| Incoming Feedback |
All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
51
|
MetArt
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- 100% original content
- Beautiful models
- High standards in their photography
- Good reputation, has stood the test of time
- Solid value, especially with specials |
| Cons: |
- All this great photography ... so what happened with the videos?
- A stong lay out but still has navigation issues and it can be improved on.
- Sometimes, sets seem to disappear in the archives |
| Bottom Line: |
If you love beautiful, nubile models then you have to join Met Art at least one time. There is no hardcore here, nor insertions, but they keep you occupied with a stable of top notch models. This site is for those who appreciate art photography, so it is not always, how should I say ... revealing as some might want.
They update on an acceptable basis and seemingly seek some of the best models out there. Met Art was the first in art-like model photography and they are still at the top but other sites are catching up, namely FEMJOY and MPL Studios. In fact, these three are not that far apart.
I'm sure the folks at Met-Art think others copied their style and don't like it. They did. They should take it as a compliment in that they are doing something right. Still the aforementioned sites are neck and neck with the old girl these days
Several of the models have now done hardcore porn but most on the site have not. Met Art continues to get the best models but the competition has closed and that is good for the consumer in that it keeps all parties pumping out good content and contracting models that are top notch.
There is a plethora of different resolutions are available for Met Arts picture sets and they take you to where you can see those lovely golden hairs on the models, giving one the impression they are right there! They have the best overall photos around!
I am not a fan of their videos. They're not bad but they seem a tad too soft in that picture sets are more revealing. You might say, they are li ... lame and need rethinking. They could use some new blood behind those cameras, IMO. On the other hand, they are far from trash, just not what you would expect after seeing their incredible photos.
They've added a live chat area that is well set up if that's your cup of tea but extra charges will apply. As most of you know, some of the talent in chat areas can be in a word scary and by average standards Met Art is on the upper side of the equation but none I have seen are great.
I remember the first time discovering the site and downloaded a lot of sets that have stood the test of time.
Download speeds are fine with a good connection and there is a lot of content to keep you occupied with new discoveries of the flavor of the month.
A classy site, that is a main stay if you like young, tight, natural models.
This is a site that perfectly compliments a harder site and it is especially for those who do not like just any old porn but beauty.
If they master their videos, they'll rock! |
|
05-15-11 06:38pm
Replies (8)
|
Review
52
|
MetArt
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The content!!!! Is excellent can't say enough of good about it. Its not over the top or trash in anyway. It has a good artistic presents and control. You can see the people involved are very good and maintain a very good consistency from model to model. I like the fact they have movies with the girls and the updates. |
| Cons: |
I do not particularly like shuffling through the massive content database. I have been a long time member and seen a lot. I wish there was a better way to navigate.
The movies addition was great when it happened but now with other sites upping the game in quality, speed, and support its just not good enough. Don't get me wrong they work but often I experience too much buffering and diminishing quality. I don't think it hurts this site at all considering the image gallery is why we all go there in the first place. |
| Bottom Line: |
The best artistic non hardcore gallery collection on the web. If you are expecting to get videobox out of this you are way off and should give it a try anyway. This site has kept me coming back for years. |
|
06-19-09 07:45am
Replies (0)
|
Review
53
|
MetArt
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
The buzz on this site is correct. I'm not particularly a fan of hardcore porn I like hot naked girls. The photography on this site is 5 star. The girls are amazing. You could surf this site everyday for a year and not see everything. |
| Cons: |
I like big boobs and most of these girls while gorgeous are not well endowed. So my score docks them for that. But thats my purgative you might not feel the same why I just want to note that. |
| Bottom Line: |
I haven't found a better deal online it was less than $20 for the month. |
|
12-11-08 11:11am
Replies (0)
|
Review
54
|
MetArt
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Huge selection of models far too many to get through in one month. So they have helped you chose with sections such as best of Met and an advanced search with 12 search options.With such a huge choice there really has to be something for everyone no matter what your taste.
Models have generally multiple photosets with pictures ranging from high 3328x4992
to low resolution around 768x1024
Most photosets have 100+ pictures of the model and you get usually 4 updates per day including regular additions of new models.
Movies are streamable and downloadable in a number of options including ipod,Divx, mpeg,real player. With the recent movies being of a much better quality than when I was a member 1yr ago and are now generally HQ 1280x720
There is also a free cam section which is worth a mention but cant comment as I have yet to check it out. |
| Cons: |
The Cons and where they lost the 10 points.
I was amazed at the difference in the quality of the photo sets from one photographer to the next with complete sets ruined with grainy and soft photos. As an example one great model VALENTINA A has a photo set NASCOSTA BY INGRET which is 9th Dec 2008 and the photo quality is terrible. Most photos are soft, grainy and lack sharpness. Compare this to the same model VALENTINA A SPLASH BY RYLSKY 25/10/08 and VALENTINA A
SPRINKLE BY RYLSKY 25/01/07 where the sets are of a much higher quality and so much sharper. You would think quality would improve as time went by yet earlier sets are in some cases much better than the updates and this is not the only example there are many more. Personally I would rather see less updates and maintain the quality. I did of course send them an email but it was never answered. The movies as mentioned are HQ but can be pretty boring and are really a movie of the photoset. |
| Bottom Line: |
Bottom line I had hope after rejoining a year later things would have improved but the photo quality of some photographers has never been addressed and I will wait some time before considering rejoining.
Otherwise it still has one of the largest photo sets to choose from and deserves to be in the top 10 though not necessarily as high as their current rating. They really need to address the quality of some photographers and if they don't sites such as torridart will soon start to give them serious competition as they grow in size and develop their photo sets. |
|
12-09-08 06:29am
Replies (1)
|
Review
55
|
MetArt
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Top of the line glamour photography...this ct from someone whose been working as a photographer for 22+ years. Some shooters used their real names...try to find that on an American site. |
| Cons: |
With notable exceptions, models tend to be under-fed, size one types.
Just a few non-Whites featured. |
| Bottom Line: |
Remains The Site for soft-core.
Not for those searching for ethnic flesh. |
|
05-23-08 05:20pm
Replies (0)
|
Rating
56
|
MetArt
(0)
90.0
|
No Review.
|
01-06-08 12:24am
|
Review
57
|
MetArt
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Excellent quality for the price.
Huge database of very sexy models.
Easy to navigate.
Regular updates. |
| Cons: |
I was a little disappointed in the quality of some of the higher resolution pictures which seemed soft or in some cases to contain grainy elements.
Too many fully shaved models I prefer to see more trimmed or unshaven. |
| Bottom Line: |
Well deserves a top 10 place but not sure it should be ahead of some of its rivals such as Hegre |
|
11-18-07 03:02pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
58
|
MetArt
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
HUGE archive of some of the most stunning "teen" (18+....relax!) photography I've ever seen. The quality of the still photography is reminiscent of David Hamilton. If you're in to this type of stuff, I guarantee you've already seen loads of photoshoots from this site and you'll recognize alot of the models. This stuff is just on a whole different level compared to your average "amateur teen" stuff. One model, Valentina, is an absolute goddess in my opinion and I've never seen her anywhere else. |
| Cons: |
Softcore! Softcore! Nothing but friggin softcore! The so-called "girl on girl" videos are more frustrating than anything else. Beautiful to look at, but you'll be yelling at your monitor after 5 minutes in an effort to get them to do something!
The site navigation will make you angry. No question. Particularly because it's such a huge archive. I left the site feeling like I'd probably missed some really good stuff simply because I couldn't find it. |
| Bottom Line: |
The bottom line is, if you like this kind of photography, there is simply no better place to get it. Just go take a tour of the site. If you find yourself having difficulty breathing, you will NOT be disappointed by the members area. On the other hand, if you find yourself looking for the "anal" section, it's time to move on. |
|
04-13-07 07:07pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
59
|
MetArt
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Almost a million photos here - and available in top q
+ Maybe the site with the best variation in nude models
+ Quite a lot of models not seen anywhere else - or very rarely
+ Updates - they're up to 4 each day (photosets, mainly)
+ Good price at TBP
+ Good feedback/help from webmaster/webmasters
+ 3 different resolutions for photosets
+ All resolutions have zip for download
+ Ok navigation considering the vast amout of sets/models
+ Quite a lot of new models updating - and different photographers
+ Photosets are still getting more erotic/sensual and less artistic |
| Cons: |
- Videos are still not great, alas - some even just boring. This is a PHOTOSITE - if you have not been here before: do not forget that.
- Even if the navigation is ok, the browsing at model-pages is a bit clumsy - you get a lot of mouse-work here.
- Too many outdoor shoots for my taste
- Boring and not very erotic g/g sets
- Can be a bit repetitive in the long run |
| Bottom Line: |
Been at this rather special and somewhat great site many times over the years - but never stay more than that one month.
The reason is: After spending hours and days searching for those models that - for you - hit the fan - things seems to fade out. Oh, even if you get those four updates each day - everything seems to get more and more repetitive.
BUT still:
This is the place for collectors of fine nude photosets - AND the quality is getting better and better.
Those 5616x3744 high resolution sets are some of the best quality I've seen anywhere - if your're really hooked on those nude top-photosets, this is it.
The best thing about this photodeal here is, that MetArt are getting more and more new photographers - and even if some of the sets can be that repetitive, the variation is better now that the last time I was here some 9 months ago.
Even if the search might be teasing now and then - even for the experienced PU - there's help:
I like the way all (or most) sets have the choice of biography/full cover view/low/mid/high res AND inside the scene you get the choice of this models other sets - a fine plus.
The videos are the same old problem: not very erotic, not very sexy - maybe even boring.
Very Strange - since also MetArt are going for more videos now.
The quality was BAD in the start - it's getting better - but still: forget about the clips here - and even for this video-freak I join only because of the photos. AND, btw: Some newer videos (Evelyn P - 2010/04/13) are - again - in low quality - WHY?
For outside US PUs you'll get a higher price when trying to join the TBP $ 19.95-deal.
But if you write the webmaster, you'll get a link to that special price - I did - and it took about 12 hours to get the link - MetArt cares about their customers - it seems.
Even if I also this time only stay on for a month (and save maybe 20-25 sets, only), I'll certainly be back later this year...
And a final bottom line: Compared to a lot of shitty sites out there: you can always rely on MetArt - no con here. |
|
04-14-10 05:44am
Replies (3)
|
Review
60
|
MetArt
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The world’s top softcore, photography-focused site.
Multiple daily updates
Pretty models even if nearly interchangeable with each other
Videos are included, but I can’t say I download them for anything other than reviewing purposes.
Photos can be downloaded in zip files.
Intriguing trial offers to Met-Art’s other sites. |
| Cons: |
Redundant, boring, dull, repetitive are adjectives you may use if you stay around for more than a month at a time.
Though not really distracting there are a lot of ads for Met-Art’s other sites |
| Bottom Line: |
Starting with the main and first con, Met-Art’s beauty is in young, innocent women being naked for the camera. Met-Art’s biggest hurdle is keeping those scees from all being similar. They mostly succeed at that, but not fully. I really can’t offer a suggestion.
If quality is important to you then you will be happy to knoow the photo resolution is near the top of the industry and while the videos are relatively boring, those are downloadable in high definition.
Multiple daily updates keep things fresh enough.
The positives far outweigh the cons, but I will say the longer you are a member, the more noticeable the flaws are. The models are all attractive, but with a long-term membership you may start to feel like you’ve seen one, you’ve seen them all.
That colud be the best advice I can give you about Met-Art. Join it in bursts instead. Even saying that, it’s not a bad site to start your own porn collection.
The photos can by downloded in zip fles and the videos can be downloaded in multiple resolutions and quality. This is one of the few sites that I even mention the backgrounds and settings about.
There is a trial going on currently where they give you access to one or even ten of the Met-Art sites. It’s a good way to get at least a sampling of their content. Each site seems to have a boundary up. Though Met-Art is more explicit than ever, it still often doesn’t even reach masturbation. The trials to their other sites may also show you which models obviously are not comfortable doing anything more than teasing on camera.
The toughest part of reviewing Met-Art is no other site than I know of has such a low dependency on their videos. It has made me wonder why they even film videos. I know there is a market of video lovers, but these videos aren’t going to impress a video lover. The videos even look like someone recorded a video of a photographer taking pictures of the models.
Met-Art is still at the top of the heap in porn photogrephy, but if videos are the least bit important to you joining a site, you may want to skip Met-Art. |
|
02-08-23 06:22am
Replies (0)
|
Review
61
|
MetArt
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- It's probably the greatest picture porn site on the internet. I consider it slightly intimidating to review.
- Very pretty models.
- To my knowledge, the technical quality (picture resolution) is unmatched.
- The photo sets can be downloaded in zips.
- Advertises 4-6 updates per day. It's been 4 per day during my current membership.
- Good download speeds that seem to choke up and slow down on some sets.
- Considering the size of the site and the overwhelming amount of content, their navigation is very good and often surprises me with how good it is.
- The scenes themselves have become more "adult" or I should say "nude". You rarely see a set now without full nudity.
- Strong network of sites also can be purchased with Met Art.
- The locations of the shoots are often as pretty as the model. |
| Cons: |
- The videos are a complete waste for me. They're usually in the 10 minute range and are usually just of the model rolling around on a bed naked, walking around naked or posing.
- I'm assuming a new porn fan is reading this and needs to know, there's no intercourse, no blowjobs, no double anal penetration to be found anywhere on the site. It's a site about pretty girls being pretty and naked. And yes, I think for many, that's a major con.
- I really wish they would get rid of those cam ads. It takes up roughly 1/3 the page.
- Site itself can be a bit wonky. I've had it close for no reason, refuse to remember my login, store my old login so I login to an account from 2011 and I still think they try too hard to get you to buy an upsell. |
| Bottom Line: |
There's few sites that I consider intimidating to review, Met-Art, might be at the top of the list. First, there's so much content there's no way you're going to see all of it in a month or even a year. Second, even though it doesn't show as much with me as it does with other PU members, I really like pictures. Third, if I was to complain about something that bothers me it's the way the site presents its content and shoots/produces its content.
The reason the photo one bothers me is if I just reviewed it from just what I think about the site, it's going to get a very high score. But ... I don't think their pictures are the best. I prefer FTVs pictures and some of ALS Scan's too. Complaining about how the site produces or presents its content is just a subjective opinion. In a few words, it's a little more artsy than I like.
Then there's the big one. The videos still aren't worth downloading. I think that should be the biggest question you ask yourself before joining Met-Art. If you're strictly a video person, you're going to be disappointed and wondering why everyone scores this site so high. I think for me, it's that I always loved the old porn magazines, but not the tame ones like Playboy. Penthouse was a borderline one for me. I liked Hustler, Gallery, and a few other more obscure ones that showed full-nudity and penetration of fingers. Met-Art does a very good job of recreating those classic magazines in their photo sets. If you think you would enjoy that, then this is a definite join site.
Technically, the newest photo sets are nearing 6000 long end, there might even be some that go over 6000, but I've not seen them. Still, 6000 long end, is big enough to count the fuzz hairs on a model's butt. This is where one of my only complaints about the pictures comes into play. Some of the photos are blurry when viewed in the largest size. I don't get that near as much with FTV or ALS Scan.
Their presentation and style of content can be described this way and it's not about every single set, it's more of an "in general" than blanket statement. It's like when you're younger and see this beautiful girl who smiles at you. You are so excited to go out with her then you go out with her and there's no chemistry, her personality is flat, dull. I normally wouldn't make a comparison like that, but Met-Art is the one site I've always had a slight problem with because of its presentation. For all of their uniqueness, being a photo-heavy site, trying not to be vulgar, it's like the sets become interchangeable. I'm not even for sure this word really fits here, but I would call their content "linear". And I think you have to accept that before you can really enjoy their content. Their photographers, in my opinion, take their work, direction, flow of their photo sets, very seriously. For a long time, I avoided Met-Art because I found the content too similar from set to set.
Now though, I join it once per year and download any of the new sets/girls I like. It took a long time to sort my collection from Met-Art and get it to the point, where I only needed the content from one year. It makes the membership more enjoyable and less frustrating.
The models are generally very pretty, slim, a few have bigger builds, but most are slim. Most of the models are white, which is a bit of a problem for me, not so much from a PC view, but just because I like the different physical features each race has.
They have improved one thing I have complained about before. A lot of the artsy photo sites like to start each set with the model fully nude. Met-Art was very bad about doing this. Now, you'll see quite a few of the newer sets starting with models fully clothed. I've always believed my problem with models starting fully nude was based around my own fantasies of seeing what she looks like with her clothes on then comparing how she looks nude. But I now think it was more to do with their older sets starting fully nude, but not showing pink or buttholes. It would be 120 photos of trying to hide those things. They've improved that, I think it's brought more personality out from the models than the old style allowed.
I really can't convince myself to raise the score any even with the change to more sets starting clothed. I've now been a member on Sex-Art, which Met-Art owns and I prefer it. I also prefer ALS Scan, which Met-Art is partnered with. Other than that, I would think for someone who prefers pictures and hasn't been on many other photo sites, this Met-Art site could easily represent your "100" site. I feel like I'm defending my stance of only giving it an 88, but it shouldn't stop anyone from trying it out, unless you prefer videos by a large margin. I consider myself about 50/50 on photos and videos. If you prefer pictures, add 8-10 points to my score. If you prefer videos, subtract 8-10 points from my score. As an ending compliment, Met-Art is one of the few sites I wouldn't be surprised to see rated a 100. |
|
12-26-16 11:30pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
62
|
MetArt
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Met-Art has a huge number of very attractive models (2700+). A new user could easily spend months going through the entire site. They usually have 4 to 6 updates a day. Excellent photography overall. This is primarily a photo site. They have videos, but they are very soft core. It is also primarily a solo girl site--the occasional "lesbian" sets are really just 2 girls posing together. Another thing worth noting (not necessarily a "pro") is that their Met Live Cams is just their name branded version of Streamate. I don't think there is any advantage to accessing it through their website, and I've only seen one Met-Art model there (Malena Morgan). The main attraction here is the huge volume of quality photos of beautiful naked women. |
| Cons: |
The videos are way too soft core for my taste. They are really just an extension of the photo sets. There is no masturbation and not enough explicitness in the videos for me. The site seems to have a rule against the models touching themselves, so there is no pussy spreading here. Too many models don't do explicit pussy photos. The 2-girl photo sets are not lesbian photo sets--they are pretend lesbian photo sets. There is rarely any actual kissing, and no pussy play etc. I guess the site has a rule against actual sex. I know thats their niche, but it does get annoying sometimes. Many other sites have shown that it can be done tastefully. Some of the photo sets do suffer from less than top quality lighting (this seems to be an issue with some of the European photogs). A lot of the sets have too many redundant photos--by that I mean photos that are nearly identical. This makes many of the sets unnecessarily large. Some user submitted search tags do not seem to work at all. |
| Bottom Line: |
Probably the best soft-core porn site out there, with a huge number of very attractive girls, quality photography, and lots of daily updates.
One month is nowhere near enough time to explore all of the content. In fact, narrowing down the 2700+ models to find the ones you like is the most problematical aspect of Met-Art. Their search engine uses 9 standard tags (e.g. hair color, breast size, etc), and this is useful to a degree. They also have user submitted search tags which potentially could be much more useful. For example, you can search using the term "beach". However, many of the user submitted search tags do not return all sets that have that tag. One example is the term "perfect pussy". Its in the 100 most popular user submitted tags, but when you enter it, only 15 sets are found, all of which have the word "perfect" in the name of the set. It would be very useful if they could get that fixed. Bottom line though, this a must join site, even if you only try it for a month.
Update: I contacted Met-Art support about the user submitted search tags not working. The next day I got an email back from them, stating that they had corrected the problem (I checked, and they did), and as a way of thanking me for alerting them to the problem, they gave me a free two week trial to one of their other sites! Sweet! |
|
12-18-12 01:42am
Replies (3)
|
Review
63
|
MetArt
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Enormous site
- Huge selection of beautiful models
- Models are natural (few fake breasts and tattoos)
- Supports download managers
- No obvious timeouts on downloads
- Good download speeds
- High-resolution photos are stunning quality
- Options for picture quality
- Zips available
- Over 1000 videos
- Videos available in different formats
- Newer videos in HD
- Best search function I’ve ever encountered
- Excellent value |
| Cons: |
- Site may be too softcore for some
- Site is so large it can be a bit overwhelming |
| Bottom Line: |
Why did a guy who likes hardcore videos join a softcore photo site, even after I commented that the site was too soft for me? Simple: they emailed me an offer I couldn’t refuse, so I joined.
I usually take a short while to get used to site navigation and start figuring out how I’ll go at browsing the site and finding stuff I want. I started that here and quickly realized that this really wasn’t like any other site I’ve ever been a member at. This site is HUGE. I normally try to provide accurate details on what a prospective member can expect from a site. So if a site has 500 videos, I’ll tell you that. With this site, the best I can say is that it is enormous. There are many hundreds of models, maybe a thousand even, each with multiple photo shoots and many with video clips. Just choosing a model to look at can be a daunting task.
While on the topic of models, I can’t complain because the type of model on the site is what I look for: young and natural. With a site this size there is lots of variation on body type. I can download the small-breasted lasses while you download the larger-breasted models and neither of us will feel cheated. Same with hair colour. I love redheads and there a dozens of them here. Blondes and brunettes abound. Different ethnicities are represented and there are a few models who are 35 years old.
One thing the models do lack are fake breasts and lots of ink. A vast majority of the models are all natural. Many sport pubic hair even. Remember that?
I should note, because of the above, that the advanced search function is like nothing I’ve ever encountered before. It allows searching for narrow parameters and the site is so large you’re apt to get some returns. Want some pics of a 30 year old Asian with full pubic hair? If it exists on the site it is easy to find. The site would be unmanageable without this excellent tool.
This is primarily a photo site. Anyone thinking of joining this site needs to know that.
The site has been around for many years, and I didn’t sample all of the older material. But I can say this with some confidence: they push the limits of technology now so I have no reason to think that they didn’t then. Photos are available as singles, or in a zipped file. High, medium and low resolutions are available. I didn’t sample the lower two resolutions but the high-res photos are stunning quality at 3744x5616. They’re amazing. Obviously older photos won’t be in that resolution.
There are some videos available and those are mostly videos of the photoshoots. Some of the older videos are horrible quality, but I won’t hold that against them as it isn’t a video site and those were uploaded years ago. Videos are available in streaming (multiple sizes) and downloads (multiple formats). The default is mp4 though wmv is always available too. The standard resolution for videos (all but the oldest stuff) is 1280x720 @ 4,300kb/s. The wmv files are in codec 9 and play at 30 fps. Higher resolutions are not uncommon. Subjectively, these videos look stunning.
Videos tend to be fairly short, with some less than five minutes long.
With the technical stuff, the site is as good as with the artistic stuff. There are multiple updates each day, download speeds are good, download managers are permitted and there are no obvious timeouts on download links.
I realize the 800lb gorilla in the room with Met Art is that many people see it as being too sterile. It’s as if they stripped the sensuality from their models. I can understand that criticism, but I don’t share it to the same level as some other reviewers. While the site lacks the playfulness that is often found on ALS Scan and FTV Girls, they can be erotic. Where some other solo model sites can be overtly sexual, Met Art is more sensual. There is no hardcore sex on the site at all. I can understand how many would find this simply too soft. I suspect that this is highly subjective though. For example, there is a lot of outdoor posing and posing by and in water which I like so that’s going to improve my perception of the site.
I’m left with an odd conclusion. I can definitely recommend this site: I liked it and I’m glad I joined. But I probably won’t put it on my list of sites to rejoin. The reason for that has nothing to do with the quality of the site or the models. The reason is 100% subjective. For a guy who likes sites like Sinnistar and Public Disgrace I’m way out of my element in Met Art. But if you like stunning quality photos of stunning women you really can’t go wrong with Met Art. You could spend months browsing around the site is so large.
One final note for the photographers: please don’t pose models with farm animals. It’s weird. Actually, make that ‘don’t pose models with animals.” Period. It’s weird. |
|
01-10-12 03:39am
Replies (10)
|
Rating
64
|
MetArt
(0)
88.0
|
No Review.
|
01-28-08 06:10am
|
Review
65
|
MetArt
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
My pros are the vast amount of material, updates galore. The quality of the models is great as theres so many hot women on the site. I liked the free cam, saw one of my fav girls on there Ashanti and chatted with her so that was worth the membership fee alone. chatted with lots of other really cute girls and loved the clean chat rules they have, makes a change and just had a nice feel to it with respecting the model more. Like the search engine feature too. |
| Cons: |
Can be a little boring after a while as lots of sets very repetitive. Don't like the met-models site been seperate as there was certain models sets I didn't get to see as on that site, but hey I could always join that site in the future I guess. Movies were just ok in my view, some nice ones but mainly a little boring. |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall its a great site and still the best of its kind in my opinion, you want cute softcore pics, this is the place to be. Its really come on navigational wise since I was last here a few years ago and updates and fast and furious. I like vids to much to stay a member but made a nice change and got some great sets and discovered some new stunners I'd never seen before which was really nice. I recommend it for your fix of cuties that could be supermodels and finding the real cuties is fun. Maybe wish it was so vast though, never thought I'd complain a site was too big but it just became slightly frustrating trekking through the huge numbers of sets to try and get all I wanted in 1 month, only managed half, so will join again in the future to get the rest. |
|
02-07-09 01:44am
Replies (1)
|
Review
66
|
MetArt
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Extensive collection of sets
- Excellent video quality
- Good choice of pic quality (recent galleries 36 MP+)
- Good range of photographers
- Excellent quality of models (although everybody will have their favourite.)
- Simple navigation
- No DRM
- Good search function
- Good download speed
- Sticks to its principles |
| Cons: |
- Model bios could be a little more detailed
- Perhaps the general theme of the videos could move away from the shoot environment?
- Larger sets are repetitive (almost identical pics one after the other)
- Splitting a single shoot over 3 or more sets is a bit of a con. |
| Bottom Line: |
Will it get your dick hard? Well, if you are a red-blooded hetero man (or bi/gay woman) who appreciates the beauty of teen glamour modelling, then YES, it will.
Will you be cracking one off to it? Well, if you are of a very limited sexual experience, maybe, otherwise no.
Art is the best way of describing it. As a site it really does celebrate beauty of the female form (although in a very biased way) and you will spend a lot time simply staring (and probably wishing that you had these girl's number!!!!!)
You will come away with a renewed perspective of how beautiful women are.
Be warned though, if you are looking for something to wank off to, you are in the wrong place! |
|
01-16-09 03:21am
Replies (1)
|
Rating
67
|
MetArt
(0)
85.0
|
No Review.
|
08-03-13 08:05am
|
Review
68
|
MetArt
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Enormous content.
High-resolution JPEG files.
Files have unique file names.
Navigation is simple and effective. |
| Cons: |
HUGELY over-rated by TBP.
WAAAY too "arty-farty."
Do you REALLY need half a million pictures of skinny, flat-chested girls standing on the beach, or in some other outdoor location?
Files named by photographer, not by model. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm just days away from ending a year-long subscription. As others have said, there is a huge amount of non-erotic content. Really, truly, there is probably something in the neighborhood of half a million pictures of "naked girls standing on the beach" -- just hundreds, if not thousands, of sets with nothing more close-up or erotic than a girl just standing there.
Then there are "prop shots" -- if you see a girl standing there holding a bunch of flowers or an orange ball or whatever, you can rest assured that EVERY SINGLE PICTURE in the set will prominently feature that prop.
And so on.
This is "arty-farty" nonsense. And there are TERABYTES of it.
Yes, there is plenty of "good stuff," too. Terabytes of it, too. Your job -- and it will be a substantial amount of "work" -- will be to sort through it all.
The bottom line for me was that I could skip over half or more of the sets, and still walk away with thousands of sets of really good-quality photos. It was just disconcerting, at first, to go through set after set after set of non-erotic "girls standing on the beach" stuff, before I finally found something worth keeping.
Naming sets by the photographer is nonsensical, except that you could use them to sort out the arty-farty photographers from the ones who actually comprehend why people like us pay money to subscribe to sites like these.
Finally, the sheer volume of stuff is just astonishing. It's very easy to fill up a 1-terabyte drive. And it must constitute something beyond a million images, just speaking about the pictures. Choose what you download with care! |
|
01-03-10 08:14pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
69
|
MetArt
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Highest resolution pictures I've ever seen.
- Free public web cams.
- Exclusive content.
- Great navigation.
- Model info.
- Daily updates. |
| Cons: |
- Videos are sub-par in content. |
| Bottom Line: |
What can I say, this site is huge and very popular. The models are plenty and they have such great resolution. However, I want to start with some quirks I have.
Once again, the models range from perfect 10's to lower #'s. However, I've not found a model on the site that didn't have a quality that was totally unattractive. But, you are getting exactly what the site claims it is, showing beauty through camera work. The pictures range from indoors, outside on a beach, in snow, to in a forest. The camera work is superb and the scenery can be breathtaking. But, you have to enter this site knowing you are getting he soft of the softest. I am a lover of softcore and pictures but a lot of these pictures are just too soft for me. Now I know that this is exactly what the site is, I have to state this for others who may be expecting otherwise. You will get girls that are totally naked, even pussy shots, but they are never gonna open that pussy up for you to look at. So, go in to this site knowing you are gonna see a lot of sealed lips :)
The videos range from sub par quality to great hd. However, I almost find the videos pointless. They are videos of the girls doing their photo shoots or just sitting in water naked or dancing around. Rarely will you see a video as a 'strip tease just for you'. Once again, I see the vision that this site has as being a showcase for beauty rather than lewdness but a nice striptease would be great.
The public web cams that are free are great. You can also join private ones at an extra charge. This is a great addition to the site and I can see this as being a main reason to stay with them.
The site navigation is great. Everything is easy to find with a model index which includes info for most. Everything is is in zip format with 3 resolutions, and all of these are still great quality in appearance.
Overall, this site is great for showcasing beauty of younger women. Just remember, the beauty of these women comes through extreme softcore. |
|
02-23-09 11:26am
Replies (0)
|
Review
70
|
MetArt
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+++ beautiful locations
+++ VARIETY of beautiful locations
+++ beautiful models
+++ professional photography
++ variety of outfits
++ free cam
+ daily updates
+ variety of video formats
+ convenient navigation |
| Cons: |
-- too much difference between cover page and gallery contents (see explanation below)
-- mood of some models can be better
-- movies are just recording of photoshoots
- resolution selection is not preserved
- obsession with bandwidth for movies (6Mbit/sec WMV is too much for me)
- lack of search |
| Bottom Line: |
I've decided to join Met-Arts mostly because of cover pages of their daily issues, and those are pieces of art, really. But what really surprised and quite disappointed me was that inside their galleries feel quite different from the cover page. Met-Art doesn't "cheat", and "cover" is from the same gallery, but overall feeling is still VERY different. Sure, everybody selects the very best shot for cover page, but IMHO Met-Arts kind of contrast between cover and gallery itself is unusual both for paper magazines and web sites. Fortunately, Met Art has archives and IMHO back in 2006 and earlier this difference WASN'T THAT BIG. In general, I liked old galleries MUCH better. It's both good and bad to know, as on one hand, it means I can find galleries I like more, on the other hand, means that quality of Met-Art galleries (from my subjective perspective) goes downhill :-(.
Another thing that bothered me (and which isn't present on "covers") is mood of the girls. Granted, they're REALLY beautiful, but it is quite clear from the pictures (and videos) that most of them are just doing pretty boring job; I don't mind what they really think, but when it becomes obvious on the picture, then IMHO something is wrong. And again, this wasn't that much of a problem as late as in 2007.
In addition, I shall say that I'm not fond of picture sizes like 3328x4992: I never print such pictures, I don't have monitor that large, and don't think I will ever get one in foreseeable future (monitor with 4992 HEIGHT? even if such a beast exists, I'm afraid even to think how much it costs). I obviously don't mind about such pictures as long as Met-Arts provides lower resolutions, but I don't consider such HUGE pictures as an advantage too. But one thing calls for improvement, and it is that if I've selected "Mid-Res" once, then ALL the galleries shall start to be shown as "Mid-Res" (now they still default to "Hi-Res").
Bottom line: Met Art is one of VERY few sites on the Net with potential to make erotic ART, but unfortunately it (IMHO) doesn't realize this potential. Also I had a pretty hard time rating it, so to do it, I've compared how much I enjoy it with another softcore site I've recently joined - VirtuaGirlHD (I know it's apples and oranges, but I don't have any better reference). And IMHO MetArt's old galleries are about on par with VirtuaGirlHD (88), and recent ones are significantly lower, about 82, so I've took average (85) as an overall rating. |
|
09-29-08 05:34am
Replies (7)
|
Review
71
|
MetArt
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- 100's of extremely cute, mostly young looking, European teens.
- Large 'magazine style' cover page thumbnails (ala FTV) linking to each set.
- A 'Best Of' section.
- Webcam chats daily.
- Almost every European model has been on here, so you can find your favorites.
- Photo quality/options are amazing.
- Attractive, fun, addicting web interface.
- Huge amount of content, could keep you downloading for months. |
| Cons: |
- No indicator of original resolution for photos. In some sets low-res looks original and hi-res looks fuzzy.
- There is no way to search by set rating or model rating.
- Videos of photo shoots are boring
- No personalities present, most videos have music dubbed over the models. |
| Bottom Line: |
For Hi-Res picture lovers or lovers of beautiful European teens, this site is a 100. Unfortunately, I'm learning that Glamor sites aren't my style, mostly because the girls are not turned on, they are only gorgeous. For video lovers, this site is barely a 60. Forgetting all the details, and nit picking, I've rarely seen such beautiful women photographed at such sexy angles. I can see why this site is so popular for photo lovers. I'd love to see the personalities of the girls, even if they speak in another language, it can be very cute. In many sets, the models get naked within 20 pics, more tease would be nice. |
|
06-11-07 06:26pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
72
|
MetArt
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Most beautiful Teens on the net!
- Great and huge collection!
- Updated daily with more than just one Sets
- Great navigation and browser setup.
- Easy .zip downloads.
- Monster Picture Quality!
- Good voting and favourites tool. |
| Cons: |
- Not all girls show their "privates". Guess just 60% do.
- Movies are a little bit too soft for my taste.
- More search options would be good! |
| Bottom Line: |
After all a great site for those who like pretty teens! The girls are really some of the most beautiful you will find on the net.
The only thing I REALLY rate as a Con is, that not all of the girls show their privates... sometimes I get a little bit frustrated, when I look at the set of a wonderful girl and she hides the best part of her body. |
|
05-25-07 03:22am
Replies (0)
|
Review
73
|
MetArt
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I'm not going to go into to technical aspects of the display contents because all that is clearly spelled out in the Best Porn page.
I will say that the image quality on photo sets are as good as it gets. Sharp, crisp and retention friendly with even the highest zoom setting. The number of Models appear endless, that is if you're smart enought to negotiate the dated archives, something I've yet to accomplish.
Models are listed under alphabetically labeled tabs, which I liked.
The most sterling feature, and one sadly absent in many other major sites, is their Flash Player.
This allows one to play the clip before downloading -- something I find essential.Plenty of picture sets with up to and over a hundred frames per set.
The site's reported to have thousands of videos, unfortunately I wasn't able to find them. No DRM or restriction on downloads.
No problems logging in -- as well as enjoying freedom from unexpected shortcomings after doing so. |
| Cons: |
1) Video content, although of excellent quality, as a rule provided poorly orchestrated scenes.
2) As mentioned, I couldn't access the number of videos reported...could've been my ignorance.
3) Picture Images and videos, although offering ample nudity substantially lacked eroticism.
3) Too many closeups dwelling too long on a single scene in the video clips.
4) Sizable watermarks on videos.
5) Archives going back to 2005 produced the same material as offered in 2010. That is to say the number of selections is kind'a limited. |
| Bottom Line: |
I, personally, don't particually care for Met Art.
Although Met Art and Erotica Archives came as a combo at $30, as I've said before that if I had it to go over I'd decline the offer. Both are beautiful sites, but in my mind Met Art is over-rated.
It's fair to say, to the connoisseur, the exquisite photography alone might be worth the cost. But I'm not into precision photography.
The site never delivered what I expected, although, again, it could've been something I wasn't doing; But then again, it shouldnt've been that complicated --even for me. |
|
11-01-10 07:49pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
74
|
MetArt
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
· pioneers in nude-art online
· over 700,000 photos
· 610 movies (no hdv)
· 4-7 updates a day
· 1300+ models (primilary teens)
· 120 photographers
· cam-shows |
| Cons: |
· promising covers but average photography
· flip-book styled sets
· site design inflicts browsing experience
· popups are oldschool
· no hdv movies
· can turn into a daily routine |
| Bottom Line: |
Met Art has become a drowning fat mama with a belly full of luscious teens doing softcore only.
If you do not care about boring flip-book style photography or seeking for a specific girl's contents, you're at the right place.
The girls are super but the site itself had frustrated me. A proper redesign and the usage of common technologies would increase the browsing experience drastically. |
|
01-28-09 02:41am
Replies (0)
|
Rating
75
|
MetArt
(0)
82.0
|
No Review.
|
02-02-08 03:48pm
|
|
