Mr. Skin (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Low membership fee with PU discount. $9.95/month, or $79/year.
However, the site sometimes offers a lifetime membership for $99.
And with the lifetime offer for $99, they usually add a 1-month membership to the Playboy site or the Naked News site.
PU lists a lifetime membership for $1,000. That is a ridiculous price.
If you want a lifetime membership, wait for a holiday, and they might offer the $99 lifetime membership. But great sites like MetArt and Hegre offer lifetime memberships that are far cheaper, especially during holiday discounts, than the $1,000 membership offer from Mr.Skin.
-The easiest way to search for nudity by actresses.
Just put the name of the actress in the search box, and you get her clips at Mr.Skin.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading of the clips. However, the clips only download in one definition. |
| Cons: |
-Almost all clips are either softcore or non-nude. No hardcore clips.
-Most clips are short: two minutes or less. I guess the idea is to skip to the good parts, but what happens is you get a peek at a breast, and wonder: is that all?
I have some fond memories of nude scenes in films, but even the clips that supposedly feature those movies are disappointing: there is no build-up to the scene, quality of the clip is usually poor, and the impact of the clip is: so what? So instead of re-living the excitement of the original scene, you're watching a shortened, unsatisfying, poor quality version of a snippet that has lost most meaning.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. |
| Bottom Line: |
The theme of Mr.Skin is "Fast-Forwarding to the Good Parts, Since 1999!"
However, there are problems with this approach:
-The main problem is that you drop the set-up which gives most of the meaning to the scene. The clip is either non-nude, or a very brief glimpse of the actresses breasts.
Or you might see the actress' ass.
So it doesn't have the impact or meaning of the original scene.
Also, the quality of the clip is often poor. The clips, I assume are from the original DVD or movie, but the crispness and color and image-quality if often degraded from the orginal, which detracts from the impact.
If you are a fan of nude celebs, this is probably the easiest way to search for their nude content.
Although the internet has made it possible to search for nude content of celbrities (mainly actors), Mr.Skin makes it easy to find most of their nude appearances. However, there are two problems with Mr.Skin.
-The clips at Mr. Skin are very short, many of them are less than 1 or 2 minutes in runtime. So you might see a nude breast, but a lot of the clips don't feature nudity, just what Mr. Skin considers a sexy appearance.
-Many of the clips are low quality: I'm suprised at the poor quality of the clips. Since many of the clips are probably from DVDs or from an actual commercial movie, the clips should be much higher quality than they are.
And with lower quality, you lose much of the impact of the scene.
Not only do you lose the build-up to the scene, but the poor image quality reduces the value of the scene.
So, even though you have a convenient access to the nude scenes of actors, the site does not impress me very much.
There are some actresses who have done some erotic scenes, but I don't feel that the scenes shown on Mr. Skin are very erotic, because the scenes are too short or poor visual quality.
Also, almost all scenes shown on Mr. Skin are either non-nude or softcore. I certainly haven't seen all the clips at Mr. Skin, but there would be very few or no hardcore clips.
I'm giving the site a score of 80.
Many other PU members have given the site a score higher than 80.
So the value of the site is really based on personal preference:
I guess the site satisfies the element of curiousity: has this actress done a nude or semi-nude scene?
But the scene in the original movie would be far more erotic.
I bought a lifetime membership to Mr Skin for $99 about 2 years ago. The site is an easy way to check if an actress has done nudity: but for me, the clips are disappointing: they just lack impact. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
