| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
PinkPanther (0)
|
Different tastes. I love Met-Art, find their stuff quite erotic.
The photo-sets, that is. The vids still seem like they are made as examples of the most boring vids ever made.
|
04-29-10 04:39pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Denner (0)
|
Been back to MetArt year after year - and still: my collection consists of very few MetArt-materials - mostly some photosets (forget the videos).
And again: I read this bottom line by hugow several times - and even if I like SOME MetArt photosets - I'm getting "partial" (like Virgil Tibbs said in the movie "In The Heat of The Night") to the bottom line by hugow.....can't help it...is this "inflation" of porn?
Is this just a going on and on in the same deal - for ever?
|
05-01-10 07:04am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
hugow (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - PinkPanther :
I agree -- the photo-sets are much better than the movies, which are a complete waste of time.
|
05-03-10 03:01pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Monahan (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - Denner :
Agree with Denner. I'm a video guy and quit Met-Art after about 3 months. The photo sets are good with a lot of full spreads and excellent angles. But I agree; no heat at all, no insertions and very little eroticism.
|
09-03-10 11:46pm
Reply To Message
|
