co-sign with the last user, it's best to troll the site while NOT logged in to view things like girls cam speed and quality. If you go into the room while logged the girl can see you and usually starts trying to chat with you. if you don't respond quick enough she'll kick you from the feed.
Plus, the cost is HIGH so don't screw around, let her know before hand what you wanna see. And keep the chatter to commands only and trust they DO charge by seconds too
Streamate camgirls are plenty expensive, so get results promptly or disconnect promptly.
I tell the girls before going private exactly what they must be showing the instant that the private window opens. I make sure she understands before going private. If I don't see it from the start, I disconnect.
Otherwise they drag their feet once in private session, and try to distract you with conversation and endless strip-teasing
It seems there is an effort by the fans of this site to give it a good showing. We've seen four high score reviews (84+) in two days. It's not unusual for a site with this type with member participation to be loyal fans, however, because of the nature of the site, it's obvious some have a vested interest in the site looking good.
So, for now, we're not accepting any new reviews for this site.
I recently wrote in the forums of this site and my critique was removed in less than 24 hours. Please note that #6 was wrong and I did add a reply to note this. Basically, the video I thought was reposts was video that appeared on another site (jackass-nudebeach.com) so it was not reposted for this site. Here is what I wrote:
Subject: We are not that stupid
While I appreciate the site there are several problems that could be addressed to make the site much better. However, I am guessing that those who own/manage it are soooo rich that they do not care to make more money, or they smoke pot all day and are unmotivated to improve it. In either case here is what needs to be fixed, because for those of use who subscribe and browse the collection from time to time...to put it bluntly...we are not that stupid to notice that...
1. Making 20 videos out of a single 5 minuet clip and then spreading them over a 5 month period doesn't mean that the site has more content. It just means the user has to spend more time downloading a bunch of short clips instead of one. I assume the owners feel this increases the appearance of their content and/or dissuades users from using more bandwidth. In either case it sucks and makes the experience second rate to quality adult sites.
2. Video shot from above that shows shoulders and bald-headed men plain suck and should appear very rarely. If I wanted to look at the tops of naked bald headed men I would find a spot in the ceiling of the men's locker room at the local YMCA.
3. High Definition video is NOT up-converted standard definition video OR compressed HD video made to be smaller in file size so that users use less bandwidth. Just because a video appears in HD aspect ratios doesn't make it HD, and yes we can tell. Come on most of us HAVE HD or are members of sites that offer REAL HD (e.g. ilovethebeach.com). Real HD doesn't take up 9MB for 17 sec clips but about 50+MB.
4. Did I mention how STUPID clips that are less than 1 minuet are...
5. Taking captures of the REAL HD video (which is not made available to subscribers) and then posting it as "pictures" is weak. It is quite obvious that this is what you are doing...
6. You may have 190+ pages of video content (mostly due to the STUPID 17 second clips), but that doesn't mean you need to repost so many videos. Sure most people will get tired of wading through the STUPID 17 second clips, but those of us with memories longer than goldfish are quite aware of how many reposts appear in the course of a year.
To summarize this site could be SUPER cool. It could have the quality that ilovethebeach.com has with its content. But it appears that those who manage this site are cheap and prefer to cut corners and maintain their profit margin instead of increase it. It could be such a great site too which is what makes it a shame...I do wish they read this and consider some of what I have said (even if it was caustic and sarcastic).
This site, like another of the company's sites, Desperate-wife, is a total bogus rip off. All or at least most of the women profiled on the site do not exist. They're pure fiction. I tried writing to several, and the replies don't make sense. They're just random and general and have no connection to anything you might have said in your message. Also, I get messages from women who have supposedly seen my profile, and if you answer them, the same thing--nonsensical answers. TOTALLY BOGUS.
Having had 'dates' with a few girls from this site I can say it does work however many of the ads show the girls haven't logged in for months.
The blogging/social aspect of AFF is actually very good and I ended up spending most of my time doing that as it was a good way of talking about dirty things and sharing tips etc as well as showing to potential 'mates' you're cool. lol
The worst thing is the fustration that comes from contacting loads of females and hearing back from almost none (seeing as most filter there messages or are no longer active)
That and the cost and wierd way that even as a member you need to pay extra to allow non-members to contact you.
To fully succeed with this site you really do need to put a fair amount in, spend time filling out your profile FULLY, and try and build up a blog/spend time in the different forums/chatrooms.
Oh and a tip from a female (she showed me her account and we chatted about it)
They (females) get 10's of messages a day so to stand out try and personalise the first message somehow and keep it fairly short but provoking conversation.
(Most messages from most guys are obviously sent to everyone and/or are just two sentances crude and lazy.
If you live in Sweden, it seems this site might be OK for getting some. I live close to Oslo in Norway, and I could have gotten laid several times if I didn't have any standards. All the people that contacted me were couples 35+ from Goteborg, Malmo and Stockholm in Sweden. And even though I had stated I was heterosexual, they all wanted me to get it on with the man too. No way, not ever!
I recommend this site to bisexual/trysexual people only, with a fat wallet.
It's impossible to do anything at all except wait if you don't pay. You even have to pay to answer people contacting you, unless THEY pay to allow you to contact them.
Ads on the Net saying that this and that girl from your "neighborhood" awaits you, are NEVER of girls in your "neighborhood"
My rating would be somewhere around 65-70 for this site.
Today I had some free time and signed in my Streamate account to see who's online. I visited a model's free chat room (model's name is '' Xxdarkpanter4u '') said '' hello, how are you? '' and got banned, LOL, well some Streamate models seem to have a brain damage or something, at my opinion, or at least they kick or ban people from chat rooms without any reason and no one checks their actions to members . Probably some of them think that their members are too ugly or something ... what can I say I can not explain it though I will surely cancel my account, LOL.
Just some advises for the site for the ones who doesn't know it.
Few minutes ago I had a private chat with a girl / model asked her for a strip and did it without delays and other tricks that other live cam models do. Well, I had many premium / exclusive chats but that one was the best.
i love cam girls as well. i've found a few good ones who have girl cum on other cam sites. one of them is wildsexyass on imlive. she really cums an incredible amount. she does a show where she cums repeatedly, scoops up her thick creamy white cum with a spoon, and collects it on the plate. once she has a plateful, she eats the whole plate of cum, licking it clean.
would you care to share which girls you found on streammate you are referring to? i've found other good ones as well, including another girl who i would say is even hotter. i've been looking a long time for some lesbians like the ones you described, but haven't been able to find them so far.
I just joined 3 days ago, and haven't had a lot of time to check the content. I'll post a full review in a few days... If you're looking for HiDef video or pics, or professionally produced scenes, they're not here. What is here is a HUGE collection of (mostly short) amateur videos and (mostly small) amateur photos. I'm way more interested in the video section, but in the pics there's a section called "see-through babes" which is all babes wearing see-through t-shirts, lingerie, laughably tight blouses, etc. It's a great section, and it appears to have 370 pages of 20 pics each. The "Cute Babes" section has 5700 pages. I could spend the next month just clicking through that... In the vid sections I recognized a few I'd seen before (I've seen the same "Christyne" no-sound video on many sites), but there are many more new to me. So far this is looking like an excellent join... I'll get back with more specifics in a few days...
Is, is this site for real? I went to the site a couple of times and tried to do the Free registration thing, but never got an email reply... I've gotten some scenes which purport to come from this site [per the watermark] through Skin Video, and a couple of them are very good amateur scenes which I haven't seen elsewhere, so I'm quite curious, but slightly trepidatious to give them eighteen bucks or so when they wouldn't reply to my email... If anyone has tried them out, please let me know. If I have to be the first, well, I'll have to "steel" myself for the challenge...
Have not been a member of this site long enough to review it, and with all the various content its hard to do so. But let me tell you this stuff is as real as it gets, as if you or I filmed the material. The quality really lacks for the pics and videos. But man there is alot of content in here for only 40 dollars a year. Updates daily. Not as good as tac amateurs I feel, but it is definetly comparable.
A little over a month ago I reviewed this site after enjoying a month's membership. Although I had some qualms with the site, I praised it for its ingenuity and saw only good things on the horizon. My intention was to check back in with the site after a few months to see how it had grown and to report on whether or not it was deserving of the promise I had forecasted.
While the jury is still out, I am happy to report that the site automatically gave everyone who joined during 2007 an extra month of membership, even for those who had already cancelled. I confirmed that my membership was again active and am pleased to report that I have full access. Not a ton has changed (and I wouldn't have expected a lot of change that fast), though updates have continued to be steady and more girls are featured overall.
I still plan to check back in with the site in a few months to allow them some time to make improvements to the site, but if guestures like providing a free month to past customers are any indication, I think the site is headed in the right direction.
All the arguments going on over "is it shilling or not?" if a member of an amateur site recommends it glowingly made me curious enough to become a member of Newbie Nudes: for all of 15 minutes.
It is my personal opinion that the ratings given by present contributors to this site are way out of line when one takes a look at what is actually offered there. Forget, for a moment, that larger pictures and videos are available for a hefty price and look at the general make-up of this amateur site:
The overwhelming majority of the members choose to remain anonymous (for valid reasons) which means faceless body parts all over the place and very few pics where one could actually admire the beauty of the WHOLE woman (and a paid subscription and larger pictures wouldn't change that). When you do come across a "whole person" pic you still have to consider yourself lucky if the face isn't masked somehow.
In my opinion you would have to be a contributor who gets a thrill from exposing his/her genitalia anonymously, or someone who likes to mingle with fellow exhibitionists, (not that there is anything wrong with it) to give the site more than a fifty! To the uninvolved (non-contributing) voyeur the site isn't worth a second look.
I sound just like an 80s sorority girl, but OH MY GOD! Can this be the site I've waited for all these months? By all means, anyone check it out, but I'll be reviewing this one personally as soon as I get the time. It looks a bit small at the moment, but any great site starts out that way. Of course it could be too good to be true and no substance. However, I'll take that risk! :)
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.