Excellent bottom line summary:
"The site is what it is. You get a well run inexpensive site but not one to sign up for to get off. If you are just curious to see the stars, you may find it interesting. On the other hand, if you are a fan of a particular star, you probably already saw the scenes that are here. Now you can own that 20 second clip."
That was my main knock against the site: the clips which feature nudity lose the impact of the scene or nudity because they are so short, without the setup that the movie or other source provides.
Also, many of the scenes seem to be low definition, and have lost the crispness of the original source material. So for porn, that loses a lot of impact, as well.
My opinion is that the site is very good for finding if an actress has done nude scenes.
So it's an easy way to check.
But the site is not erotic.
However, back when I was in my teens, just seeing a nude breast was erotic.
But I'm past that now.
I want more to get me interested or excited.
I like softcore and hardcore.
But quality softcore.
The hardcore can be more varied.
So Mr Skin is excellent if you're into celebrity nudity.
But it's not really erotic.
Although, if it was put into a library, it would be in the erotic section.
Or maybe the porno section?
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Low membership fee with PU discount. $9.95/month, or $79/year.
However, the site sometimes offers a lifetime membership for $99.
And with the lifetime offer for $99, they usually add a 1-month membership to the Playboy site or the Naked News site.
PU lists a lifetime membership for $1,000. That is a ridiculous price.
If you want a lifetime membership, wait for a holiday, and they might offer the $99 lifetime membership. But great sites like MetArt and Hegre offer lifetime memberships that are far cheaper, especially during holiday discounts, than the $1,000 membership offer from Mr.Skin.
-The easiest way to search for nudity by actresses.
Just put the name of the actress in the search box, and you get her clips at Mr.Skin.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading of the clips. However, the clips only download in one definition.
Cons:
-Almost all clips are either softcore or non-nude. No hardcore clips.
-Most clips are short: two minutes or less. I guess the idea is to skip to the good parts, but what happens is you get a peek at a breast, and wonder: is that all?
I have some fond memories of nude scenes in films, but even the clips that supposedly feature those movies are disappointing: there is no build-up to the scene, quality of the clip is usually poor, and the impact of the clip is: so what? So instead of re-living the excitement of the original scene, you're watching a shortened, unsatisfying, poor quality version of a snippet that has lost most meaning.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
Bottom Line:
The theme of Mr.Skin is "Fast-Forwarding to the Good Parts, Since 1999!"
However, there are problems with this approach:
-The main problem is that you drop the set-up which gives most of the meaning to the scene. The clip is either non-nude, or a very brief glimpse of the actresses breasts.
Or you might see the actress' ass.
So it doesn't have the impact or meaning of the original scene.
Also, the quality of the clip is often poor. The clips, I assume are from the original DVD or movie, but the crispness and color and image-quality if often degraded from the orginal, which detracts from the impact.
If you are a fan of nude celebs, this is probably the easiest way to search for their nude content.
Although the internet has made it possible to search for nude content of celbrities (mainly actors), Mr.Skin makes it easy to find most of their nude appearances. However, there are two problems with Mr.Skin.
-The clips at Mr. Skin are very short, many of them are less than 1 or 2 minutes in runtime. So you might see a nude breast, but a lot of the clips don't feature nudity, just what Mr. Skin considers a sexy appearance.
-Many of the clips are low quality: I'm suprised at the poor quality of the clips. Since many of the clips are probably from DVDs or from an actual commercial movie, the clips should be much higher quality than they are.
And with lower quality, you lose much of the impact of the scene.
Not only do you lose the build-up to the scene, but the poor image quality reduces the value of the scene.
So, even though you have a convenient access to the nude scenes of actors, the site does not impress me very much.
There are some actresses who have done some erotic scenes, but I don't feel that the scenes shown on Mr. Skin are very erotic, because the scenes are too short or poor visual quality.
Also, almost all scenes shown on Mr. Skin are either non-nude or softcore. I certainly haven't seen all the clips at Mr. Skin, but there would be very few or no hardcore clips.
I'm giving the site a score of 80.
Many other PU members have given the site a score higher than 80.
So the value of the site is really based on personal preference:
I guess the site satisfies the element of curiousity: has this actress done a nude or semi-nude scene?
But the scene in the original movie would be far more erotic.
I bought a lifetime membership to Mr Skin for $99 about 2 years ago. The site is an easy way to check if an actress has done nudity: but for me, the clips are disappointing: they just lack impact.
I was not aware that Mr Skin offers a streaming-only membership.
My guess is that since you are a new member, you haven't found out how to download clips from the site.
In the member's area:
Go to to clip you want to download.
Directly underneath the thumbnail of the clip, to the right of the clip is a hot link with the icon of a small arrow pointing down, and a small horizontal bar under the arrow.
Click on the arrow icon, and a pop-up box appears.
There are two options
-Open with.
-Save file.
Put a dot in the Save file option (click that choice).
Select/click the OK button at the bottom of the pop-up box.
If the OK button is not active, click the "Open with" choice, then click the "Save file" choice. That should activate the OK button.
I'm a current member of MrSkin.
I bought a lifetime membership for $100 on one of their specials.
Anyway, I can still download the clips.
The hot link to download a clip is:
a downward pointing arrow, with a _ beneath it.
(The hot link icon is small).
Click on the hot link icon, and, depending on your file-saving mechanism, you should be able to download a clip.
I checked different clips for different celebrities, and they all were able to download.
I did this today, March 10, 2018.
So I don't know why support said downloads are not available.
IT'S A GREAT PRICE FOR LIFETIME MEMBERSHIP.
I TOOK THEM UP ON THE SAME OFFER A WHILE BACK, AND I VISIT THE SITE ONCE IN A WHILE (BUT I DIDN'T GET THE PLAYBOY PLUS MEMBERSHIP OFFER).
THE NAKED NEWS AND PLAYBOY PLUS ONE-MONTH MEMBERSHIPS MAKE IT EVEN BETTER.
BUT THANKS FOR THE POST.
HOPING I WILL FIND GREAT DEALS IN THE FUTURE, LIKE THIS ONE.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A huge number of clips of nude women in movies and tv shows.
-You can do searches in a number of ways. But I am not a fan of their search, or the site structure. See my cons.
-Low membership price with PU discount: $9.95/month.
-This is a very brief tag to describe each scene: Sexy; Sexy, underwear; Sexy, thong; Sexy, bikini; Nude, breasts;
The tags are basically helpful, except sometimes they aren't. For example, some tags state "Nude, breasts", but the clip just shows a breast that is covered by a bra. I don't consider that nude. Just like I don't consider a woman wearing a bikini or underwear as nude, which is what some "nude" tagged clips are.
-You can do search by many different factors:
Actress name. title. keyword(age, nationality, hair color, etc.)
-Automatic login to site (if cookies are enabled).
Don't need to enter username and password.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Navigation is poor.
I don't know why more people haven't complained about the site structure, which was designed by an idiot.
-The quality/definition of the clips varies. Some clips are high definition, other clips are standard definition. A lot of the value of a nude clip depends on how well you can view the images, and the colorization (and degradation) from the original source).
-This is a personal opinion. But even though some of the clips show nudity, they often lose the impact and potency of the original scene. Maybe it's because the clips are too short: They lose the build-up to the scene.
There is no automatic notice that you are logged in to the site.
Most sites have some indicator (in the address bar or someplace else) that tells you you are logged in to the site.
I was searching for the log-in link a couple of times, before I realized I was already in the site itself.
CONS CONTINUED IN NEXT SECTION BELOW:
Bottom Line:
CONS CONTINUED:
-The site was not designed for members ease of use.
One example:
There is a blog. One blog entry is "Top Ten Nude Debuts of 2016".
To show you the top ten nude debuts of 2016, the site does not give you a list of the actresses/models.
Instead, it gives you a slideshow of screencaps of the actresses. That you have to click through.
The name of each actress is in tiny letters at the bottom of the screencap, that is difficult to read.
One member comment on this blog entry:
"How about you make the name and titles big enough to read. Doesn't help me if I don't know where to look."
If you fiddle around, you can enlarge each screen cap (with a few mouse-clicks), to be able to read the name of the actress, and the movie she appears nude in.
But why not make it easy for members to read the actress name and movie, without the mouse clicks?
And without additional clicks to find the next actress on the list?
-There is a learning curve to using this site. I am getting old. So it's irritating if the site navigation is not simple and easy to use. If I have problems searching the site contents, I enjoy the site less than otherwise. And this site was created by someone who knew the foibles of the site structure, and figured the members would figure out the foibles by themselves.
-Many of the photos are screencaps.
-Most clips are very short. Two or three minutes runtime. Many clips are 30 seconds or shorter.
-Most of content is softcore.
BOTTOM LINE:
The Mr. Skin clips are both good and bad: Good, to give you a slight taste of the nude appearances of these celebreties/actresses, but not enough to fill your appetite if you remember the original movies in any detail.
-Cons: the quality in some the clips is just OK. The clips are not high definition, even when taken from a standard commercial movie. Either the copying is done poorly, or some other factor controls the poor image quality. Todays porn consumers are accustomed to the high quality or ultra high quality available at many porn sites.
For example, the Two Moon Junction (1988) clips seem poor definition.
Two Moon Junction (1988) was directed and written by Zalman King, who also did 9½ Weeks (1986), Wild Orchid (1989), and the Red Shoe Diary series (1990s) on cable.
Part of the appeal of Zalman King's work was the high definition (for the time), vivid images, strong colors, erotic content, along with main-stream actors/actresses and plot structure.
The Zalman King clips should be one of the site highlights. But they are disappointing.
-The site will appeal mainly to fans of celebrity nudity.
The problem is:
For a softcore site, the site does not offer high-grade photos or clips that we want.
There is probably no hardcore sex offered for hardcore fans.
So bottom line: this is mainly for celebrity softcore fans, who want to see their idols in brief nude scenes.
I doubt that many PU members would remain a member for more than one month.
This site would have much more value if this were not the internet age: where the internet will give you many of these same images and clips for free.
Yahoo now allows nudity in its clips and movies.
But for a simple way to access brief celebrity nudity, the site will have its fans.
I can't tell you how often the site is currently updating.
My membership ended last week. I had problems trying to enter the site. I kept getting the error message that I was not authorized, even though my membership was still current.
I sent emails, asking for help.
No replies.
I also sent emails asking for my membership to be extended, because the site advertised, for a while, that 1-year memberships (and I paid for a 1-year membership) would be extended due to the site not updating in 2008 and most of 2009.
No replies to my emails.
So I just gave up in frustration.
The site has a number of very attractive models.
But the photosets are very small: about 15-20 photos per set. So even though the model might be attractive, the small number of photos per set is just enough to make you hungry for more. Or frustrated. I want a larger number of photos in a set, where I can look at the photos, and focus on the ones I like best. I can get large photosets at most mega-sites, where you get 50-100+ pictures in a set.
The site says they are emphasizing quality over quantity, but the quality is not any better than at the mega-sites like met-art (where Richard Murrian, the site photographer for m-u-s-e.org, has some photosets), or mplstudios, or a bunch of other mega-sites. Actually, the quality at the other sites is better, in my opinion, because the photographer tends to put a lot of shadows and "artsy" focus in his small photosets, making the number of photos that I really like even smaller.
You are not substituting quantity for quality if you join one of the quality mega-sites. You get both quality and quantity.
This site has a much smaller content. The archives go back several years, but I just don't like the idea and practice of a small number of photos in a photoset.
I believe you will be better satisfied, spending your money on a softcore mega-site, than at this site.
But if you are a Richard Murrian connoisseur, then the site might be worthwhile. I thought one Murrian photoset at met-art was really striking. But when I looked at the same set at m-u-s-e, I found a small set, with a smaller number of photos. Grrrr.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
-High quality softcore photosets.
-Glamor style photography.
-This is a Richard Murrian site (some contributions by other photographers).
-There are some yummy-looking models here.
-Most models are teens, some in early 20s.
-Photo series come in 3 resolutions: 2500 px, 1500 px, 1000 px.
-Zip file for download of the photo series.
-Low annual fee ($59 per year).
-Exclusive content.
-No DRM.
-Billing by CCBILL.
Cons:
_The photosets are small with only a few photos per set.
-Because of the small number of photos per set, it's not a satisfying experience looking at a photoset. I want more photos in a set, which I can get at met-art, metmodels, mpl studios, femjoy, justteensite, or any of the softcore megasites.
-There are some videos, but the main focus is on photos.
-Updates are very irregular.
-No response to emails from customer service.
Bottom Line:
Problems at muse:
I joined muse with a 12-month membership in March, 2009. Because the site had no updates for most of 2009, the site advertised that members who had a 12-month membership in the un-updated part of 2009, would get a free 6-month extension of their membership.
I emailed the site requesting the membership extension, but received no reply. My membership was not extended.
Also, it was difficult trying to log into the site while my membership was still active. I often got the error message: "Sorry, the
page you requested could not be found or you do not have the necessary authorization."
My experience at the site was unfavorable. I wasted my membership money, and was left with a bitter aftertaste.
There were no updates in all of 2008.
The updates in 2009 just started a few months ago.
That is why the site is offering a free one-year membership to anyone who had a 1-year membership in 2008.
They are also offering a free 6-month membership to anyone who bought a 1-year membership in 2009 during rhe period it was not updating.
I joined for 1 year in March 2009, so I am supposed to get a free 6-month extension of my membership. I sent an email requesting the extension on Dec. 01, but have received no reply yet.
Because of the lack of updates at muse during 2008 and most of 2009, muse is offering to extend any annual memberships purchased during that time period.
If you bought an annual membership in 2008, you get a free 12-month membership.
If you bought an annual membership during the months of January thru September 2009, you get a free 6-month membership.
Special $59 offer for 1 year subscription to muse.org
Special $59 offer for 1 year subscription to muse.org
-Richard Murrian site (with some contributions by other photographers).
-He is softcore nude teen photographer, featured at Met-art.
-Very glamor-style, very softcore. Pictures are female solo models.
-Most models are teens, some in early 20s.
-Some really stunning-looking girls, some really great-looking pictures (but strictly softcore).
-photo series come in 3 resolutions: 2500 px, 1500 px, 1000 px
-plus a zip file for download of the photo series
-video formats: quicktime, divx, ipod
-payment by ccbill or verotel
Team Skeet premium sites (require a separate membership for each premium site):
Name of site + Number of movies
BFFS Movies 102
Black Valley Girls Movies 23
DadCrush Movies 97
DaughterSwap Movies 76
FamilyStrokes Movies 160
Shoplyfter Movies 91
SisLovesMe Movies 123
Submissived Movies 117 Teens Love Black Cocks Movies 97
BOTTOM LINE (CONTINUED):
You can flag (report) a problem with streaming or downloading a video with a handy hot link by the video.
You can post comments for each video (like or dislike, whatever).
The like/dislight buttons seem more realistic than at many other sites, which seem to favor almost unanimous approval. Team Skeet seems to allow negative votes on videos by members.
Bottom line summary:
1. If you don't experience slow connection speeds;
2. If you don't expect a glamcore experience that Blacked, Tushy, X-Art provides, but a more bread-and-butter approach to teen porn;
3. Many of the models are cute, even if not much effort is put into making them attractive.
4. Then, because of a low price ($17.87/month with PU discount), you get access to a large amount of teen hardcore videos in a wide variety of niches.
Giving the site and network a score of 85.
If it weren't for the complaints by some PU members about the slow connection speed, I would give the site and network a higher score.
But since there's an element of uncertainty of what you will be getting for your money, I think 85 is a fair score.
IN THE NEXT REPLY, SEE A LISTING OF THE SITES CONTAINED IN THE BASIC SITES YOU HAVE ACCESS TO, WITH THE NUMBER OF VIDEOS IN EACH SITE.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A very low membership price with PU discount: $17.87/month.
-Content is exclusive for this site. But some content at the team skeet network is posted at other sites. For example, almost all of the Rub A Teen site content is posted at Teen Mega World, and much of it is also posted at Diesel Access network.
-With a membership to this site, you get access to the basic Team Skeet network of 30 sites.
This includes a variety of teen niches: massage, babysitter, lesbian, anal, school girl, etc.
The premium sites in the network each require a separate membership fee to access.
Cons:
-The major con is that some PU members have complained about a poor connection speed, that would not allow them to view the pages, stream the videos, or download any content without hours of effort.
If you encounter such a poor connection speed, I recommend asking for a refund, either through the Team Skeet support, or through the billing agent.
Some PU members asked for and got a refund, due to poor connection speed.
However, I've been a member of Team Skeet for over a year, and have rarely had a poor connection to the network. And other PU members have seemed satisfied with their membership: so the poor connection speed issue seems hit or miss, and I have no idea why it happens.
-Sometimes, to enter the site, you have to pass through a gateway ad page that is completely filled with ads.
To get to the member site, you have to find the one small square that says something like: "Continue here to Team Skeet". The square/hot link is mixed in with all the ads, so be sure to look for it.
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
-Ads on every member page. Distracting.
-There are a number of premium sites in the network that each require a separate membership to access.
Sometimes you find videos you want to see, and only after clicking on the hot link do you find that the video is part of a premium site. I wish they would do a better job separating the basic content you have paid for from the premium content you have to pay extra for.
BOTTOM LINE (START OF):
There are currently 30 sites in the basic Team Skeet network.
There are currently 9 premium sites, each of which requires a separate membership to access.
The network updates daily with a new video.
The basic sites are listed in the first reply to this review, along with the number of movies in each site, as of 2018-05-28.
The premium sites are listed in the fourth reply to this review, along with the number of movies in each site, as of 2018-05-28.
(I'm using the reply section, because of the review limits of characters and lines.)
The entire basic network has over 2,907 movies.
Almost all the movies have an accompanying photo set of the movie.
If you encounter a terribly slow connection speed, you should get a refund on your membership.
Because you won't be able to view or download the videos or photo sets.
But a lot of PU members seem to have a good experience with the network, and have given the network and its sites a high score.
The network covers a lot of teen niches.
Some of the best sites that I personally have enjoyed are the Rub A Teen site, which is a massage-themed site, and the My BabySitters Club site, which features a dad boffing the cute babysitter. Oye Loca is also one of the better sites in the network, featuring Latina models.
Most of the videos are professionally shot: good lighting, good focus and camera-work, good sound control.
The network is not glamcore. They don't put a lot of effort into making the models attractive.
In fact, some models that are really cute on other networks, just appear to be almost plain in their team skeet videos.
Which, for me, makes the vidoes worth much less: I want to see pretty or lovely models.
And the photography and makeup and other factors can have a massive effect on how attractive a model will look.
Because the site and network does have some problems beyond the poor connection speed.
They have far too many ads on every page.
They could put more effort into making the models more attractive.
They used to list the premium sites at the bottom of the site listing, so you could separate the basic from the premium sites.
Now they just list the premium sites willy-nilly in with the basic sites, so you don't know if a site is basic or premium, until you click on the hot link.
Which is annoying.
I don't want to pay extra, beyond my basic membership fee.
And I want the basic sites, that I paid for, to be easily apparent to me.
Which is no longer the case.
You get the basic and premium sites mixed together in a listing, and you don't know whether the site is available to you, until you click on the hot link, and see whether it's open, or needs an upgraded membership to access.
The network has some nice features:
You can stream many of the videos in different definitions: 360p, 480p, 576p, 720p, 1080p.
You can download the videos in different definitions: 360p, 480p, 576p, 720p, 1080p.
They used to have a feature where you could choose to download or stream the entire scene, or pick the clips from the scene that you want. But they seem to have dropped that option for the site and network.
REVIEW CONTINUES IN REPLY SECTION BELOW:
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU discounted price $17.87/month (recurring).
-Membership in My Babysitters Club gives you access to most of the Team Skeet network sites.
Note: You have to pay extra for access to the "Unlock" sites in the network.
-Cute models. The models are late teens, early twenties.
-Numerous choices to stream or download the videos.
-The videos are offered in low, medium and high definition. For both streaming and download.
-You can choose to download or stream the entire scene, or pick the clips from the scene that you want.
-The videos are excellent quality: professionally shot, good lighting, clean sets, good sound control.
-Epoch is primary biller. A trusted name.
-Exclusive content.
-No download limits.
Cons:
-The biggest con is that the site is small. Only 30 scenes.
-Slow update rate. You only get one or two scenes per month. The site was started mid-year 2015, over a year ago, and it only has 30 videos. So it's growing, but at a snail's pace.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-A few of the sites in the Team Skeet network are "Unlock", which means you have to pay extra to access their videos.
-Although the models are cute girls, not much effort is put into making them appear more attractive. They are presented as the girl next door, which does not capitalize on how pretty these girls naturally are.
Bottom Line:
Site stats:
-30 videos.
-30 matching photosets.
Site theme: a babysitter is either tricked or forced into having sex with the father.
-This is one of the better sites in the Team Skeet network. The babysitter theme just fits the 18+ models more easily. Porn models are not hired for their acting ability, but the setup is so simple in these skits, that you can ignore the amateur performances and the stupid dialog and concentrate on watching these young girls having hot sex with an adult male. The videos are professionally shot. The models are cute. I wish that more care was put into making these models attractive, because they could look fantastic. But the models are presented as normal girls who are baby sitters, and not glamorized.
This is a small site. That is growing at a very slow rate. So if you were to score this as a stand-alone site, the score would be in 60s. The site has a small (30) number of videos of cute teens having sex. The sex is usually hot, the videos are good quality.
But because you have access to most of the rest of the Team Skeet network, that obviously raises the value of the site. The network features a number of popular niches: massage, cream pie, tiny girls, anal, exercise, blowjobs, latina models, black models, step siblings, etc. So there's plenty of videos to look through after you have finished with the My Babysitters Club site.
I think My Babysitters Club is one of the better sites in the Team Skeet network. In spite of its small size. The theme is just easier to build a video around. And their videos look good. Not great, but good. It's a step down from the videos at X-Art, Blacked, Tushy, where the glamor element is added, which makes the models look outstandingly attractive. But the models at Team Skeet are naturally cute, and the sex can be hot.
Giving the site (and network access) a score of 85. For a low price ($17.87/month), you get access to a lot of videos of cute girls engaged in hardcore sex.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Low membership price.
PU lists discounted price of $24.95/month (recurring) for My Dad's Hot Girlfriend.
Join through Naughty America instead of through My Dad's Hot Girlfriend, and save $15.
-Multiple definition choices to download a video:
For the full movie: 4k, 1080p, 720p, 480p.
For specific clips of the movie: Quicktime (Apple), DVD, Normal, Mobile.
-Can stream videos on Roku on your TV.
-Zip file for each photoset.
-Epoch is the billing agent. A trusted name.
-The site (and network) offers a guarantee: if you are not completely satisfied for any reason within 30 days of purchasing a membership, contact customer service and they will refund your membership price.
I purchased a membership. I don't like their videos. But that is personal preference. The videos are professionally shot. With a lot of big-name porn stars. With high production values. So I think it would be wrong for me to ask for a refund. The site offers a lot of value for people who like their videos.
Cons:
-Navigation could be much simpler.
-Too many ads on each page.
-Very large files for the video downloads.
-Pre-checked cross sale on join page.
Bottom Line:
Site has 315 videos.
Site has 315 matching galleries.
Starting around October 2013, the site offers 4k definition for some videos.
Starting in late December 2013, all the videos from that date on are offered in 4k definition.
My Dad's Hot Girlfriend theme is about guys making it with their dads' hot girlfriends.
So I guess the fantasy is that you are getting revenge on your dad for whatever he did to you in the past.
Showing him that you are a bigger man than he is.
With the added bonus that this is behind his back, the more fool him.
If that fantasy rocks your boat, then this site was made for you.
Otherwise, it's just a lame premise.
However, not all the videos feature a woman playing the girlfriend of a man who fucks the son.
Some of the videos have the woman playing the wife of the man.
So--depending on the audience, that might be a con, because it breaks the theme of site.
These are porn actors. So don't expect Academy award performances. The script is usually lame, the dialog is lame, the plot is lame, the actors are lame.
As I mentioned in my review of Naughty America, it helps to drink a few beers (or some hard liquor) before watching these videos, to help suspend your disbelief. That way you are more free to enjoy these stupid videos.
Personally, I think the videos at most other porn sites are easier to enjoy. The many other sites give you straight porn videos, whether it's gonzo sex or glamcore sex or some other variation. But I have a hard time watching the My Dad's Hot Girlfriend videos and getting in the mood to appreciate what I'm watching.
The site offers multiple download options:
For the full movie: 4k, 1080p, 720p, 480p.
For clips of the movie: Quicktime (Apple), DVD, Normal, Mobile.
Some PU members have reported problems downloading files from Naughty America. They say that downloading a file can crash their computer, or that the download speed is extremely slow.
From most porn paysites other than Naughty America, I can often get 3-5 MB/sec.
At Naughty America, I average around 1-2 MB/sec download speeds.
That is far faster than what other PU members report.
There was a recent comment (dated 2016-05-22) by PU member Divinx on Naughty America that reports "Downloads below 50 KB/s. Nobody does it worse."
If that is what I experienced, I would ask for a refund. Because the file sizes of a video are so large, that it would make downloading a video extremely difficult.
For example, a single video, runtime 29 minutes 39 seconds, 720p definition, has a file size of 1.11 GB.
That is a huge file size for a single video of that definition and runtime.
The file size for the 1080p definition of the same file would be 2.57 GB. So even at today's prices, you would quickly run out of storage space if you want to archive many of these videos.
The only way that someone can store these videos is because hard drive storage prices keep dropping. 5 or 10 years ago, it would have been far too expensive to buy the drives to store many of these videos.
Even at today's prices, you really should use some program to compress the files, if you want to store them on a personal hard drive.
When I report the specifications for my download speeds, I should note that I am not downloading more than one file at a time. Also, I am not streaming any videos while I am downloading.
On a simple basis, I can report that if I am streaming a video and downloading a video at the same time, the video I am streaming can exhibit playback problems: the video can stutter during playback. And the download speeds will drop. So the fact that I am not downloading multiple files at the same time, and not streaming at the same time I am downloading, might help to explain why I am getting faster download speeds than some people report.
But I do get slower download speeds at Naughty America, and its sites, than I get from other paysites. Most other paysites will give me a download speed of 4-5 MB/sec.
Theodore Sturgeon (the science fiction author and critc) wrote Sturgeon's Revelation (commonly referred to as Sturgeon's Law): 90% of SF is crap. But he also said that applies to most other fields: 90% of film, literature, consumer goods, etc. is crap.
In my opinion, 100% of My Dad's Hot Girlfriend is crap.
Naughty America is a low-priced network. It has a low membership price of $9.95 for the first month with a PU discount. And you can sometimes find special offers with an even lower introductory price.
Is it worth joining the network?
Even at that low price point, unless you like the videos offered, it is not worth joining.
But if you do like the videos, then it's a worthwhile join. Unless you experience the problems that other people have reported.
Review serves as a useful warning to those of us with poor memories of what Naughty America has become.
Thanks for trying to save us money on worthless sites.
At My Horny Asians (part of the 21sextury network), they advertise $9.95 Month.
You click on the hot link, and you get 3 options to sign up:
1. 1 year, no rebill, $9.95/month, billed at one installment of $119.40 at one time.
2. 1 month, rebill at $9.95 after 4th months. In the first four months you pay $19.95/month.
3. 3 month, rebill at $19.98/month. Recurring at $59.95 every 90 days.
So I don't see any option to sign up for $9.95 for the first month, whether it's one-time only, or $9.95 for first month, and a higher price for succeeding months.
I've seen a similar advertisement at another site, where they advertise $9.95/month, but it turns out, when you go to the signup page, that is the rate for a 1-year subscription.
Which seems slightly deceptive to me.
If they advertise $9.95/month, and at the signup page it turns out that $9.95/month is only available with a 1-year subscription, I wonder if that is legal.
There are supposed to be "Truth in advertising laws".
From the internet:
http://www.ftc.gov/opa/reporter/advertising/
FTC Resources for Reporters
Truth in Advertising and Marketing
When consumers see or hear an advertisement, whether it’s on the Internet, radio or television, or anywhere else, federal law says that ad must be truthful, not misleading, and, when appropriate, backed by scientific evidence. The Federal Trade Commission enforces these truth-in-advertising laws, and it applies the same standards no matter where an ad appears – in newspapers and magazines, online, in the mail, or on billboards or buses. The FTC looks especially closely at advertising claims that can affect consumers’ health or their pocketbooks – claims about food, over-the-counter drugs, dietary supplements, alcohol, and tobacco and on conduct related to high-tech products and the Internet, such as the dissemination of spyware. The FTC also monitors and writes reports about ad industry practices regarding marketing of food, violent movies, music, and electronic games to children.
When the FTC finds a case of fraud perpetrated on consumers, the agency files actions in federal district court for immediate and permanent orders to stop scams; prevent fraudsters from perpetrating scams in the future; freeze their assets; and get compensation for victims.
But internet sites advertise $9.95 month, and then at the signup page, it turns out that only applies with a 1-year subscription.
So I guess it's misleading, but legal.
Edit01: If you use the PU link to 21sextury, you can join that network for $9.95 for the first month, recurring at $29.95 every 30 days.
The 21sextury network includes access to My Horny Asians. So there are sometimes work-arounds to getting a cheaper subscription price.
This is a small network of teen sites. There are some cute models, but almost from the start of the different sites, there were update problems: updates were slow, irregular, or none at all.
With no updates, there is no reason for a membership beyond 1 month.
This is a full-fledged glamour site.
So they offer all the trimmings.
A zip file for the photo sets in low, medium and high definition.
A recent set:
low is 1.8 Megapixels
medium 10 Megapixels
high 36 Megapixels
They also offer the streaming for videos in
360p, 720p, 1080p.
The videos have a choice for download of:
360p, 540p, HD (which I assume is 720p), full HD (which I assume is 1080p).
Sorry, I am not going to download each file definition, because I'm not feeling well, and don't have the energy to verify the file sizes on my PC, at the moment.
But Tony Murano was a MetArt contributor for many years at MetArt, and if you have a MetArt membership, you can find many examples of his work (mainly photo sets).
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A very low membership price:
$15/month - rebills
$30/6 months - one time purchase
$50/year - rebills
$65/year - one time purchase
-Content is exclusive.
-Up to 4k and 80mpx photos and videos.
-Can choose your own login details: username and password.
-Secure join page.
-CCBill is the default biller. A trusted biller: easy to use, to cancel membership, to get details on the CCBill website about your membership status, etc.
-Tony Murano is the main photographer. He used to contribute to MetArt. He has an eye for beautiful models, and I personally think he is a great photographer, that showcases the beauty of his models.
-No pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Not only do they offer a low membership price, but they also don't try to trick you with a pre-checked cross-sale on the join page, a rarity for porn sites.
-No ads. This is amazing. The first porn site I've seen that doesn't put ads on its pages. Makes the pages almost seem naked without any ads for other porn sites.
Cons:
-There is a notice at TBP that TBP no longer does business with this site. No reason given (as per PU/TBP guidelines for this type of situation).
So I joined this site through a link from Rabbit's Reviews (a sister site for PU/TBP).
My hope is that PU/Rabbit sites will get some credit for my join.
-Poor public preview pages.
You get a model list of the models, with small thumbnails of their sets.
-The significance of the posting date: this is the date the set/video was posted to the site.
But the set/video might have been photographed years earlier.
So when the age of the model is listed, that might refer to her age when the set was photographed,
and probably not when the set was posted to the site.
I've found some sets that were shot years ago, but have a recent posting date.
-Basic navigation: even though this is a fairly small site compared to mega-sites, the navigation is basic and could be improved. No search engine on the site. No search by tags or other criteria.
Bottom Line:
The site features the work of Tony Murano. He was a long-time contributor to MetArt.
The site is basically softcore, but it does have a harder edge than MetArt: the models are allowed to masturbate, have toys, and sometimes have girl-on-girl scenes that go beyond MetArt's very softcore content.
The photography is excellent.
The girls are mainly gorgeous.
Bottom line:
This is not a mega-site. It's mainly the work of a single photographer, Tony Murano. I enjoy his style: Clear photographs of beautiful models.
The style is slightly more hardcore than MetArt, but still considered softcore: there are sets/scenes of a girl masturbating, masturbating with a toy, slightly more explicit lesbian sets than MetArt allows. But the site would probably be considered softcore glamour: the distinction between softcore glamour and midcore glamour seems blurry to me.
Anyway, the main attraction is the low price: $50 yearly (with rebills).
Many of the models are lovely to gorgeous (I'm not sure what the difference is between lovely and gorgeous: many of the models are fucking attractive).
This is not a mega-site like MetArt or Femjoy or even MPL Studios. But the site has been around for years, and it has more than enough content to spend months going through all the beauties at this site.
Years ago, I was burned by a softcore site that had a low yearly price, from another photographer who contributed to MetArt. I joined that site for a year, and during my membership, there was not a single update. And that site had maintenance problems. That site went out of business, thank God, because even though it was not a sham, it seemed like a rip-off to me, because there were zero updates, and many times I could not log in to the site even though I had a paid, active membership
Getting back to the My Naked Dolls review:
The site has an irregular update rate.
New photo sets might be posted anywhere from 2 days to 12 days apart.
New videos might be posted once or twice a month, but some months have no new video.
The photosets and videos are professionally shot: clear, well-focused sets and videos of attractive young women: mostly late teens to early twenties. Slender white Eastern European models (Russia and surrounding areas).
The main attraction is the price: for $50 per year, it's a worthwhile join for viewing these lovely girls.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
