern European teen models, many of which are very attractive.
Giving this site a score of 83. Site deserves that score because it's part of the Teen Mega World network. If the site was a standalone site, the score would be much lower, maybe 70 or less.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
So many videos, so many sites. Yes some of them get cross listed, but for the most part they are providing a lot of specific niche material. I actually think they have a pretty smart business model, charge big up front, because lets face it people are going to rip the sites in a month or so, then lessen the fees as time goes by. It's a pretty smart thing to do. Anyone balking at the price might consider this.
Basically you get a shit ton of nylon sites, which are actually really good sites even if you aren't into the fetish. They have a lot of femdom strapon stuff, some mature stuff, bisexual, and more. The newer vids are pretty good in terms of quality. There's still very little HD at this site because they just started adding some HD stuff. I know that is a peeve for some people. However, the fetish stuff their offering is pretty unique, and sometimes it has to be more about the content than the quality. Most of the models are pretty hot too.
Cons:
There is no BDSM or Cuckold stuff here for some reason. The BDSM I get, but seems like cuckold sites would be right up their alley, or his....;)
Older vids are pretty damn old. Low quality for the low bandwidth days. They get progressively better though.
Very little search and navigation capability.
Like the others have said, you have to manually log in to each site. The problem is you have to do it with a very cryptic username and password they assign to you. That's why everyone is complaining. They're too hard to remember. Type it into a doc and just cut and paste with your browser set to remember the passwords.
Bottom Line:
Yes, it's expensive. Yes, it's worth it. Let's be clear. This is a softer domination site, so if you're looking for extreme hardcore BDSM and femdom, not a good choice for you. If you are looking for nylon fetish, feminization, humiliation, men getting ass fucked by men and women, women getting as fucked by men and women,tranny sex, mature sex, masturbation, gay and bisexual sex, then this is a damn good choice.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Models on the average are easy on the eye. Not porn star quality but not ugly either.
Site updates videos once every eight days. Not great but mentioned under the pros because other Ferro Sites are so much worse when it comes to updating.
Picture sets appear to update every two days.
Videos since 2009 (I counted 114) have been shot in HD at 1280x720p in wmv at a total bitrate of 3320kbps. Videos before that are at 640x480p.
Picture sets can be downloaded zipped, with the individual picture weighing in around 1000x1500px.
Cons:
Separate sign-ins required for pictures and videos, because the username and password are generated by Ferro and therefore very convoluted, it is an impossibly aggravating extra task to have to sign in twice to every site you receive as a bonus that also contains pictures.
The huge watermarks in the bottom right hand corner as well as in the left top corner I've remarked upon in previous previews of other Ferro sites, are present here, too, and manage greatly to add to the aggravation factor. I almost didn't bother adding this site because while the technical quality of the videos isn't too bad, they are not worth looking at with that intrusive logo staring you in the face all through the video.
Picture sets are small and not very erotic.
Download and streaming are highly erratic. My downloads started at around 1MB/s, gradually reduced to 200K/s, and then see-sawed back and forth between those two values.
No proper search engine, no model directory or bio.
Bottom Line:
This is a site I was prepared to love. After all, who, over fifty, does not like to see models dressed in nylons and garter belt?
And you get plenty of that in this site. For once pantyhose was not substituted in someone's mind for stockings and they stick to the old definition when it comes to nylons.
One idiosyncrasy of this site, or maybe two:
Most models start out naked and then get slowly dressed, rather than the other way around, also very few of them wear panties but walk around commando style under their lovely dresses instead.
This anachronism is jarring to an old-timer because nylons and garter belts belong to an era where no woman would have thought to get dressed without panties and slip.
Both picture sets and videos lack imagination, with the models looking stiff and uninvolved. Of course, it doesn't help that the videos are in a foreign language (Russian? Hungarian? Czech?) so you miss out on the context of the video as well.
Let me sum things up in a highly subjective way (in other words don't take every negative thing I have to say as the Gospel truth):
A. I wouldn't bother with the pictures. The quality is too uneven and the sets are too small. Plus the logo, even if it has been reduced to one only, is still too intrusive.
B. I wouldn't bother with the videos because they lack erotic heat as well as the tease factor, and on top of that they are being ruined by watermarks that are meant to protect their copyright but manage instead to aggravate purists like me who like to look at a clean picture with no, or at most, with a discrete logo.
The separate sign-in for the various sites is just plain dumb. Especially if a distinction is being made between pictures and videos requiring authorization by both.
If I judged this site, or any other Ferro site I got during this past month, for myself I wouldn't give any of them more than a 69 because I look and then throw away ... see humongous watermarks.
However because of their relatively good rate of update, plus the basically decent TECHNICAL quality of the videos, plus the fact that one monthly subscription will give you four sites eventually, I will give it a 79. Of the four Ferro sites I reviewed during the past month this site, despite its flaws, is the best.
BTW, the site is softcore with some toy play thrown in. A plus for me (the softcore part), might be a minus for others.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Good quality pictures for leg and nylon fans with a girl next door appeal.
Seems to be updated regularly.
Cons:
Video content is boring.
No zip-file content.
Bottom Line:
I gave this site 50 which is poor but this is not the site's fault, the content quality deserves a higher rating. The real reason I have submitted this review is that I have been left highly displeased at the problems with access to the website therefore please take the following as a warning. I joined the mysexylegs.net around a week ago. I was happy with the content however for reason's unknown, my access to both the site and it's billing partner MSL Enterprises ceased entirely, and I was left with a screen message that stated "internet explorer cannot display webpage". After emailing MSL with this, I was told that this issue was probably my web browser. I tried a different browser to no avail. After contacting MSL Enterprises I was eventually advised that the firewall had been activated possibly by too many log in attempts. I am in the habit of saving my automatic log ins as I go, so I don't know how this happened. MSL Enterprises swiftly resolved the firewall issue however I was unable to access the actual members area beyond the homepage with either the new or the old passwords. Again I contacted MSL Enterprises and again I was advised that the issue was probably PC / web browser related and there was nothing more they could do. I asked about a partial refund and this was refused with the same advice about changing my web browser or PC. About this MSL Enterprises were adamant as they advised me that they had been able to log in with my user-name / password on three different devices with no trouble. I would advise anyone therefore to avoid mysexylegs.net simply because you might not be given the full month's subscription period you have paid for. You take your chances...Shame as the site itself was quite good.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+Exclusive content
+Large collection of photos and videos
+Quite a few "name" models who appear elsewhere
+Fast download speeds (1-1.5 Mbps)
+Zips of photos at 3000 pixels from 2008 to present
+Some zips of photos at 1500 pixels (earlier)
+Videos in wmv HD (1280x720), wmv standard (640x360), and MP4 (more recent); wmv standard for earlier; many videos stream also
+166 "hi def" videos are hardcore b/g or g/g videos; but there are lots more of interviews and solo footsie fun
+Allows use of download manager
+Foot fiend navigation niches: find only the stuff for dangling shoes, or tickling, or food, or another of many choices.
Cons:
-Navigation is too complicated; well, the site is too complicated, really
-Inconsistencies in video formats available even in the same part of the site history
-Quality of wmv "standard" videos not so good
-Photos in 1500 pixels not in zip files once they began offering "full scene" zips in Jan 2008
-They don't make it clear that the "full scene zipped photo sets" usually contain ALL of the photos of a model, even the ones that are shown in earlier sets such as "Meet" and "Living" and "Self-Sucking" and so on.
Bottom Line:
I'm not much of a foot fan, but overall I liked the content of this site. In fact, my hunt for nice pictures of girls showing their asses was my "sole" (a-hem) purpose in joining.
The photos from 2008 on are nice quality, if not super professional. There are plenty of hot models (Veronica Rodriquez, Ashley Jane, Jynx Maze, Marlena, Sammi Rhodes, Elle Alexandra, Emma Mae, Georgia Jones, Nikki Brookes, etc.). And it's all exclusive material, and it goes all the way back to 2004. (Wow, the quality sure has improved since then!)
You can also watch interview videos of the girls telling you about their sexual experiences and turn-ons. Beyond that, well, you can watch a lot of them getting down to gentle foot-and-pussy play with another girl, and/or foot/pussy fucking with a hardened male.
But there are problems with consistency in the offerings and with how things are presented. You can get hi def versions of many videos, but not all. You can get zips of some sizes of photos, but not all. You see the thumbs of only the hardcore photos, but actually the zip file has hundreds of photos that include the softcore and solo foot stuff of a model. You click the "Hi Def" movies link, but that's not all of the hi def movies. And the foot niches drop-down menu appears on some pages, but not on all of the pages you'd like it to. You may find yourself opening multiple tabs or windows just to keep part of the navigation at hand, which means that you're having to compensate for less-than-stellar web design. And in so doing, you'll wind up making the experience of the site more complicated.
About the complexity of the site, some may say that it just has a lot of navigation options, which can only be a good thing. After all, you can look at content that's only "Kick Ass Feet," or only "Flowers Exclusive," or only "Mark Archer Exclusive," or only "Barefoot Confidential." But do these terms mean anything to you? The term "exclusive" got me thinking they were different from what I was seeing on the page until I realized (by looking at the bottom of the page) that each entry is color-coded for these terms. Oh, well, now that's nice. Flowers is blue; Mark Archer is green; Kick Ass is pink; and Barefoot is purple. Well, I don't have to learn the color system, but I have wasted my time by wondering if I should.
Plus, there are 16 bonus sites included, but each one contains only 8 galleries and/or videos. Some are only videos ... And some are really old stuff (but not all). And you're given an offer in the bonus sites to join the "Kick Ass Network" for only $14.95. The "Kick Ass" bonus section includes that offer as well. So there's "Kick Ass" bonus and "Kick Ass" network and they're probably not the same thing. You know what? Fuck it.
I mean, I've already spent $30.
Anyway, I do recommend this site for its abundant quality exclusive content, but be forewarned that if you're not careful, the design and complexity could lead you to needless distraction.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Excellent quality photosets available in multiple download formats (standard, extra large, ultra large photos size).
- Very good quality videos available in multiple download formats (HD and High Resolution) as full length movies.
- ZIP downloads.
- Cool website design.
- Pretty easy navigation.
- Daily updates.
- Fast downloading.
- Large variety of models.
Cons:
- Needs Fast/Permanent Tracks for full access to some photosets/videos.
- Old photosets and videos quality is average (Standard and High resolution size).
- No bonus content.
- Expensive.
- No trial option.
Bottom Line:
I have to admit that this sites monthly membership is kinda expensive but I really think that it worths its money. The only problem that I found is that with your membership you don't have access to all photos/videos of their models as some photosets/videos need fasttracks or permanent tracks to be unlocked for view or download. With your membership you get 10 fasttracks per site and if you spent them you can buy 10 permanent tracks for 10 USD. So far from what I saw the hottest models galleries and videos can be seen or downloaded by spending fasttracks or permanent tracks and that's a big con for the site. Photosets and videos quality are great except from some old ones which have standard quality. ZIP downloads are available and videos can be downloaded as full movies. I feel that some bonus content would be cool and a trial option membership is necessary.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Approx 150 video sets and 200 photo sets
+ All exclusive content
+ Zip downloads for photos
+ No DRM, no download limits
+ On the whole video quality is great, the first 100 videos are only 640x480 but look good. The last 50 are HD 720P but dont look as crisp as they should (see con)
+ Download managers supported and should be used to get good speeds (~300kbps without, ~1mbps with)
+ Latest image sets are 1500x1000 and look nice. Older sets are 1024x768 and are average
+ ~75 photos per set all focusing on anal action with pantyhose
+ Great looking Russians, some famous faces but are hard to spot due to the very unique and natural style of clothing, sets and makeup.
Cons:
- Short scenes ~15 min long each
- Large watermarks. Worse on the older 640x480 clips
- HD videos use too low a bitrate (3mbps) resulting in noticeable artifacts and graininess.
- No choice of download formats, just one full clip in wmv for each scene
- No streaming
- Photo sets are separate from the video even if they are shot at same time and obviously the same scene
- Some videos waste a lot of bandwidth on unnecessarily high bitrate audio at 320kbps.
- The site has a update log but not all content is listed. On the video and picture update pages the content is not dated making it hard to see how often the site is updated
- Very basic interface. No search, no model index, no scene description, only a single scene thumbnail, no streaming. Basically no real way to see what you get before downloading the video.
Bottom Line:
Here we have another classic example of a group of people that know how to choose the models, how to dress a set, direct the action, get the best angles, choose sexy clothing and makeup etc but have no idea how to wrap a usable website around it. I am not a massive fan of the analogy but I do feel a couple are apt when summing up this type of site which, unfortunately, I tend to see a awful lot. Would you set up shop selling a Bugatti Veyron other super cars in a dealership that looks like it used to be a McDonalds? Or design the packaging of a new all singing, all dancing smart phone to resemble a tin of Tesco value beans? In a market that is overflowing with porn it is hard to choose to stay a member of a website that makes it hard to consume its, admittedly good, content. Given a single (tiny) thumbnail and the generic model names, I have no way of knowing if I like the model or scene setup without downloading the whole scene. And when I do find a model I like I have no way of searching for more of her scenes.
Bottom line: Plenty of sites polish turds. This site wraps a diamond in a natural unpolished turd. I wouldn't mind the diamond but I am not too keen on getting my hands dirty in order to get it.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
For those who like to boil before they burn, there is no doubt this is the best site for leg/hose/stocking fetishists on the entire WWW.
Quantity and variety are excellent. The models are beautiful. Pic resolution is fantastic.
Cons:
A general sameness about all image sets despite the variety of models and outfits
Videos are generally a snooze. One model (a really pretty one named Nicole) actually says something along the lines of "Let's get this over with" in one of her vids; the boredom shows. Models could actually heighten the excitement of the whole thing by talking to the viewer (esp fetish talk).
Most notably: While conceding that OAS reliably serves the majority of men who prefer buxom/voluptuous models, there are precious few models for those of us who prefer the slender-but-shapely supermodel or petite types.
Needs more foot dipping, shoe-dangling, crossed legs shots. Lot of us leg fetishist prize those shots, guys.
Bottom Line:
If you go in for a real leg tease that starts subtly and works its way to a boil, there is no better site.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Now offering HD videos
Large collection of archive galleries and videos
Content is exclusive to the site
Jessica is thoughtful and passionate about lingerie
Sticks to lingerie/stocking/vintage fetish
Can email her direct and make requests
Cons:
No longer adding new galleries (HD videos only now)
Wont be updated frequently enough for some people
No hardcore, purely softcore/tease
Videos are quite short
Images are not high-res
Bottom Line:
This site is for people into lingerie and stockings, it is very tame softcore tease only with some nudity, topless mainly.
The 85 score is based on a 'best in class' minus some points for the length of the videos and old school site design/layout.
I've tried to find other sites that that covers vintage lingerie, girdles and shapewear, robes, gloves, bra/panty fetish etc and so far not found one.
Also a site that is pretty well maintained by the model herself, who will reply to emails and even do requests.
The site itself is very basic, looks a bit 90s but navigation is simple enough and all image galleries have zip link at bottom of page. In fact each gallery has a running commentary which is fairly unique.
There are roughly 300 image sets in the gallery, all medium res (roughly 700x900 size). Jessica is no longer doing image sets and producing only HD videos now.
90% of the ~330 videos are 640x480 and mostly shot herself using tripod and some decent lighting. More recently she's been doing HD vids which are significantly better quality.
All videos are downloadable and in WMV format, there are screencaps and a detailed description for each.
Videos aren't that long, out of the 327 i have access to right now, most are less than 10 minutes. Strangely I never noticed this but actually that does seem quite short.
There is a daily cap of 7.5gb and an hourly limit of 3gb. If you are downloading the lot (~50gb) then you'll need about a week to get it, however, probably about 50 of of the vids are a 'bonus' which she doesn't link to on her site and releases every now and again, so you obv need to stay a member to get them all.
There are a couple of extra areas on the site, a section for stories which is something i've never really looked at and then an image gallery for slips and one for stockings. These are rarely/never updated and just good to pick up, there are about 40 image sets in each section.
So I can highly recommend this site to anyone with lingerie/stocking fetish, looking forward to any questions/comments.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
This is going to be a long review, but this site deserves it.
The Good:
1) The main Ferro Network site is massive, I mean stunningly massive. Fifty-four main sites and four bonus sites. Even if you aren't into a lot of the kinks they offer, you'll still be pressed to get through all the ones you are into!
2) Picture quality is outstanding. A lot of care went into resolution, camera position and final selection of photos that actually make it onto the site. The picture size is large but not those massive, bloated monsters that are a bit slower to download.
3) Movie quality is also excellent in hi-res. After downloading a movie, then opening it, I could enlarge it to full-screen on my 18" screen and not loose any resolution quality.A lot of care went onto filming as well insofar as set decoration.
4) LOTS of other good aspects, but I'm limited in character count here!
Cons:
The Bad:
1) Navigation stinks. No way to search by model, date of update, etc.
2) My biggest beef is thumbnail size for both pictures and movies. I actually downloaded one of the thumbnails and opened it in Photoshop to get an exact height and width: 47x70 respectively. Absolutely horrible. I do not know why Ferro Network makes the thumbs so small, but its annoying as hell.
3) Once you join Ferro Network with your username/password, you have to sign into each and every site in their network one at a time. Very frustrating and time consuming.
4) You have to download and install a small driver in order to watch the movie after download. Its annoying, but everything works fine once installed.
5) The four 'bonus sites' are total crap. Low res movies and pictures not worth even signing it to see. One of the bonus sites wouldn't even load.
Bottom Line:
Even with the cons, its hard to beat this network of sites. Yes, it costs $85, but the amount of content you have access to is astounding. Tens of thousands of movies and videos in high quality, high res format is pretty sweet.
The models are fresh and clean without belly button rings and giant fake tits, fake hair, fake fingernails, facelifts, asslifts and all that other bullshit that seems to reign here in the American porn market.
The models also seem to genuinely enjoy their work, which is also refreshing.
The average quality porn site costs about $30 a month, but for $85 you can join over fifty quality sites. Its well worth the investment. So nix the Starbucks Cappuccino for a couple weeks and you've saved enough money!
One tip to enjoying the Ferro Network: Once you join, go ahead and join all the sites you know you will be interested in right off the bat. Let IE or Firefox store the saved user/pass and THEN go back and explore the sites at your leisure. This will save you a lot of trouble later when you've got lube in your left hand! :-)
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Over 100 scenes most of them with image sets and videos (Movies come usually as WMV at 640x 480, but some have MPEG formats at smaller resolutions. Also some scenes are available as clips or 320x 240 resolution. Images were around 768px × 1,024px)
- A great variation in models (some Russian teens, some more mature models, a lot more Asian girls than similar networks so that was a nice surprise)
- The tour gives a good impression of the action inside the site, some lesbian (2-3 scenes) a little anal (more of the recent stuff has it, I'd say maybe 20 scenes overall) and mostly hardcore boy girl with focus on outfits/ stockings, including some footjobs and guys cumming on the girls feet. Overall a lot of variation (which is good and bad at the same time)
- Some hot models that really seem into it
- Full network access with a few more sites that are very similar.
- Download speeds were very good and I didn't have any trouble navigating the site. (No dead links, no sudden sign-outs)
Cons:
- The site updates randomly, the latest scene on 03/04/11 the one before on 12/12/10 (3 or 4 videos in December last year, with not much before then)
- The site is really not focused on images (some sets only have the girl stripping and none of them have a zipped folder download option)
- More and better quality video options would be nice (the camera work is not always the best (awkward angles and poor lighting really hurt many of the videos))
- The whole site feels like it has 3 very different types of content(I'll elaborate in the bottom line, but overall there is a kind of strange break between various scenes.)
- Navigation, while it works is not the best. No search options, no way to tell what happens in the scene, no model index. The site is basically a page that shows all the sets movies and pictures mixed together on one page. It's simple to the point where it's frustrating, especially when a photo set shows up but you have to hunt for the movie.
- Some sets are mislabeled
Bottom Line:
This has gotta be one of the strangest sites I have joined in a while. The members page is a black screen with thumbnails of the movies and the photos all together on one page, mixed with each other to the point where it's hard to understand what exactly you're getting (a few of the older sets are also mislabeled or several of the girls have the same name)
Basically I wanted to get the scene with Brigitte white from the preview tour. I click on the movie of the model called Brigitte only to realize that it's another model, of course the thumbnail was so unclear and they had no preview images so I only realized I had the wrong video after finishing the download. I go back only to realize there is no Brigitte movie... I think. Not sure since there is no way to search for a particular model or type of scene. Even worse, they have no zip archive... but they do have a slideshow option so there's that. But wait, a bunch of the photos are actually not hardcore action, just the girl getting undressed. Maybe I could stream the scene instead, alas no streaming available on this site. At least the downloads went incredibly fast, got a 400 mb scene in just a minute or so.
To make things even more confusing there seem to be 3 types of scenes on the site. The very first 20 or so scenes feature English speaking girls, dialogue (mostly stuff along the lines of: "Those are hot stockings, you make me hard, I am cumming now.") and a lot of focus on the stockings, cumming on the stockings and rubbing the penis on the stockings (These scenes are all named "ss_model name" and are very similar to what the preview tour promises, just see the trailers to get an idea of what these scenes look like).
The next bunch of videos named "was_model name" seem to be pretty generic hardcore Russian porn. No talking, no music, guy walks in and within 30 seconds the girl is blowing him. The models are also not as cute in my opinion, they look more generic Russian porn-like, and there is not nearly enough focus on stockings.
Finally the last kind of videos which only have the model name are little story scenes (girl dressed up as bride, girl dressed up as secretary, etc.) and have horrible, horrible music. I swear I have never heard such poor choices for porn music.
Scattered among those rather generic and boring types of scenes there are some real gems. I found one scene where the girl tries on several pairs of stockings in front of a guy before having sex, I also found a really good video with a bunch of behind the scenes type of directions and an adorable model in crotchless panties.
Sadly there is no easy way to tell which scene will be interesting/ different and which one will be a 15 minute close up of a girl's back in doggy style. Some scenes have the girl look straight at the camera as she puts on stockings or plays with herself, some are nothing but poor close-ups of genitalia. Overall a rather strange mash-up of scenes that feel like they belong on different sites.
Aside from the strange discrepancies in the content the site was overall average. Navigation was sub-par but the large network makes up for it ( check out like legs and secretary hoes since both have a bunch of stocking material). Download speeds were very fast, but the lack of more download options/ better quality videos brings the score back down. The models were okay, with no exceptionally ugly or beautiful girls standing out. Overall a nice mix of English and Russian girls (they are missing out on some really cute girls though, no Aspen, no Payton or Flick, no Amai Liu or Sasha Grey).
Another unhappy point is the technical quality of the videos. Sadly, I think none of the videos looked as good as the preview page made them appear. The lighting is not always optimal and sometimes the camera guy focuses on the wrong things (please no close up of a dude's face while he's jacking off.) also I think the three preview videos are a bit misleading since most of the content, especially more recent stuff is not really representative of those trailers (In my opinion)
That being said there are some nice gems hidden here and if you do join I recommend Whitney and Anne as their scenes were some of the more interesting ones. Also make sure to check out the rest of the network.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Unique, interesting themes
- Good, unusual photography style
- Wide variety of models, some well-known
- Good descriptions of videos
- Good value full trial available
Cons:
- Low res pics and videos
- Sparse updates
- Set names obscured & unhelpful zip names
- No tagging or categorisation
- Some sets too big
Bottom Line:
Yet another infuriating site!
I'll start with a couple of disclaimers. First, I'm not really a foot/leg fetishist as such; however I seem to have become a one by default since the genre (particularly legs) seems to cover eroticism, undressing, nylons and lingerie etc - in short, the whole picture - more than most porn. Second, I'm slightly biased since I'm familiar with the photographer, Ed Fox; I've just had his second book delivered and like his work in Leg Show magazine - which I get occasionally, one of the few printed magazines still worth a look with all the online porn around.
Anyway, at FF, you'll find a good selection of foot-oriented material; sets and videos cover various themes, such as:
- candids of eg girls getting dressed, putting on shoes;
- masturbation scenes, sometimes starting with the girl eg rubbing lotion onto her feet
- quite a few with sex toys
- some girl-girl scenes and a few b/g scenes
- scenarios, eg I liked a couple involving undressing/masturbating during phone calls
- behind the scenes
- some not explicit at all, purely focused on feet
- outdoor or other unusual locations
- plenty of dirty feet
Some themes I didn't like; smoking is common but has never worked for me, and some weirder S&M stuff, eg unseen strangers whose gloved hands abduct or molest girls. And many videos have music whereas I prefer without; however it tends to be ambient/electronic/experimental stuff which although sometimes offputting, is far preferable to the corny faux-sexy music we get so often.
It's worth noting that this is material that leans towards foot fetishism but doesn't focus solely (rimshot) on it - hardcore foot folk may find it strays a bit too much but it's a balance that works for me. And largely I really like the style; it's not as brightly lit as most porn so it may not appeal to some folk; but there is a documentary/voyeuristic style to it which is quite unique, and even the magazine type shoots have a starkness and realism that sets it apart from most glam. The light and shadows make it very erotic - but not at the expense of being too arty, which it's not, or too tame - although there's not much hardcore, there's plenty of explicit midcore.
And there are a great selection of models featured. Some I'm familiar with from the pinup/fetish genre, eg Angela Ryan, Emily Marilyn, Dita von Teese; some porn stars, such as Aria Giovanni, Ryan Keely, Jelena Jensen; and plenty of pretty amateurs that perhaps only appear here.
Roughly 570 photo sets and 230 videos going back to 2004; maybe 150 models. Photo sets are split between 'photos' and 'features' - I think the former are meant to be more candids, and the latter more glamorous, magazine shoots and the like - but it's a vague distinction and there seems to be quite an overlap. Updates are quite sparse at 1-4 per month; but this is clearly stated on the tour so I don't have a problem with that.
Site navigation is fairly standard; a general updates list, photos/videos lists in date order, a model index. Given the number of themes involved it would be nice to have some kind of tagging, but sadly there is none. The layout of the site means that the names of photo sets are obscured which is annoying, especially as zips do not have meaningful names; but at least zips are there and easily accessible. I found some sets too large, maybe > 200 pictures, and really could have been edited; more is not necessarily better. Videos are mostly WMV, some QT, and whereas there's no info about photo sets, most videos have a long and explicit description, particularly discussing the feet - Mr Fox is quite a fetishist.
The biggest issue, though, is the resolution; all pictures sets are just 1024x768 (or less on the shorter side). I'm really not a resolution fiend and don't expect the somewhat daft 80 megapixel sets that Hegre Art is now offering; but Ed Fox is a well-known published photographer and it baffles me that he can't/doesn't/won't muster more than even 1 megapixel. I'd at least like to look at them full-screen and 1024x768 is well under half the size of mine - at least 2000px would be far more appropriate.
Similarly, videos are fairly low; many are DVD size, but older ones seem to be about 450x300 px - although for me a video survives upscaling a bit more than a photo so I don't mind quite so much. But still, a bit of HD would be appreciated and hardly technically challenging to produce now.
As some others have pointed out, once you go to leave the site you get offered a link to a $3/3 day trial; I took this and felt a bit guilty since I did get some good content. But I'd really need a month to comfortably go through everything - I like the material so much that it's only the resolution issue that preventing me from buying a full subscription. And similarly that's what prevents me scoring this higher; even with all the other cons I would happily give this 90+ - but it's still good size archive of great material and hopefully 80 reflects this.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
excellent quality of pics and videos..
beautiful russian models..
very hot and amazing scene each time..
between 6 and 10 movies and photo-sets every days..
(For that..the price of membership is justified)
Cons:
no models directory...
Bottom Line:
if you are amateur of russian porn..this sites are for you..
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Good quality pics and videos.
- Nice sized pic and vid galleries.
- Nice stocking foot pics.
- A lot of footjob and b/j videos and pictorals
Cons:
- Annoying music in all of the videos. Audio is almost always muted in favor of it.
- Lily is thin, but wears stockings much to big for her. While stocking wrinkles are sexy, the ones she puts on almost seem to droop off of her legs.
- Videos seem to drag on most of the time and the aformentioned music makes it worse.
Bottom Line:
Lily has an average stocking/pantyhose/feet site going on. She runs the gamet from tease to hand/footjobs to hardcore sex. Unfortunately, all the videos on the site play music that is meant to be sensual, but ends up being annoying because the audio of the actual scene is almost always muted. So you can't hear the nylons shusshing, voices, or moans. And even when you can hear them, the music is so distracting that you can't enjoy them. Finally, she should check if the stockings she wants actually fit before buying them as many times they are unforgivingly loose around her legs.
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Great stocking and pantyhose pics of various styles, colors, and consistencies.
- Hardcore stocking sex videos and pictures.
- Very personable attitude on camera.
- The price is right.
Cons:
- Slow to update. Was the reason why I quit.
- Needs a cameraman instead of her husband(?) holding the camera for POV or in a fixed position for shots that are too tight.
- Julie seems to be "hands off" with the site. No replies to emails.
Bottom Line:
Julie is a very hot mature stocking sex amateur who shows what she's got and gives exactly what she promises you. Her site has a lot of potential, but she needs to update more and get some more camera angles going. She probably won't hit the level of Lady Sonia, but if stockings and stocking sex is your thing then this is a great site for the money.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Great pair of legs
- Nice quality shots
- Many nice quality videos at no additional charge
Cons:
- Misleading banners and promotional pictures (namely on the OfficeGirl.net site) with hardcore b/g content. As of 7/29/11 there are no sets or videos with hardcore b/g. It never truly gets dirtier than the occasional pussy shot and dildo play...and the dildo isn't used for insertion 9 times out of 10.
- The pics you'd get as a member only serve as an extension of the free pics you can get from the promotional sites as they are nearly all tease pics. This would be okay if the site were promoted as a tease site, but is promoted as a nylon sex site.
- Pic galleries are non-DL manager friendly. If you want the pics, you have to right-click and d/l each one individually.
- Has a saucy Scots accent, but only speaks in exactly one of her videos out of about a couple dozen.
- Has a nasty and disinterested look on her face in many of her videos.
- Bad communication.
Bottom Line:
Natasha has a lot of potential as a leggy MILF that knows her assets. However, her site relies on bait and switch tactics to rope you in by showing her in hardcore orientations such as b/g and b/g interracial sex, but the actual content is softcore teasing and is on par with what you would see from a softcore leg tease site like Akira Lane's or Sandy's Nylons, but pretends to be at the level of the Michelle's Nylons site. And like I mentioned above, this would be fine if the promotion of the site reflected it. The hardcore pics shown in the free area of the site don't even exist in the members area. If you ask about the pictures, you are ignored or given a nasty reply.
So I will tell you what she doesn't want to tell you - THIS IS A SOFTCORE TEASE SITE! If you see the banners of her doing reverse cowgirl...don't believe it. If you read the sample pictorals promising cumshot endings...don't believe it. If you see a sample pic set looking like she's about to plunge a dildo inside her...don't believe it. She does not cater to the hardcore nylon sex enthusiast as she claims. Save your $22 for someone with just as saucy legs but delivers on what they promise.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-One of the longest going sites in the DDF Prod network if not the longest one. The earliest scenes are dated January 2001 which is quite historic when it comes to internet porn
-Number of scenes going at nearly 2000 with your standard DDF Prod caveats of possible cross site content. However this site with it's clear niche is less likely to have content shared between sites and one can almost guarantee any footjob scenes are site exclusive
-Very strong approach on the subject again. Scenes may be solo, lesbian or hardcore but legs and feet are always in the focus of the action
-DDF understands that there should be multiple women in the same scene with a man. This is what 21Sextury.com could learn from
-Everything related to production and technical side is fine. Quality of photos, videos and sets in general is very high. Site works well with multiple download options, tagged searching is great too. Downloads are generally very fast and I repeatedly max out my bandwidth
Cons:
-Recycling. With this network it's hard to tell if material is new or old as scenes of all ages are added regularly and it's not uncommon to see a previously removed scene added again
-This is subjective but personally I'm not that much into feet and when it comes to legs, it's good enough that they look good. This site has many scenes where the only female part getting much action are the feet and they are nothing for me. However fans of the niche will 100% disagree
-Casting scenes that are of lower quality and not very interesting
Bottom Line:
Feet, legs, socks, pantyhose, stockings and some shoes and boots are the focus here. The rest varies as much as on all the DDF sites from solo girls to group hardcore action. This site has been going for a very long time and if the oldest scenes all the way from the early 2001 aren't worth much in their 320x240 video format, at least they have decent photosets with many legendary stars. Actually the very oldest ones have only photosets with the video starting few months later.
Even if one is not into the feet and legs in particular, this site offers lots of videos with enough normal sex to entertain non niche people. Due to the specific foot focus in those scenes too, they are more often site exclusive too and not found on other DDF Prod sites as often as ones on some other sites. DDF also does one thing right if one compares with the "main competitor" 21sextury.com, there are usually more women than men in the hardcore scenes. Of course there's lots of solo scenes too and many that feature maybe only short blowjob in addition to footjob so if those are your thing, you might like this site even more while for me they are just filler.
Quality of photography and video in newer scenes shines here too. The ones available in 1080p are generally very good but as they are updating also with older (sometimes recycled) material, you will see 720p too which is perhaps a bit smudgier than the new content but still nice. Photos are the subjective best in the business and available in three sizes in zips although I cannot see anyone really downloading anything but large size ones these days. The large photosets in zips are usually from few dozen to maybe fifty megabytes so no 600Mb monster zips here.
The talent is nothing new to the ones familiar with DDF and the other European sites. The names may vary from site to site but the girls are the same big Euro names of today and past years with some Americans thrown in between. In case anyone is interested, yes the guys are the same handful you have learned to tolerate on every site and film over past few decades ;)
Technical side is in good order and exactly the same as on the other network sites. After they did away with the individual site designs and interfaces, everything has been clearer and very easy to search. It's also easier to check if the content is duplicate or a re-edit of some other scene from another site. Downloads speeds are not maybe the most consistent I've experienced but generally fast enough to max out the fastest connections with a DL manager.
This site is another cornerstone of the DDF Prod network. Despite the topic, it has much to offer to users more interested in just plain action but also many 100% topic focused scenes.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ unique amateur MILF content
+ weekly updates
+ mostly good picture quality (even for the oldest sets)
+ no download limit, no DRM but clumsy navigation
+ fast server with very good download speed (about 2.5 MB/s)
Cons:
- older picture series may only contain about 50 pics and have 1024 pixels on the long side
- only a few sets together with other girls
- videos come as WMV only
- no ZIP files for the picture series
- poor navigation on the member pages
- Billing through CCBILL only but at least no regional pricing
Bottom Line:
DISCLAIMER
First of all I have to point out that I'm a fan of Michelle for several years now. Nonetheless I do hope to be professional enough to write an honest review about her second site.
ABOUT MICHELLE
Michelle is a 50 year old girl from the UK now living in Spain. She IMHO is a drop dead gorgeous lady with a very pretty face and a killer smile. Her firm 32FF boobs and round ass are so delicious I would never think that she's already that old not to forget her wonderful legs and smooth skin. If someone would ask me for a prototype of a genuine British or western European MILF I could only name her.
In the beginning she was always shaved but it seems to me that she now wears her pubic hair with pride. She wanted just to grow it and do a shaving special for one of her members but that was months ago.
Michelle loves her little hobby and as one can see it did her good the last 5 years as she now looks more sexy and absolutely self-confident. She simply enjoys to be watched and to tease.
ABOUT THE WEBSITE
Michelle started this site in October 2007 and until now she made more than 200 picture updates (with more than 130 matching videos) showing her in- and outdoors wearing elegant dresses and of course nylons and girdles. She loves short skirts, elegant heels, playful lingerie, nylons and girdles, oral sex, to masturbate using toys or her fingers alone, posing nude outdoors in the countryside and to tease. The updates are different to what can be seen on Southern Charms she may use the same dresses or lingerie but the content differs.
Only a few sets show her together with some other girls mostly her friend Julie who shares her interest in nylons and hot lingerie.
ABOUT THE PICTURES
The preview area gives you a very good idea of what can be found in the member's area. Starting end of 2010 (updates 189 dated 2010-12-18 to 211 dated 2011-05-02) the pictures now have 1280 pixels on the long side. The JPG quality is good enough to blow them up even on a very large screen.
But beware because some of the newer sets contain pictures that aren't sharp enough guess her husband had some trouble with his camera. The latest sets are crisp again. I use one of her landscape pictures as background for my PC and therefore blew it up to 2401x1600 pixels from the original 1277x851 size and the quality is still good.
ABOUT THE VIDEOS
Her videos are mostly 4:3 aspect ratio with 720x576 pixels resolution and come a bit grainy but still enjoyable. I have to sit about 2 metres away from my screen to be able to enjoy her teasing me. The videos show her doing solo teasing, masturbation with fingers and dildos, doing handjobs, blowjobs or having intercourse.
CONCLUSION
This website is recommended for MILF lovers that like to see a nylon lady sharing her passion for sex. The site has some points that would need some improvements but is worth a try.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
05-17-1111:07am (Update History) Reason: Since this is primarily a picture site the consistent blurriness (softness) of the HR pictures forces me to downgrade my original score.
Pros:
Beautiful models. Some of them very well known and sought after.
Good selection of picture sets and videos.
Pictures come in three different sizes with the biggest ones weighing in at 3000x2000. Typical set is rather small though.
Videos come in two sizes: a smaller one at 640x360p, but very crisp, and an HD one at 1280x720p.
Both sizes are very nice when it comes to clarity of the picture. Videos vary in length. Some can be as short as 3-5 minutes or as long as 11 minutes. There might be longer ones but I haven't come across them. On the other hand, if you have a solo model slowly divesting herself of her lingerie you don't really need a 30 minute video.
Pictures and Videos are downloadable with no restrictions!
Daily Updates alternating between picture and video.
Cons:
The naming is horrible. A combination of numbers and letters plus the size you downloaded, that's about it. (eg. 2180-zzD-Ultra.zip) It forces you to stop and rename each and every file when it has finished downloading so that you will remember the name of the model inside the zip.
I am a picture person at heart but was disappointed with the quality of the High Resolution pictures at 3000x2000. They almost reminded me of Twisty's or Only Tease. Too much body make-up, too much air brushing, too much photo shop? Picture became way too soft because of the way it was treated.
It's presented in a size where one should be able to count every pore and hair and fold of garment on a model but in my sample sets I couldn't.
Focus was in the wrong place at times as well. But I guess that's where the "art" comes in.
I had very slow speeds when using DTA and was surprised to find that I was doing better with my ordinary Firefox downloader .. but even then I barely managed more than 500-600KB/s
Bottom Line:
A very nice, user friendly site for lovers of erotic lingerie. It has the same basic lay-out as Only Tease and if you've ever been a member of that site you will know that it has to be excellent.
I liked the idea that in some sets and videos the model started out with more than just bra, panties, garter belt and stockings (sadly many of them ARE like that) but would have liked them to finish fully nude.
They don't hide anything, as opposed to OT, but be warned the site is very softcore! Don't expect spreading or masturbation or insertions, you won't find it here.
The models are very appealing to me despite their youth. I guess that touch of fine lingerie helps. Too bad about the pictures, though. I will restrict myself to downloading videos until someone decides to do away with all that powder and sharpens the pictures a bit.
It is my opinion that they built themselves a very nice site here with lots of content considering they are only a couple of years old and I would recommend it to lingerie lovers, if for nothing else than the HD videos that can be found right from their beginning in 2009. I would even recommend it to picture lovers if they don't mind that soft look!
If they renamed their zip files to something more practical like "Eufrat01HR.zip" for instance I would happily give them a higher rating because the models and lingerie are truly stunning, but the present way of naming files is annoying me no end.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
02-19-1112:06am (Update History) Reason: Download links now provided to pictures - see my edit notes.
Pros:
- Good photography
- Fairly unique content
- Pretty models
- Nice outfits and (obviously) great nylons
- Some good mild-fetish wear
- Many location/outdoor shoots
- Some entertaining videos
- Downloading pictures was a mildly diverting intellectual challenge
Cons:
- Arguably not much actual nudity (depends on your definition)
- Max resolution of 1200x800px; videos at 320x640
- Frequent timeouts of login
- Only one connection allowed - eg can't open a gallery while viewing a video
- No zip sets
- No video download
- No model index
- No update schedule, or dating of sets
Bottom Line:
I recently saw some pictures from Pantyhose-X - a German nylon fetish magazine (unsure whether print or only online). The few sets that I saw, I loved, and decided to seek out and join the source. I'm not sure of the details, but reading between the lines, I suspect that some change of ownership has been involved recently; pantyhose-x.com becoming nylon-x-files.com with content from the former. I also rather suspect that the changes are not for the best.
First the good.
This is obviously very nylon-oriented material - and more to the point, it's very fetishistic. By which I mean that it focuses very much on the sheerness of it; in fact in the majority of the sets, the tights don't come off at all. Some of them are gusseted and you don't see that much, other than them pulled up tight into the model's pussy; others are seamless and sheer and there are plenty of closeups of the girls masturbating through and under the nylon. The rest of the clothing is great too - from casual and businesswear, to things like corsets, high lace-up boots, PVC miniskirts etc.
The models too are pretty - not too glam or polished (maybe some peroxide), some girl-next-door types - but great figures and legs (of course!). And the photography is great - with a lot of shoots outdoors and in public places - some quite risqué stuff which is kind of exciting.
My only gripe with the content is my usual - most models are shaved, and given the nature of this style, that you get to glimpse them through the sheer nylon, I can't help feeling that even a trimmed strip or patch of hair would be something more to glimpse.
However...
Although I love the material, the presentation of it is the worst I've come across. Having emailed the webmaster to check, I knew about the resolution (it seems to have suffered in the transition, from the 1800px sets that seem to have been offered by pantyhose-x) and the lack of zips - but figured I'd give it a try.
The members area is very basic, just a list of sets with no dating, model names, or sorting/searching features for the 150 odd sets available.
**Edit** When I first wrote the review, there was no download of anything - not even individual pictures - you could only view on screen in a lightbox-type viewer, which made me mark it down heavily. But the site does now offer download links to pictures; there are still no zips, but this small change makes it easy to download a set with a manager, eg downThemAll.
The site still has issues as in the cons above, but this small change makes it seem far less mean-spirited, and is enough to bump my score from 65 to 75 - it's now recommended if you like this material (and can use a download manager!)
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
