I have 4 at the moment and would love to add more. I like the freedom it gives me to not have to download like mad, piling up a huge number of zip files that I never open. I do have the concern that the site might go belly up shortly after joining - after all, it is called a "life of the site" membership. I assume they take the cash and plow it into cigars and booze rather than putting it in escrow. So there's definitely a risk there. Plus it gives me motivation to live forever.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Prior to their move from Australia, this site was one of the very best anywhere. The stuff in their archives from this period is extraordinary.
After you logon, in the top right, it tells you how many days until your next rebill.
Lots of content – 1984 models, 7049 shoots.
Cons:
Starting in June 2023, they stopped making any new shoots. This is announced on their internal forum. They are still posting one update a week, but the backlog will have to run dry at some point.
The regular monthly subscription is expensive, and the discount for longer terms is minimal.
Updates are only 1 per week.
Many models have had their content removed, at their request.
You need to give 7 days notice to cancel your subscription rebill. But otherwise it was easy.
Bottom Line:
I have to give credit to KayTBuffs for talking me into signing up for this site again, and I am super glad I did.
Providing a score for this site is kind of tough. For the version in Australia (up to 2010), I’d give it 100. It was darn near perfect. For the version in Europe up to 2023 (while they were still doing photo shoots), I’d give it 88. For the most recent version, I’d give it an 80.
Especially during the period where they were based in Australia, the site emphasized fun more than anything else. It didn’t have to necessarily be sexual fun, just naked fun (the best kind)! I think they also got some of their models via a couple of girl friends (not necessarily lesbian lovers, just girls that are friends) who would sign up along the lines of “I’ll do it if you’ll do it.” There are a lot of girls with only one shoot and then they are done – they got the rush of thousands of paying customers signing up to look at their naked body, hopefully enjoyed their time in the buff, and have returned to normal life.
I think part of the attraction for a site like this is that most of these women fall into the category of “pretty” rather than “super model”. These girls feel like they are in my league – like if I asked them out they’d probably say yes, assuming they are currently not in a relationship. And based on the fun they are having in their photo shoot, I’d expect to have fun with them on a date.
Models can request that their content be removed. Abby Winters will honor that request, although if they appear in a group, then that content will usually still be on line. As a human being, I can certainly understand this and applaud them for doing so. Their sets go back to 2000, so some of these ladies are now mothers with kids in school, and it can definitely be awkward for junior to have his/her classmates comment on Mom’s porn career. But as a porn purchaser, it is disappointing to see that some of my favorites no longer appear on the site.
One thing I enjoyed as I looked through the archives, the Girls Down Under tended to keep their feminine furriness intact Down There. So many beautiful bushes in one place was a real treat.
There are over 3000 different tags you can search on. It isn’t obvious how to get to the Advanced Search though. The search bar on the main page will only search for models by name. But you can type in just about anything, and when it comes back with nothing found, they will present some random shoots for you to look at. There is now also an Advanced button, and if you click that button, you will have more options.
Alternatively, go to abbywinters.com/tags and you will get a (very long) list of every tag that has been used as a tag on the site. You can break that down a little bit, by Model Tags, Shoot Tags, Video Tags, or Image Tags. Then click on a tag, and it shows you everything that had that tag applied. These are mostly user-supplied tags, and spelling (and misspelling) matters. For example clicking on the Model Tag for “fair skin” returned 240 models. Of course, a model might actually have fair skin but not be tagged this way, or she doesn’t have fair skin so was tagged incorrectly. But it’s not a bad feature to check out.
The ”fetishes” section is a nice feature. “We call activities and aspects of our models "fetishes" because we cannot think of a better word.” These are curated collections centered around something like Girls in Dresses, Topless in Jeans, Tan Lines, Natural Redhead, Glasses on Naked Girls, Full Body Standing Nude, Large Natural Breasts, Tiny Breasts, Rubenesque, etc.
The Boy-Girl stuff on the site is pretty unique – these are actual real-life boyfriend and girlfriend.
Some porn royalty have appeared on the site. Katya Clover (as Caramel S), Ryana, Eve Sweet to name a few.
A pointer – when you go to sign up, scroll down a bit on the home page to find the Deal of the Day. These deals rotate every 24 hours. Most of the time it offers 10% off on a membership. Some times it offers bonus credits in case you would rather buy only a few sets rather than do a full membership. And occasionally there will be an offer for buy one month, get a second month free – that is the one I used when I signed up.
Bottom line – I highly recommend this site to anyone, especially if you can get the buy-one-month-get-one-free deal. No telling how much longer this site will be around.
Also , a bit of history:
2010 – The Company was charged and found guilty of “producing material a reasonable adult might find offensive,” a crime in the state of Victoria (Australia). This caused them to relocate business and staff to the Netherlands. Also starting in 2010, all videos were released in HD1080. Then starting in 2020, videos were released in 4K.
I would never suggest you change your score or anything else about the review. You are actually one of my favorite reviewers because I can tell they are heartfelt. As for Abby Winters, the blog post doesn't say they will stop updating - they said they will stop doing new photo or video shoots. I'm sure at the time they still had stuff in the archives they could roll out, although I am surprised that 2 years later they are still adding stuff. And at the rate of 1 update a week, they can probably keep going for a while, depending on their backlog.
Anyway you talked me into signing up, and I'm loving what I'm seeing so far.
One thing to mention is on the home page, if you scroll down a bit, there will always be some kind of coupon code available for use. The code changes every 24 hours. I saw one that said get a free month when you buy a sub, so I now have a 2 month subscription.
Sorry if you are unaware KayT, but I'd make sure to download everything you want while you still can. From their forums:
"Sunsetting abbywinters.com
28 June 2023, 10:26 PM
We recently made the difficult decision to stop making new shoots. This is for a few reasons;
Lack of profitability: In the last year we made a significant financial loss, and the next 12 months are looking similar. We had a few projects in the pipeline to increase our sales, but I am not confident they are enough. Unfortunately, some have been cancelled now (though the new Tour is going ahead).
Lack of the right models: We never properly recovered from moving to Europe in 2010. The loss of our backbone of regular Australian models is what we built our reputation on. I think we (and especially the models) did a good job over the last 13 years, but we’re finding it harder and harder to find the “right” models every month.
Time for a change for Garion: It’s been 23 years now, and I don’t look forward to abbywinters.com work like I used to.
We have a bunch of shoots made but not yet released, that we’ll be releasing over the next year or so, at a reduced update schedule or two releases per week from July 1 2023 (we’ve added a note to the signup page, so it’s clear to new subscribers)."
It's a pity, I was strongly considering joining up.
Nice review. Are they back to Australia? That's where they started out, and I loved the site back then, but at some point they moved to Europe and the feel of the site changed a lot, so I haven't joined in years. Their "contact us" lists an address in The Netherlands.
Back in the day, my favorite part was the number of girls who gave off the "I can't believe I'm doing this" vibe, and it was quite charming.
Reasonable pricing, especially on a lifetime membership
Cons:
Older videos in SD, but that was state-of-the-art at the time they were created
There are plenty of studios where I have no interest at all, but on the plus side, you can hide some of them, or else make a list of your favorites and then only concentrate on those faves.
Pricing is in Euros, so you will have currency exchange considerations when signing up.
Bottom Line:
This is now my favorite large network site. Even after eliminating the stuff I am not interested in, there is still a huge portfolio of stuff that I am loving.
I know most reviewers praise Adult Time for its navigation, but for me, Adult Prime is much easier to get around. But maybe that’s just the way my mind works.
Current PU pricing is 19.99 Euros for 1 month, 69.99 Euros for 1 year, and 299 Euros for lifetime.
There are currently 149 “studios”, but not all of them are actually part of Adult Prime. Several are listed as “Bonus” or “VIP”. Bonus Sites give you a sample of the content from that bonus site. Usually it’s a video that you can stream, but not download. The VIP sites are really nothing more than a link to be able to sign up for that site.
My favorite studios include Club Sweethearts, Digital Desire, Perfect 18, and Lesbian Summer. I might do a separate review at some point of one or two of these studios.
Some of the studios are actually quite large on their own, and could easily be successful as a stand-alone site. Many others are small. Some are actively updating, most are not.
Here is the list of Actual Adult Prime Studios (99 by my count):
Note: Sites with *TBP after the name have a separate review on TheBestPorn
4K CFNM *TBP, Adult Prime Originals, Arousins *TBP, bAmateurs *TBP, BB Video *TBP, Beauty and the Senior, Bi Fuck *TBP, Bionixx, Bondagettes *TBP, Bound Men Wanked, Brasil Bimbos *TBP, Breed Bus *TBP, Club Bang Boys *TBP, Club Castings, Club Sweethearts *TBP, Cockin, Cuckoldest *TBP, Damn Tight, Daring Sex HD, Desi Bang , Digital Desire *TBP, Dirty Gunther, Dirty Hospital, Distorted, Elegant Raw *TBP, Evil Playgrounds, Family Screw *TBP, Fan Fuckers, Fetish Prime *TBP, Flxxxion, Fresh POV, Fucking Skinny, Gender Flux *TBP, Gonzo 2000, Good Morning Sex, Granddadz *TBP, Grandmams *TBP, GrandparentsX *TBP, Group Banged *TBP, Group Mams *TBP, Groupsex Games *TBP, Hardcore Holiday *TBP, Hollandisch Passie, Hot TS *TBP, Industry Invaders *TBP, Interraced, Jim Slip *TBP, Jims Classics, King BBC *TBP, Lady Lyne *TBP, Lara’s Playground *TBP, Lesbian Summer *TBP, Lets Go Bi *TBP, Mams Casting, Man Up Films *TBP, Manalized *TBP, Manko 88 *TBP, Massage Sins, Mature Van, Mucha Sexo *TBP, My Milfz *TBP, My Sexy Kittens, Nice and Slutty, Nylon Flix, Old Hans, Oldie X, Original JAV, Pawg Queen *TBP, Peep Leak, Peg Him, Perfect 18, Plumperd *TBP, Pornstar Classics *TBP, Pornstars Live, Prime 3DX *TBP, Prime Lesbian, Raw Euro *TBP, Redlight Sex Trips, Salsa XXX, Sensual Heat, Shadow Slaves *TBP, Sinful Raw *TBP, Sinful Soft, Sinful XXX *TBP, Southern Sins *TBP, Submissed, Summer Sinners *TBP, Sweet Femdom *TBP, Sweethearts Classics *TBP, SWhores, Teen RS, The Pain Files *TBP, Tranny Bizarre, Trans Happy *TBP, UK Flashers *TBP, Vlaamische Passie, VR Teensrs, Wankrs, Young Busty
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Most downloads and browsing are very fast, although occasionally a single file might take several minutes to download, when it would normally complete in a couple of seconds.
I don’t think I’ve ever experienced an outage on the site.
Many of the models in the 30-40 yo range are truly gorgeous.
I am mostly a consumer of soft core porn, and a lot of the content here qualifies as soft core. But nearly every model has at least some masturbation scenes, and more than half either participate in “Ladies on Ladies” or “Ladies in Action.” That’s mostly straightforward girl-girl or boy-girl stuff, but there is a wide range of content.
3 updates per day, 6 days a week, for a total of 18 updates a week. Both photos and videos are high quality.
I LOVE the interview videos.
Most models have a bio section, and for most of these that have a bio section, the answers were written out by hand by the model herself. Text is also provided in addition to the images.
Cons:
If you’re looking for teens, you came to the wrong site. Every model is at least 30 years old.
Not as many newbie models as I thought there would be – a lot of the models have been active in porn for quite a while.
I’m not interested in the 50+ yo models, but if you read the comments, there definitely are some fans of these ladies. So if you do like that type, definitely consider signing up – it’s just not for me.
Older content is in lower resolutions, although close to state of the art at the time they were created. Since some of this goes back to 2006, adjust your expectations accordingly based on the age of the set.
Bottom Line:
This has quickly become one of my all time favorite sites. I had never really been interested in the MILF genre, but I truly love this site.
Browsing is easy, commenting is easy, downloading is fast (and easy). So all the nuts and bolts stuff works great.
I mentioned in the Pros that I LOVE the interviews. So what do they talk about that is so interesting? I mostly forget what they talk about. But nearly every interview involves the model talking for a couple minutes, then stripping totally naked, and then continuing the conversation. As a soft core porn consumer, I find these to be wonderful. Especially for the models that have a porn background, they are so absolutely and completely comfortable having a conversation while nude that it is truly delightful. And especially for those porn pros, it’s probably very enjoyable to be able to focus on being simply beautiful for a few minutes with no pressure to perform any crazy sex acts. Although from the way they answer their questions, they do appear to genuinely enjoy crazy sex acts. Also, when they interview a non-English speaker, they use a translator during the interview – so almost every model has an interview, even if she can’t speak English at all.
Some stats:
Models – 1471
Photos – over 2.6 million
Videos – 8791
The regular monthly price is $29.95, but the Porn Users discount drops that to $24.95. You can also get 2 months for $49.95 or 3 months for $64.95. Those are best prices I have seen anywhere and at any time – they don’t seem to offer big discounts. If they offered an annual at $99.95 I’d sign up for that myself, but I have never seen an annual subscription offered for this site.
This is the first time I've ever run into this. Tried to join AMKingdom and it asked me for a phone number to send a verification code. Not sure I want to be handing out my phone number to a porn site.
I definitely agree all pay sites should use HTTPS. I've been noting whether or not it is in use in my reviews. It was the firefox pop-up that caused me to be aware of it in the first place.
Especially since some people use the same user ID and password in multiple locations, it's important to have encrypted logons everywhere, not just on banking sites.
regarding: "-NON-SECURE LOGIN PAGE.
THERE IS A POP-UP WARNING ON THE LOGIN PAGE (WHERE YOU ENTER YOUR LOGIN DETAILS TO ENTER THE SITE) THAT STATES:
THIS CONNECTION IS NOT SECURE. LOGINS ENTERED HERE COULD BE COMPROMISED."
This is because the site does not use HTTPS. Your browser (not the site) is popping that up to warn you. (Firefox started doing this a couple of months ago on their browser, when they detect you are being prompted for a login with only HTTP). This will be true for any site that does not use HTTPS. If you are using cookies to log in to sites you may find that more sites than just this one are leaving you vulnerable in this regard (not because cookies are inherently vulnerable, but because you aren't noticing the warning message when being automatically logged on).
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
2 updates every week on Monday and Thursday
Lots of smiling in the photo sets - I like seeing happy girls
BOTD Archive - still accessible for free off the legacy site (legacy.domai.com) - updated daily, 15 beauties are rotated through
Lifetime memberships are offered
Navigation and site layout has been updated to match the style of MA (although the old legacy style is still available)
Site response is generally quite good - good download speed, good refresh from page to page, etc.
Picture quality is superb
More girl-next-door types here
Lots of nature sets, because nudity is natural, and nature is natural, so what better place to do your first nude photo shoots than in nature? These do seem to be the first photo shoots for a large number of these models.
The emphasis is on beauty, not sex. The girls are beautiful and the settings are beautiful.
The site uses TLS 1.2 so passwords, etc are secure in transit
Part of the Met Art network – customer support is superb
Cons:
Only two updates per week
Pictures only - no videos
Price for monthly is up to $29.99 (it’s not hard to find discounts to $19.99), even though the legacy site still mentions $9.99 as the price - and the price is the same whether you join from the legacy site or the updated version. There typically also sales for all the sites in the MA network around holiday times (like Valentine's Day) for $9.99 - so definitely look for those.
Most girls have only a small number of photo sets (like one or two or three), so if you really like a girl you may not get to see that much of her
Model info is really minimal here, and in many cases non-existent. DOMAI started up in 1997, but very little of the pre-2005 content is available
Very little striptease action, which goes along with the idea of “just the nudes ma’am”
The emphasis is on beauty, not sex. This is a very tame site.
Bottom Line:
Some stats:
1533 Models
161 Contributing Photographers
3916 Galleries
Long one of my favorite sites, I’ve been a member of this site for years, and ponied up for a lifetime membership in 2017. The focus here is quite simply pictures of beautiful nude women. In fact the founder of the site referred to the philosophy being “simple nudes”, and that is still the governing idea here.
While full nudity is throughout the site (most of the sets the model is completely nude starting at picture 1, so not a lot of striptease here), Domai sticks to the tamer side of things. In fact, a few years back, the original founder of Domai (Eolake Stubblehouse) added a sister site called Goddess Nudes to allow them to show more private parts.
There is a lot of overlap between Goddess Nudes and Domai, with some sets appearing on both sites and only a couple of pictures added or removed. Since both of the sites have been acquired by Met Art, the sites appear to be a little more distinct than in the past, but even Goddess Nudes isn’t remotely hard core, and Domai is no longer afraid of open leg shots.
There are 3 other sister sites in the Met Art network that are very similar to DOMAI – Erotic Beauty, Goddess Nudes, and Errotica-Archives. Each of them now updates twice a week, and there is considerable overlap between the models and the photographers. They are also not nearly as distinct from each other as they used to be when they started out. It’s also not unusual for a set for a girl appearing on one of the sites, and then a bit later a second site will pick up the same set, although with a slightly different selection of photos
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on all of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
I didn't see this offered by TBP, but if you go directly to the DOMAI site they are offering a month for $9.95. They don't do discounts very often so this would be a good time to grab it.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
5 updates every week Monday through Friday
Lots of smiling in the photo sets I like seeing happy girls
BOTD Archive still accessible for free off the legacy site (legacy.domai.com) updated daily, 15 beauties are rotated through
Lifetime memberships are offered
Navigation and site layout has been updated to match the style of MA (although the old legacy style is still available)
Site response is generally quite good good download speed, good refresh from page to page, etc.
Picture quality is superb
More girl-next-door types here
Lots of nature sets, because nudity is natural, and nature is natural, so what better place to do your first nude photo shoots than in nature? These do seem to be the first photo shoots for a large number of these models.
The emphasis is on beauty, not sex. The girls are beautiful and the settings are beautiful.
Cons:
What? You cant post updates on the weekend?
Pictures only no videos
Price for monthly is up to $29.99 (its not hard to find discounts to $19.99), even though the legacy site still mentions $9.99 as the price and the price is the same whether you join from the legacy site or the updated version.
Most girls have only a small number of photo sets (like one or two or three), so if you really like a girl you may not get to see that much of her
Model info is really minimal here, and in many cases non-existent. DOMAI started up in 1997, but very little of the pre-2005 content is available
Very little striptease action, which goes along with the idea of just the nudes maam
The emphasis is on beauty, not sex. This is a very tame site.
No SSL is used, so your passwords, etc. are not encrypted in transit. Same is true for all your browsing, which your ISP is now no longer required to keep private. So something to think about.
Bottom Line:
Some stats:
1095 Models
142 Contributing Photographers
2922 Galleries
Long one of my favorite sites, Ive been a member off and on for at least 10 years. The focus here is quite simple pictures of beautiful nude women. In fact the founder of the site referred to the philosophy being simple nudes, and that is still the governing idea here.
While full nudity is throughout the site (most of the sets the model is completely nude starting at picture 1, so not a lot of striptease here), Domai sticks to the tamer side of things. In fact, a few years back, they added a sister site called Goddess Nudes to allow them to show more private parts. There is a lot of overlap between Goddess Nudes and Domai, with some sets appearing on both sites and only a couple of pictures added or removed. Since both of the sites have been acquired by Met Art, the sites appear to be a little more distinct than in the past, but even Goddess Nudes isnt remotely hard core, and Domai is no longer afraid of open leg shots.
This is how they describe the difference on the Goddess Nudes web page: Or you could say that on Domai the sexuality is in the background, on Goddess Nudes it's in the foreground.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on all of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously its pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus its not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
I last reviewed this site in 2018. The general style of the site has not changed much at all, but the update frequency has dropped sharply, down to 2 updates per week, on Saturday and Sunday.
Erotic Beauty is a sister site in the Met Art network. It was previously named Met Art Models. The updates on the current incarnation of the site date back to 2005. Its core competency is soft core nude photography.
Back in the day, each of Erotic Beauty, DOMAI, Goddess Nudes, and Errotica Archives were somewhat distinctive. But the original owner of DOMAI and Goddess Nudes is no longer with us, and while Erro is still photographing for Met Art, the site named after him is no longer exclusively posting his work. So each of these four sites is now posting only twice a week, and there is no theme to distinguish one site from the next.
Erotic Beauty generally has a feeling of being a landing spot for sets that, for whatever reason, were not placed on Met Art itself. This does not mean that the content isn’t good, although overall I would say the stuff on Met Art averages out to higher quality than the stuff on Erotic Beauty. There are fewer models you’d rank a 9 or 10 on EB as opposed to MA. Maybe more at EB would be called ”pretty” than “gorgeous”. But my absolute favorite photo gallery, with Lisabelle, is found on Erotic Beauty.
One issue I have is the considerable overlap with DOMAI, which has now extended to Goddess Nudes and Errotica Archives. For example, say a photographer goes out with a model and takes 500 pictures at a single shoot. Then maybe 50 or 60 of those will be posted on DOMAI in a set. Then a few months later, a slightly different 50 or 60 photos from the same shoot will be posted on Erotic Beauty. (Sometimes EB gets them first, sometimes DOMAI. And now there might be a third set on Goddess Nudes and a fourth set on Errotica Archives). This can actually be a good thing if you really loved a particular shoot with a model, since it gets you more photos of that girl. But it does feel a bit like you are being taken advantage of when you come across something like this.
EB would also sometimes post 40 pics from one shoot, and then later 40 more from the same shoot, and sometimes even a third posting from the same shoot. This was quite common a few years ago, but is pretty rare now from what I can tell.
While the site does not loudly proclaim itself as an all-natural site, the covers for their photo sets all bear the mark “EroticBeauty.com Naturally Beautiful Amateur Nudes”. And I think there are very few models with breast enhancements on this site.
The site navigation and style is very similar to Met Art, which in my opinion is excellent. Favorites, comments, all the stuff you would expect. Browsing and download speeds are good.
I’ve seen other reviews mention something about the navigation, and not being able to paginate through easily when browsing. One way to get around this is once you see something like ‘page01’ at the end of the URL, you can replace the 01 with any page number you want and so jump to the middle of the series.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
I’ve also seen them offering specials on lifetime memberships, such as $200 for a site, so if you can get on their mailing list that might also happen (or might not). I’ve also seen them offer most of the MA network (10 sites, excluding Rylsky Art, Eternal Desire, ALS Scans and Stunning 18) with a lifetime membership of 699.99. Again, no idea if this will ever come up again.
Regular pricing for Erotic Beauty is 29.99 per month, or 99.99 per year. The PU discount brings it down to 19.99 per month. Right now there is a July 4 special going for 9.99 per month. These types of discounts usually occur around holidays. The next one might be Labor Day, or possibly not until Thanksgiving.
The bottom line is there is more than enough content here to keep you busy for a month. If you enjoy softcore content, this is a site you should give a look. After you have already joined the flagship Met Art site.
Suffers the same occasional logon glitches as all the sites in the Met Art network. Maybe once or twice a month that can last for a couple of hours.
Bottom Line:
Erotic Beauty is a sister site in the Met Art network. It was previously named Met Art Models. The updates on the current incarnation of the site date back to 2005. Its core competency is soft core nude photography.
It generally has a feeling of being a landing spot for sets that, for whatever reason, were not placed on Met Art itself. This does not mean that the content isnt good, although overall I would say the stuff on Met Art averages out to higher quality than the stuff on Erotic Beauty. There are fewer models youd rank a 9 or 10 on EB as opposed to MA. Maybe more at EB would be called pretty than gorgeous. But then, A Pretty Girl is Like a Melody, so pretty is nothing to sneeze at, especially if shes naked.
One issue I have is the considerable overlap with DOMAI, also in the Met Art network. For example, say a photographer goes out with a model and takes 500 pictures at a single shoot. Then maybe 50 or 60 of those will be posted on DOMAI in a set. Then a few months later, a slightly different 50 or 60 photos from the same shoot will be posted on Erotic Beauty. (Sometimes EB gets them first, sometimes DOMAI). This can actually be a good thing if you really loved a particular shoot with a model, since it gets you more photos of that girl. But it does feel a bit like you are being taken advantage of when you come across something like this.
EB would also sometimes post 50 pics from one shoot, and then later 50 more from the same shoot, and sometimes even a third posting from the same shoot. This was quite common a few years ago, but is pretty rare now from what I can tell.
While the site does not loudly proclaim itself as an all-natural site, the covers for their photo sets all bear the mark EroticBeauty.com Naturally Beautiful Amateur Nudes. And I think there are very few models with breast enhancements on this site.
The site navigation and style is very similar to Met Art, which in my opinion is excellent. Favorites, comments, all the stuff you would expect. Browsing and download speeds are good.
Ive seen other reviews mention something about the navigation, and not being able to paginate through easily when browsing. One way to get around this is once you see something like page01 at the end of the URL, you can replace the 01 with any page number you want and so jump to the middle of the series.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously its pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus its not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
Regular pricing for Erotic Beauty is 29.99 per month, or 99.99 per year. The PU discount brings it down to 19.99 per month.
The bottom line is there is more than enough content here to keep you busy for a month.
Yes, I would agree with that assessment. But I am already a lifetime member at Met Art, so was looking to expand the horizons. There is a lot of overlap with Met Art in terms of the models, but there are photo sets and videos for these models that do appear on only Errotica Archives. So if you're looking to add some sets for a favorite model, this can be a good place to look. But if I was to join only one or the other, then Met Art would be my choice too.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Daily updates, either photosets or videos (vids are one or two per week).
Excellent photo and video quality
Good download and browsing speeds
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2)
Beautiful girls
Cons:
Site layout is not quite as good as Met Art, but still better than a lot of sites on the interwebs.
Limited Model Information measurements and home country
Very little striptease action here in most sets, the model is completely nude throughout.
No sexual activity of any kind the emphasis is on beauty.
Bottom Line:
Errotica Archives is another site in the Met Art network. Originally it was a site for the single photographer Erro, who also posted frequently at Met Art, but it has evolved to be more of a multi-photographer site. Erro continues to contribute, but only a few times per month.
What I always considered one of the biggest strengths of this site was the long term relationship some of the models had with the site. For example, Iveta has 41 galleries posted from 2007 to 2013, with a handful after that. Nikky has 43 galleries posted from 2006 to 2013. Belle (aka Indiana A) has 37 sets from 2011 to 2015. Antea appears in 204 galleries (!) from 2006 to 2017.
Lately, it has started to feel a lot more like its sister site, Erotic Beauty. It seems like just one more place for various models to post a set or two that didnt get posted at Met Art. There is still a lot of high quality content here, but Errotica Archives no longer feels as unique as it once did.
Almost all of the photo sets and videos involve solo girls, and the ones that have two or more are just nude girls near another no sexual activity is going on.
The girls are very beautiful, rarely shy, and photographed with great technical skill. The site performs well.
The site boasts 319 Models. Its hard to get a good count on the total number of photo galleries, but the main site goes back to 2005, and the archives contain some sets from 2004. There are over 600 videos.
The PU discount of $19.99 for a month is a good value. Annual memberships go for $99.99.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously its pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus its not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
You should certainly find plenty of material here to occupy yourself for a full month if you take the plunge. And if any of your old favorites have an extensive representation here, you will think that you hit the jackpot.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Large amount of content – 258 models, 1551 photo galleries, 362 videos
Updates come every third day, so usually you get 10 per month
The Babes are gorgeous
Very high quality photography
A little more explicit than Met Art
Cons:
I’d really like to see this get back to every-other day for content – every third day feels kind of light
Full page ad on each logon – easy enough to click past
Bottom Line:
I reviewed this site back in 2018, and this is my first time back since then. The site has grown a lot in terms of numbers, about double what it was back then. But it is still a site featuring the photographer Arkisi. The models are still gorgeous, the network still runs very efficiently, the navigation is still good. Really nothing to complain about.
The site is maintained by Met Art, but technically it is not part of the Met Art Network. So if you join the full Met Art Network, you get 10 sites, but not this one. (That also applies to Rylsky Art, Stunning 18, and ALS Scan – the editorial content is controlled by the artist for those sites, while the technical part of running and maintaining the site is done by Met Art)
I think the content is still slightly more explicit than that on Met Art – a little more spreading, a little more fingering, a few more toys. It is 99% solo content.
There isn’t a lot of striptease action on this site – I’d say more than half of the photo sets begin with the model fully nude. The videos do start with a little more clothing, but even if they have some clothes on, it isn’t a lot – like just a bathrobe or just pjs.
The models with the most appearances include: Mila (66), Nancy A (40), Gloria Sol (38), Loretta A (34), Elina (31), Serena Wood (29), Nika N (29), Keira B (28), Lisa Dawn (28), Dita V (27).
The regular monthly price is $29.99. The standard PU discount runs at $19.99, and there are fairly frequent specials for $9.99 for a month, followed by $19.99 recurring. Billing is with Rocket Gate, but PayPal is also an option. It is very easy to cancel when the time comes. Annual is $99 per year, and a lifetime sub is offered at $500 (which also includes a bonus where you can select a second site in the MA network to get a 1-year sub).
If you enjoy soft core glamour photography you should absolutely pick up a one month subscription when it is offered for $10.
For new users, billing is with ccBill if joining from within the Met Art network, the processor is Rocket Pay
Cons:
Daily updates would be nice
Susceptible to the same occasional logon glitches that hit the Met Art network. Averages a couple times a month.
Bottom Line:
This site, part of the Met Art network, features the work of a single artist, Arkisi. (Although some sets and videos are from other artists, the vast majority are from Arkisi). The site started in February 2013, and this is their front page statement of purpose: The artist known simply as Arkisi possesses a keen eye for the feminine form, unmatched technical skills, and the ability to capture the beauty of female sexuality in dazzling digital images. And his considerable talents with a camera combine with a knack for bringing out the inner, usually hidden, sensuality of his subjects. Whether she's shy and demure or bold and uninhibited, Arkisi knows exactly how to present each model for maximum erotic impact. Welcome to the world of Arkisi. Welcome to Eternal Desire.
Updates are usually every-other-day, with 19 updates posted in November and 19 posted in December 2017. There are currently 193 models with sets on the site. I wasnt able to get a count on the total updates on the site, but there are certainly over 700, most of which are photo galleries.
There are 127 videos, almost all of which are solo pieces, but a handful of boy-girl sets. They range from the simple nude girl moving around to masturbation. All are very well done.
One thing Ive wondered about for artists that contribute heavily to a site like Met Art but also have their own site which place gets their best work? Ive checked out a number of sets by Arkisi on Met Art and on Eternal Desire, and they seem very comparable to me, so Id say in this case, the overall quality is about equal.
One neat thing is that Arkisi does read the comments, and will occasionally respond to them, especially to constructive criticism and suggestions. (Ive also seen him do this for his sets on Met Art). Interaction with the site owner is always a plus.
The content here is usually more explicit than on Met Art, but not always. Its still more on the soft core side of things, but can include insertions, spreading, and masturbation.
Some of the models have made a large number of appearances here, such as Mila with 37 sets, Loretta A with 27, Serena Wood with 26, Aislin with 25, Zsannett Tormay with 23, and Nancy A with 34.
The regular price is $29.99 monthly, but the PU discount brings it to $19.99. Annual subscriptions are $99.99.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously its pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus its not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
The models are all gorgeous, the photography is very high quality, web site navigation is very good, download and browsing speeds are good. There is a lot to like here. Id definitely recommend giving this site a look.
Daily updates, sometimes a couple extra each week. 1 video each week
They replaced their more-annoying-than-most captcha with what looks like a Cloudflare to show you are human. I use Firefox for my browser and have never had an issue with this.
The site is quite stable and download speeds are solid.
Cons:
Still some technical glitches, although much better than for the review I wrote a while ago. Several models have no thumbnail on the model page, even though all their sets and videos appear to be fine.
I don’t think they have any videos in 4K, which is fine with me as I usually download at 720, but that could be a drawback for some of you. All the more recent videos have at least 1080 as an option
Bottom Line:
I last reviewed this site in 2017. It hasn’t really changed that much since then, except for adding many more photos, videos and models since that time.
I’ve signed up for the annual membership several times over the years, and have always been quite happy with my purchase. I just finished my most recent year and I’m still a happy camper, and I will be back again soon. I wish they offered a lifetime membership, but unfortunately they don’t. The annual price of $79.95 is quite reasonable. The regular monthly charge is $29.95 but there are frequent sales for $14.95 per month.
This is a very solid soft core site, with excellent photography and videography. The archives contain many beauties that are simply breathtaking. I felt that in the past 12 months the number of OMG sets was not as high as in other years, but of course a lot of that depends on personal taste. Every girl on the site is at minimum beautiful. Out of the nearly 2000 models on the site, I added 334 to my Favorites and downloaded every photo gallery and video of each of these ladies onto my hard drive.
If you like soft core you definitely want to spend at least one month on this site. For me, whenever I do sign up I do the annual sub, and I have never regretted it. I’d rate Met Art a little higher just on volume alone, but this is an outstanding site in the soft core genre.
Gamma manages the site now, and cancellation was quite easy.
I struggled with the score to give, could have gone as low as 85. But the number one job of a nude photography site is to post great pictures of beautiful nude women - and this site does succeed at that.
I'd love for them to read this review, fix the problems, and earn high praise from me in response.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Some of the most beautiful women you will find anywhere on planet Earth
Daily updates, with about 9 to 11 total updates each week. Almost every week, one of the updates is a video.
Extremely high quality production values.
Some of the models have A LOT of content Ariel has 73 photo sets and 40 videos, Lorena G has 78 photo sets and 27 videos. Rena has been appearing very frequently recently she now has 26 photo sets and 1 video.
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2)
12 years worth of content, and a lot of the older stuff is stellar
Cons:
Still a number of technical quirks / glitches. They dont interfere with the main task you are here for looking at pictures/videos and downloading the same. But they make searching, tagging, favoriting, etc. a lot less useful than they should be.
Very little striptease action here in most sets, the model is completely nude throughout.
Tech support is a joke.
Bottom Line:
Back in the day, Femjoy and Met Art were very close competitors, and I tended to prefer Femjoy. Then at some point Met Art really stepped up their game while Femjoy seemed a little stagnant. The models on Femjoy were always quite attractive, but not spectacular. In the past year or two, this seems to have changed there are a number of models on Femjoy that are stunningly beautiful, and I have not seen many of these models on other sites.
And when I say stunningly beautiful, I mean I am actually stunned. Several times a month there will be a photoset where I just stop and stare at the cover photo before clicking into the photo set. My jaw will quite literally drop on some of these. That doesnt happen very often on most other sites.
The new design of the site (implemented in January 2017) is a huge improvement over the older Femjoy, but it still has many quirks and other issues. (If you prefer the older layout, that is still available at old.femjoy.com). The new version has been up long enough that these quirks should be fixed by now, so it seems likely that there will be slow or no progress on fixing the issues.
For example, if you go to the Models page, there are filter buttons across the top of the page for Sort By, Bra Size, Hair Color, Ethnicity, or Shaved. However, if you click on these buttons in Firefox or IE 11, nothing happens. If you do it in Chrome, The Sort By allows you to choose Recent, Views, or Rating, but the other buttons dont do anything.
You can save Favorites for Photo Sets, Videos, or individual pictures, but not for Models. You can save as many Photo Sets as you want as Favorites, but your Favorites page will only display 20 of them theres no next page to see the other ones.
If you want to change your password, you have to do it through the billing site (ccBill in my case) rather than on the site itself.
Tech support is a joke. If you post a request for help via the FAQ/Support Page, you get no response. (I tried several times). If you try to send feedback, the page just hangs and never sends your feedback in. Luckily my requests were fairly minor, but it would be nice to actually have at least a response, even if its not possible to fix the issue. But when you make it impossible for complaints to ever reach you, you also make it impossible to improve the site. If they are assuming that the lack of complaints reaching their ears indicates all is well, then I guess ignorance really is bliss.
At least the speed is good for browsing, streaming and downloading. Picture and video quality is uniformly excellent.
Monthly memberships go for $29.95, with a PU discount to $149.5 for the first month. Annual memberships are $119.50.
There are 8151 photo galleries, 632 videos, and 577 models appearing on the site. The oldest content dates back to 2005.
If you like looking at outrageously gorgeous women who have no clothes on, this is the site for you. Based on the quality of the photos and the models, this should be ranked as one of the top sites in the world. Unfortunately the annoying technical stuff knocks several points off the score.
I just noticed that the TBP discount is currently $5 per month - quite a bargain if you've been considering this site. Probably a US Black Friday weekend special.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Updated:
06-11-1705:01pm (Update History) Reason: Streaming is working now on older videos too
Pros:
So help me, I really enjoy the story lines
They take their time
They sure look like real lesbians to me.
New videos are posted once every 3 days. Given the length of the videos thats not a bad schedule.
Over 600 actresses appearing in one or more videos
Some actresses have A LOT of content Prinzess is in 88 videos, India Summer in 77, Elexis Monroe in 152 videos (!), to name a few (although some are just cameos)
Ive been pretty pleased with the talent appearing in their most recent videos hopefully this is a trend that continues
Download speeds are good and streaming speeds are fine too
PU discount price of $14.95 per month is pretty reasonable
Cons:
Anything with a post date of 10/17/2013 or earlier will not stream for me, anything with a listed date after that will stream fine.
Streaming quality is not HD more like 480p or 540P
Really big file sizes for downloads
I like talking and foreplay, but theres too much of it here for my taste. Good thing fast forward works
Videos only no pictures
No model info at all
Logging in requires a captcha
Navigation and site layout could use some work not that easy to find what you are looking for, unless you can be pretty specific. No Favorites, although they do have Playlists, which sort of do the same thing.
The site requires Adobe Flash for any streaming. Given all of Flashs vulnerabilities, Id prefer to not have it installed on my system.
No HTTPS is used, so your passwords, etc. are not encrypted in transit. Same is true for all your browsing, which your ISP is now no longer required to keep private. So something to think about.
Bottom Line:
Over 600 models
1294 Videos.
Theres a lot to like about this site, but I dont love it. Update: They seem to have fixed the streaming issue for older videos, so I am bumping their score a little.
More than any other lesbian site Ive visited, their target audience is other lesbians, as opposed to men who like watching women. The guys are certainly welcome, but the group they are most trying to appeal to is women. At least thats the impression I got.
The videos all have some sort of story associated with them. Some of the series include Cheer Squad Sleepover, Women Seeking Women, Mother Daughter Exchange Club, etc. The stories are actually one of the stronger points of the site theyre pretty good (for porn videos).
There are a lot of videos that have an older woman paired with a younger woman. Personally I prefer two younger women together. Given the total number of videos here there are plenty that have two younger women, but the percentage of older-younger combos is surprisingly high.
For example, youd think Cheer Squad Sleepover would imply high school or college cheerleaders, and at least one of the ladies is a cheerleader. But the other is frequently a coach or a stepmom or somebody along those lines. Not that theres anything wrong with that, but it isnt what I was expecting.
Mother Daughter Exchange Club is another example. Of course, nobody should be surprised that one half of each couple involves a mother, who is obviously at least old enough to have a daughter who is a grown woman. But once all the exchanging is done, and the younger set has been introduced to the joys of lesbian love, wouldnt it make sense for the two daughters to get together? Amirite?
I saw another reviewer mention the large file sizes, and hes certainly right about that. I downloaded an older video 480p, 32 minutes long, 1.3 GB. Thats huge. For a 480P film the quality was good certainly comparable to a standard-definition DVD. At least the speed of the download has been fine for me, so Im not complaining about the length of time it took to complete the download given its size, just the massive file size itself. A more recent video (posted 2/19/17) was 1080p, 39:33 long, and took up 1.93 GB. Still I was able to download 5 videos at once, or about 7.5 GB, in about an hour, and was able to stream a video as well at the same time with no loss of video or audio quality Id call that very good.
In your travels, you may have heard that women like talking and foreplay. Well, the women on this site love talking and foreplay it can sometimes take 10 minutes to get to the first kiss. All that talking and foreplay leads to many of their videos having a long playing time (so far the longest one I found was 1:02:16, and its not like Ive looked at even half of the videos). 30 minutes would be a short video on this site. So if you like a long slow buildup this site should be great for you. Of course, eventually they do move on to very enthusiastic Sapphic love making, so you can always skip ahead to the hotter parts if you so desire.
In terms of navigation, heres one of the oddities. Say you are on the main page and not logged in as a member. There is a tab at the top for Categories, which allows you to filter on 68 different criteria knee socks or stepmom for example. After you log on, when you select the same Categories tab, there are only 36 categories to select from.
Another oddity has to do with streaming. As I mentioned in the Cons, I am not able to stream any video which was posted on or before 10/17/2013. But I can stream every trailer for every video (at least for those that have trailers) regardless of how old the video is.
No HTTPS is used, so your passwords, etc. are not encrypted in transit. Same is true for all your browsing, which your ISP is now no longer required to keep private. So something to think about.
One thing to try is to go to the sign up page, then go back, then go to sign up again, then back again. (Like youre thinking about it but not sure). Eventually youll get a pop-up chat window (but you have to be on the sign-up page to get the chat) where youll be offered a discount code this is especially valuable if youre looking for a longer term subscription. Or the standard PU discount is $14.95 which is pretty good. Standard non-discounted pricing would be $29.99 for monthly or $96.40 for annual.
Bottom line there is a lot to like here. In porn, content is king, and the content here is really good. My main complaints have to do with technical issues, which should be easily fixable, but unfortunately they dont seem to be addressing those things. So this is just an almost-great site, not a great one.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
