Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Comments Browse all our comments with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
By Company Scotty JX
[ Remove ]
Option only available from company page.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Replies   Re-sort the comments by select criteria.

Shown : 1-7 of 7  

Visit Action Girls

1. Action Girls (0)

PinkPanther (46) 01-10-13  08:47pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)

This site done now?

This site appeared to be on its last legs when I was last a member in April 2012. I just checked again as I have periodically, and I see no signs of any updates at all since August 2012.

So I believe that this site is done. It will probably stick around for a while with more and more links breaking down until it has been shut down completely.

RIP, Actiongirls

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Action Girls

2. Action Girls (0)

PinkPanther (46) 04-22-12  09:27am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)

Are They Even Trying Any More?

This site USED to have some of the most unique content on the internet - shot-on-location craziness with gorgeous women with perfect bods being pursued by evil prison guards or zombies or whatever and fighting back with martial arts or big guns. Then they did some really wonderful surreal stuff with Susana Spears as a drunk Super-woman and other such stuff.

At a certain point, they started licensing material and throwing it up as "ActionGirls Recruits", which was fine as a supplement to their original material, but now they seem to have gone the "Babelicious" route where it's just "Throw Something Up As An Update And Call It A Day".

Where once this site was doing some of the most original material on the internet, that seems to be all in the past. What original vids they do now could have been done by Playboy or any paint-by-numbers "erotic vid" site. And they have even stopped regular posting of those. The most original stuff they do now is shoot girls against weird blurry backgrounds and call them "jungle" shoots, etc.

Sad, sad, sad.

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Action Girls

3. Action Girls (0)

ipg386 (0) 01-30-12  10:38pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)

Major Recycling Going on Here

Regarding the picture sets, the site is re-dating its old pic sets and claiming they are "new." The site has some stunning pics - at times - but compared to my last join several months ago I see very little that's truly new. The site is somewhat deceptive: specifically emphasizing its sets by date posted when many of the sets are old ones with new dates. If you've never joined, however, try the 3 day full trial for $4.95, it's a great deal, but as a prior member looking for new stuff, I found it lacking even at the dirt cheap price.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Visit Action Girls

4. Action Girls (0)

Drooler (220) 09-26-10  05:49am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (82), NO (0)

Speaking of Non-Nudity

The current poll is about nudity and sexuality. So here's a sideshow: Actiongirls has, for this entire month, had nothing in its stock of new photos but non-nude material. And frankly, I think they look pretty awful as well. It sure isn't what I'd signed up for (6 month subscription, stupid-stupid-stupid me!).

I haven't been able to equate any of them with sexuality, btw. ;)

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Action Girls

5. Action Girls (0)

Drooler (220) 06-25-10  02:51am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (82), NO (0)

Four Bones to Pick

Two and half months ago, posted a favorable comment about this site. I also joined soon after, and now I have a few warnings for those interested.

First, the maximum pixel resolution on new photos is their "super large," which is about 2000 pixels (sometimes exactly, sometimes a little less). But the site is still advertising "2722 PIXELS RES." to this very moment.

Did somebody just make a little mistake and just kept copying and pasting it? I mean, they're not just lying, are they?

The second problem is that although you get access to Viewpornstars, too, getting there is a hassle. You have to look around to find the entry point, turn off your popup blocker, click the Viewpornstars collage icon, then click this little button in a popup. Then the windows to the site open.

And then there's a third problem, and this one is really bad. The more recent galleries and zips prompt you for a usepass that you don't have! And not having it, you're up the River Shits.

I've emailed them twice about Viewporstars access problems. The responses: NOTHING. And that's problem #4.

So buyer, beware!

Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Action Girls

6. Action Girls (0)

Drooler (220) 04-09-10  07:17pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (82), NO (0)

Worth a Look!

It's $5 week in Droolerland, I guess. This site offers 3 days at that price. Have been a member before and although it was tough at first, having to put up with with confusing navigation and usepass boxes popping up too often, I finally tamed it.

There's some nice stuff here along with the "action" stuff that I myself don't care much for. (Women in grease paint, body oil, and dom uniforms welding weapons and baring their teeth is not my idea of sweet hunnykins.)

What's really great is that they've recently moved to a larger max photo size, 2722 px (was 1722). There's plenty of content I've not seen elsewhere of girls like Crissy Moran, Amy Reid, etc.

Here's a good place to start: http://actiongirls.com/Actiongirls-Recruits/index.html

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Visit View Pornstars

7. View Pornstars (0)

Drooler (220) 01-16-08  10:44pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (82), NO (0)

Skip it

This site has little exclusive material. It has loads of non-exclusive stuff, most of which you'll find on other sites, sooner or later, with zip files (which this site doesn't provide).

But for photo lovers, the #1 reason to skip it is that it takes GOOD jpegs, compresses them WAY down, and tacks its ugly little watermark on them in the lower right corner.

Example: They just put up a photoset of Marketa Brymova (Workout). The pics are 1063x1600, but the file sizes are only 82 to 95K or so. You can see the pixel halo around in places where the blue background meets her skin.

I haven't seen this set anywhere else so far, but mostly likely it will show up in better shape at one of the Babelicious bonus sites, or Babelicious itself, or another site with lots of non-exclusive stuff.

Have seen plenty of it at other sites.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Shown : 1-7 of 7  

Easy Site Search
Advanced Search

Most Comments
1. VideoBox (167)
2. 21Sextury.com (122)
3. Brazzers (115)
4. Reality Kings (93)
5. Met Art (85)
6. Bangbros Network (82)
7. Naughty America (74)
8. Twistys (66)
9. DDF Network (62)
10. abbywinters (60)

View All : Most Comments

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.04 seconds.