| Incoming Feedback |
All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
MetArt
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Top rated softcore site
Some of the most beautiful models on the planet!
The site is HUGE!
Spectacular imagery and sets
Dozens of outstanding photographers across Europe
4-6 updates PER DAY!
Excellent search capabilities
Excellent navigation and "window" management
Excellent range of photo and video resolution
Download speeds are consistently fast.
Customer service that ANY on-line company would be proud of. |
| Cons: |
Only one thing in the CON category:
Too much cross-selling to the other sites in the network. |
| Bottom Line: |
I noticed there were no current reviews of this site so I thought I would write an update to a review I wrote two years ago.
I've been a member of this site off and on for over a decade now and am a loyal, permanent customer. It is without a doubt one of the best softcore sites on the internet. The models are spectacular, the sets are great, the clothing, hair and make-up are usually perfect, the variety is great and the girls generally look like they are having a good time. Nothing cheap or poorly done anywhere, period.
Navigation is also very good and the way the site opens tabs for sets and individual images is the best I've seen. I've actually used this site as a reference to other webmasters with sites that have mediocre navigation.
There are several exclusive or nearly exclusive models on this site that words cannot describe. Many are well known European models but many are women you've never seen before but will want to see again and again. The girls are almost entirely all natural. The images you see on the main page and tour are perfectly representative of the images in the site as are the scores of the models (over 150 legitimate 9+ models).
To be clear here, this is a SOFTCORE site. If you enjoy looking at incredibly beautiful naked women positioned in ways that tastefully show off their assets, this is a great site for you. The site is mostly solo sets with a few two-girl sets and an occasional masturbation set. Sexy, but no sex. If you are looking for hardcore, insertions or kink of any kind, you will need to look elsewhere. Pretty much the only gaping here will be your mouth just before you say "Oh my fucking god this girl is beautiful"....and you will say that a lot!
There is really only one negative that I'm going to mention here and it is more of a customer service thing than a fault with the site. Met Art is part of a pretty big network which includes Sex Art, the Life Erotic, Errotica Archives, Erotic Beauty and a few others. Unlike many other networks, you have to join each of these sites separately. OK, I can appreciate that the individual owners want to maximize revenue. What I find a little annoying is that in Met-Art, when you look at a set of a model, a section sometimes appears at the bottom of the set that says something like "more of this model:' with a bunch of images that are links. Well, although there may be more of this model on Met-Art, the links are NOT WITHIN THE MET ART SITE. They are links to offers to join one of the other sites in the network where more images of this model exist. Since I first mentioned this a few years ago, I have seen a few other networks that do it but some of those are all inclusive networks with free access to the other sites. There is always a link on the top of each page that will get you to the models "profile card" within Met-Art (just click on the model's name), so after a while you will learn to ignore these links at the bottom.
Now, in-spite of that cross-selling tactic, the guys at Met-Art are gracious enough to discount the other sites once you join Met-Art, sometimes providing significant discounts, as low as $5-10 for a month for each site. To be fair, these sites have their own flavor and plenty of unique sets. And pretty much every site on the network is the same or nearly the same quality as Met-Art, although some of these other sites are considerably smaller.
Oh, and here's an interesting one. They have a cam site called MetCams.com. I do not partake in cam sites very often but browsing this one brings up several of the top models that are showcased on the Met-Art site. A few years ago I, um, came across Mila I., one of my all time favorite Met-art models, on the cam site and I could not resist. She did not disappoint, I was completely satisfied and I have a memory that (oddly, I admit) rivals a few from high-school. Clearly, the cam site is not soft-core....
I also want to say that the customer service for Met-Art and their network is simply outstanding. They are very responsive and have cleared up billing and other questions/issues immediately whenever I have had to contact them.
So...if you have not yet been to this site and want some seriously great softcore imagery and video to add to your collection, Met-Art is a MUST. I have an annual membership and have joined nearly every one of the other sites in the network for at least a month. This site and every other site on the network is totally, completely worth subscribing to. |
|
03-22-15 08:02am
Replies (4)
|
Review
27
|
MetArt
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Top rated softcore site
Some of the most beautiful models ON EARTH!
Spectacular imagery and sets
4-6 updates PER DAY!
Good navigation |
| Cons: |
Only one thing in the CON category:
obnoxious cross-selling to the other sites in the network.
One minor annoyance: The user defined keywords are not particularly useful. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is without a doubt one of the best softcore sites on the internet. The models are spectacular, the sets are great, the clothing, hair and make-up are usually perfect, the variety is great and the girls generally look like they are having a good time. Nothing cheap or poorly done anywhere, period. Navigation is also very good.
There are several exclusive or nearly exclusive models on this site that words cannot describe. FOr example: Mila, with 44 sets, always looks like she is enjoying herself. Fergie, with only 16 sets, is a little more conservative but can melt ice with her looks. Wait...loking at the site while writing a review can be very distracting....
OK, there is rally only one negative that I'm going to mention here and it is more of a customer service thing than a fault with the site. It seems that Met Art is now part of a network which includes Sex Art, the Life Erotic, Errotica Archives and Erotic Beauty. Unlike many other networks, you have to join each oif these sites separately. OK, I can appreciate that the owners want to maximize revenue. I can even appreciate that some owner/photographers hire a model for a day or a weekend trip, shoot many, many sets and then break the sets up over multiple sites, again, to maximize revenie (Met-Art and Met-Models, now Erotic Beauty, comes to mind) What I find offensive is that in Met-Art, when you look at a set of a model, a section sometimes appears at the bottom of the set that says something like "more of this model:' with a bunch of images that are links. Well, the links are NOT WITHIN THE MET ART SITE. They are links to offers to join one of the other sites in the network where more images of this model supposedly exist. It is one thing to list other sites on the model page, but it is simply obnoxious baiting to put a clickable image of the model at the bottom of the page and only include a small reference to the name of the other site. This is the only site I've ever seen that uses this relatively deceptive practice and I absolutely hate it. (Can you tell?)
Now, in-spite of that trashy cross-selling tactic, the guys at met-art are gracious enough to discount the other sites once you join one. And, to be fair, these sites appear to have plenty of unique sets spread around to each of the sites.
So...if you have not yet been to this site and want some seriously great softcore imagery and video to add to your collection, Met-Art is a MUST. I come back every year and will probably succomb to the cross-selling and try one or more of the other sites...and will review them when I do, of course! |
|
08-23-12 10:19pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
28
|
MetArt
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Bill through CCBill
-Discount through PU
-Huge site with over 2000 models and over a million photos. Archives go back to 1999.
-Nearly every model is absolutely drop dead gorgeous with few exceptions.
-Models are natural in that there are no tattoos or implanted breasts. Most are shaved, but many are not.
-Six updates daily.
-Zipdownload photo option with three choices, large, medium and small
-Three video download choices, MP4, AVI and WMV. The AVI is the best quality. HD quality at 1280x720.
-No download limits. Works with download manager.
-Great search engine. Without it, the site would be unnavigable. Even with it, many searches provide over a thousand photo sets. This can be daunting if you are trying to get to them all.
-User rating system for photographers, models, photo sets and videos. You can search by ratings.
-Wonderful, very complete tour that lets you see what you will get. |
| Cons: |
-Not very fast downloads. I got speeds of about 600KB and my FIOS conenction maxes out at 2400.
-The largest photo files are huge, ranging from 200MB to over 1GB. Individual photos can be as much as 6MB.
-Close to zero ethnic variation. Nearly all models are thin Eastern Europeans between 18 and 25.There are a few Asian, Black and Latina models and they are exceptionally beautiful. I just wish there were more. |
| Bottom Line: |
I don’t usually sign up for big well known sites that have many reviews as I prefer niche sites. However, I felt in the mood for a photo site that had so many nice reviews, as well as a very low discounted price. I love the quantity and quality of the models and the photo sets. This is overall a truly great site that deserves the many wonderful reviews. I will focus primarily on the videos as I am much more a into them than photos anyway. The previous reviews were much more focused on the photos and I feel did notappreciate the videos.
I was impressed by the videos here. The models are almost without exception drop dead gorgeous. At present there are 1077 videos and are now being updated more so than in the past. As of today, 30 new videos have been posted this year. They added 106 in 2011.
The quality is HD, DVD level stunning and most videos are outdoors. Usually lighting is a negative in outdoor photos and videos, but mostly that is not a problem here. There are a few videos of public nudity that were just ok. Some were not really public, as you are directed to scenes in a forest or a deserted beach. Some of these were hot, but the majority were not very effective at creating eroticism.
Across the board, the camera work is outstanding and the videos are generally shot by the same photographers who shoot the photosets. This leads in many cases to the videos being either a video of a photo shoot, very boring, or suffer from a lack of direction that makes the videos look like moving photo sets, also some what boring. But there are also many that do work and are very erotic.
I like the work done here by Luca Helios. He generally gets the models to flirt with the camera in most of his videos. There is also a little teasing and even a few showcase a bit of stripping. No dancing though. They have a rating system on the site and he has the number one slot with a video featuring Dominika A called "Parusa". She walks past some shops, enters a room, and slowly removes her clothing, piece by piece. She gets to total nudity at 3:37 and spends the rest of the video, about four minutes, in a chair and on a bed showing us her body in slow motion. No masturbation here, this is all for our pleasure. She shows everything and is very explicit. Nothing artsy about this; it is the good stuff. He also has a video starring Jenni A called Carefree that I really like. She comes walking down stairs inside a house, bottomless, and walks towards the camera and teases. This goes on for about ten minutes. She is simply gorgeous and knows how to create a mood. Great direction in a video that works.
I also appreciated the videos by Goncharov, especially Ksucha C in a video called Lathin. She is not much to look at, but is great at teasing. She goes to a home in the forest wearing a short skirt. She teases us continually with pussy peeks up her dress, while not wearing panties. Very hot.
While many videos are not worth downloading unless you just love a particular model, there are some true gems here. I appreciate eroticism that focuses on putting on a good show.
As a total package, I would give this site at least a 95 for the sheer quantity and quality.
As a video site, I think it is fair to compare it to the videos on other photo sites. It is number one in that category in my book. Compared to other soft core sites, in the area of videos of solo females without masturbation, I think it can hold its own. I would give it at least an 85. There are just too many videos of photo shoots and posed videos to go for a higher score. |
|
05-06-12 05:20pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
29
|
MetArt
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Features just about the most gorgeous girls on the planet....naked!!! How does that work?!?
+ Huge resolution photo sets
+ Great download manager support with no connection limits
+ All pic sets available in 3 different sizes - all zipped
+ Nice favourites, voting, and model index system
+ Very regular updates
+ Good value for money
+ enormous back catalogue |
| Cons: |
- Some videos are poor (not all though by any stretch)
- No explicit content - a lot of the girls don't even spread :-(
- Like to keep everything? You'll need a few Terabytes of HDD lying around |
| Bottom Line: |
In my eyes the best picture based, non hardcore site on the internet. No question worth the monthly subscription (currently $30 per month, $60 for 3 months or Ł100 for a year) - 4 updates a day (usually all photo sets but around 10 video updates per month instead of photo setse) - first day of the month is 6 updates.
The site is not explicit, there are no BG sets or insertions of any kind. The odd GG set is tame and not really worth the bother. The real strength of this set is the quality of the models. You know the sort of girl you see in magazines (the sort of girl that doesn't exist in real life - they're just too perfect)? The sort of girl you could never hope to get to first base with let alone any further. Well - Met Art is a strike for the normal guy - a chance to see what these perfect creatures are really like. What's going on under the clothes of a girl with movie star looks. Why these girls take their clothes off for money I have no idea - there's hardly a girl on the site that couldn't earn a perfectly good wage just modeling fully clothed!!
There's a pretty steady influx of new talent too - it's not like they've got a few top quality models to strip and stuck with it - rearely a week goes by without some new knockout talent appearing. And I cant' remember a day going by without at least one new photoset being worthy of...well...worthy of Met Art earning their money from me!!!
The site is quick to navigate with full thumbnails of everything and a full archive going back further than most of us have hard drive space for. Each model is fully indexed so - sea a girl you like? You can easily find all the rest of her content.
The servers are quick and there are no download limits - I set use FDM to run 4 connections and get very few connection issues. Just as well - there's currently around 1Gb new content every single day!
Only slight niggles:
-Video content is often just video of the photoshoots and if not - is often a little too arty for my taste - lots of quick jump edits.
-I'd like a little more info on the models - maybe some interview reels. Most models have a small bio text file but they are VERY short and not really that informative in most cases.
-There's maybe a little too much airbrushing at times but this site is all about perfection so I'm not one to complain about the webmasters going that tiny bit further to float my boat.
I can't recommend this site enough - if you're into art shoots then you'll already be a member, have been a member or have been living in a cave for the last 10 years. If you're into harder stuff then maybe this shou;dn't be you're primary site but...hey...we ALL like beautiful girls yes? They don't get any more beautiful than on Met Art. |
|
05-10-09 03:56pm
Replies (10)
|
Rating
30
|
MetArt
(0)
95.0
|
No Review.
|
12-28-07 04:58am
|
Rating
31
|
MetArt
(0)
95.0
|
No Review.
|
12-18-07 08:41pm
|
Review
32
|
MetArt
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Very glamorous
+ Tons of picture sets
+ Multiple sets of models
+ Excelent photo quality
+ Navigation is good |
| Cons: |
- Pricy (but well worth it)
- Video quality can be poor
- Many videos are just of the photo shoots
- Often times there will be radio music in the background, but this applies to the previous con. |
| Bottom Line: |
If you're looking for class, then you've found it in MET-Art. This is one of the classiest sites (if not the most classy) on the net! You'll pay a good amount, but its well worth it.
Some of the hottest models around, and not just one or two photo sets, but many of the same the model. The video can be sketchy at times, but the site really isn't about video; its about gorgeous girls being professionally photographed for your viewing pleasure |
|
12-14-07 07:27pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
33
|
MetArt
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Excellent value with yearly option.
-Unlimited downloads.
-No DRM.
-Supports download managers (actually incourages use of them).
-Has great respect for models.
-Huge amount of models, all appear to be 18 and are extremely attractive.
-High definition videos.
-Multiple daily updates.
-Super quality pictures. |
| Cons: |
-Not that many videos.
-Browsing site can be slow (but downloads are fast).
-Some navigation issues (can be hard to find all of a certain models content). |
| Bottom Line: |
Firstly I'd like to say I'm not going to deduct anything from this site in terms of points or cons because it's a softcore site.
This is made clear by the tour and the name of the site, so anyone who joins Met-Art would be ill-informed if they expect hardcore content.
I joined Met-Art recently, for the first time ever; and based soley on the information available in the FAQ and tour, I took out a yearly membership ($99), and It's one of the best decisions I've ever made.
If you look at my reviews, you'll quickly notice I'm not one to use all caps in a sentence, but I'm going to make an exception here:
ALL THE MODELS ARE ABSOLUTELY STUNNING. THE BEST LOOKING TEENS YOU'LL FIND ON THE NET, PERIOD.
Whilst that was out of character, I needed to make it very clear. The people who run this website strive for quality. All of their content is superb. The photo sets are available in low, medium and high resolution to suit your download speed / hard disk capacity, but the high quality pictures are nothing short of spectacular, and they don't have any watermarks.
There are not as many videos on the site, perhaps around 400 at a guess, and not all of them are in high definition, but are all a pleasure to watch.
I'm now running out of space for this review, but this has to be my favourite site so far.
Heed the con's I noted and then Join this site.
I can't recommend it enough if you like beautiful teens and don't require hardcore content.
HIGHLY RECOMMENDED! |
|
07-21-07 04:14pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
34
|
MetArt
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Incredible level of updates - usually 4 per day
Great photography really high quality
Multiple sizes of photos - new option this month gives you small, medium or large - this is great!
Zip downloads available in different sizes as well
Good variety of models increasingly - they seem to have gotten away from the all-waif tendency that they had at one time, though there are a LOT of waifish models
Multiple live cam shows a day (6 most days) with hot MetArt models |
| Cons: |
Their vids often aren't very exciting for my tastes
If you're looking for hard-core, definitely don't expect it from this site. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a tremendous site for lovers of hot young European models. The people who run this site show a desire to give quality in everything they do, from the volume and consistency of their exclusive updates and their cam shows to the increasing quality of their browsing and download features.
Just this month they added a middle size for viewing and downloading that is just perfect for my tastes and added a "next image" viewing mechanism that I've been craving for a while.
Given that their pricing is not higher than other similar sites, it really makes me wonder how they can do this and others cannot.
Since I don't know when I'll find the answer to that particular question, I'll just keep enjoying this truly fine site. |
|
03-07-07 08:25pm
Replies (0)
|
Rating
35
|
MetArt
(0)
95.0
|
No Review.
|
01-28-07 05:18pm
|
Review
36
|
MetArt
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
My first time ever joining this legendary photocentric porn site.
There are an astounding 3,825 models. Most of the models are very young looking and attractive, but with that many women there will be some that may not do it for you.
The number of photo sets reminded me of why I hadn’t joined this site before. I like photo sets, but there are 22,442 photo sets. I am just sitting here letting the number sink in.
The videos are not near as large in quantity at 1,796, but of the 12 or 13 I watched, I’m not complaining. I see why others have complained about the videos not even really being needed.
They update 4 times per day which explains how they got to that astronomical number of photo sets.
Newer photo sets are a little more explicit than the older ones. |
| Cons: |
It would take me more than a month just to see all the models. If you are really into this site and the content I highly recommend a longer membership than one month or else the size of the site becomes a con.
Could be a continuation of the previous con. The model names. How many Olgas could there really be? There are 30 on here by my count. The main separating factor is they put a letter after Olga. I am guessing it’s not their last name since they go in alphabetical order since there aren’t any repeats, it’s just Olga A, Olga B, Olga C all the way to Olga Z and they have even started adding “last names” like Rich and Miss since they run out of alphabet letters at 26. |
| Bottom Line: |
What kind of porn user, a fan of porn, has never been a member of Met Art? The kind that knows it’s going to be way too overwhelming to even scratch the surface of in one month. That’s exactly how I feel. There are many beautiful, gorgeous, cute, every adjective you can think of to describe a woman’s looks on here, but there are so many. I’m not subtracting from their score for that. I’m just thinking about some new porn fan reading this review and wondering just how big the site is. It’s so big I would only recommend joining it for the first time if you join for a year.
What I would recommend in feedback to the site itself is to put a list of years. That way a user could just click on 2019 and see all of 2019’s updates. Going through a model list of nearly 4,000 models -- most that I’ve never heard of, continues the overwhelming feeling.
I do prefer the newer content on the site. The older content is not explicit and really isn’t very teasing either. A lot of the sets start out with the model nude and she spends the next 70-120 photos doing everything she can to cover up the parts Met Art wasn’t showing in their earlier days. The newer sets at least show everything, but you’re not going to see anything that explicit or sexual. Being a female, I don’t get as much out of just looking at a still, non-used naked female body.
The videos remind me of a lot of sites “behind the scenes” videos. I am sure there are some that are better than the others, but the ones I watched made me not want to watch anymore of them. I believe that has to be stressed. This site is for photo lovers who don’t mind if the photos aren’t very explicit. I do believe that’s more of a male crowd. I’m really not trying to sound negative about the site, but am trying to say I wouldn’t recommend it to females. In a comparison, if you gave me a site with 22,000 photo sets of young, hot men and they barely even touched their penis, I wouldn’t like it that well either. That’s an interesting situation I’m being put in. I don’t like most hardcore, but here’s gentle, very softcore content and it’s not interesting to me. I do believe their network as a whole is a good deal if you get a discount on it. I just don’t see me spending much time on this specific site. One thing I have done is if I find a model on one of their other sites I like, I do jump to Met Art and see if she has any photos on it.
The update schedule is great. The photo quality is top-notch. You can download the photos in zips. The women are as young and pretty as you will see on any site, but that just doesn’t seem to be enough for this female subscriber. Even though I am rating this higher than Met Art X, I preferred Met Art X since it at least has the women using their body parts. This is one of the first times I have ever scored a site objectively. The only points they are losing are for the videos. If you love just photos and don’t require explicitness, this site would be very close to a 100. I believe a 6 point deduction for what I’m going to call “poor” videos is fair. |
|
04-06-21 02:21am
Replies (1)
|
Review
37
|
MetArt
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-PU discount of $19.99/month (recurring).
Occasionally a cheaper discount will pop up if you search the internet.
-Tremendous backlog of softcore galleries.
-Many of the most beautiful models in softcore porn appear at this site.
-Zips for all galleries. Choice of definition of low, medium, high for zips.
-Huge number of professional contributing photographers.
-Although this is a huge site, the search engine is helpful: can search by model's name, title of the photoset,
photographer, model's attributes (Hair color, Eye color, Ethnicity, Breast size, Age, Weight, Height, Country, etc.).
-Get 4 updates per day (except for the first of each month, when you get 6 updates). |
| Cons: |
-The cons are basically minor. This is the largest, finest softcore photo collection of models on the internet.
-In spite of shooting attractive models for the video, the videos are mainly boring. The last couple of years, some effort has been put into making the videos more erotic: the models are now allowed to touch themselves in a softcore manner. However, not only are the older videos boring, but most of the newer videos are boring as well. It's hard as hell to make an interesting or erotic softcore video.
-Member's can comment on each gallery or video. However, the members seem to form a fan club, where each model is described as wonderful or amazing in looks.
-If you post a comment that a model appears at a competing paysite, that comment will be deleted. MetArt should have enough confidence in their appeal and worth that useful comments about the model's appearances at competing paysites should be allowed.
-Lack of diversity in the models. |
| Bottom Line: |
On 2017-01-25, the stats are as follows:
Models: 3,285
Contributing photographers: 272
Galleries: 16,678
Videos: 1,362
MetArt came online in 1998. It's original title was Most Erotic Teens. It featured softcore of young teens.
(So "Met" came from M for Most, e from Erotic, t from Teens.)
(And "Art, because this is supposed to be erotic art.)
MetArt started off as softcore erotic photography, and has not changed drastically since its beginnings.
Currently the models are now allowed to touch themselves, to add a larger element of eroticism. But MetArt is still one of the softer softcore sites on the internet.
MetArt in recent years has added a network of other porn sites: It currently has about 15 porn sites.
MetArt is the largest of the sites, in terms of content.
The basic appeal of the site is the backlog of attractive young women (mainly teens, at least when they were first photographed). The models are featured in galleries and videos. The videos are mainly boring, a waste of MetArt's time and money. But many of the photosets are outstanding. The models are not only attractive to beautiful, but they are photographed by a wide range of professional photographers. The settings are indoor, outdoor, with money spent on the photoshoots and videos.
Many of the photoshoots could be hung in an art gallery or museum.
A minor problem: The site could be too softcore for some PU members tastes. This is softcore only. No sex (except possibly two girls in a photoshoot who are touching each other, but not in a hardcore way). No man in a photoshoot with the girl, or in a video with the girl.
Another minor problem: Many of the photos in a gallery are similar to each other. I remember back in the days of Playboy and Penthouse (in the 1960s and 1970s and 1980s), when the magazines featured a model with 12 photographs or less. But the individual photos were separate from each other, often in a different location, different costume, something to differentiate each photo from the others.
The MetArt galleries show a model in one photo, she moves her arm slightly, and that's a different photo, she moves her leg slightly, and that's a different photo...so you get a gallery of 90 - 120 photos where the girl is snapped moving into different positions on a bed or room, and most of the photos are almost duplicates of each other.
If the girl has truly outstanding beauty, you can focus on the girl. Otherwise, the gallery gets boring fast.
Unless mere onscreen nudity is enough to turn you on. Which I believe most PU members have gone beyond.
One problem with MetArt is the sheer size of the backlog: You have so many beautiful models, with a large number of outstanding photosets by professional photographers, that you become bored or less appreciative of physical beauty.
If MetArt had fewer galleries, with fewer models, I believe the members would appreciate it more.
That's my take, anyway. However, the MetArt members do seem to form a fanbase, where almost every model and gallery is described as outstanding, wonderful, fantastic, amazing. Personally, I don't believe every model is fantastic. There are models that could be described as plain. Or ordinary. And there are galleries that have serious defects. Except that you will find member comments describing those galleries as outstanding or wonderful.
In conclusion: I believe MetArt is the best softcore collection of nude teen photos on the internet.
Based on
-the amazing amount of galleries posted, since 1998.
-the quality of the models: most of the models are attractive to lovely.
-the quality of the photosets: the photosets are filmed by many of the world-class erotic photographers.
-the outstanding update rate: 4 updates per day, except for the first of each month, which has 6 updates.
-the outstanding level of customer service. The finest customer service of any site I've ever belonged to: fast, responsive, helpful in most cases.
-Excellent download speeds. I normally get 4-5 MB/s, which is close to my max download speed limit of 6.25 MB/s.
-Download zip file of a gallery is automatically named with Site name-Date posted-Gallery title-Model name-Photographer name-definition (high, medium, or low).
Giving the site a score of 94. The boring videos, the sameness of many photos in a gallery, and other quibbles take away from a perfect score of 100.
But if you are in a generous mood, you could say the site deserves a score of 99 or even 100. |
|
01-25-17 05:58pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
38
|
MetArt
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
*Probably the best teen amateur site on the net
*Every girl is absolutely beautiful
*Tons of European models
*Ability to see pics in very high resolution
*Tons of picture content. It never ends!
*Moderate video content |
| Cons: |
*Video content could be more expansive
*Site can be tricky to maneuver
*Hard core videos would be on my wish list |
| Bottom Line: |
*Hands down the creme de la creme of nubile teen picture sites on the internet today. Their content is constantly being updated and the models are supreme. If you are looking for a vast library of vidoes, you may be disappointed. |
|
01-27-07 01:16pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
39
|
MetArt
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- My new favorite of the picture heavy sites, TBP price of $19.95 is a bargain, as is the year deal of $99.99.
- 4 updates per day
- There could be bigger, but the biggest resolution I'm seeing right now is 3744x5616, all sets are zipped.
- Amount of content is overwhelming, more than I have been able to go through in 3 months.
- After much thought, I consider the lack of many movies a pro. The movies they do have rarely compare to the photo sets.
- Movies are high quality technically and come in DIVX, QT H264, IPOD, WMV and MPEG.
- Navigation is pretty simple to use considering the amount of content.
- DL speed uses about 98% of my max speed |
| Cons: |
- Movies to me are not worth downloading, and if they didn't post them, I wouldn't complain.
- Hard to believe, but some of the g/g sets to me take away from the solo sets.
- If you like anything that has to do with penetration, even solo, this isn't the site for you and wasn't for me a few years ago. |
| Bottom Line: |
Back when I first reviewed Met-Art, I gave it an 80. I felt at that time, I was being nice with that score. If nothing else, the 80 was my way of saying at least everything is high quality and they update consistently.
Things have changed, I hadn't been a member in a year. I joined again and it was like a whole new world opened up to my perverted eyes. There still are sets that I find annoying, poses for example, but I'm finding much more to like now than I did two years ago.
The models range from typical slim models to average weight and bust. There aren't many Daisy DDDD cups here.
I think my change in how I look at this site came about when on a forum of a well-known Euro photographer, I read a post by him that said his sets when viewed told a story and that "some people don't get that story". I looked at Met-Art's sets that way and now will be joining for a year as soon as my monthly subscription runs out.
The resolution size of the pictures is huge. Those high 4000s images are almost like looking at a map! You scroll sideways or up and down and those are really amazing to look at in that much detail.
It probably didn't hurt that I developed myself a crush on Lidiya A and probably 30 other models. Including some of my longtime favorites like Zafira, Eve, Aneta.
My cons for this site are limited to things that I think could/would be cons to others. The videos are photoshoots or biographies/interviews. These are also quite large files. I downloaded one a few days ago that was 500 MB+, and it was nothing more than videoing the photoshoot. I also think the g/g sets are not near as good as the solo sets, though I haven't seen them all.
I am seeing more variety in their models than I had noticed in my earlier review and that helps me add the points to this re-review.
The search feature can be a hassle, at least for me, I'm not real specific in my searches, so I end up with hundreds of results, that is probably more my fault, but I don't know any of the set filenames, so how would I know what to search for using that function? In time, I would guess the search will be more functional for me as I get used to the site and its filenaming.
The locations are usually only second to the models in beauty also. I did run into a few blurry pictures here and there, but I'm not really complaining.
I had thought about sending their webmaster an email to ask a question, but haven't yet, so I don't know how their customer service is. To give an example of how much content there is, my question was going to ask who the model is in the thumbnail over "Your Profile", she is brunette, white lacy top opened to the middle and looks to be a matching skirt. I thought it was Zafira, but it isn't. So, I'm stuck looking through every model's page at the covers, hoping to find out who she is.
To me, that is a credit to how large the site is and how much content they have, add the very high quality and I have a new favorite photo site, recommended! |
|
04-07-09 12:17am
Replies (1)
|
Review
40
|
MetArt
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Best site in class of glamore
+ High quality photography
+ Pictures in different sizes and zip packs for download
+ Very pretty models
+ Lots of Daily Updates
+ 3 image sizes for download – small, mediem, large
+ good wed design |
| Cons: |
- Videos are boring
- No hardcore or even no spreading
- No response on emails
- Girl-girl photo and video has no sex touching
- Inconsistent shoot quality, photographers not equal
- No information about model
- Small browse pictures should start with lo-res first |
| Bottom Line: |
This is one of few sites I keep constant membership. It is best site on internet for glamore. Photos much better over videos. Videos of dancing and strip tease always to soft and get boring. Site has slowly shown more vagina but still no spreading and always leaves me wanting to see more explicit of model.
I email site with question and do not get emails back. Site used to have to many European girls only but now has more American girls to, that is good. I have joined other glamour sites that try to copy met-art but none beet this site.
Some photographers at Met-art make very good sets and some are not so good sets with blurry and graney pictures. They have good photographers and some bad photographers. They have very nice very large pictures, but sometimes larger pictures show quality weekness of some photographers. Also some photographers sets have no variation that model only stand hole set or model only sit hole set which is not good. I want to see odder poses. Please understand my bad English.
They should do glamore with more open vagina. Hair on vagina is nice but not hair by vagina lips and sometime model never show vagina. To girl sets should have girls touch more and kiss and spread more like real life girls do. It can still be glamore and sexy. Model pages do not give information about model that makes them seem distant and cannot touch.
Best glamore site but not perfect. |
|
12-10-07 03:46pm
Replies (9)
|
Review
41
|
MetArt
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-One of the premier softcore glamcore sites on the internet.
-The biggest collection of models and photosets on the internet. The site has been around since 1999, and updates with 4 new sets (photosets + an occasional video) daily. On the first of the month, they update with 6 new sets.
-They offer a zip file for each photoset in 3 definitions: low, medium, high.
-They offer a streaming photoplayer to view the photosets, with a time-lag you choose for each photo.
-They offer a cover and also a clean cover (the cover of the photoset without any script) for each photoset or video. Useful for collectors who want a simple reference to the collected content.
-They offer unlimited streaming and downloading. Which is a nice feature, in the period where many sites are starting to charge extra for downloads or have download limits. |
| Cons: |
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-They did a recent site update, and dropped some useful features:
They used to have a listing of all the sets posted for each year, with the years divided by months.
That feature is gone. It was an easy way to browse through the back catalog. Now, I don't know an easy way to browse through the back catalog in a systematic way.
-They used to have a feature where you could mark your favorite models and favorite photosets. That is gone.
-The videos at MetArt used to be boring. In spite of the nudity of pretty or lovely models, the videos had almost zero erotic content. Lately, the videos are showing some erotic content. Although there is no masturbation or sexual activity, the models are now allowed to touch themselves, which is a giant step forward. Almost all the videos are solo girls, but the new videos can be considered slightly erotic.
-The quality of the models has been going down recently. That is a personal opinion. |
| Bottom Line: |
Stats
-Over 3,000 models.
-Over 21,000 photosets
-Almost 300 different contributing photographers
-Number of photos per photoset range from 100 to 170.
This is probably the finest softcore glamcore site on the internet.
I've been a member of this site, continously, for 7 years now.
Maybe I'm getting crotchety in my old age, but I personally don't enjoy the site as much as I used to.
I think the level of the model attractiveness has been going down.
I miss the old features, where you could list your favorite models and photosets.
I miss the listing of the site content by year and month, that made searching the content much easier.
The videos are getting slightly more erotic, whereas in years gone by, they were a waste of time and money and talent, because they were almost all boring.
But for variety, I think I should join MPL Studios, or Zemani, or Femjoy, or some other fine glamcore site.
This review is very subjective.
I wrote in an comment on MetArt a few months back, that I didn't like the recent changes at MetArt.
PU member blaine responded, on 10-29-19:
"Completely disagree, I love the new layout, look/feel of the website, I found all the important features still available, just access is more intuitive. Been subscribing to Met and the available network of sites for years, hadn't noticed any drop off in the quality of the models. But just my preference I guess. I still love the site."
Maybe my review is too subjective. But it reflects what I believe.
I don't enjoy the site as much as I used to.
I'm giving the site a score of 92. A few years back I gave it a 95. However, other PU members can score the site higher than I do, because they seem to appreciate the site more than I do.
But any score of 90 or more indicates an excellent site, on technical merits. |
|
06-04-20 06:54pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
42
|
MetArt
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Huge archive going back 12 years featuring 2600+ models, almost 11,000 photo sets, nearly 1.2 million photos, 1000+ movies from 236 contributing photographers.
Original exclusive content
At least 4 updates per day 7 days a week
Super high resolution photos up to 8000px and HD1080p videos
Photos in 3 sizes with full set zip download option for each
Multiple streaming and download options for videos
Excellent browse, search and tag features
Constantly adding new models
No download limits or DRM
12 month membership provides excellent value for money
Independent billing by CCBill |
| Cons: |
Regional pricing supplement outside US
Site may be too softcore for some tastes
Lack of clothing or lingerie worn by models in many sets
Most 2 girl sets lack any kind of heat
Occasional photo sets can seem a little overly airbrushed or too glam although this tends to be restricted to a couple of particular photographers.
Videos not very exciting
File sizes not listed for zips and videos |
| Bottom Line: |
It’s difficult to know what one can possibly say about this site that hasn’t already been said many times before. If like me you are in to softcore teen photography sites then this one is probably the ultimate site on the net. Surprising then that given the time Met Art has been online this is my first ever time to subscribe here. I guess the thing that has always deterred me is knowing the sheer volume of content here and the time scale I’d probably need to go through it all knowing that virtually every model is a beauty and I’d probably want to download every photo set. Thanks to the PU half price thanksgiving offer last November I was able to sign up in the knowledge that I would be happy to stick around and enjoy the content for many months at that price.
The site provides plenty of navigation and search features to help you find what you’re looking for. If like me you want to check out every photo set then the easiest way is to just go through the year and month listing from 2005 to the current day. Everything prior to 2005 is classified as “archives”. For those who are more choosey they provide a model index whereby you can display the top rated models or all the models via the A-Z listing. There are a couple of cool features on the model index pages where you can alter the view between headshots and covers and also if you hover your mouse pointer over the “i” next to the models name her personal info and bio will pop up. There is also a further advanced search option whereby you can search models by criteria such as hair colour, eye colour, ethnicity, country, breast size, shaved or unshaved, age, height and weight. You can also add additional gallery criteria such as location or search by photographer. If you like to view all the work of a certain photographer you can easily find all of his/her work from the photographer’s index page.
The models themselves mostly fall in the 18 to 25 age range and are mostly naturally beautiful with few fake tits and tattoos on show. So far I’ve managed to find plenty of content of virtually all my favourite Euro models, the likes of Marketa Belonoha, Monika Vesela, Eve Angel, Ariel, Suzie Carina, Peaches and Eufrat to name a few. Eufrat has over 70 updates here and it’s certainly the biggest collection of her I’ve come across anywhere to date. Other models that have caught my eye so far include Jenya D (a.k.a. Katie Fey) with over 100 updates, Natasha S (a.k.a. Helen of Helen’s Planet) who has become one of my most downloaded models in recent months, Elle B and Mia Sollis a cute freckled redhead and relative newcomer to the site. If you’re looking for non Euro models then yes they do have some here including some ethnic diversity but in terms of the overall content it’s quite a small percentage. I did find some of my favourite American models here like Georgia Jones, Jana Jordan and even the lovely Faye Reagan but disappointingly only 1-2 sets each.
The photos come in 3 different sizes, small 1024px, medium 2048px and the largest size varies quite widely anything from around 3500 to 8000+ pixels on the longest end. Each size comes with a downloadable zip and I like their attention to detail by giving the zips proper file names including the date, photo set name, model name and photographer. They also include the photo set cover in each zip along with a text document listing the model’s info/bio. The photos on the whole look great even at the highest resolution and you get to see the models posing in many stunning outdoor locations, anything from a tropical beach to a snow covered wilderness to an urban city backdrop. You will also find a number of risqué public nude shoots which looked fun.
Nobody really joins Met Art for the videos and has many others have said quite honestly I found them pretty boring. You can stream them in a choice of 3 resolutions or download them as an mp4 in mobile, 360p, 720p, or HD1080p plus a 720p wmv and avi option. Although they don’t list the file sizes I discovered the 720p mp4 file sizes were about half the size of the equivalent wmv ones with no noticeable difference in the quality.
The Met Live Cams access doesn’t really add any value to the site and is pretty pointless in my opinion unless you’re willing to pay for a private show. Whatever happened to the free live cam shows they used to have when I had a membership to Errotica Archives a few years ago and got Met cam shows included for free. Still have fond memories of being transfixed to my monitor for an hour watching Ashanti on cam….ahhhh the good old days. |
|
02-13-12 11:47am
Replies (4)
|
Review
43
|
MetArt
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ sets the standard for quality of photos and beautiful women
+ video content
+ frequent updates (a few new sets every day)
+ women are natural: no fake breasts!!!!
+ photos look like a REAL PHOTOGRAPHER took them, not just some creep with a brand new camera
+ models really pose well (no 'deer in headlights')
+ no insertions - personally, I want to see the beautiful women being themselves, not pretending to be turned on with some ridiculous toy
+ MUCH higher quality than typical American porn sites |
| Cons: |
+ most recent models are completely shaved (might not be seen as a con for all)
+it's not very 'artistic' in terms of model poses. Erotic is more accurate (this could be seen as a pro, but the name of the site implies artistic)
+ navigating is rough although search helps, but it's kind of an outdated search system
+ would like to see a little more ethnic diversity. Yes eastern european woman are hot, but other ethnicities are very much under represented. |
| Bottom Line: |
A bit pricey, but worth it. At least for a few months. I have been a member 3 times. After letting my membership lapse for a few months (because I've already been through all the content) I have been going back for more.
If it's your first time, grabbing the year subscription is worth it, but if you've been a member before, take the shorter term or you might be bored. |
|
07-07-09 08:30pm
Replies (10)
|
Rating
44
|
MetArt
(0)
92.0
|
No Review.
|
10-02-07 07:44pm
|
Review
45
|
MetArt
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Excellent photography with photos in sizes going up to approx. 4000 x 3000 pixels.
- Newer vids go up 1280 x 720 pixels with good download speeds (older vids are 512 x 330)
- 1000+ very attractive models, many with multiple sets
- Multiple daily updates
- No DRM |
| Cons: |
- No model info
- Vids aren't as good as the photo sets
- Site gets a little dull and repetitive
- No hardcore or toys or penetration, a few very mild lesbian scenes
- Photo quality can vary a little with some of the larger photos being somewhat grainy |
| Bottom Line: |
As a photo lover I would have to rank Metart as the best solo model / softcore photo sites out there. The photos get insanely large (4000+ pixels - practically life size if you got a monitor that big) and the photography is mostly excellent. With multiple daily updates and over half a million pics no one can complain about a lack of quantity or quality for the most part.
I would have to say that the vids lag behind the photos and that the vids mostly parallel the photo sets in terms of content. Like other PU reviewers have noted, they need to expend a little more effort to boost their video quality.
As with Hegreart, the focus here is mostly on european girls and for some reason they can sometimes come across as a little "cold" although this isn't a major problem. I did find the site a bit repetitive given that the content is very softcore.
Overall, I would join primarily for the pics at this point although the newer vids are quite good in their quality. If the site got a little "edgier" with some toys or lesbian sets I would jump my score to about a 95. As is, I got a little too bored with the vast amounts of material so, for me, a 91 seems appropriate. |
|
05-29-08 06:09pm
Replies (2)
|
Rating
46
|
MetArt
(0)
91.0
|
No Review.
|
05-09-07 12:00pm
|
Review
47
|
MetArt
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
--extensive collection
--easy to navigate; helpful user interface
--attractive models (and lots of them)
--artistic approach to the shoots |
| Cons: |
--lacks diversity (both in terms of models and shoots)
--videos tend to be unambitious and predictable
--the sheer volume of material can be a bit overwhelming |
| Bottom Line: |
I can only subscribe to a few sites a year, and Met Art is always on the list. Unlike ALS, these are artistic shoots with an erotic bent -- nothing extreme here. But like ALS, many models are on the younger (legal) side, so if you're seeking out a new model, you can't go wrong here. Honestly, sometimes the youth concerns me -- some of the younger models look out of their element, as if they're not yet entirely comfortable with their sexuality. But most models look entirely comfortable, and the fact that so many of them have returned to do follow-up shoots speaks to their comfort level with the site and its producers.
The photo shoots have a quality about them that can transport you to an Eden-like place where beauty roams the countryside in all its natural splendor. (Outdoor shoots aren't uncommon.) And the models seem to be enjoying the experience. And OH, what beauties they attract: Lorena B (singled out by Standard in his review, and rightly so), Katie A, Lily C, Mia D, Nikia A, and Niemira (who apparently needs no last initial) are merely a few of the models who consistently grace this site with their beauty, and the shoots are always respectful and revealing.
When I do sign up for a one-month membership, I also like to search for models (like Nastya E) who are no longer posing for shoots but whose archives are available. All models are easy to locate, and each shoot is rated by members to help guide you (if interested). There are treasures to be mined on Met Art if you devote yourself.
On the downside, I'll echo what my fellow reviewers have offered: you don't find much diversity on the site. Most of the models have similar features, and depending on the model, shoots can become rather predictable (even though the site uses an impressive aray of photogs). The beauty and artistry, for me, is enough to overcome such a flaw, but it's there, which means that after you've spent some time on the site, you might find yourself needing a break.
Finally, the shoots are, as I mentioned, revealing but never too revealing. Parted labia may represent the most extreme content on Met Art. :-) Those expecting more may be disappointed; or they may come away from the site appreciating the female form as art. Whether that gets them off is another question entirely. |
|
01-08-17 01:14pm
Replies (7)
|
Review
48
|
MetArt
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
high quality content
deliver what they promise
unike pictures in my opiniom
large gallery, many many hours if you will go through everything.
very satisfied |
| Cons: |
You should have the ability to create favorite photo album. |
| Bottom Line: |
Very good site that provides very good content. Well worth the money.
My account was hacked, and the hackers used my account to become members of all the pages in their network. They also used money from my account on the web camera shows. Met-Art were very helpfull, and I've got all my money back. The handeld this very professional. |
|
07-20-12 03:02pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
49
|
MetArt
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Fast Downloads
HD Videos Over 1000 not all HD
Over 1 Million photos.
Over 2500 Models
Been in the business 12 years
No Drm
Over 100 Updates a month. |
| Cons: |
Repetitive Content
Lots to navigate through
Over picture& video quality is ok.
$19.99 Membership
Recurring every 30 days at $19.99
$39.99 for 30 days To big of a difference as you can not download the site in a month. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is the top of the line best SoftCore nude site on the planet.
There are varies formats, pic Divx its the best picture format for their production work.
The site is huge with over " ONE MILLION " photos and over 2500 models. There are about 100 updates per months and it one huge site.
I do not want duplicate others reviews on PU and most details are recently covered, so a twist on review here.
The site is very high quality site, the models are gorgeous, I could hardly find one that was not drop dead model material.
Compared with 99% of the websites we review this one has to be the classiest site of all.
They have worked 12 years and respectfully stayed successful in soft-core porn.
Why other sites are reaching to find a new level.
Met Art takes things to a new level in quality nude women.
The look and feel of the site is like going to a high class show in Vegas. The site feel like they are kings of the Softcore and have numerous photographers that get the shots right.
There are gratuitous scenes in the collection, but nothing that would be known as Hardcore.
That said, I am sure many will love the curves and erotic nature in how hey present.
This is not playboy tame, nor hustler slutty, it fits nicely enough to a niche in its own class.
Bottom line:
Price is tad high as you will have to stay a member awhile if you plan on full site collections. They take CCbill and Epoch so thats helpful. I like the navigation as its not that hard to find stuff even though the site is huge.
They appears to be free stuff but never had time to look at it. Site may have similar scenes and format. But hard to avoid in 12 years in business, so why it is in my cons, it is expected.
Toads Take.
Its worth a peak, even for a month. If you have not seen a softcore site or avoided them because you thought you would fall asleep with lube in your hand. Rest assure this site will excite and is erotic enough to peak the interest.
I never finished the site before my subscription ran out. But I have a nice collection
A site that is up 12 years will never get the review it deserves. I tried to give some details that may do that justice if at all possible.
Hope you enjoyed my review.
CT. |
|
09-22-11 06:59pm
Replies (8)
|
Review
50
|
MetArt
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
This site is one of the best for online nude photography. The layout is a little weird but there are search abilities and the site offers so much content that it took me the whole month to download the site even with a fast connection. |
| Cons: |
Nothing really bad.. There is some really old content on the site but overall nothing bad to report. |
| Bottom Line: |
I would sign up if I was not already committed to another site as well have majority of the content from the last time I was there. |
|
05-20-11 07:47am
Replies (3)
|
|
