Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Webmaster Profile A detailed history of activity from this webmaster in all different categories.

Webmaster : Jayz (0)

View Feedback:   Replies (5)         Other:   Site Feedback (769)   |   Replies Received (2) Incoming Feedback All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites. Shown : 76-100 of 191 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 76 MetArt (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Lots of beautiful young models - Good search options/tagging - Browsing by photographer is useful - Lots of good lingerie/outfits - Most sets good resolution - Amusingly pretentious set names - Massive archive and approx 4 updates/day Cons: - Would prefer a few more mid/late 20s models - Age search option is daft - Lingerie doesn't necessarily suit the models - Some older pics quite low res - Massive archive is bewildering - Annoyingly pretentious set names - Some sets too large - Lacking in erotic content - Videos uninspiring and soundtracked to death Bottom Line: Met Art has been vaguely on my list of sites to try for a while, mainly because it features work from a couple of photographers I like (I tend to follow photographers rather than models), and last month's special offer gave me the incentive to sign up. There are plenty of other reviews, including TBP, which detail the specific stats on the site, so I'll be a bit more subjective here. Firstly, the site is vast; there is so much material, so many models, so many photographers, that it's hard to know where to begin. Fortunately, the search options are good; sets are tagged so you can just type in any particular keyword - eg nylon, stockings, etc and get a number of results. Sadly this doesn't work well with multiple keywords, getting sets with any of the words rather than all, but it's still useful. Search is also available on height, age, ethnicity, country, photographer - all useful, although unlike height, where you can search on a range, age is done purely on a single year, so you can only find eg all 25yo models... but it is smart enough to find sets where the model was 25 at the time of the shoot, as opposed to now - potentially a big difference in a site that's been running for a decade or more. My biggest issue, though - and this is quite personal - is that the material here just isn't exciting. The girls are all stunning but - although there are some exceptions - have little sex appeal to me; the concept of the site seems to be to emphasise the beauty of the models at the expense of any sexuality. Even the models who do hardcore elsewhere seem uninspired here - and the same for the photographers, eg there's quite a bit of material from Michael White and Roy Stuart, both favourites of mine, but it's a toned down version of their other stuff. Similarly, I'm quite keen on lingerie and nylons; there is actually a lot more nice stuff here than I thought, but most of the models are too young or inexperienced to carry it off; they look dressed up, posed, in it rather than comfortable and sexy. Reading between the lines of some of the blog posts there, I suspect both model and photographer are constrained by strict guidelines MA put on what can and can't be shown - with a veto on any kind of lascivious behaviour, so there is little teasing, no touching, and rarely even a lewd glance. They may even be getting stricter, since of the sets I did enjoy, most seem to be going back a few years. Even though the photos are of course fully nude, I've genuinely been more turned on by some of the better lingerie catalogues & sites. As others have noted, the videos here are also insipid; drowned out by supposedly sexy sax music and the like; and unlike the photo sets I didn't really find any worth keeping. Scoring this puts me in a bit of a quandary. It's a good, well-organised site, with a vast quantity of solid photography and frequent updates; so it would be really unfair to give it less than 80. However, this is PU and I struggle to see it as porn, or even particularly erotic or arousing - It's just too... wholesome, like a glamorous naturist site and I kind of agree with hugow that if you wanted to cure your porn addiction, this could do the job. I'm not even sure about art - to me, art is doing something unusual, creative, pushing some boundaries, which MA doesn't really - but by that definition, my last reviewed site, Juliland, is art, so maybe I'll skip the whole subject :| Anyway, a (very generous) 80 it is. 12-30-11  01:48am Replies (7) Review 77 MetArt (0) 80.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: - Massive amount of content, I guarantee you that you won't see everything in a month! - Very high quality photographs, resolutiuon ranges from 3800 to 4300 on the high end. - Videos are now HD quality 1280x720 - Price isn't bad for all the content you get, would have expected it to be $39.99 - Many models on here that you just won't see anywhere else Cons: - Videos are boring, massively boring in some cases. - As with any site of this size, there will be some models that aren't that good looking. - You ready for this? Every girl that spreads her legs has a bush big enough that you can't see pink, the shaven ones don't spread their legs - With all this content, this is hard to say, but I get bored after a few weeks. Bottom Line: I've been a member on Met-Art off and on now for 3 years. Some months I just want to look at a glamourous/beautiful/artsy nude picture, problem is those months only come about 1 time a year. Met-Art does the artsy nudity as good as anyone, probably better than anyone, but they don't give me more! One of the biggest reasons that I join this site is to show my wife that I too, can enjoy the natural curves of a woman while shrouded in a curtain, with Beethoven music playing in the background. I said enjoy, kind of like I can enjoy plain brocoli. I'm not trying to be harsh here, but there are so many sexy women on this site it makes you sick to see them never laying down and wrapping their ankles around their neck. I know it isn't supposed to show that, but to get a higher score from me, they are going to have to show more. High quality all around on this site. It is a beautiful site even, but I don't like being teased and Met-Art leaves me feeling teased. Overall, the site is a total class act, it has huge pictures, HD video, pics are downloadable in zips and you also get an archive of material that dates back to 1999. Maybe I am just a male chauvinistic pig, but this is porn damn it! It is a walk along frustration avenue for me. If you can look at a nude woman without her spreading at least one time, and if you think women just posing like statues is sexy, then join it. I highly recommend it for those people. If you need more, I don't recommend it. 07-28-07  03:14am Replies (6) Review 78 MetArt (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: 5 SETS ADDED DAILY QUALITY PICS EASY SITE USE Cons: EXPENSIVE TOO SOFTCORE VIDS NOT WORTHY Bottom Line: IN THE END IT IS NOT WORTH THE MONEY. MOST GIRLS ARE PRETTY, FEW ARE HOT. WAY TOO SOFTCORE. FOR MOST SETS YOU REALLY HAVE TO SPEND ALOT OF TIME OPENING EACH SET TO FIND "PINK" SHOTS. IT'S A GOOD SITE IF YOU LIKE THE PLAYBOY FORMAT. BUT, THEN AGAIN... THAT IS WHAT THEY ADVERSTISE. THEY DEFINETLY STAY TRUE TO FORM. SAVE YOUR $$$, YOU'LL GET MORE SKIN OUT OF A VICTORIA SECRET FLYER. 05-25-07  04:48am Replies (2) Review 79 MetArt (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: * Stunning women shot beautifully * Range of image sizes for each gallery * Huge number of photos in each gallery * Regular updates * Some of the greatest puffy nipple models on the net (A personal fav - Koika) * Great looking locations to match the women * Good range of hair and skin tones on the girls * Great variety of natural breasts on offer Cons: * Difficult search and navigation options * Video seems to be a last minute thought * Girl/Girl shoots and video extremely softcore * Some video files are massive (200Mb+) * Good quality videos take too much trawling to find Bottom Line: Met-Art is hard to beat for photos of beautiful women in beautiful locations and each shoot gallery provides plenty of images. Offers plenty for those with the eye for the erotic rather than hardcore and may not be to everyone's taste. For stimulation and suggestion rather than hardcore action Met-Art is an internet leader. 04-09-07  05:06am Replies (0) Rating 80 MetArt (0) 80.0 No Review. 02-02-07  03:55am Review 81 MetArt (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Stunningly beautiful models Brilliant and artistic still photography Sophisticated layout Cons: Not particularly user-friendly No hardcore action (well... I haven't found it, anyway - but perhaps we're getting back to that "not user friendly" issue!!!) Limited billing options Videos aren't particularly impressive Bottom Line: If you like sexy photography with some great-looking ladies, then this is the site for you (I have to say that Koika is damned HOT!!!) Personally, I like my girls to look like they're enjoying themselves; unfortunately most of these ladies look like they're about to trudge off to a family funeral once the shoot's over. Have noticed a lot of users (specifically guys) like the live cams, so I can recommend that aspect of membership even though it doesn't do much for me. All in all, I think there are better sites around - but the beautiful, BEAUTIFUL girls do count for something! 03-27-07  03:51am Replies (10) Review 82 MetArt (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Stunningly gorgeous models, photographed in the most tasteful settings. Cons: This isn't soft porn -- it's flaccid porn. No heat at all. Cover thumbnails are small and difficult to see. Many sets don't seem to have working slideshows. Bottom Line: After years of depriving myself of a MET-ART membership, I finally succumbed. What a disappointment. Maybe I'm just jaded, but MET-ART could be the perfect antidote to porn addiction. In the end, it's just one beautiful naked, hairless girl after another. Absolutely no heat, no spontaneity, no nothing. Vogue without the clothes. If that's your thing, go for it. 04-29-10  11:10am Replies (4) Rating 83 MetArt (0) 60.0 No Review. 07-26-09  10:55am Review 84 MetArt (0) 55.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Obviously a very professionally run site. Nothing to complain about the nuts and bolts Cons: One man's meat is another man's poison. This is undoubtedly true but all men know a beautiful woman when they see one and they are going to see very few of them on this website. I have never seen so many average-looking females thrown together. Most are plain, many are almost ugly and – what is worse – few are genuinely sexy. The whole set-up is more reminiscent of nudism in the 1960s than modern erotica or porn. It beats me why anyone should want to see these plain janes without their clothes on. Bottom Line: The models are neither beautiful nor sexy. Many look so incredibly softcore that it is doubtful that they would know what to do with a penis if they ever came across one. 10-06-12  10:10am Replies (5) Comment 85 MetArt (0) Is the Met Art biller they use safe Hi I noticed that they no longer go to ccbill when signing up and must be their own biller, anyone been a member recently and can vouch its an OK biller to cancel and trust. 01-04-23  02:31am Replies (14) Comment 86 MetArt (0) Metart ad $5 for the first month I've seen an ad for Metart for $5 for the first month. Metart is probably the premier softcore photo site on the internet. 1000s of lovely models, first rate photography, a huge collection of photosets going back to around 1999. If you've never been a member, or if you haven't joined recently, this is a fine chance to join for the lowest price of the year, to see these girls. I believe that the sub includes unlimited downloading, but you have to check that out, since I'm a member already, and can't view the offer (I hit the offer link, and am automatically logged into the site, without being able to view the offer details). 12-18-21  11:39am Replies (0) Comment 87 MetArt (0) Site won't load in Firefox browser. I've tried for over 1 hour to load the MetArt site in my Firefox browser. All I get is a blank page. Is the site under construction, maintenance, or under cyber attack? 07-14-21  05:41am Replies (2) Comment 88 MetArt (0) MetArt will soon offer personal video message from models. Don't know when it will happen. But if you're a MetArt member, you can expect personal video messages from their models. Don't know if that is free, or will cost. But if the video is delivered in person by the model, that would be great. Especially if you can choose the models you want. In my dreams. LOL. 09-17-20  07:20am Replies (1) Comment 89 MetArt (0) MetArt did a recent update to the site. The update to the MetArt site was supposed to make the site faster and more responsive. A new interface sometimes takes getting used to. I can't find the older features that I liked. So I'm not impressed with the update. It makes it harder for me to use the site, not easier. In my opinion, the level of attractiveness of the models is going down. So my enjoyment of the site has dropped. 10-29-19  03:40am Replies (3) Comment 90 MetArt (0) New feature at MetArt? Limited search. "Sorry, you have submitted too many search requests in a short period of time. Please try again in a few moments." That the message I get when searching for models' content. Guess that MetArt is trying to reduce the load on their servers. Or maybe trying to reduce their electric bill (joke). MetArt, you used to be best in class. What the heck happened to you? 08-12-19  05:35am Replies (0) Comment 91 MetArt (0) MetArt wants to simplify your longin process. I'm currently a member of 5 different sites in the MetArt network. There's supposed to be a way of switching between sites with a drop-down menu. Currently, if I try to switch to a different site, instead of switching, I get a webpage stating: Update Your Account Details Three easy steps to simplify your login process. In the past, when I've updated my login details (by creating a new username and password), I've usually been locked out of the network, until I email customer service and ask for a new username and password. Which takes a couple of days, sometimes. So, currently, I can't use the simple drop-down menu to switch sites. Irritating. To make things easier, they mess up my account access. As I get older, I wish they didn't force these changes on me, which make using the sites more difficult. Also, not only can't I use the dropdown menu to switch sites, but I can't enter the sites directly (using username and password), because I get the same run-around of "Update Your Account Details". Also, I should add that the update process is faulty: When I click on the "continue" hot link, nothing happens: I do not advance to the next step in the update process. So I am locked out of the MetArt sites. MetArt, you used to be a first-class network. But there are problems with your network, off and on. Some of them are created by you. 06-06-19  02:50pm Replies (4) Comment 92 MetArt (0) MetArt encourages fantasy. I read an advertisement for MetArt recently that states: "Clean Photos: MetArt does not alter its photos with airbrushing techniques or other photo altering practices. Enjoy the models with complete immersion." This is the first I've read that MetArt does not alter its photos with airbrushing techniques. Some of the models do have tattoos, that are removed in the MetArt photo sets. How does MetArt remove the tattoos, or keep them from showing? Is there a special soap that MetArt uses, that removes the tattoos for the shoot? And then the tattoos re-appear after the shoot is finished? Enquiring minds want to know. 04-17-19  06:25am Replies (0) Comment 93 MetArt (0) MetArt is having a $9.95/month Easter sale. Don't know how long the sale will last. $10/month is about the lowest price I've seen for this premium site. 04-17-19  12:19am Replies (0) Comment 94 MetArt (0) Watch out for network discount offer issues if you are already a subscriber I've been a member of Met Art for many, many years and have an annual subscription. I rotate through the other MA network sites and typically have 3-5 subscriptions at a time. I sometimes get highly discounted offers. However, whenever I try to sign up to a discounted offer, the Met Art system recognizes the cookies on my browser and something goes wrong. Either the offer changes to a higher price or I get an error. The last time this happened was when I got an internal trial offer for MetArtX with a subsequent discounted monthly rate. I signed up within the MetArt network and got an error on the approval page. I knew I was going to sign up for longer, so I just went ahead and signed up for the monthly discounted rate using a different browser and email and billing method. Worked. 2 months later I realized I was being double billed for MetArtX as the original sign up that gave me an error had actually cleared. The problem then was that I did not know which account was attached to my single sign-on, so I reached out to MetArt help to see if they could resolve the issue and maybe make it right. That was nearly 3 weeks ago and all I have from them so far is a "We're working on it." I was just billed for one of the accounts again, so I cancelled both of them, one through the MetArt singl-sign-on and one through Epoch because the login credentials didn't work. Now....I really like this network and will probably be a subscriber until I'm dead, but not being able to take advantage of discount offers without signing up from a different browser with different credentials because you are already a subscriber to a site on the network is just rediculous. I just reviewed a couple of the MA sites and was about to re-review Met Art (for the 4th or 5th time), but I think I will wait until they respond to this issue so I can include it in the review. Update: The support folks responded and, after looking into the issue, sign-up timing and billing records, refunded all of the double billing and gave me access to the site of my choice for a couple of weeks for my troubles. They also recommended that I contact them before signing signing up with a discounted rate so that they could make sure it goes smoothly. They came through, as I expected. I'll comment again if there are any significant issues with adding sites under the single-sign-on process again. 01-06-19  05:05am Replies (3) Comment 95 MetArt (0) TBP Discount Just noticed that the TBP discount is currently at $5 for a month (rebills at 29.99) - might be a great time to check out the site. Presumably this is a short term US Thanksgiving special. 11-21-18  04:16pm Replies (0) Comment 96 MetArt (0) Login problems. MetArt is getting tricky. They asked for a new username and password, because I have multiple accounts with them, and different login details. I entered a new username name and password. Then tried to login to the main MetArt site. I then got a page telling me my MetArt account has expired. Since I have 3 lifetime memberships to 3 of their sites, plus a monthly membership that I've had for several years, plus a more recent monthly membership that is still supposed to be active since I paid for it, I'm guessing that MetArt customer support will give me back my memberships that I paid for. But if it wasn't so irritating, I'd be laughing. At how messed up computers can be. Update: Problem fixed. MetArt customer service fixed my login problems in less than an hour, and sent me an email with my new login details. One of the finest and fastest customer support teams for any porn site. Thanks, MetArt. 11-15-18  05:01pm Replies (4) Comment 97 MetArt (0) LOGIN PROBLEMS. I CAN'T LOGIN TO METART.COM. I'VE TRIED FOR OVER 40 MINUTES, AND KEEP GETTING A FATAL ERROR MESSAGE OR A 504 GATEWAY TIMEOUT MESSAGE. A TEMPORARY PROBLEM WITH THE METART SERVERS? HOPE THEY FIX THE PROBLEM SOON. UPDATE: TRIED LOGGING IN TO METART OVER 6 HOURS LATER. STILL UNABLE TO LOG IN TO THE SITE. NOW GETTING THE ERROR MESSAGE: "Firefox can’t establish a connection to the server at members.metart.com." ANYONE ELSE HAVE THIS PROBLEM? I'M SURE I'M NOT THE ONLY METART MEMBER AT PU. UPDATE: 7:17 PST. 2017-11-30. I AM NOW ABLE TO LOG IN TO THE SITE, AND VIEW THE PHOTOSETS. SO THIS WAS MERELY A TEMP PROBLEM. ANNOYING, BUT TRIVIAL. BUT THE LOGIN PROBLEM LASTED ABOUT 7 HOURS. UPDATE: 7.32AM PST. 2017-11-30. --------------------- I DON'T KNOW WHAT PROBLEMS THE METART SERVERS ARE HAVING. BUT I NOTICED THAT THE COMMENTS FOR A RECENT PHOTOSET WERE DELETED. THE DEBUT PHOTOSET: PRESENTING JERRICKA BY PARAMOV. POSTED 2017-11-29. HAS THE MEMBER COMMENTS ON THE PHOTOSET DELETED. SIGN OF THE TIMES: DID A HACKER OR GREMLIN GAIN ACCESS TO THE METART SERVERS, OR ARE THE TECH SECTION PLAYING GAMES, OR WHAT? --------------------- UPDATE: 8.28AM 2017-11-30 THE COMMENTS HAVE BEEN RESTORED TO THE JERRICKA PHOTOSET. TECH TEAM UPDATING SITE? HIRE BETTER TECH TEAM PROGRAMMERS TO KEEP THE SITE/NETWORK RUNNING SMOOTHLY. OR MAYBE I SHOULDN'T PAY ATTENTION TO THESE MINOR GLITCHES. WHATEVER. 11-30-17  12:44am Replies (1) Comment 98 MetArt (0) METART $9.99 BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL. JOIN METART FOR $9.99 FOR THE FIRST MONTH. REBILLS AT $19.99/MONTH. METART, ONE OF THE FINEST SOFTCORE PHOTO SITES ON THE NET, FOR LESS THAN $10 FOR 1 MONTH. GREAT DEAL, FOR FANS OF SOFTCORE PORN. 11-26-17  12:06am Replies (0) Comment 99 MetArt (0) R.I.P. Slastyonoff I received an email flyer from Met Art this morning informing of the recent passing of one of their great photographers Slastyonoff. He was one of the early contributors at Met Art with currently over 600 of his photo sets on the site dating right back to 2003. One of the highlights of his work for me were his photo shoots of Lucy C, I remember being in a trance the first time I viewed his shoots of Lucy and her magnificent breasts, she literally took my breath away, but it was some of his early work that really drew me into the world of online erotica back in the early 2000s when I first got online. Who can forget some of those early classic beauties he shot for Met like Narkiss, Aneli, Ashanti and of course one of my all time favourites Koika with those amazing puffy nipples. His works of art will stay on my hard drive forever, never to be deleted. As a tribute to Slastyonoff they are offering a half price $14.99 subscription with all proceeds generated from the email flyer going to his family. 10-07-17  02:53am Replies (0) Comment 100 MetArt (0) Be Careful When Joining MetArt These Days MetArt used to be a safe site to join - no shady prechecked boxes. They always made various offers but it was your choice whether to accept them or not, which is perfectly fine and reasonable. But yesterday I joined MetArt with a special discount as I have numerous times before without problems. Then I noticed in my spam folder that I had a message that I had also joined SexArt, which I had not done at all. I emailed MetArt's customer service and their proof that I had joined SexArt was to send me 2 attachments, neither of which mentioned SexArt, and both of them were referring to me joining MetArt at an entirely different price than I had agreed to when I joined. Something is very troubling with the MetArt Network. Maybe it's getting too complicated for them, or maybe they're outsourcing it to some careless company. Either way, I recommend that you be very careful when joining MetArt - including asking their C/S to confirm the price that they show you joined at if it's not mentioned in their confirmation - it wasn't in mine! 09-10-17  05:24pm Replies (4) Shown : 76-100 of 191 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.07 seconds.