Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The legendary site that reminds me of how old I am. It will be explained in the bottom line, hopefully, with some humor.
- Very pretty models, I once theorized these sites have a farm somewhere where they grow these models.
- It’s one of the few sites that I think you could buy a 1 year membership to and still not see everything. It’s that big of a site. Numbers in the bottom line.
- The switch to more explicit, more pink showing, was to me, the biggest step in porn. I will tell about my first review of Met Art way back in 2007.
- No site makes a set of plain white sheets, prettier. I’m speaking specifically about the newest update, Sex and Candy featuring Katherinne.
- Good download speeds (80% of my max)
- Very good navigation for a site that really could be navigational mess.
- Always easy to join and cancel, you do it right from your account page.
Cons:
- The videos. They could remove those and I wouldn’t even notice.
- This is a classic con that goes back to the pre-2010 days, of saying how many women have the same name? My favorite one and it’s me just coming up with a not really con, con. They have 23 models named Olga. I have never met a woman named Olga. See my theory about that farm? That could be a con for someone that’s newer to porn. That goes into overwhelming.
Bottom Line:
In 2007, I joined Met Art for the very first time and returned to Porn Users, reviewed it and gave it a 78. I still remember typing, “This isn’t even porn.” It wasn’t like I was a lover of hardcore porn. My favorite model at the time and a top 3 all-time, Eve Angel, has photosets on Met Art. Those were the tamest photos I ever saw of Eve. Eve made a career of being a softcore model. Using the word, “tamest” with a softcore model, it shows how softcore Met Art was. It still is but it has evolved. The photos are not really that much more explicit than they were 14 years ago but they are no longer the tamest. Keep in mind, we are talking about 2007, back when no one had heard of networks and mega sites.
I know that Met Art won’t mind me saying this since I’m also going to review it. Viv Thomas was the standard for me. The more current Met Art is like Viv Thomas without sex. They should take that as the highest compliment. They have learned to photograph explicit poses without being trashy. One of the things I believe video porn loses is the photos of a young model spreading her legs and showing how wet she is. You get that on Met Art. Especially if you view their largest photos.
The one complaint I usually have with Met Art and still do but I’m not listing as a con is they don’t keep the models in clothes long enough. A lot of the photosets start nude. Give me one picture of her in clothes. That is what makes softcore porn … porn. It crosses from “this could be in a R rated movie” to “This is going to be in an X-rated movie.” Don’t question my farm theory either. If people can believe that the politicians are good, I can believe there’s a farm raising these near perfect models.
I don’t like being negative about their videos and really think the nicest thing I can say is if they removed the videos, I wouldn’t notice. We’re just overflowing with video porn these days. When I join Met Art I don’t even think about videos. I think I’m just old enough that I was raised around porn magazines. Very few if any sites can compare to Met Art in overall quality of pictures. There are a few sites that typically have models I may prefer over Met Art’s. I do as my name says, like exotic women and they have exotic models on Met Art but not as many as some sites. It’s funny that I talk about softcore, I do like the very explicit pictures and Met Art doesn’t have a lot of very explicit. I will even explain very explicit, masturbating, milky orgasms, Met Art doesn’t quite that far. I don’t expect or want them to change that for me. They are the best at what they do. I forgot about the age part. This site makes me feel old. I reviewed this site 14 years ago. That means some of these models were 4 when I reviewed this site the first time! The models look young. They are young but they keep that young look unlike a lot of porn sites do with their models. Also forgot to add that it’s nice to see the trimmed V pubic bush return.
The numbers always matter with me: I’m going to get the videos out of the way, they have 1,866 videos. Those are high quality videos. I wouldn’t make fun of you for watching them. I just prefer the pictures on Met Art.
There are 23,370 photosets. I’m typing in MS Word and am getting a peek at nice V pubic bush under the typing box. It’s distracting me. That number is the whole reason to join. I think 1,000 photosets is impressive. You then get the quality and resolution and yes to the snobby ones, some are blurry, nothing in the world is perfect. The photos are nearing 7000 long end. I’m in a joking mood. Maybe we should photograph all women’s boobs in 7000 long end pictures? It would stop implants. I guess we could work naked men into the 7000 long end photos and we wouldn’t have as many angry men running around. The pictures are huge. One boob takes up the whole screen. That’s why I don’t need the videos.
There 3,909 models. And besides being a review this is how you make a softcore porn site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through CCBill
-PU discounted price of $19.99. This site is worth at least double that, considering the quantity and quality.
-First class customer service.
-Very complete tour of the site. You know exactly what you will get.
-Huge quantity of material gong back to 1998. You cannot download everything you might like in one 30 day subscription.
-Daily updates of about four to six photosets.
-Stunningly beautiful models. Hardly a disappointing one on the entire site. I did not see a single tattoo.
-Outstanding specs. Hi res photos recently come in at 5616x3744, videos at 1920x1080.
Cons:
-Mostly Eastern European models, which results in close to zero ethnic variety.
-Mostly teens to twenties models and most are extremely thin. In some cases their rib cages and pelvic bones are quite visible. Despite their beautiful faces, many are not sexy.
-Little variety of body shapes.
-Too much emphasis on the art aspects of the female body. If I wanted art I would take a class or perhaps glance through Vogue. I like more explicit.
-Most sets seem to have no natural progression, such as stripping. The sets often have the model clothed in the last few photos. You could randomly mix up the order of the photos and they would be just as logical.
Bottom Line:
It has been more than three years since I last joined Metart. In spite of some flaws, it is a great site for many objective reasons. The low price, as well as the quality of the content and the models makes this a site that should be ranked at the top of the nude photos category. Lk2fireones review says a lot that I totally agree with and he describes it very well.
I want to describe the subjective experience of being on the site. The layout and navigation are both logical and easy to use. The search engine is great. It is inviting, warm and friendly and it practically begs for you to get into checking out the content.I am referring to the old format here, as they just launched a Beta. I did not use it much yet, so I can't say much about it.
Once you are inside the site it is a lot like being in the jungle hunting for the good stuff which is camouflaged. I am not so much into art as I am into more explicit photos. There are some here, but it is hard to find them due to so much art. What you mostly see are side shots, legs crossed, jumping, use of props etc. Sometimes the photos are black and white, sometimes sepia, some with a soft focus, some with a low depth of field, where one part is in focus where other parts are not. Some sets are shot in the dark without much light. This is soft core, but that term does not tell all. I can find soft core erotic, but dont find art erotic. Some sets have no explicit shots, most have only a few. The videos mostly do not tease as they have the model moving too fast. I would prefer a scene to linger as appropriate. Finding what I like is tedious as there is just so much to see. When you finish checking out a photoset and want to move on, you can look for more of the same model and many have multiple photosets, more of the same photographer, especially if you like his style of photography and model presentation, more sets with the same tags, or the one updated before or after-you can see a thumbnail of the model.
Tags are comments that subscribers add to the sets. You may see for example, killer body or pretty face. Obviously these are a matter of opinion. Some tags are not so easy to use though. If you use unshaven, you get sets with full bush or even as little as barely a landing strip. You never know what may turn up in the search. The same is true for open labia . There is a large gray area here. In some sets you cannot even see the labia, but the tag is still there.
I find that about an hour of downloading is about all that I can reasonably do. This requires a lot of patience and attention to detail. The temptation to go all over the place following the searches can be a bit overwhelming. Should I check out more of the same model or should I switch to searching for open labia?
I cannot leave without mentioning the customer service. I accidentally signed up twice using two different billing processors. Each came with a prechecked cross sell for another site and I did not catch that. The member name and password were randomly generated and I did not know which went with each subscription. It was a complete mess so I contacted customer service. Despite that fact that it was a Sunday, everything was corrected in about five minutes. No hassles, no runaround that I should contact the processors. My highest compliments to their staff!!
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-In my opinion, the best softcore photo site on the internet.
-Over 3,000 models. Many of the models are lovely to stunningly beautiful.
-A wide range of professional photographers contribute to this site.
-A huge backlog of photo sets. Site started in 1998, as MostEroticTeens.com (hence the name change to Met-Art.com).
-The site updates daily with 4 to 6 photo sets + videos per day. So not only a huge backlog of content, but a truly generous update rate as well. Most updates are photo sets.
-You get a small bio sheet on the models, that includes their age when shot, body measurements, and a brief note on what they like. Not much a bio sheet, but it makes the girls more real.
-No DRM. You download a photo set, it's yours to keep.
-Excellent download speeds. I get 5.5 or 5.6 MB/sec, which is extremely fast for me.
-Fast response from technical support. You get an an email within a few hours that shows a human actually read your problem email and is helping.
Cons:
PROS (CONTINUED):
-Site is basically easy to use. However, because of the huge number of models and photo sets, it can take months to search through the site to find everything you will like.
-There is an index of the models, with a large thumbnail of the model to show what she looks like.
-There is also an index of the contributing photographers. With the photo sets from each photographer.
-So you can search by the name of the model, or by the name of the photographer.
-You can comment on each photo set (or photographer). And there is an active community that discusses their likes and dislikes of the photo sets. Most comments are positive, but negative comments are allowed. And the contributing photographer sometimes responds.
-No download limits.
-CCBill is the billing agent-one of the best credit card processing agents on the Net.
-Allows the use of download managers. I use DownThemAll, a free download manager.
-The photosets are offered in three sizes for download and viewing.
Bottom Line:
PROS (CONTINUED):
-The photosets have separate zip files for low definition, medium definition, and high definition.
CONS
-The cons are basically minor. This is the best softcore erotic site on the Internet.
-Not strictly a con, but the site is softcore erotic. No hardcore porn. If you want hardcore, look elsewhere.
-The videos are boring. They have tried in recent years to make the videos more erotic. These are videos of attractive models that are naked, but the videos are disappointing, and mainly a waste of time and effort.
-Because of the huge amount of the photo sets, and the 3,000 plus number of models that are mainly attractive to stunningly lovely, it's a natural human reaction to become slightly bored with the site. Back in the day when Playboy and Penthouse were in their glory days, you only got those magazines once a month, so the impact of each issue was more potent. Because Met-Art has thousands of photo sets and thousands of lovely models, instead of appreciating how wonderful the
site is, you start to feel bored by the loveliness and attractiveness of the models and photo sets. That is human psychology. You want what you don't have, but once you get it, the value of what you have diminishes.
-Some people object that the photos don't meet the professional standards that they are seeking. Again, that is human nature. There will always be people who object or complain about any beautiful model or photo or object. The site features attractive to stunningly beautiful models that are photographed by professional photographers.
Obviously, not every photo set is a masterpiece, but you get access to a boatload of softcore photos of lovely women.
-Most models are 18 to early 20s. White, slender to medium build. You don't get a lot of variety in the models as far as age or race or build.
BOTTOM LINE:
MetArt is best site for softcore erotic photography on the Internet.
Based on a variety of factors:
1. Huge number of attractive models (over 3,000 models).
2. Huge number of photo sets (around 15,000 sets, which will take you many months to look through.
3. Over 1,000 videos, which you can use to put yourself to sleep through boredom. Maybe a few videos are truly erotic, but the erotic videos are few and far between).
4. Hundreds of contributing photographers. So you get access to a range of styles. But the overall approach is softcore erotic.
5. Site is easy to use. Can search by name of model, name of photographer, or by other attributes: hair color, age of model, eye color, ethnicity, etc.
6. A low price (with PU discount). $20/month, or $100/year.
There are other sites that are similar, that offer high grade photography and lovely models: MPL Studios and Femjoy are 2 of the closest competitors. But even though they are both Mega-sites (huge content of photo sets and large number of lovely models), Met-Art is the biggest site as far as number of photo sets and number of models.
I enjoy the photo sets at Met-Art and MPL Studios more than the photo sets at Femjoy. The Met-Art and MPL Studios photos seem fresher, the models look more attractive, than the models at Femjoy. Many of the Met-Art and MPL Studios models also
appear at Femjoy, but I normally prefer the Met-Art and MPL studios sets over the Femjoy sets.
Other people can and do appreciate the Femjoy style over the Met-Art style, and have stated so. So it's a matter of personal preference.
This is my third review of Met-Art. I gave it a score of 97 in my first review (which was also my first review for PU), a 99 in my second review (because the number of models and photo sets just keep increasing).
In this review I am giving Met-Art a score of 99.
I know many members feel that a score of 99 for any site is wrong. They believe that any site can be improved, and that a score of 99 ignores whatever faults a site may have.
But I believe that Met-Art is the best softcore site on the Internet. And that because of many
factors that I listed, it does deserve a score of 99. In spite of the boring videos.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The finest softcore teen glamor site on the Internet.
-A huge amount of photosets, number of individual models, number of contributing photographers.
-Easy login.
-Long time before site timeout.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-I use DownThemAll download manager, which works at this site.
-Fast download speeds. I normally get 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
-CCBill billing agent, which is one of the best credit card processors around.
-Search engine to allow you to search for models or photosets or photographers that you might like.
-Wide range of locations for the videos and photosets. In studios or houses, in fields, forests, at lakes or oceans or beach, they pose their lovely models to best advantage to show off these beauties.
Cons:
-The cons are basically minor. This is without a doubt the finest softcore teen glamor site on the Internet.
-The sheer size of the site (number of photosets, number of models, number of videos) appears to turn some people off. Instead of appreciating the massive amount of content, many people seem to
think the site has too many photosets to go through, and that, because there are so many gorgeous gils, that the models themselves are not as attractive as they really are.
-Metart has a patent on filming gorgeous naked teens and making the videos boring and a waste of time to watch. This is something I've wondered about for years: It's just a wasted opportunity of attractive models.
-The site will disappoint those looking for midcore or hardcore action. This is strictly a softcore site. No boys are in any photosets. If there are two girls in a photoset or video, their interaction is extremely softcore. No masturbation or fondling of the other girl.
Bottom Line:
As I've stated many time in the past, this is the finest softcore teen glamor site on the Internet.
There is an amazing amount of content. The site updates with 4 to 6 updates daily, which is just amazing for a single site.
Site statistics:
Number of photosets: 12,534
Number of videos: 1,045 Movies
Number of models: 2,766 Models
Number of contributing photographers: 250
Number of photos: 1,365,839
Those are staggering numbers, that blow past any softcore teen glamor site that I'm aware of.
Metart is the giant in the field, not just in terms of quantity, but also quality. Since it's start back in the late 1990s, Metart has featured high-quality teen softcore photography from leading photographers around the world.
The photosets are offered in three sizes for both online viewing and for download:
Low definition, medium definition, high definition.
The videos can be streamed or downloaded in three definitions as well: low, medium and high.
Metart was the site I picked for my first review for PU in 2008. At that time I gave the site a score of 97. That turned out to be the highest score I've ever given to any site. Since that time, the site has only increased the number of models and photosets and photographers. I think the review I did about 4 years ago is still basically accurate today.
One difference is that the Metart live shows/live chat have changed. Metart used to offer an in-
house live chat that featured a number of girls that were live each day for a number of hours
daily. The public shows were basically free. True, you could pay for a private show, or you could tip a girl during her public show. But it was basically a free source of entertainment, and the girls were friendly, and the shows were not designed to maximize the amount of money the members would pay to watch the show. That seems almost quaint today. Most live shows I've seen recently try to get the members to pay to watch the girls perform.
Metart no longer has the in-house live chat shows. Instead, they offer a link to a commercial live chat program designed to make money off the members. I believe it's cheaper to go to a topless bar than to watch a private live cam show.
Lately, the site seems to have loosened their rules, and allow two girls to kiss in a photoset or video, but the kisses are almost chaste. The sample video in the preview pages gives a false impression the site has erotic videos. It's true the videos inside are of naked girls, and many of the models are attractive. But I can't emphasize enough how boring these videos are.
I complain about the boring videos. But because of the massive photoset content, the high quality of the photos, the number of photographers that contribute to this site, the site deserves its reputation as best in breed of teen softcore glamor sites. I gave the site a score of 97 about 4 years ago, and the site has only improved since then, adding more content, trying to make using the site easier to use over time, changing the default filenaming system to make the filenames more descriptive, and in other ways they try to make the site more user-friendly.
I am giving the site a score of 99.
How could they improve this site, to give it a perfect 100?
That would be a fantasy project:
1. They could delete almost all their
videos, and hire whoever shoots the videos at X-Art or the Diesel Access network. But that would mean a change in the Met-art philosophy, which stresses softcore porn.
2. They could send their models over to my house, where I could tell if their models are really as attracive as they look. At my age (I'm in my 60s), I couldn't do that much with these girls, but it sure would be nice to try. But that might be illegal. So maybe they could hire me as a stunt cock. Again, that would mean a change in their softcore approach. But maybe they could start a "Metart meets an aging fan reality show", because reality shows are very popular today.
Unfortunately, that's only in my dreams.
For $20/month with a PU discount, this site is a fantastic bargain. Or $99/year, which is an even better deal if you join the site for a month and believe the site is worth a long term membership. I think the site is like a museum of Most Erotic Teens, which I believe is the former name of the site, from which they changed it to MET-Art. For a softcore teen site, this is truly the best in show.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Probably the finest softcore porn site in the world. The site empasizes photo sets, but also has thousands of softcore videos.
-The site has thousands of models, many of them some of the most beautiful models in the world.
-The models are mainly white Eastern European teens, but there is a large number of models in their twenties and thirties as well.
Most of the older models started their careers as teens, and continued as models for years afterward.
-The site updates with 4 models each day, except for the first day of each month, where you get updates for 6 models. No other site (softcore glamour) comes close to the daily update rate of Metart.
-The photography at the site comes from hundreds of professional photographers, the largest stable of photographers of any site I know of.
Cons:
-The amount of softcore content at the site is huge. And that is a problem: You don't appreciate the quality of the photo sets because there are so many gorgeous models on display. That's human nature.
-The site structure is organized for easy navigation. The search is excellent. That's a plus, obviously, but people take the excellent organization and search capabilities for granted. Again, it's human nature to discount what you have in abundance.
-Most of the Metart videos are boring, in spite of how lovely the models can be. I don't know why. Softcore videos can be erotic, but I find that most photo sets are far more erotic than the videos. I'm guessing that there are too many factors that go into creating a video, and that it's easier or simpler to make an erotic photograph than an erotic video.
Bottom Line:
Metart is the finest softcore site I've ever found. Many of the models are some of the most beautiful women in the world. You have a vast amount of photosets, well over 2,000. You have over 4,000 models. You have no download limits for streaming or downloading. You have a daily update rate of 4 models each day (except for the first of the month, when you get 6 models).
Almost all photo sets have over 100 photos per set.
Metart started around 1999, so if you have your favorite models at the site, you can probably find several of her sets over time.
There is a brief model listing for most models, which give her physical attributes, and most model listings have a brief bio, which might be accurate (or wholly made-up, which is often the case with porn, going back to the days of Playboy and Penthouse).
Basically, I think Metart is the best softcore porn site on the internet. Because of the huge amount of photo sets of thousands of attractive girls. And the ease of navigating the site.
The membership price is no higher than any other softcore site, in spite of the massive amount of content.
However, some PU members might want Metart to have a more diverse selection of models: most models are white, slender, Eastern European teens. There are some Black, Asian, Latino models, but they are definitely the minority.
I'm giving the site a score of 98, because I think Metart is, as I said, the finest softcore glamcore site in the world.
And the support staff is superb. One of the best I've found. They are responsive to any emails asking for help from members, responding within 24 hours usually.
The PU site has a discounted price of $5 for the first month.
Any PU member who has not been a member of the site should grab that bargain.
And PU members who have been previous members of the site should also use that chance to see what new content is available since their last membership.
Like I said, Metart is the finest softcore glamcore site on the internet.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
PU/TBP discount, often memberships can be had for under $10 with holiday deals.
The ultimate site for fans of softcore photo erotica with a massive collection dating back 20 years.
Photos come in 3 sizes small, medium and large with a zip download for each.
Video download options from 270p up to 4k, stream options from 270p to 1080p.
4 new updates per day 7 days a week apart from the 1st of the month when you get 6.
No problems using my download manager. (Firefox DTA)
A multitude of user tools to set up your browsing options, search and sort the content as well as an advanced model search and user generated tags.
Billing by ECHST.net (Rocketgate), never had any problem with them and easy cancellation.
Cons:
It's difficult to find any faults with the actual site or content itself. My only real gripe and I get this every time I join any site in the Met Art Network is the misleading pricing how they display the join price in USD and then charge me the same figure in GBP, that's why I'll only ever join any of their sites on holiday deals and stay for 1 month only.
If you prefer videos it's probably not the site for you. I don't care about videos so not really a con for me personally.
Earliest content on the site lower resolution which is to be expected.
This is my first time back to MetArt since I last reviewed it back in February 2012 thanks to the early May $10 holiday deal from PU/TBP and it's clear the site continues to go from strength to strength with the number of photo galleries having almost doubled in the last 8 years. There seems to be no let-up in the production line of hot young women coming out of Russia, Ukraine and other Eastern European countries willing to take their clothes off for our enjoyment and even during the current world pandemic they continue to provide 4 new updates every day. In the last 7 days there were 26 new photo sets and 2 new videos and this is typical of most weeks so still very much a photo orientated site.
Back in 2012 my favourite models here were all the well known Eastern Euro models from the 2000s such as Marketa Belonoha, Monika Vesela, Eve Angel, Ariel, Suzie Carina, Peaches and Eufrat but these days I much prefer the newer generation of models and favourites include Milena D (70 galleries, 6 videos) Mila Azul (42 galleries, 3 videos) and Emily Bloom (53 galleries, 6 videos). Mia Sollis, a cute freckled redhead who caught my eye as a relative newcomer with 6 or 7 galleries back in 2012 has taken over the crown of my favourite redhead from Faye Reagan and now has 67 galleries and 6 videos. Not forgetting my passion for exotic women there's the beautiful Asian goddess Li Moon with 51 galleries and 1 video and the dark, dusky Spanish senorita Apolonia with 18 galleries and 3 videos.
It's interesting looking back at my 2012 review and almost as if the guys at MetArt read it and changed things at the site to suit my personal preferences. The biggest improvement in the galleries is that the vast majority of sets now start with the model clothed or wearing lingerie so a greater emphasis on the tease and a more seductive feeling with the anticipation and build up to seeing the girl naked. I was never a huge fan of the photo sets where the girl is completely naked from picture number one although they can sometimes be nice when photographed in stunning outdoors locations. I was also never a fan of those pseudo-lesbian shoots featuring two or more girls so pleased to see they don't seem to bother with those here anymore and that its basically all solo content these days. There has only been 2 two girl photo sets added in the last 2 years and the last two girl video was released in 2016.
I'm not really that much into the videos and stated back in 2012 that I find the MetArt videos boring so decided to download some of the more recent videos of some of my favourite models to see if they have improved. I think the videos have improved to a point for the same reason as the photo galleries for the simple reason that the models start out in more clothing or lingerie than they used to making them more seductive. Watching Li Moon teasing on a bed in a white lace basque in the film titled “Beautiful Handwriting” and watching Apolonia stripping out of a college girl uniform in the film titled “Homework” was simply mesmerizing. Once the girls become naked though this is the point for me where the videos revert back to boring because they don't really do anything remotely sexual and I find myself just skipping to the end. I guess they don't go as far as masturbation or insertions to keep the distinction between MetArt and their more explicit sites Sex Art and Metart X.
Apart from the introduction of the 4k videos the technical specs of the content has not really changed much since my last visit in 2012. I have no idea if my PC could play a 4k video so don't bother with those. On the videos page in the sort options you can select 4k but on doing this to see how many they have I only got 6 videos in the search result so I assume they can't be tagging their 4k videos correctly to show up in the search. The size of the highest resolution photos still vary greatly as noted in 2012 with recent updates ranging from 4300 up to 9000 px on the long side. Personally I don't see the point of 9000 px photos with a 24 inch monitor when the model's face won't even fit inside your screen. As an obsessive photo set collector who likes to keep every set the medium 2048px photos suit me still as the perfect compromise between quality and file size.
I'm raising my score from 92 in 2012 to 98 today as the improvements in the content make the site almost as damn near perfect as possible for a collector of solo photo erotica such as myself. If they got rid of the regional pricing forcing me to pay 30% more than an American all the time I might even consider giving them a 100.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- High Res Photos
- Zip Files
- Hi-Res Videos, NO DRM
- Beautiful Models
- Endless Amount Of Material
- Very Frequent Updates
- 14 Hours Free Webcam Per Day
- Favorites Folder With Rating System
- Fast Downloads
- No Download Limits
Cons:
- Original Met-Art Sets No Longer Archived
- Some Photo Sets Are Bland
Bottom Line:
This site has really sold me with it's high quality material and very frequent updating. You get 4 brand new sets per day to go along with the massive archive. Photos come in 3 sizes (Roughly 3000+, 2000+, 1024) available in fast downloading zip files corresponding to each size. So many beautiful naked models that not one stands out amongst the bevy of girls. Most Erotic Teens has stepped beyond the strictly teen genre in recent years, but there are no hags here. Some of the sets are nothing but bland statue posing by model wannabees, but with such a wealth of material, it's no big deal to skip past these. As of this review, Met has about 90 videos, the newer ones available in divx, wmv, mpeg, quicktime, mp4 and ipod files. The divx are 1280x720 in size, the wmv 720x576. Naked girls with no hardcore to be seen is what these videos are about. They have a high quality webcam with 7 two hour shows daily where you can chat about anything but sex with the naked girls if you are into that. Unfortunately, the oldest original Most Erotic Teens photo sets are no longer archived here, these are collector's items now. Met-Art is what every porn site should aspire to be. Attractive, erotic, interesting, fun to use, interactive with a bottomless well of material.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the internet's largest sites and highest quality sites.
- No longer is just about teasing or non-pink or non-sexual poses, the site continues to become a little more risky each time I join and it's a very welcome change.
- Not only will you find at least a dozen or more models you really like, you most-likely won't see half of them thanks to size of the site.
- Download speeds are very good (80% of max).
- The models are all very attractive, very much teens and they're becoming more playful.
- The quality is close to as second to none as you can get, that's technical quality.
- The pictures can be so big that they're bigger than life-size. I opened one and all I could see was the model's belly button and a couple freckles. That's virtual reality to me.
- For a site this size the navigation is very good.
- The videos are nice technical quality and some are good, not great but the real draw here are the pictures.
Cons:
- So, about those videos, it's not meant as disrespect at all or even demeaning to the models but most of these models are so young that they're just not seductive in the videos. It reminds me of watching a woman do naked yoga. Some might like that but some won't.
- Similar to the other sites on Met-Art's network, there are cam girls over on the right of your screen.
- This is a new one that I hadn't seen before, "staff selection" videos. Looks interesting, started playing one ... it's a 30 second sample. If I want it ... pay $4 for 1 video. I don't like it. I know, I can skip it but when you're posting videos of non-masturbation then post one of masturbation and tell me I have to pay to watch/download it, I don't like it.
Bottom Line:
I've been trying to review sites that aren't reviewed as much but my subscription to Met-Art is running out in a few days and I wanted to review it.
For years, Met-Art frustrated me. I like pictures as much as videos. They're taking really good steps to improving the photo sets. More models are starting sets in clothes and teasing, that's a big improvement to me since used to it was "she's naked" in picture 1 and by the end of the set she's still naked and not showing anything. Now, you're going to see most everything including the fun teases, upskirts, upshorts, panties slid over. I'm glad to see them adding more sexuality to their site. I used to kind of "poke at them" for their models doing the "what is over on that hill over yonder" poses. Now, they're doing, "I'm bending over, what do you see?"
I listed in the cons and I really don't like the "staff selections" videos that feature masturbation, which very few if any of the regular membership videos show. At that asking price, two videos would cost almost as much as I pay for a monthly membership to Met-Art. I've been borderline on complained about Met-Art X having masturbation while Met-Art doesn't but I think Met-Art at this point has earned the right to stick to no masturbation videos on Met-Art ... which is why I don't like the staff selection videos. It makes me feel like they could just combine Met-Art and Met-Art X if they're going to charge extra for masturbation.
Met-Art's strength has always been photo sets so I didn't really punish them in the score for the video problems.
You get 4 new photo sets per day, which is more than anyone that I know of. And they have a very good variety of settings. I know someone asked recently on another review of another site about photo orientation. Met-Art has a good blend of both portrait and landscape orientation in their photos. The overall numbers would normally be more than I would try to include in a review but I'm going to try it in this one.
Here goes nothing...
18,886 photo sets
812 videos
And yes, those numbers could be wrong! I would say even if they're not exact, they're fairly close. Just estimating, that's around 1,500,000 and 2,000,000 photos. When you add in that high technical quality, it's all but impossible to complain about Met-Art.
I'm going back to the beginning because I have been very impressed with their style of shooting in the newer photo sets. We've got upskirts, upshorts and the lost art of skin-tight shirt with nipples sticking out. I don't want to say they've been influenced by anyone but a lot of these newer sets are very similar to the sets on Zishy, which to me is the best tease photography site on the internet.
The navigation features updates tab, films, photos, model list, blog and they all work! It let's you focus more on what your preference is and with a site this big that's a must. Maybe even ALS Scan has influenced them a little on the photos, I just thought about that and threw that in.
They also are adding a better blend of models, they're almost all slim/slender but a few are more built and you're starting to see more Hispanic, Asian models. That to me is where Met-Art is at their best. You're capturing very young models, so the teasing and hints at shyness is important to it. This also plays into the large photos. If it's an upskirt and you open one of the large photos, you can see everything you've ever wanted to see through the models' panties. The combination of adding more tease and big photos offsets the video problem for me.
You of course can download the photo sets in zips and some of them are as big as some videos you've downloaded. These newer photo sets are nearing 8000 long end. We have joked before about the huge pictures sometimes showing imperfections but in this case, with all this teasing, I don't mind being able to count the pubic hairs she missed while shaving.
Similar to Zishy, I just can't go all the way to a 100 with Met-Art because porn is photos and videos. I will say that if they improved their videos it wouldn't really change how I view Met-Art, as a photo site. So, maybe it's best that they don't try to become a solo masturbation video site. I don't even know that I would download the videos. I have a Met-Art folder that has over 300GB in it and it's all photos. It's going to be a long time before anyone threatens their dominance of the photo porn world.
I would recommend it to anyone but I like to think everyone likes some photos. If you're dead-set on videos, I can't say you'll be happy with these videos. I do want to mention someone asked a few months ago about sites that have videos of fully nude models lightly touching themselves but not full masturbation. Met-Art fits that description well.
Like some of my other recent, highly-rated, well-known sites, I probably won't review Met-Art again unless there's major changes. It's near perfect as it is.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Being this site, was recently reviewed. I'm going to give a more unique point of view from the site.
The site has some amazing deals for the size of it. I've been able to find access for only $9.95. And it was only at a monthly requirement.
This site is more than worth, the access price I'm paying. It is one of the largest sites, and best organized they've seen. As was noted, there are vast amounts material to look through. if you have not been a member here it is highly recommended. But most of the materials considered soft, seeing the high quality and level that this type of material can be done at a few look at other websites and ask why they don't do similar.
Cons:
Cons:
There isn't much that can be said about this site, being negative. The only thing I could think of that would be negative, is with the mass amount of material modern technology for websites simply did not give it the needed navigation. That is not the site's downfall because simply at this point there's nothing better out there to browse through and find material.
Bottom Line:
As noted above I am taking more of a personal approach to this review. It is something new I am trying on my reviews at that simply stating statistics. At this point it became and sites like this have been around for over 20 years. We must figure at this point that most sites have a mass amount of material, and have certain conditions upon joining either monthly, yearly etc.
Overview.
The sites aesthetics are amazing. Upon joining you find yourself, with an overwhelming amount of information to start at once. You then realize even if you had paid full price that would've been well worth the amount of access. The site has been around for very long time, about eight years ago I gave the last review.I gave it a 90 at that point. It considered it a very well done site than. It is improved if that was possible, to give it a 97 this time. It is improved so much over the last eight years since the last review, that I find 97 is about the highest I could give any site. Anything above a 97 or 98 simply doesn't exist at this point in my reviews. It means they're simply technology has caught up to access some websites making it simpler than it is right now. Right now navigation has been about the same give or take for the last eight years, with little improvement. I am sure sites are waiting for the new technology that will thrust( no pun intended) this industry into a full interactive navigation system.
The good, everything you see within this site is high quality, and amazing the video and photography is unmatched. And something you might see at a professional studio is reflected here. It's obvious they take great detail in choices of lighting, atmosphere, and sound to make it an experience you won't forget. Why this may be on the soft end of things. You won't be disappointed, unless it's simply something you're not into. But the quality alone is definitely worth taking a look. The gallery is something I think that's overlooked as well in websites like this in the day and age of video. The gallery produces a high-quality and amazing experience as well. I 4K monitor, and it is amazing, the detail and perfection that you see on the stuff that's on this website.
Negative,
If there is one thing I could say about this site, is that what you get for the pricing is not all that clear. As a novice coming to that website looking at it for the first time you would not be as impressed as you will be after you join. Other websites tend to put all their best work forward. I noticed the basic advertisement, and interaction to entice others to join is at minimal. It's not a negative for the viewer or the person that may join as a member. But it actually hurts them as a business not to have the material more well known and pronounced on the website. Maybe it's just me but I compare it to other sites tend to give you a lot more before you joined telling you a lot more what's going on inside the site.
Should you join?
It would be worth collecting bottles and cans, to join a site like this if you're broke. It's an experience you won't soon forget once you go back out and look at other sites and compared to this one. Why does lack the hard side of things, the soft approach seems just as rewarding once a viewer looks at the information. It's not often I am impressed especially with the absorption of the jury like this on the Internet. It is so overwhelming, to see the Internet have the material it does saturating the Internet. That it often is very difficult to find anything unique or different. But this site does it well, and pushes itself outside of the box just enough to be above the rest. As was noted in another review this is about as good as it gets for this niche. There isn't any other website out there that I can think that comes even close. And actually other should not even try it's a waste of their time to meet this level that is taken them years to get to.
Closing thoughts,
why do this review, I sometimes found myself a loss for words to describe the amazing job done. Often times in this particular type of business, we look at the sameness, the repetitive nature and it becomes boring. For some reason at least from this reviewer's point of view, they were able to take each scene and make it unique and not repetitive. It's as if they took the actresses, themselves and allowed them to dictate how their personality could be best used in this unique niche. I say unique. Because there's nothing else out there, that comes close to what I see here. I decided about a month ago to take another look back at this site. Then found myself going why did I wait so long to take a look at it again. If you've not join the site you are missing an awful lot of the intended nature of the industry in this niche. I would like to give them 100 I simply cannot give a perfect score to any site that still uses the typical menu system. What is not their fault until something else comes better along I can't read something a perfect score.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- The obvious: Beautiful models.
- Easy to navigate, easy to use.
- No download limits that I encountered.
- A surprising number of models with very natural tan lines. I'm going to type it again just because they're so attractive and I'm surprised no one has started a niche site based on them. Tan lines.
- Not the same setting for every model. FWIW, I didn't recognize any repeats.
- Very few, if any at all, fake breasts.
- Did I mention tan lines?
Cons:
- Aliases for some well-known stars.
- User tags not as complete as they could be.
- Pretty limited in age, color, and body type.
- Naming is a bit odd. Lots of single letters after first names to differentiate from models. Made up example: Lori B., Lori G., Lori H., and Lori L. Not a big deal, but noticeably unusual.
Bottom Line:
For perspective, my average site rating is 77 and the best score I've ever given is a 91.
I decided to finally see what all the fuss is about, and I'll be damned if the site didn't live up to its reputation.
Know what you're getting into. It's not hardcore. It is gorgeous women photographed well by people who know what they are doing.
This is the first time I think I've really experienced a hydra. A very, very pleasant hydra, but a hydra still. You can click to look at a model's set, and either the "previous set" or "next set" thumbnail will show a different model's scene that you're going to click on to look at, too. And then it will happen again with that set and another model. And again. And again. And again.
Most websites find you browsing through multiple scenes to see the ones you DO to view. This one is the opposite. You'll realize that you are having trouble finding sets you DON'T want to see. Word of warning: If you join, you won't just be a member one single time. It might not be month-to-month, but you'll probably be joining this site again.
Beautiful models. Not "hey, those are beautiful models for an adult site," but beautiful in the women-in-general sense. I prefer older women, but there's no denying that almost every single model would turn heads in any room she entered, and more than likely be the prettiest one there. Even the models you decide to skip over are attractive, and if the skipped-over one were to approach you at the beach or grocery store (much less a bar) and began chatting with you and showing even the slightest bit of interest, then you'd do your best to see her again. And she's one you'll skip over on the site.
Every shoot I saw had small (10-ish mb), medium (50mb or so), and large (80-500mb) zip files, and the images can also be viewed on-screen with a choice between small, medium, and large as well.
Did I mention tan lines yet? It's indicative of why the site is so good. It's not simply tan lines, but all-over tans, pale skin, hairy pubic areas, completely shaved, etc. It's so great to see different women look like different women.
Everything isn't perfect, though. Letting users add the tags is a pretty inefficient system. While "sexy", "gorgeous", "pretty face", and "perfect 10" are nice, they're very subjective and not extremely useful. Very basic tags from the photographer/webmaster like curly hair, brunette, lingerie, etc. would be appreciated since the tags can be clicked on to pull up any other set that has the same tag.
There is very little ethnic variety, and is 95%+ beautiful white women. That's not a big deal for me, but if you prefer women that are more towards the darker side of the spectrum be aware that you're not going to find too much variation here.
You'll recognize a few stars here and there (the lovely Lorena Garcia comes to mind, and I was very glad to see her), but for the most part it's unknown amateurs.
I didn't download or otherwise investigate the videos at all so someone else will need to give input on that, but I have no reason to suspect they're anything other than superb.
Bottom line:
A great site. If you have any appreciation for the female form, join. Will I join again? Definitely.
Webmaster: Do you run (or does anyone else know of) a MILF website with similar photography? Anilos is great and I've been a repeat member off and on for years, but there's a definite difference in styles and I'd really like to see some older women handled with Met Art's artistic approach.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Best site on Internet for softcore European models.
Huge selection of models.
Many of the models are lovely/gorgeous/beautiful: really, some of the prettiest models I've seen on
any porn site.
Many different erotic photographers have contributed to the site.
Most models have multiple photosets.
Most photosets have 100+ pictures of the model.
The photosets are of very high quality (except some from the early years of the site).
With a membership, you get a large number of hours of live webcams per day.
For years they have been posting 3-4 new photosets per day. That is a huge number of updates.
They are constantly coming out with new models, as well as with new photosets of older models(not in age, but as in previously viewed models).
Most models appear to be in their late teens or early 20s.There are many different physical types of European girls: breast size: small, medium, large. Most girls slender, some medium, a few large (not heavy, just big beautiful girls).
Cons:
Met-art has made an art of posting boring videos of beautiful young girls.
Sorry, but that disappoints me.
The videos are a very minor extra, hardly worth watching.
The models are almost all European. There are very few Asian or African or others. To see other types of models, go to a different site.
This is softcore only. If you are looking for hardcore, go elsewhere. No boy-girl sex. No boys at all. A little girl-girl touching, but so mild you wonder why they bother.
Met-art has a posted schedule for the livecam shows. If a model does not appear for her show, you don't find out about the change until you are waiting for the model to appear live, and maybe there is a replacement model, or maybe no show at all.
The same model can have different names. This is a porn problem, but why can't they give a girl a name and remember it?
Search feature for model sets is OK, but could be easier to use.
Bottom Line:
If you like soft-core pictures of beautiful European girls, this is the site to join. The annual fee of $99 is a bargain.
This site (in my opinion) offers, for the same or less money, so much more than competing sites such as:
metmodels: (a sister site to met-art) that has fewer updates and fewer models and fewer photosets.
hegre-art: fewer updates and fewer models and fewer photosets. No livecams. No variety of photographers. And is more expensive than met-art.
domai: a nice softcore site, but again: fewer updates and fewer models and fewer photosets. No
livecams. And the photosets do not have the great quality of the met-art sets.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-outstanding model selection
-large amount of photographers
-models from many diffrent countries
-very good updates(normaly 4 or 5 sets each day)
-site has been doing very good with viedos lately
-no download limits
-photo sets average around 140 pics often more
-models often dont start off nude which makes sets more interesting
-some sets have very artistic look
-most sets have many good shots of the model from various angles
-there is now model info got added sometime in 2008
-huge ammount of pictures something around 600,000 total!
-good amount of models of diffrent bulids, skinny,large breasted,many diffrent skin tones, many models have very nice butts
-for me the site has very fast servers and I have used it on dial-up as well as DSL connections
Cons:
-not all models have a bio yet
-due to there being so many models one that you like may not appear very often
-site layout can be confusing at first
-some viedos are filmed photosets
-cost of site much higher if you pay the monthly cost of $29.95 or $359.40 after a year compared to $99.00 for a year or $8.25 a month.
Bottom Line:
I feel that MET-ART is the best errotic art site on the net. It has the most to offer over any other simular site namely in sheer number of models and cost(if you pay the $99.00 yearly fee).I have been a member of FEMJOY,DOMAI,HeargeArt,and MC Nudes. All of these sites are very good as well but MET-ART is the one that keeps me most happy.AS I said in the cons the site can be a little confusing layout wise but to me its not really a big deal because MET-ART provides what I really like(errotic art) in spades.Another con would be that some viedos are just filmed photosets though I think this is more the artists choice than the sites saying. One artist GONCHAROV has outstanding films that are purely films and there is no camera(photographic)work going on the model is simply moving around as GONCHAROV films. Another con is that sometimes a model may only pose one time and never appear in another set however this quite rare and there are so many models that you are likely to have many favorites and most likely there will be a model that you enjoy pretty much everyday.I see that some people con the site for lacking masturbation ect. I dont agree with this it is not the aim of the site.Masturbation is more like true pornagraphy while MET-ART is errotic art to me those are two diffrent things.This site is for the person with a "sensual" eye one that is most pleased by the female form but not by a direct sexual act. The number one con to me is the pricing. The basic monthly fee adds up to $359.40 if you kept the account open for a year. It is best to try the site for a month and if you like it buy the $99.00 full year fee which ends up being $8.25 a month or the 90 day fee which is cheaper than paying the monthly fee at a higher price for the same timespan. My best advice is to try several errotic sites and find the one that most satisfiies your personal taste. That way you have tried some that you think you like and pick the best one much like when you buy a new car test drive.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Fantastic models
-Varied photographers
-Crisp Clear images
-Large sets
-4 daily updates
-Many new models
-Sensual poses and vibrant sets
-Continual improvements in models and average quality
-Superb Lighting
-Create Galleries
-Re-rate artists and models
-Amazing Value
Cons:
-Recent Majoly (artist) sets
-Some boring videos
-Occasional quality lapse
-Met-cam models moved to private cams
-PSP videos low res
Bottom Line:
The best artistic nude website online, there is no competition for Met-Art because they are easily in a league of their own. The reasons for this are an absolutely huge amount of archived sets and huge collection of models. New models are regularly added with increasing quality. New models that get rated highly are very quickly brought back for follow up photo shoots (usually 2 more). Completely amazing website, one you should check out as you have probably stumbled upon many great sets from them anyway.
Photo quality in the website is extremely good with models, artist and locations being of high standards. Artistic and photo quality is excellent, artists like Voronin and Ingret are masters at lighting and produce superb sets with wonderful colour contrast along with clear high megapixel photos. The actual set locations are great and varied on their own, although there is some reusing of set location there is usually a fair gap between those updates. Models are very attractive but of course people have different likes and dislikes and Met-art has the huge range to cater for anybody. I think there is plenty of variety for new models also.
The site does have a few minor negatives including movies and some artistic choice. Movies themselves are up and down, quality is fairly good but content varies from sexy to sterile. In some cases watching videos of existing photosets can be a bad thing. Other times videos are very nicely put together, some videos you can hear the sound of the camera clicking and the artist speaking and this may put off some people who prefer music, although many include music. Older videos tend to be sexier and racier. Another very big issue currently is the artist Majoly who seems to be bringing the quality of the site down, his recent works appear as if he has taken some shots of attractive models in good locations and then passed them through a very aggressive Vaseline filter making them look awful, thankfully most artists are not like this.
Content on the site is almost beyond quick description. There are so many great sets in the archives dating back almost 10 years. They will post up a preview of the four updates coming for the next day. You can rate on each model and each artist and then change your vote at a later stage, which I do quite a bit. There is a brief bio for the model which I think is sufficient, more community feedback, such as commenting on sets or voting on upcoming sets is something to look at. After a year with this site I still check it daily for content. Its very much worth a yearly membership, especially considering the huge amount of existing photos you may need to download. Ive still got hundreds of models to rate and I try to rate every new set, which again emphasizes the content and introduction of new models, 39 new models in January 09 alone. Its amazing value and I will continue to subscribe given what I have seen in the past year. Im glad to be a subscriber.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
#membership special is only $19.95 a month
#these women are shot as if they are royalty
#models personify godesses: Athena, Diana, Venus etc..are well represented by these models in the flesh- they models are beautiful, just made me gasp to look at them.
#pics come in 681 x 1024, 1024 x 681; 1362 x 1248, 1248 x 681; 2000 x 3008, 3008 x 2000; 2912 x 3468, 3468 X2912.
#live Met cams ( about 12 models a day); are everyday at these times:12 midnite, 5am, 8am, noon,3pm, 6pm, and 9pm; user can give feeback in realtime to met cam model.
# 2 hr webcam session per model.(in real time with model in Russia)
# movies come in DIVx;Quicktime;mpeg;wmv,ipod about every 4-5 days
#this is not just a nude site. Met art utilizes acessories very well: models wear necklaces and jewelry, earrings, shoes, belts, bracelets. You see hosiery, lingerie, ballerina outfits and more..
# offers private webcam chats for $2.50 a minute without admin.
Cons:
#there is not really a variety of themes in the vids; won't see dress up or masterbating, public nudity
#has trial memberships, be carefull when joining to select the month membership and not like $16.99 trial amount for three day trial for two sites membership and 19.99 for three day trial for three site membership unless you want to try the sites out for three days.
# specialty site; you will get your nudelover fix.Will have to go elsewhere for other genres.
#webcam for dial up connection can be choppy at times.
Bottom Line:
Met Art has very stunning and striking photosets. If I had to describe the models. They would be queens, royalty, princesses and goddesses personified and represented with these models. some of the models were so striking that they took my breath away- just great top of the line sets.
I joined this site a few days ago for the fourth time and was surprised to see the price of $19.99. I suppose this special is to help promote their other two sites Metmodels, and Errotica Archives which is offered for $19 if you join them seperatly (their banners are prominent right after joining). The idea I suppose is that they lowered the price to make it possible to have 2 memberships for just $40. I just checked. you can select two of the three for $49, or all three for $59.99.
I have the metcams on another webpage as I speak.-- just got a hello back from the model Neela, very nice. Works well even with dial up ( is what I have) and can be resized to full screen mode by pressing f11. You can tip the models and make an offer for a private webcam chat at $2.50 a minute.
I give this site a 96 because $19.99 is really a great deal to have access to their stunning models and webcam sessions that run 7 days a week. The interaction feature is nice..
I have no idea when the price will go back to what it was when I last joined which was $29.99 so I'd say that this is a real good time to jump on board and try out this site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Vast amount of photos - softcore only - in various resolution. (over half a million)
Great high-resolution photos
Zip for different resolution.
Ok amount of videos (480 today)
A significant selection of mostly east-european teens.
Easy navigation - fine layout
No limits of any kind
Good on updates
Ok quality live-cam
Cons:
Older videos lacks quality (but that's the same elsewhere)
A little too much outdoor-photos for my taste.
I'm not much into videos of photoshoots, but later videos are getting better.
Bottom Line:
I have not been at Met Art for a couple of years - this site has turn to a far better softporn-deal than earlier.
In contrast to some of the hardcore-sites I've visited lately, this Met Art has what I've been looking for (ok, only in the soft line).
But here is NEW stuff - photos and videos of great (mostly) looking european teens.
As a video-freak, I'm pretty content with the way this site has developed. But, fellow PU's this Met Art has given me back the pleasure of enjoying fine girl softcore photos. And these guys do a lot with fine photo-quality for the comstumers.
They have 3 diffenrent solution for the later sets:
High, medium and low (4368x2912 and 1365x1048 and 1024x683 - in that order)
And they have zip for each solution.
The later videos have 1280x720 - and the formats are several: Divx, WMV, ipod, mp4 (I think it's called) quicktime and mpg.
The earlier videos are not that swell (512x334) they are still a bit blurred - man, would it not be great if they reedited some of these videos and placed them on the site in better resolution!
I've been a bit like a grumpy old man in my latest reviews - but here I found the spirit again.
This site just makes my happy to browse for fine porn.
And above all - the joy of fine photos is back.
It's not perfect or a 100 here, but man, it's close (BUT fellow PU's - this is still entirely softcore)
And sorry, I gave up counting the amount of photosets........but I think, you get value for every penny.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Probably the finest softcore photo site on the internet.
-The largest softcore photo site on the internet. See the bottom line section for the site statistics on the number of photo sets, the number of videos, the number of models, the number of contributing photograpers.
-Updates daily with 4 new items (photo set + video), except on the first of each month, when there are 6 new items.
-Photo sets are offered in a zip file of low, medium and high definition.
-Videos are offered in 270p through 4Kp for the last several years. Before that, the maximum definition offered was 1080p.
-Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads.
-Navigation is basically simple. Good search engine, tags for photo sets and videos. I mainly use the search engine to search for a particular model's content.
Cons:
The cons are basically minor.
-Years ago they had a simple way to list the contents by year and month. They still have a listing for year and month, but it takes more clicks to use it.
-I don't know why, but I find many softcore photo sets can be erotic. But it's much harder for a softcore video to be erotic. Many of the videos at MetArt are boring, in spite of how lovely the model can be, in spite of the model exposing her naked flesh.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-MetArt is a huge site. It can be overwhelming when you browse through the massive amount of photo sets and videos. It's a psychological effect, but it's easy to devalue the photo sets of these beautiful models because you have access to thousands of these sets.
-Most models range in age from 18 to about 30. Most models are white. Most models are slender to medium build. If these model characteristics fit what you're looking for, you're in luck. But some people want greater diversity.
Bottom Line:
MetArt is a softcore site. Don't join expecting hardcore content, you will be disappointed.
It features a collection of thousands of the most attractive women on the planet.
Site stats:
Films: 1,839
Galleries: 23,019
Models: 3,878
Photographers: 291
MetArt is probably the finest softcore site on the internet. Because of the low price (it's the same price as Femjoy, MPL Studios, and other fine photo sites), the massive amount of content, the easy navigation.
During the holidays, you can often find a special discount of $10 to $15 for the first month.
Which is not the case with Femjoy, MPL Studios, or other good softcore sites that only rarely offer a discounted price. Hegre usually offers $15 for the first month during holidays, but MetArt beats Hegre on amount of content, the update rate, and I prefer MetArt over Hegre for its content. I saw a special offer for a Labor Day discount of $5.00 for the first month for MetArt, which is a great price.
MetArt has excellent customer support. They will normally respond to an email within a few hours, and they make a real effort to solve any customer problems.
If you haven't joined MetArt before, and you enjoy softcore photos, I strongly recommend joining MetArt.
It's the finest softcore site on the internet, in my opinion. The beauty of the models, the massive amount of content, easy navigation, excellent customer support, make this the finest softcore site I've ever joined.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
Excellent customer service. I had a problem when initially trying to log into the site just after making payment. I sent an email to the support team and received a near instant reply and the problem was solved.
The sheer scale of the site. With so many updates it is essential to be able to find what you're looking for and they make it easy to locate particular girls, sets or dates.
The sheer beauty of the women!
Cons:
I consider this site's main emphasis is on photos. Videos are added fairly regularly but they account for only a small proportion of the site's product. I also find them somewhat tame and even a little boring. A solo girl moving about caressing herself with perhaps some stripping off. I would really like them to be a bit more explicit but I guess that's not the style on this site. There are probably other sites on the MetArt network that would provide this style and I hope to try them at some time.
Bottom Line:
I have recently enjoyed a month's membership of this long standing site and as I had such an enjoyable experience I thought I'd post a review. In the past I take a one month membership every year or so to enable me to catch up with some of my favourite young women. I often receive emails from MetArt offering discounted subscriptions and that's when I sometimes join up. I received one such offer a while ago but didn't take it up there and then. A month or so later I fancied joining up so sent an email to the support address asking if they were going to make any further offers. I received a very fast response in which they supplied a link whereby I could join at a good discounted rate. I think I made a bit of an error in providing wrong login details and having paid I couldn't get in. Another email again led to a fast response and following their instructions I was able to access the site fully. So I can really say that their customer service is second to none.
As mentioned I tend to have a membership only once in a while and the capability to search back on the large number of previous sets is important to me. This time I went back by date to the last time I had a membership then went through month by month just initially quickly looking at the opening of sets that caught my eye and adding a favourite marker to these. I could then go back to the whole collection of favourites and download those in due course. So the excellent navigation tools on the site are a real plus point in my opinion.
I am more interested in the still photos of the site and as mentioned above I do find their videos a bit tame and uninspiring. I do like explicit views of these lovely ladies and I've noticed that in the last couple of years there has been some more content of revealing lovely labia and pussy stil pictures but the videos don't seem to follow suit. I appreciate there are other sites in the MetArt network that possibly offer the style I'm interested in and I hope to sample those at some time.
So to sum up I really enjoyed my month of membership. If you enjoy good basic nude photos of stunning young women you really can't go wrong here. I would highly recommend this great site.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-In my opinion, the finest softcore glamour site on the internet.
-The site is best of breed. For softcore teen photos. No other site comes close in terms of number of sets, frequency of updates. MPL Studios and Femjoy and some other sites are great, but MetArt is number one.
-Currently, MetArt has a PU discount of $9.99 for the first month, recurring at $19.99/month.
This is one of the lowest prices I seen for MetArt at $9.99 for the first month.
-The largest catalog of softcore glamour photo sets on the Internet. See bottom line for the current statistics.
-A large number of contributing photographers. So you get a variety of approaches. Not all sets will appeal to any one person, but if you are into softcore teen photos, this site should have plenty of content that will satisfy your needs.
I paid for a lifetime membership several years back, because I was tired of paying for monthly and yearly memberships. It was the first porn site I paid for a lifetime membership.
Cons:
PROS (CONTINUED):
-A large catalog of models: some of the cutest or most attractive teens on the planet.
However, you can also find a huge number of attractive teens at competing sites such as MPL Studios or Femjoy or other glamour style sites.
-Secure login and member pages: https.
-Customer service is 24/7. One of the finest customer services of any porn site I've ever dealt with.
The reps are friendly and helpful.
CONS -The cons are stricly minor.
-The sheer size of the site: it's the largest softcore teen site on the internet. You stare at thousands of photos of gorgeous girls, and your brain starts to shut down. You can't appreciate how lovely these girls are. It's human nature, or human psychology.
-Site is strictly for soft, softcore teen. No hardcore action.
-Almost all models are white. Very little variation in race, or age. Most models start at around 18, and some can continue shooting into the late 20s. But no older models in upper 30s or above.
Bottom Line:
CONS (continued):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. But this is standard for porn sites.
-The MetArt network used to have a system where if you were a member of one of their sites, you had access to membership plans to join most of the other sites for a discounted price of around $10/month. But they dropped that system years ago.
-MetArt used to have a live cam show offering where some MetArt models or other models would put on free shows. The models also offered private shows, but the free shows lasted 30 minutes or more, and the girls were friendly. There wasn't a lot of nudity in those shows, but it gave you a chance to interact with the models. They dropped that system many years ago, and went with a more commercial type cam show, where the performers and the sytem itself encourages the viewer to pay: These shows, both public and private, can become very expensive. It can be cheaper to go to a strip club and watch the strippers versus watching the modern live cam show.
BOTTOM LINE (start of):
On 2017-01-25, the stats are as follows:
Models: 3,285
Galleries: 16,678
Videos: 1,362
Contributing photographers: 272
On 2018-10-30, the stats are as follows:
Models: 3,548
Galleries: 19,089
Videos: 1,544
Contributing photographers: 283
Models are 18-30 years old.
Mostly Eastern European.
Most of the models start out at around 18, but many continue to be shot at MetArt for years, so you have some models that started at 18 that are still shooting at 30.
Some models have over 50 sets at MetArt.
Galleries: 19,089
Galleries include indoor and outoor locations.
The technical quality of the galleries is usually outstanding.
Videos: 1,544
Most videos are a waste of time.
You have beautiful girls, getting naked, and the Wow factor is zero: almost all videos are boring.
A lot of time and money are spent making these videos: I don't know how photo sets of a model can be erotic or beautiful, while a video of the same model is almost always boring, but MetArt has perfected the Art of Making Boring Videos of beautiful naked women.
I have found a few videos that were slightly interesting: Must have been a mistake on MetArt's part, because I've stopped watching their videos.
Also, the background music on these videos is often jarring.
If you're going to watch a video, I recommend turning off the sound.
Contributing photographers: 283
Instead of one or a few photographers contributing to the site, you have access to almost 300 professional photographers of erotic beauty.
I'm giving the site a score of 95.
The site is for soft, softcore teen porn fanatics.
As such, it's such a fantasic site, for a low price, that it deserves a score of 95 or even higher.
Not all sets or photographic styles will appeal to everyone, but you have access to:
-A huge backlog of galleries of teen models.
-A huge number of attractive models: Some of the most beautiful models in the world.
-A huge number of daily updates: 4 updates daily, except the first day of the month is 6 updates.
-A very low membership price: PU discounted membership is $19.99/recurring monthly. There is currently a PU discounted price of $9.99 for the first month.
If you do a google search, you can sometimes find a discounted price under $10.00 for the first month.
One problem with such a large mega-site: you become bored with physical beauty. You have such a catalog of beutiful girls, thousands of galleries, that you just don't appreciate what you have.
That's human nature.
Except some of the models are freaking hot; other models are freaking cute.
Unless you are dead inside, there should be plenty of sets that will appeal to you.
But if you want hardcore, MetArt is strictly soft, softcore.
In my opinion, MetArt is the finest softcore site on the internet.
It deserves a score in the high 90s.
The only major flaw are the boring videos. But I've never found a good site for softcore videos.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
