Drooler made a comment on 07-11-10 that the site was having update problems.
A lot of the content at this site was posted years earlier at a different site that I was a member of, Teen Stars Magazine. Teen Stars Magazine stopped updating maybe 5 years ago, but the preview pages for Teen Stars Magazine has a program that shows old content from years ago with the current date, so you are tricked into thinking the site is still updating, if you haven't been a member before.
But, unfortunately, I think Teen Stars Magazine and My Precious Virgins are archive sites. By "archive", I mean they stopped updating, probably years ago.
I'm more soft core than hard core. If the girl is attractive enough, I don't mind looking thru a "taking nothing off" photo set.
I was just looking thru some photo sets I downloaded from Teen Stars Magazine years ago. Isabella, Maria, Nicole and Rebecca are some of the models I can look at, whether they are nude or not. They are just good-to-great looking girls. Their photo sets are also at My Precious Virgins, where they also have the same names as at Teen Stars Magazine. It's easier when you don't have to list a model under different names, like you sometimes have to do at met-art.
And even tho the photo sets are not as high quality or artistic or artsy as the met-art photos, I can enjoy the photos of these girls as much as the met-art photo sets. Simple can be nice, for a change.
Sometimes I find myself almost drooling over some of these girls. I have to remember to keep my mouth closed. Lol.
Sorry you seem to be disappointed with the site contents.
If you read the earlier reviews at PU and TBP, they indicate the main focus of the site is soft core teen.
The earlier reviews also state the number of vids at this site are very limited, compared to the photos.
My only quibble with the TBP reviews would be where two reviewers give a + mark for exclusive content. As Drooler noted in his review, a lot of the photo sets were earlier shown at other sites, such as Teen Stars Magazine.
But you have to admit there are a huge amount of yummy-looking girls here. So the site is not a complete waste.
Thanks for the kind words.
2 other people also reported they were having problems with Firefox with the PU link to this site.
Computers can be funny.
I'm guessing they have installed add-ons that affect some links.
But I'm far from expert, on computer tech.
I'm using Firefox browser.
Maybe with a different browser you're getting a different result?
Anyway, I was not impressed with the site, My Teen Oasis, itself.
I think the network access to Fame Digital network (Devils Film, etc.) is what gives the membership value.
But if you want to join the network, do a google search for Devils Film or Peter North, and you should be able to find a discounted membership price of $9.95 (or less) for the first month.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-If you join through the Devils Film site, the price is $9.95 with a PU discount for the first month.
Note: that price has recently changed to $14.95/month with PU discount.
If you do a google search, you might be able to find a discounted price of $9.95 for the first month for Devils Film.
The price is $14.95/month with a PU discount if you join through the My Teen Oasis site.
-This is a member of the Fame Digital network. You get full access to over 20 separate sites in the Fame Digital network. Gamma Entertainment, which owns Fame Digital, also owns Evil Angel, which has a separate membership.
-Login details are the same for all the sites you have access to (don't need a separate username and password for each different site).
-Login to the site is through a secure server. Also, member pages are on a secure server.
-You are sent 2 confirming emails on joining. They contain your login details, your membership pricing details, and the last 4 digits of your credit card you used.
Cons:
-They did a network upgrade in 2017. They now use brighter thumbnail photos to make the network sites fresher and more appealing. However, the navigation is now clumsier, takes more effort to navigate within a site, and to switch between sites.
-The site/network has a ton of hardcore material. Finding the content that appeals to you requires stamina (to slog through the junk that is boring or less appetizing).
-A lot of the models have tattoos, which I don't like.
-A lot of the models have enhanced breasts, which I don't like.
-A medium-sized logo of the site appears on bottom right corner of the video.
-Poor model listing inside this site.
Bottom Line:
My Teen Oasis is a site featuring teen and twenty-something models (that are supposed to be teens, but look too old to be teens) in hardcore sex.
The sex is basically hardcore gonzo style.
Not too rough or violent, but far from the heartcore that is featured at X-Art, Vixen, Tushy, or Blacked.
I prefer the X-Art, Blacked, Tushy, Vixen or Diesel Access style videos.
Or the Teen Mega World videos, which have improved over the last few years with higher production values: the models at the competing sites are much more appealing, to me: the models at My Teen Oasis seem like whores doing their job: the models at the competing sites are less like whores, more like girls who are finding some excitement or pleasure in the sex.
Actually, a number of the models featured at My Teen Oasis are also featured at competing porn sites, but the action at the competing porn sites seems fresher, or more vivid, less gonzo. So even though My Teen Oasis features a large number of videos of hardcore sex, I prefer competing porn sites, where the videos are more appealing.
My main complaint about the site is that the recent site/network re-design made using the site/networkmore difficult: to find the contents, to see the model listings.
The old design was much more user-friendly.
Although the videos are professionally shot, I enjoy the videos at competing sites more.
Customer support is excellent: you have 24/7 access. You can use live chat, email, or the phone.
If you have any problem, I suggest live chat, since that is the fastest way to get a response. I chatted Customer Service a couple of times, and they solved my problems immediately.
The most famous sites include:
devils film
peter north
rocco siffredi
silvia saint
silverstone DVD
Access to any one of those 5 sites would justify your membership fee.
And you also get access to a number of other sites catering to special niches.
So, based on quantity alone, you are getting far more than your money's worth.
(Assuming that you are new to porn, or that you enjoy the gonzo style porn these sites feature.)
-A complete listing of the sites you currently have access to with a membership in Fame Digital network is shown on the first reply at the bottom of this review.
I'm giving the site a score of 80. This is not based on the value of the site itself, but is based on network access: a membership to My Teen Oasis gives you access to over 20+ sites in the Devils Film/Fame Digital network, thousands of hardcore gonzo videos covering many different niches.
I'm sure that a lot of the videos at this site are old.
But that's not what I meant when I said the content is dated.
When a photoset or video is posted at a site, and they also give the date of posting, some reviewers say the content is dated. That gives the viewer an additional bit of knowledge.
Other sites do not date their content, so the viewer has no idea when the content was posted.
Obviously, posting date is not the same as the date the photoset or video was created. But it's still better than no date at all.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Content is dated.
-Nice PU discount for first month of $9.95. But recurs at $29.95/mo.
-No DRM.
-Videos are good quality for a DVD site. You don't get the high definition found at some sites, but the definition is good, the camera-work is good, good focus, no jitters in the video, good lighting, good colors, good sound control. I wish there were less fake moans and groans of excitement, but it's not as bad as some sites.
-Recent update rate is one video per week. But starting in January 2012, there were no updates for almost 4 months.
-There is a dropdown listing of the site models. But it would be easier to search a stationary list, where the models were presented alphabetically, with a nice-sized thumbnail to show what the model looks like, with hot links to her appearances at that site, and to other sites in the network.
Cons:
-There is a listing of sites the model appears at. But to play or download her videos at another site in the network, you have to manually log in to each different site, and then do a search for her videos at that site. So searching for model appearances is difficult, and time-consuming.
-No model biography.
-Videos have a small/medium-sized watermark bottom right corner.
-Photos have a small/medium-sized watermark bottom right corner.
-No zip file for the photosets. But I doubt many members would want to keep these photos anyway, except for one photo to show what the model looks like.
-Uncheck the pre-checked cross sale at signup, or you will be charged a trial membership in another site.
Bottom Line:
Site statistics:
Number of videos: 557
Number of high definition videos: 56
Streaming options:
240p
480p
540p (if the 540p is available).
56 videos have the higher definition options of 540p, 720p, and 1080p.
Video length: 3 to 31 minutes.
By watching these videos, you can learn a lot about how to deal with models. For example, in a video titled "Cleaning Cock!", Ashlyn Rae, a pretty model, wants to buy a new dress. So a guy hires her to clean his house. Once she finishes cleaning, he offers to pay her in cum. And she
says she loves cum. And he says "Well, that's good because he has lots of cum". So then she gives him a blow job and they fuck.
PU members can use this line on their girlfriends, and save lots of money.
Not only does he pay her in cum, but when she asks for a tip, he says it was included in the cum he already gave her.
I was a member of this site before. My impression is that the videos were upgraded. They look better than what I remembered. This is an impression, because I don't have the videos I downloaded from my previous membership.
They have photosets illustrating the videos. But the photosets are screencaps of the video. And the number of photos in each photoset varies.
One photoset has 3 photos. Another has 43 pics. Another has 97. The photosets are useful for showing what the model looks like. But they have
little artistic or erotic value.
You can click on a thumbnail of a photo and get a larger thumbnail. There is an option to enlarge the thumbnail to full-sized screen. Sometimes it
takes several clicks on the "expand the image" icon to enlarge to full-sized screen picture.
The site theme is teen-to-early-twenty girls having hardcore sex. They usually have a brief story introduction setting up the sex, but the
story is brief and has little value.
You can search the site by 3 main categories:
1. By series. For example: Couples Seduce Teens; Fresh Euro Flesh; Latin Eye Candy; Masters of Reality Porn; etc.
2. By type of sex. For example: Anal; Ass to mouth; Blowjob; Cream pie; Cum swallow; Cumshot; Cumswapping; Cunilingus; Deep throat; Double
Blowjob; Double Penetration; Lesbian; etc.
3. By name of model.
This is a large DVD site. It's part of the netFameSolutions network. You
get access to this site and about 20 other sites by joining through the Devils Film site for $9.95 for the first month (using the PU discount).
Those main sites include tens of 1,000s of hardcore videos of all types.
And the smaller sites include 1,000s of hardcore videos covering many different niches.
So for $9.95 for the first month (with the PU discount), you get access to a huge amount of hardcore videos.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No DRM.
-No site timeout. But I do get disconnected after long idle times, so maybe there is a site timeout, but it takes a good while before disconnect.
-No download limits.
-Streaming, low and high quality
-Download, low and high quality WMV file
-Less fake moaning and groaning than many porn videos
-Canned background music could be better, but less annoying than in some porn videos
-Some attractive models
-Female models in videos are listed by name
-Screenshots, maybe 20-30, to illustrate the video
-Caucasian and Latina female models
Cons:
-Navigation is basic.
-Site design is poor. The videos are not categorized or laid out to make searching easy.
-No search. Have to click through the entire site to see what is there.
-DownThemAll download manager sometimes does not work smoothly. Sometimes get error message 400 (file does not download). Don't know reason why.
-No text listing of models' names, with nice-sized thumbnails, so you can get an idea of what the models look like. There is no text listing at all, and thumbnails of models are scattered through the pages, making a simple
search of the models at the site extremely difficult.
-No zip file to download the screenshots for a video. But who would want to download and keep the screenshots anyway?
-They should definitely get rid of the tool they use to display photos. It makes viewing the photos more difficult than normal. Many times it is hard to enlarge the thumbnail sized photo that is first presented, to get a normal-sized photo. And the photos are slow to load.
Bottom Line:
Myteenoasis is a hardcore teen video site.
The site is made up of videos from other sites in the network, mainly SilverstoneDVD and DevilsFilm, that were put in here to make another site offering.
The video runtime is from 8 to 20 minutes.
File size is from 100 MB to 300 MB for high quality.
Frame width x height = 720 x 528
Total bitrate = 2096 kbps
The netFameSolutions network has about 32 sites currently. There are about 5 sites with general hardcore appeal, and the rest of the sites are more niche, with a wide range of niches:
tranny
blowjob
granny
Indian (from India)
etc. etc.
With membership in any network site, you get access to about 22 sites.
Get a special price of $9.95/month from PU/TBP, which is a steal considering the large amount of content, the varied content, the generally OK to
good quality of the content. This is mainly a video network. The photos are mainly to give you a good idea of what the videos will show.
The quality of the photos is low. These are screenshots. Even when the model is good-looking, she does not appear good-looking in the photos. A
model like Ashlyn Rae, who appears in a bj video here, is just blah. At Metart, where she also appears, she is presented as a fine-looking woman. You would not recognize it was the same woman except for the same name.
In the videos, Ashlyn Rae looks better than the screenshots. In the videos, giving a bj, she comes across as enthusiastic and enjoying her
work, as a professional should. Sure gives a different impression from her Metart photos, where she comes across as lovely but more distant. Makes me appreciate Ashlyn Rae in a whole different way. Lol.
This is one of the minor sites at the network. I am strongly into teens, so I would normally rate this site much higher than a normal niche site.
But there are only a few very attractive models I found at this site. And because the navigation is so basic, with no search, it's hard to find the videos I might like at this site.
The main value of the site is that it gives access to the netFameSolutions network.
This site has a few really attractive models, but the navigation is bad. And the general level of the videos is slightly disappointing. Maybe I am spoiled, but even a DVD site (which this is, basically) should have nice quality lighting and focus in the videos, so when you find an attractive model, she will be presented and seen clearly and easily by the viewer.
TBP states videos are streaming only, can not be downloaded. But
all videos that I looked at can be downloaded as high or low quality WMV files, as well as be viewed in high or low quality streaming.
40 years ago, or more, I went to a few strip clubs. But even then I didn't have much money to spend on them.
But I'm guessing, and I've said it in a few comments at PU, that chat rooms can be just as expensive as strip clubs.
More private, of course.
But one reason I don't like strip clubs, is I don't drink a lot of alcohol.
For one thing, it's expensive.
For another, it often gives me a headache.
For another, my alcohol tolerance is low: I take one drink, and I start to feel sleepy. Not high, just tired and want to lay down.
If alcohol made me happy, I would drink more.
But I can buy a six-pack of beer and have it last for months.
But if you can find some chat rooms that give you pleasure, and have the extra cash, then more power to you.
Smell the rose buds while you can.
Grab whatever pleasures you can find in this life.
(Hopefully, while not hurting others.)
It's been many, many years since I've been to a topless bar. But it seems like it would be cheaper to go to a topless bar than to watch a private cam show.
I only mentioned leaving out PU from your email because normally it's better to keep things simple. Less confusion that way, easier to understand.
I agree that you should have gotten the $14.95 rate when you were rebilled for 30 days, because that's the rate the signup page shows.
If you don't get that rate, instead are charged $24.95, send a second email explaining you sent a first request, and this is a second request for a refund since you are being overcharged for your subscription. And send the details of why you are being overcharged in the second email.
If you don't get satisfaction, go to your credit card company, and they should credit you with the $10 difference.
One quibble: I see a "$4.95 Two Day Trial Membership". This is shown both at PU and at the nakedcloset site signup page. Unless you specifically remember that your trial membership was for 3 days, it was more likely for 2 days.
Could you explain in more detail exactly what happened, in terms of your membership?
What length membership did you first join for?
2-day trial
1 month non-recurring
monthly, recurring
The $24.95 charge you are talking about, is for what, exactly:
A 30 day membership, the first one
An additional 30 day membership
A different membership period
It's easy to get angry about extra charges, but I think you will be better off if you make clear, in your email to support or billing, the details of why you believe you were overcharged.
If you don't get satisfaction from support or billing, you can have your credit card company reverse the excess charge.
But it really helps if you explain simply to whoever you are talking to the details of what went wrong.
But I personally agree 100% that you should be entitled to the prices at the page you originally used to sign up.
Edit: A side note: Unless the PU page directly applies to the problem, you're better off leaving out any mention of PU in your complaint. That just adds confusing and un-needed details to the problem.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Automatic login to site (if you have cookies enabled). When you go to the site, you are automatically logged in, without having to re-enter your username and password.
-Works with Roku.
-Homepage acts like a table of contents:
--Gives list of anchors (both lead and guest), with nice-sized thumbnails and links to their bios.
(Trying to make a connection to the member so member will be more interested in the site)
--Amateur Auditions. Follow the search for our next anchor
(Same idea of making a connection to the member.)
--Recent listing of news features.
-Bonus content from Mr. Skin, a sister site of celebrity nudity.
-Cam show for site.
-Updates 6 days a week (so 6 new shows per week).
-Multiple download options.
--You can download the entire day's show, or specific segments of the show.
--You have choice of 480p, 720p, 1080p defintion for the download.
-When the news anchor finishes her segment, she turns and walks away. So you can watch her front and back jiggle.
Cons:
-If you want to post comments about the site, there is no internal page on the site.
Instead, you are supposed to post at the Site's facebook page.
Since I don't have a facebook account, this is a negative for me.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Billing processor is third-party company I never heard of.
-This is a softcore site that features female nudity. But no sex.
-I don't know how long the strip/nudity feature will hold your interest.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: news read by anchors who strip and go nude.
So it makes the news more watchable than a regular news program.
Except that a regular news program probably covers a wider range of subjects.
If you like their models, it makes the news much more interesting, to see them strip while reporting the news.
The stripping is not a strip-tease act, the anchors/models just take off their clothes while reading the news.
You have a number of regular female anchors.
You also have a number of guest anchors.
It's a nice idea, the first few times you watch.
Except they must be doing OK. Because this site has been around since 2000. And they update 6 times a week, so they are doing much better than I would have thought.
There is a blog.
The blog is useful, because it lists some of the main headlines for each newscast.
So if you want a preview or summary of each day's newscast, this is the the best source.
You can stream or download each news cast.
$15.00/month with PU discount.
The site is not expensive, but does not appeal to me personally.
The anchors/models are not selected to be the most physically attractive. Some are good-looking, but other anchors are just average-looking.
And some models have implants, or tattoos, which I dislike. That's a personal preference.
You can do search by news anchor, by segment, by date.
I'm giving the site a score of 80.
The site structure/navigation is good.
The videos are professionally shot.
The choices to stream or download are varied.
You get 6 updates per week.
Do I recommend this site?
It's not a bad site. But I would have thought it had limited appeal. However, as I wrote, it's been around since 2000, and still updates 6 days a week, and the site is well-managed software-wise. (I did not find any dead links).
Thanks for the very fast response. It's really helpful when Webmasters answer questions about their sites. (And I wasn't even really asking.) Lol. But thanks again.
For $1.23 you get a 1-month subscription. Don't know what the renewal rate is, but $1.23 is less than the price of a cup of coffee, or a soft drink at McDonald's. Even if the videos are non-exclusive, it's worth checking this site out. The only negative I can see is that some PU members might feel it's not worth the time to wade through the large amount of videos that are not high-quality to find the ones worth watching. But $1.23 for a 30-day trial seems like a great deal to me.
The videos that I really liked were from years ago. I know that because I saw them before, but I can't recall where from.
I believe this is an archive site, and no new material has been posted recently. That's a guess, because they don't have any dates for when the content is posted.
I'm pretty sure Clubseventeen is still around. It used to be a really nice site, with lots of attractive models. But I haven't been a member of that site in many years.
I would not expect to find any new material at Nasty Angels. Just old content, but I was pleasantly suprised that the quality was still ok. Not really high quality compared to what is being offered today at sites like X-Art or Diesel Access networks or the other high-end video sites. But the quality is certainly better than what I've seen at other sites in the Serious Cash network of sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Apparently one username and password will work to gain entry to all the bonus sites I am supposed to have access to.
-Get access to 21 bonus sites with membership.
-Download manager works. I use Down Them All, which is very helpful at this site.
-Homepage has a link to "YOUNG TIGHT PUSSY new for your ultimate pleasure", which opens an ad for fleshlight, which has differently named models of the fleshlight, also different color options, which is really more than I wanted to know.
Cons:
-You are assigned a random-generated username and password for site login.
-Primitive site design.
-Download speeds can vary from less thant 200 KB/sec to 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
-You have to be patient with their hot links. They often don't work on the first or second click.
-Download manager is really helpful. If a video file stops downloading, you can resume the download with the download manager. Several files stopped downoading in mid-download, and I was able to resume the download in each case.
-Video files download with the default filename of "download.zip". So you have to rename the files to keep them separate.
-Site contents have no posting date.
-No search function. If you want to find the videos with a model, have to manually search through the entire videos and hope her name is listed on the tiny thumbnail that represents the video listing.
-No streaming offered. If you want to examine a video, have to download the video, and then play it.
Bottom Line:
This is not a tiny site. There are over 300 videos at this site. The theme of the site is young teens doing nasty things with sex.
The poor site structure makes navigation difficult. No search function, no model listing with thumbnails to show what the models look like, no model bios. They opened this site, and dumped a bunch of videos into it. And that's a shame. Because many of the models are cute or attractive. Many of the videos are nicely shot.
Videos are grouped into two categories:
Softcore movies, and hardcore movies.
Their definition of softcore includes lesbian sex, blowjob, masturbation.
Their definition of hardcore includes boy-girl fucking. Blowjob can be found in both the softcore and hardcore movie categories.
The videos are better than I thought they would be.
Sample data rates:
The frame width x height is: 1024x576.
Total bitrate: 2548kbps
Frame width x height is: 632x512
Total bitrate: 1181 kbps
The videos are professionally shot: good color, good focus, good lighting, nicely framed shots.
They also have some very attractive models at this site.
It's a shame they have some nice videos of attractive models that they just dumped the videos into a site without making much effort to making the site easier to use. Because of the unsorted, jumbled videos, most people would not realize that some of the videos are really excellent.
I'm giving the site a score of 75 because some of these videos are worth viewing and saving. That's in spite of the site problems which I've detailed: no search function, no streaming, no model iist with thumbnails to show what the models look like, hot links that barely work to download the videos.
I certainly can't recommend the site. Except that if you stumbled across some of the videos that I thought were really nice, maybe you would think the site might be worth joining, after all.
There are few limits when it comes to ways people can grab more of your money.
When I bought my first computer, many years ago, I bought it from a mail-order company. The company was out of state, which means it was located in a different state from the one I lived in. I live in the United States. At that time, and it's still the case, out of state sellers did not charge state sales tax (no sales tax from the state of the seller, and no sales tax from the state of the buyer).
But I was charged my state sales tax on the purchase of the PC, by the seller.
In theory, the seller was supposed to turn the "state sales tax" money over to the state I lived in.
On a practical basis, there was no way to check to see if the seller did turn the money over to my state, or just kept the money.
And legally, I believe the seller could keep the "sales tax money", and claim that it was holding the money to turn over to my state. If the matter had ever gone to a court of law.
But my guess is that the "VAT tax" would be kept by the seller, with the intention of turning it over the the British government. This would happen when the seller dies, and goes to heaven, and does pay the British government it's fair share of all revenues.
I just checked, and I am seeing the $19.95/month special price.
But I live in the U.S.
So I guess you are being hit with regional pricing, if the price you see is about $30/month.
I used the PU hot link to go to the site. Did you remember to use the PU hot link?
I would be very hesitant about making a large payment to any porn site, such as the $239.40 for a year.
The reason is: I paid for a Sinemia membership for 1 year with a Discover card.
I was supposed to get 3 movie tickets per month for 1 year.
I tried using the cell phone app to get tickets, was never able to get a single movie ticket.
I disputed the charge to Discover.
Told Discover I was never able to get a single movie ticket after trying many times.
When Discover told Sinemia I was disputing the charge, Sinemia suspended my membership. When I tried logging in to the Sinemia app, I got the message: Access denied!
Discover ruled against me, twice: Discover told me the merchant stated:
" The merchant is willing and able to provide service. They state that users can use the app to purchase tickets while they are waiting for the physical card to be delivered?"
I sent Discover the email from Sinemia stating that my membership was suspended. And I told Discover many times that I was never able to get a single movie ticket, after paying $179.88 for the membership plan.
But Discover ruled twice, that the transaction was valid.
Discover did give me a $50 credit on the transaction, so I lost $130 on the membership.
I was surprised Discover ruled the transaction was valid, after I kept repeating I never got a single movie ticket, and that my membership had been suspended, and I told Discover the Sinemia customer service ignored my requests for help getting movie tickets.
I was very disappointed in Discover. But they have the final say, unless I hire a lawyer, which makes no financial sense, for a $130 charge ($130 after the $50 credit from Discover).
So if you charge something on your credit card, it appears that the credit card company will treat it as a valid charge, even if you don't get what you paid for.
I'm not a lawyer, but I thought I had a strong case. But Discover told me, in writing, that the merchant was willing and able to provide service. (Even though I kept telling Discover I never got a single ticket, and that the merchant had suspended my membership. And I gave Discover proof my membership was suspended with the email from Sinemia.)
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
