| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
Femjoy
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Some of the most beautiful women you will find anywhere on planet Earth
Daily updates, with about 9 to 11 total updates each week. Almost every week, one of the updates is a video.
Extremely high quality production values.
Some of the models have A LOT of content – Ariel has 73 photo sets and 40 videos, Lorena G has 78 photo sets and 27 videos. Rena has been appearing very frequently recently – she now has 26 photo sets and 1 video.
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2)
12 years’ worth of content, and a lot of the older stuff is stellar |
| Cons: |
Still a number of technical quirks / glitches. They don’t interfere with the main task you are here for – looking at pictures/videos and downloading the same. But they make searching, tagging, favoriting, etc. a lot less useful than they should be.
Very little striptease action here – in most sets, the model is completely nude throughout.
Tech support is a joke. |
| Bottom Line: |
Back in the day, Femjoy and Met Art were very close competitors, and I tended to prefer Femjoy. Then at some point Met Art really stepped up their game while Femjoy seemed a little stagnant. The models on Femjoy were always quite attractive, but not spectacular. In the past year or two, this seems to have changed – there are a number of models on Femjoy that are stunningly beautiful, and I have not seen many of these models on other sites.
And when I say stunningly beautiful, I mean I am actually stunned. Several times a month there will be a photoset where I just stop and stare at the cover photo before clicking into the photo set. My jaw will quite literally drop on some of these. That doesn’t happen very often on most other sites.
The new design of the site (implemented in January 2017) is a huge improvement over the older Femjoy, but it still has many quirks and other issues. (If you prefer the older layout, that is still available at old.femjoy.com). The new version has been up long enough that these quirks should be fixed by now, so it seems likely that there will be slow or no progress on fixing the issues.
For example, if you go to the Models page, there are filter buttons across the top of the page for Sort By, Bra Size, Hair Color, Ethnicity, or Shaved. However, if you click on these buttons in Firefox or IE 11, nothing happens. If you do it in Chrome, The Sort By allows you to choose Recent, Views, or Rating, but the other buttons don’t do anything.
You can save Favorites for Photo Sets, Videos, or individual pictures, but not for Models. You can save as many Photo Sets as you want as Favorites, but your Favorites page will only display 20 of them – there’s no next page to see the other ones.
If you want to change your password, you have to do it through the billing site (ccBill in my case) rather than on the site itself.
Tech support is a joke. If you post a request for help via the FAQ/Support Page, you get no response. (I tried several times). If you try to “send feedback”, the page just hangs and never sends your feedback in. Luckily my requests were fairly minor, but it would be nice to actually have at least a response, even if it’s not possible to fix the issue. But when you make it impossible for complaints to ever reach you, you also make it impossible to improve the site. If they are assuming that the lack of complaints reaching their ears indicates all is well, then I guess ignorance really is bliss.
At least the speed is good for browsing, streaming and downloading. Picture and video quality is uniformly excellent.
Monthly memberships go for $29.95, with a PU discount to $149.5 for the first month. Annual memberships are $119.50.
There are 8151 photo galleries, 632 videos, and 577 models appearing on the site. The oldest content dates back to 2005.
If you like looking at outrageously gorgeous women who have no clothes on, this is the site for you. Based on the quality of the photos and the models, this should be ranked as one of the top sites in the world. Unfortunately the annoying technical stuff knocks several points off the score. |
|
08-13-17 07:26pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
27
|
Flexy Teens
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Over 500 photo sets and almost as many videos.
All the videos are available in both 1080 and a smaller resolution. Newer ones are also in 4K.
No download limits that I can see, no DRM.
The photo and video quality is excellent. |
| Cons: |
Rudimentary web design, but it's not as bad as some of the older reviews make it
Updates come once a week, on Fridays.
The very oldest sets are photos only.
No model index, although you can search by model name
No dates on the sets themselves, but you can see that they have done weekly updates at least since May of this year. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a niche site, but I don’t think I’d call it a fetish site. Their front page states that these are gymnasts, ballerinas, and dancers, and that is 100% believable. Many do excellent en pointe ballet. They are not only flexible but strong and athletic, but also quite feminine – no bulging muscles. They are all graceful movers.
The vast majority of the content is solo soft core, and consists of a model starting clothed, then eventually ending up naked or nearly so (keeping on a tutu is not that unusual). Throughout the video she will be stretching every part of their body one way or another. Full leg splits are simply the entry level stuff for these ladies. Many can stretch well beyond 180 degrees. Some are so flexible as to qualify as contortionists. And it’s a given that they are not pussy shy when their legs are opened so wide and easy.
There are a few boy-girl sets, and they bring to reality some of the things that are likely going through your imagination as you view the nude stretching.
I was a little surprised to see some of my favorites from other sites appear here – for example Sade Mare appears as Galina Markova, Sofi Roko as Musya Gnutaja, Melena A as Marusya Mechta.
If this sounds like it would be interesting to you, I would highly recommend joining. I’m not going to be a long term member here, but I’m very well pleased with the time I have been here. I signed up for their newsletter before joining, and they offered me a discount from the regular 24 Euro price. A bonus is that once you join, they offer a 50% discount to members for the sister site UnderwaterShow (which I will review shortly too). Billing was through Vxs Bill. |
|
10-10-25 06:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
28
|
Girlfriends Films
(0)
|
|
11-21-18 04:43pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
29
|
Girlfriends Films
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
06-11-17 05:01pm (Update History)
Reason: Streaming is working now on older videos too
|
| Pros: |
So help me, I really enjoy the story lines
They take their time
They sure look like real lesbians to me.
New videos are posted once every 3 days. Given the length of the videos that’s not a bad schedule.
Over 600 actresses appearing in one or more videos
Some actresses have A LOT of content – Prinzess is in 88 videos, India Summer in 77, Elexis Monroe in 152 videos (!), to name a few (although some are just cameos)
I’ve been pretty pleased with the talent appearing in their most recent videos – hopefully this is a trend that continues
Download speeds are good and streaming speeds are fine too
PU discount price of $14.95 per month is pretty reasonable |
| Cons: |
Anything with a post date of 10/17/2013 or earlier will not stream for me, anything with a listed date after that will stream fine.
Streaming quality is not HD – more like 480p or 540P
Really big file sizes for downloads
I like talking and foreplay, but there’s too much of it here for my taste. Good thing fast forward works
Videos only – no pictures
No model info at all
Logging in requires a captcha
Navigation and site layout could use some work – not that easy to find what you are looking for, unless you can be pretty specific. No Favorites, although they do have Playlists, which sort of do the same thing.
The site requires Adobe Flash for any streaming. Given all of Flash’s vulnerabilities, I’d prefer to not have it installed on my system.
No HTTPS is used, so your passwords, etc. are not encrypted in transit. Same is true for all your browsing, which your ISP is now no longer required to keep private. So something to think about. |
| Bottom Line: |
Over 600 models
1294 Videos.
There’s a lot to like about this site, but I don’t love it. Update: They seem to have fixed the streaming issue for older videos, so I am bumping their score a little.
More than any other lesbian site I’ve visited, their target audience is other lesbians, as opposed to men who like watching women. The guys are certainly welcome, but the group they are most trying to appeal to is women. At least that’s the impression I got.
The videos all have some sort of story associated with them. Some of the series include “Cheer Squad Sleepover”, “Women Seeking Women”, “Mother Daughter Exchange Club”, etc. The stories are actually one of the stronger points of the site – they’re pretty good (for porn videos).
There are a lot of videos that have an older woman paired with a younger woman. Personally I prefer two younger women together. Given the total number of videos here there are plenty that have two younger women, but the percentage of older-younger combos is surprisingly high.
For example, you’d think “Cheer Squad Sleepover” would imply high school or college cheerleaders, and at least one of the ladies is a cheerleader. But the other is frequently a coach or a stepmom or somebody along those lines. Not that there’s anything wrong with that, but it isn’t what I was expecting.
“Mother Daughter Exchange Club” is another example. Of course, nobody should be surprised that one half of each couple involves a mother, who is obviously at least old enough to have a daughter who is a grown woman. But once all the exchanging is done, and the younger set has been introduced to the joys of lesbian love, wouldn’t it make sense for the two daughters to get together? Amirite?
I saw another reviewer mention the large file sizes, and he’s certainly right about that. I downloaded an older video – 480p, 32 minutes long, 1.3 GB. That’s huge. For a 480P film the quality was good – certainly comparable to a standard-definition DVD. At least the speed of the download has been fine for me, so I’m not complaining about the length of time it took to complete the download given its size, just the massive file size itself. A more recent video (posted 2/19/17) was 1080p, 39:33 long, and took up 1.93 GB. Still I was able to download 5 videos at once, or about 7.5 GB, in about an hour, and was able to stream a video as well at the same time with no loss of video or audio quality – I’d call that very good.
In your travels, you may have heard that women like talking and foreplay. Well, the women on this site love talking and foreplay – it can sometimes take 10 minutes to get to the first kiss. All that talking and foreplay leads to many of their videos having a long playing time (so far the longest one I found was 1:02:16, and it’s not like I’ve looked at even half of the videos). 30 minutes would be a short video on this site. So if you like a long slow buildup this site should be great for you. Of course, eventually they do move on to very enthusiastic Sapphic love making, so you can always skip ahead to the hotter parts if you so desire.
In terms of navigation, here’s one of the oddities. Say you are on the main page and not logged in as a member. There is a tab at the top for Categories, which allows you to filter on 68 different criteria – knee socks or stepmom for example. After you log on, when you select the same Categories tab, there are only 36 categories to select from.
Another oddity has to do with streaming. As I mentioned in the Cons, I am not able to stream any video which was posted on or before 10/17/2013. But I can stream every trailer for every video (at least for those that have trailers) regardless of how old the video is.
No HTTPS is used, so your passwords, etc. are not encrypted in transit. Same is true for all your browsing, which your ISP is now no longer required to keep private. So something to think about.
One thing to try is to go to the sign up page, then go back, then go to sign up again, then back again. (Like you’re thinking about it but not sure). Eventually you’ll get a pop-up chat window (but you have to be on the sign-up page to get the chat) where you’ll be offered a discount code – this is especially valuable if you’re looking for a longer term subscription. Or the standard PU discount is $14.95 which is pretty good. Standard non-discounted pricing would be $29.99 for monthly or $96.40 for annual.
Bottom line –there is a lot to like here. In porn, content is king, and the content here is really good. My main complaints have to do with technical issues, which should be easily fixable, but unfortunately they don’t seem to be addressing those things. So this is just an almost-great site, not a great one. |
|
04-05-17 07:34pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
30
|
Girlsway
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good update schedule (recently increased to 5 updates per week)
Good back catalog of stuff too
Many of the shoots produce both videos and photo sets
Excellent picture and video quality
Good speeds for browsing, streaming and downloading
Pretty good model info pages, plus they have some behind-the-scenes videos with short interviews, so that’s another way to get to know the ladies.
Very attractive ladies |
| Cons: |
No HTTPS is used, so your passwords, etc. are not encrypted in transit. Same is true for all your browsing, which your ISP is now no longer required to keep private. So something to think about.
Captchas required when logging in
I think some of the stories can get kind of weird |
| Bottom Line: |
Girlsway is basically a network that includes access to several lesbian sites: Mommy’s Girl, Web Young, Girls Try Anal, Sex Tape Lesbians, and Girlsway Originals.
In early July, they announced that they will now be posting 5 updates per week on the network, by adding a Girlsway Originals scene every Sunday.
Here are the updates for Mommy’s Girl for June 2017 – Videos on the 3, 10, 13, 17, and 24th. Photos on the 3rd (2 sets), 10th (2 sets), 13th (2 sets), 17th, and 24th.
Here are the updates for Web Young for June 2017 – Videos on the 4, 9, 18, and 23rd. Photos on the 4, 9th (2 sets), and 18th (2 sets).
Here are the updates for Girlsway Originals for June 2017 – Videos on the 1st, 2nd, 5th, 8th, 11th, 12th, 15th, 16th, 19th, 22nd, 25th, 26th, 29th, and 30th. Photos on the 1st (3 sets), 2nd, 5th (2 sets), 8th, 11th, 12th, 15th (2 sets), 16th, 19th, 22nd, 25th, 26th, 29th, and 30th.
Here is the update for Girls Try Anal – last update was 9/17/2015
Here is the update for Sex Tape Lesbians – last update was 6/22/2015
They’ve recently produced a number of squirting videos, which seems to be a trend in the industry right now, but it’s not something I personally enjoy.
Photo and video clarity is outstanding. Performance for browsing, streaming and downloading is quite good.
A percentage of the videos in the Girlsway Originals are consumer driven – “dream pairings” where the members vote on which two girls should shoot together, or maybe pick the type of scene they are in. This can be a fun way for members to interact with the promoters of the site. This often results in some fetish oriented stuff – you may like it, but it’s usually not for me.
One thing to try is to go to the sign up page, then go back, then go to sign up again, then back again. (Like you’re thinking about it but not sure). Eventually you’ll get a pop-up chat window where you’ll be offered a discount code. Or the standard PU discount is $14.95 which is pretty good. Standard non-discounted pricing would be $29.99 for monthly or $119.40 for annual.
Also, definitely check out the specials they offer on other sites once you have joined Girlsway. I was able to pick up a 1 month membership to Errotica Archives for only $5 – a great deal.
There is a lot to like at this site, and it is definitely worth at least a one month subscription to check it out. I ended up getting the annual subscription and I don't regret it. |
|
07-17-17 08:00pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
31
|
Goddess Nudes
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Beautiful girls, beautifully photographed.
All the good navigation and tech support you can expect from a Met Art network site.
A very fine soft core site.
More than enough good stuff to justify a monthly membership |
| Cons: |
Recent changes make it indistinguishable from the sister sites DOMAI, Erotic Beauty, or Errotica-Archives.
Only 2 updates a week, on Monday and Friday. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a very enjoyable soft core site. I last reviewed this site in 2018, and not a lot has changed. The biggest change is the less frequent updates, but the overall style of the site is basically the same.
Years ago, this was a sister site to DOMAI, which was run by Eolake Stubblehose. DOMAI was a very tame site, basically the tamest site you could have with full nudity. Goddess Nudes was largely created as a place to show some of the slightly more explicit shots, where the girls opened their legs. As Eolake’s health failed, he sold both sites to Met Art. For a few years the 2 sites continued following that pattern, and both sites updated 5 days a week.
At some point, this changed. Updates went down to 2 per week on each site. In addition, the four sister sites of DOMAI, Goddess Nudes, Errotica-Archives, and Erotic Beauty became indistinguishable from each other. Then during Covid, the four sites were used to post some older stuff that had never made it to being published. That wasn’t a bad thing, because a lot of these sets were more than good enough for publishing. But then they would push out some other photos from the same shoot to a different site. Sometimes that even happened a third time. At least each time they published the photos were slightly different from each other, but this was really milking it, in my opinion.
If you’ve never joined here before, there is a lot of good stuff to peruse. No download limits or DRM, and good speeds most of the time. (Some times the sites will slow down and even stop, but after an hour or two everything is back to normal).
3,110 photo galleries, 1,279 models, 162 artists
No videos at all, except for the “Staff Selections”, which are an extra charge.
Met Art does offer lifetime memberships on its company owned sites (including Goddess Nudes), running from $500 per site. You do need to join one of the network sites first to be presented this option – it never appears on the general sign-up page. But once you have joined one site you can either upgrade that one to lifetime or pick a different one. As an incentive they also will throw in a one-year membership to any other site in the network.
Monthly memberships run $29.99, and annual memberships are $99.99. The PU discount is typically $19.99. During holiday periods (like Christmas, Valentine’s Day, Easter, etc.) the site is usually discounted to $9.99 a month. For 10 bucks this is a worthwhile join for anybody that likes this content. 30 bucks a month is pricey for the value. |
|
12-29-25 05:49pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
32
|
Goddess Nudes
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
2380 Photo Sets
1030 Models
147 Artists (Photographers)
Oldest sets date to October 2009
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2)
Very regular update schedule (Monday through Friday)
Many beautiful models
High quality photography |
| Cons: |
Only 5 updates a week – daily updates would be nice
No videos at all
Most models have only one or two sets on the site |
| Bottom Line: |
Originally, Goddess Nudes was a spinoff from DOMAI. Here was their mission statement:
“GoddessNudes was founded in 2010 and made by the same guy who founded and runs Domai.com and has been doing so since 1997. That's me! :-) (Eolake Stobblehouse)
I bring the same love, care, good taste, and responsibility to this as has made Domai one of the most beloved and respected nude art sites on the web since 1997, bringing European art sensibility to Nudes. And members' reports tell me I'm succeeding.
GoddessNudes shares the fun and beauty with Domai, only even sexier, for those who have been wanting that. The girls show a bit more. Or you could say that on Domai the sexuality is in the background, here it's in the foreground. (Of course that's not to everybody's taste, which is why it's a separate site.) But fun and beauty are still very big components.”
After the Met Art network acquired DOMAI and Goddess Nudes, the sites were updated to more closely match the style of Met Art, although the original formatting of the site is still available via legacy.goddessnudes.com. Except for reasons of nostalgia, I’d say the Met Art style of formatting is a big improvement.
Since the acquisition, both Goddess Nudes and DOMAI have become more similar to their sister site Erotic Beauty. There is still more sexuality in GN than in DOMAI, in the sense that there are many more open-leg photos on GN than on DOMAI. But close-ups are still uncommon on GN, and any kind of pussy play is quite rare. So DOMAI is the softest of the sites in the Met Art network, and GN is more explicit but still soft core.
The quality of the photography is very high, and the web site performs well and is easy to navigate. It has nice features like favorites and comments. Technical support for any Met Art network site is outstanding - you will rarely have a problem take more than a few hours to fix.
Met Art does offer lifetime memberships on its company owned sites (including Goddess Nudes), running from $500 per site to $800 per site. You do need to join one of the network sites first to be presented this option – it never appears on the general sign-up page. But once you have joined one site you can either upgrade that one to lifetime or pick a different one. As an incentive they also will throw in a one-year membership to any other site in the network.
One other thing – I recently joined one of the sites for a single month, and after completing the purchase, they gave me the chance to purchase a monthly membership to any other network site for a 50% discount – and also the lifetime memberships are available for $400 each (for any site) – so this would be a great way to get a lifetime membership to a site if you are so inclined. The catch is that this discount is available for only 1 hour though. So the plan is, if you want a lifetime to Viv Thomas (for example), get a monthly to any OTHER MetArt site (the cheapest one you can find), but not the one you are trying to get the lifetime membership for. This approach will save you some money, although you won’t get the bonus year on a second site.
Monthly memberships run $29.99, and annual memberships are $99.99. At the moment neither PU nor TBP are offering a discount, and this site isn’t discounted all that often. Although on Black Friday weekend it was available for $9.99. I’d be comfortable paying $15 to $20 per month for this site, but 29.99 seems a little pricey to me. |
|
12-01-18 07:58pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
33
|
Hegre
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Thanks for the suggestion - I will check out that site.
|
02-14-18 06:02pm
|
Review
34
|
Hegre
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
268 models – so a lot of the models have a ton of content
The models range from beautiful to impossibly beautiful
On line since 2002 with regular updates since the opening
Daily Updates
Massage videos
Sometimes actually achieves real art (in the true sense of the word)
Extremely high resolution photography
Browsing and download speeds are very good
The site is well organized and easy to use |
| Cons: |
The attempts at art don’t always work for me, so I’d say the percentage of shoots that I like is lower than I would expect, especially given how beautiful the model is and how technically adept the photographer is. I can’t put my finger on what I don’t like, just something isn’t clicking. |
| Bottom Line: |
Content is updated daily, and there is a lot of it. In 2017, the new content included 313 photo galleries, 33 regular films, and 18 massage films featuring 17 different models. In 2016, there were 314 galleries, 31 regular films, and 21 massage films featuring 12 different models. Overall there are 4680 galleries totaling 285,015 photos.
Petter Hegre is the photographer for whom the site is named, and he has long been noted as having some of the highest pixel counts on the net and the sharpest photography. Recent photo sets are checking in at 100 megapixels.
One thing that sets this site apart is the relatively small number of models appearing here. Hegre clearly has chosen to focus on building a relationship with a select group of models rather than try photograph as many different women as possible. This means that for the regulars, there is a huge quantity of that one girl – which is wonderful if you really like that girl. For example, Dominika C has 83 galleries and 23 films, Emily has 106 galleries and 26 films, and Anna S has 175 galleries and 30 films.
There are a lot of shots in a studio, with a plain white or gray background (probably more than 50% are done this way). But there are also exotic locales, including some shots in front of the Eiffel Tower that are must-see material. There is also a huge variety in the explicitness of the sets. Some models have never opened their legs once for an intimate shot, while for others, you can see a pussy filling the entire 100 Megapixels.
Hegre clearly aims to produce art. For me, a lot of the stuff doesn’t work. It seems too stilted. But when it does work, it is amazing. It’s kind of like a baseball player that is always trying to hit a homer regardless of the score, the pitch count, the men on base or anything else. You will get a lot of wild swings that do nothing but generate wind. But when he does make contact, it doesn’t just clear the outfield fence – it goes sailing for miles outside the stadium.
The massage videos are something pretty unique to this site – they can be quite lengthy, but are well worth the time.
The site has been running a 50% off special for quite a while. The discounted monthly price of $19.95 is good if fairly standard, but the longer running subscriptions are real bargains. 6 months go for $49.95, 12 months for $75, and lifetime for $399. I don’t know how long this discount will remain in effect. You can get the same discount by signing up via PU, which of course is what I recommend.
Given the wide variety of styles, explicitness, the superb technical quality, the frequent updates – it is extremely easy to recommend this site. |
|
02-12-18 07:02pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
35
|
Love Hairy
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
All of these models have appeared on one or more of the Met Art sites. So you can be sure that they are extremely beautiful.
You get all the benefits you would expect from any other site in the MA network. Technical support via email is excellent. I also have not needed a lot of tech support either. I’ve never had an issue with their billing. Navigation is identical to the main Met Art site, as are comments, tags, etc.
Solid amount of content – 196 videos, 1487 galleries, 548 models, 155 artists.
I simply adore the pic of Eddison that is usually displayed on the site’s home page. |
| Cons: |
Some of these might qualify as “barely hairy” – so if you’re into a really full bush you won’t find a lot of that here. Even a small tuft of unshaven hair is enough to get added to this site. Most of the women have trimmed pubic hair, and a small percent have armpit hair.
Updates are infrequent and irregular. For January 2025 they came on Jan 2, Jan 3, Jan 5, Jan 7, Jan 22, and Jan 25. Next month it was Feb 2, Feb 5, Feb 9, Feb 12, Feb 26. The oldest photo set on the site is dated 5/4/2001, although this site didn’t appear as a stand-alone site until well after that.
The standard price for Love Hairy used to be quite reasonable, but now it matches any other MA site most of the time. At the time of this posting, the PU “discount” is $29.99 – I would never pay that much for this site. So wait for a holiday discount. |
| Bottom Line: |
Love Hairy is one of the sites in the Met Art network. I don’t believe any of the content is exclusive to Love Hairy – in fact you can usually tell from the cover photo where it appeared originally on one of the other MA sites. The set is identical to the one posted on the originating site – exactly the same number of pics, same photo size options, same everything.
Even before joining, you can do a good amount of reconnaissance on the site. On the Models page, you can sort by Top Rated, Newest, Alphabetical, Most Viewed, Most Favorited, or Most Appearances. And if you click on the model herself, it will take you to a page where you can see which movies and which photo sets she appears in. Then you can get a page of thumbnails or usually a short clip of the video.
Old timers like me generally prefer the natural (unshaved) look for a grown woman. This site gives us the chance to see all the lovelies that appear on the MA network with their pubes intact, all in one place. If you’ve already joined multiple MA sites, you’re going to see very little new content here. But it is a convenient option when you really miss the good old days.
The best time to join is almost always on a holiday – most Met Art sites will offer discounts where it costs between $5 and $10 for a month. I got in at $7.99 for a month, and I think at that price this is an excellent value.
I doubt anybody would take out a long term membership to this site. But if’s definitely worth joining if you appreciate the natural look and can get it at a discounted price. |
|
03-16-25 11:25am
Replies (0)
|
Review
36
|
MetArt
(0)
99.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Frequent updates, 4 per day, with an extra 2 updates on the first of each month.
The women are gorgeous.
Tech and billing support is outstanding.
Navigation is extremely good, you can make ratings or favorites and leave comments.
Huge catalog – 4,888 models, 312 artists, 28,888 photo galleries, 2,280 videos. |
| Cons: |
Some of the commenters get annoying when they complain about not enough pussy shots. They need to learn that a woman is more than just the stuff that surrounds a vagina.
Because of the complaining mentioned above, recent years have focused more on pussy shots, with the girls contorting themselves into strange positions to grant the desired view.
This is a softcore or glamcore site, so you are getting very little beyond close-ups (which are not in every scene) |
| Bottom Line: |
I’ve already reviewed a number of sites in the MetArt network, but surprisingly I’ve never reviewed the flagship site. So here’s my take.
If you like looking at beautiful, naked women, this is the site for you. Everything about this site is excellent. The women are beautiful, the photography and videography are high quality, navigation is good, tech support is good. All softcore sites should aspire to be like this one.
Ladies with the most appearances: Suzanna A (139), Candice B (100), Zelda B (85), Anna AJ (82), Clarice (81), Sybil A (81), Sapphira A (79), Mia Sollis (79), Nikia A (77), Sharon E (74). The latest videos are available in 4K, the oldest (from 2000) Top out at 360p SD. For photos, the largest top out at 6720 on the long end.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
NOTE: RABBITS REVIEWS IS CURRENTLY OFFERING A LIFETIME MEMBERSHIP FOR $199. I paid $500 for my lifetime membership in 2017 and couldn’t be happier with it.
Regular pricing for MetArt is $29.99 per month. The standard PU discount is usually $19.99 per month. During the holiday season they are offering a $9.99 special, and that will almost certainly be offered again during major holidays. Over on RR the special price as of today is $5.00 per month. |
|
02-28-26 10:58am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
37
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
I had a similar experience recently, both with an issue logging on and getting a quick fix. I think they are trying to unify all the logons, which in the long run will be a good thing, but glitches like this are probably to be expected when they do stuff like this.
|
11-21-18 04:19pm
|
Comment
38
|
MetArt
(0)
|
|
11-21-18 04:16pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
39
|
MetArtX
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
that's definitely true. I think for some models this is the "next step" before trying a twosome. And some never move beyond the solo sets.
|
09-20-17 03:34pm
|
Review
40
|
MetArtX
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Daily Updates, either a photo set or video, with about a 3:2 ratio of videos to photos
Excellent technical quality
Wide variety of locales
Gorgeous girls, including many favorites from Met Art
Excellent navigation and web design
Good browsing, streaming, and downloading speeds
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2) |
| Cons: |
Occasional logon problems that have been plaguing the entire Met Art network recently – maybe once or twice a month
Has the feeling of girls putting on a show, rather than girls enjoying themselves |
| Bottom Line: |
Solo masturbation photo sets and videos are the raison d’etre for this site, and they do these very well. The technical implementation of the sets are everything you would expect from a Met Art network site.
The site only started up in March 2016, and there are currently over 330+ videos and 220+ photo sets on the site. They have adhered to a daily update schedule since their inception, and they show no sign of slowing down, so there is plenty of content here.
Maybe it’s just me, but I did not find this site to be among my favorites. There’s nothing to complain about from a technical or quality aspect. The girls are gorgeous. So why is my reaction kind of meh?
For one thing, from a story telling aspect, there’s a lot less that can be done with one person in the video instead of two, so there is a repetitiveness that is inevitable in this kind of site.
I think the other thing that disappointed me is that I hoped for more feeling of intimacy. As I said in the cons above, it has the feeling of girls putting on a show. And yeah, I know, duh, that is exactly what they are doing. But at their other network sites like Viv Thomas and Sex Art, they do achieve that suspension of disbelief where you feel like you are watching a genuine story of some kind.
The videos have a rote aspect to them in most cases. The first part is the girl teasing for the camera to get the guys aroused. Then it’s time to go masturbate. This one-two formula is quite common.
What I am hoping they can achieve is a feeling of getting closer to the models. For my favorite example, I’d offer up Michaela Isizzu in “Alone” over at Sex Art. I’ve watched that video 50 times and it never gets old. So they do have it in them.
Standard membership rates are $29.99 per month and $99.99 per year. The PU discount brings the monthly charge down to 19.99.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
One other thing – I recently joined one of the sites for a single month, and after completing the purchase, they gave me the chance to purchase a monthly membership to any other network site for a 50% discount – and also the lifetime memberships are available for $400 each (for any site) – so this would be a great way to get a lifetime membership to a site if you are so inclined. The catch is that this discount is available for only 1 hour though. So this can be a good way to get a lifetime membership for a bit of a discount to any network site, or else pick up a monthly or annual discount for some second site. But the time limit on the discount makes it very helpful for you to know ahead of time that it is being offered, so you can think about it a little before hitting the join button.
The Bottom Line is this is a very well executed site. For me, some of the artistry isn’t quite there yet. But if you are really into masturbation photos and videos, this site is definitely worth a look. |
|
09-14-17 07:54pm
Replies (5)
|
Reply
41
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
greg909's Reply
You are correct that picture sizes are still limited to 4000 pix on the long edge. Videos also top out at Full HD - no 4K. The variety of models is also not large as you said. It depends what you are looking for - lots of new ladies to look at, or lots of sets of the same lady if it happens to be one of your favorites.
|
12-11-25 05:45pm
|
Review
42
|
MPL Studios
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Stunningly beautiful women. Really stunning.
Very high quality photography
Lots of variation in locales. Many of the pictures would be interesting on their own even if there wasn’t a beautiful naked woman also in the picture.
Billing is via ccBill. PayPal is also an option.
480,211 images and 811 videos. |
| Cons: |
Updates are only every other day. Also, some shoots are divided in 2, so it kind of feels almost like they are 4 days apart. |
| Bottom Line: |
One of the best softcore sites anywhere, with a large catalog. The models are all stunningly beautiful. Almost all of them probably come from Eastern Europe.
They must be doing something right to keep their models happy, as some of them have really large portfolios, and several of the ones on this list are still active. For example: Stefani (226 photo sets, 16 videos), Karissa Diamond (102 phot sets, 128 videos), Anya (177 photo sets, 13 videos), Alisa (137 photo sets, 46 videos), Talia (166 photo sets, 7 videos), Avery (143 phot sets, 10 videos), Lana Lane (135 photo sets, 6 videos), Lilya (138 photo sets, 5 videos), Aristeia (134 Photo Sets, no videos), Maria (129 photo sets, 1 video), Mila (96 photo sets, 18 videos), Aria (105 photo sets, no videos. You might know these ladies by other names – this site seems to select names that are unique to this site (that is more true for the models that appeared earlier in this site’s history).
All the videos since 2011 are available in 1920x1080. Older videos are in lower resolution, but would have been state of the art at the time they were released. The oldest set on the site dates from 9/9/2003, so there is a lot to look at here.
If I had to pick one site as having the very best photography, this would be the one. It only updates about 1/8 as much as Met Art, or half as much as Femjoy, but on a one-picture-at-a-time basis I’d give this one the top marks.
I do wish they had daily updates, or if not that, at least stop splitting a shoot into two posts.
Pricing starts at $29.95 for one month, $59.95 for 3 months, or $99.95 for a year. I have not seen any deviation from that pricing for quite some time. So if you’re waiting for a discount I’m not sure that one will ever come.
Going to daily updates would bump their score to 95. But even as it now stands, I am quite happy with my annual membership and plan to renew when the time comes. |
|
11-26-25 07:21pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
43
|
Mr. Man
(0)
|
|
11-20-24 01:40pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
44
|
Mr. Man
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
This site is the converse of Mr. Skin – but instead of showing nude women, the site features nude men.
If an actror has appeared nude in a movie house movie or broadcast or cable TV, his nude scene is almost certainly going to be here
Video downloads are now offered in h.264 format (MP4)
HTTPS is used
Newer clips available in 720p for download (older may still be lower quality)
LOTS of content
14000+ Celeb Pages
12000+ Title Pages
110000+ Pics
37000+ Clips
540+ Playlists
1040 Original Videos |
| Cons: |
Most videos are not HD, and the ones that are top out at 720p
Most clips include only the parts with nudity, so you lose some of the context and build up in the scene. Adding a couple of minutes to get the complete scene would be nice.
Many of the thousands of scenes they show are extremely short - as in a couple of seconds. For some of the super-short ones, they’ll offer a super-slo-mo instant replay.
Nearly all the photos are screen caps
No biographical information |
| Bottom Line: |
Mr Skin has been around since 1999, Mr Man was spun off more recently (I’m not sure when but I’d guess at least 10 years ago).
As you can probably tell from my User Name, female nudity is more my thing. But I got a chance to get a one month membership for 5 bucks, and curiosity got the better of me, so I joined up.
When you first go to Mr. Man, to sign up, they do require a credit card to be presented. They claim they will not charge the account, it’s only to prove you are over 18, and in my case, to their credit, they did not charge me anything and no transaction appeared on my account.
If you sign up this way and also sign up to receive emails, you will soon get an offer to join the site for $5 for the first month, rebilling at $20 per month after that. I signed up for that deal. Cancelling after the first month was very easy. Note that they have cross-checked sites so clear those, they also provided a one-month free subscription to two additional sites. Cancelling those extra sites is easy too, but make note – you have to cancel each of the three sites individually.
A ”Playlist” is a collection of scenes that fit a theme, such as “Best Blowjobs of the 90s” (this one has 17 scenes) or “Hot Gay Threesomes” (this one has 19 scenes). Body of Work is a pretty regular series where they focus on a single actor.
Their “About Us” statement is a pretty good summary of what they offer
“Mr. Skin- the world’s foremost authority on celebrity nudity- is pleased to present the newest destination for male celebs at their hottest, Mr. Man. Since 1999, Mr. Skin has been the greatest, most dynamic, most all-encompassing warehouse of celebrity nudity on the planet. Now we’re using our below the belt expertise to bring you all your favorite male celebrities nude and exposed.
With meticulously catalogued video clips and pictures of actors who have dared to bare, Mr. Man has no fakes and no scams, only the highest quality content that you can trust. Forget the days of wading through plot and dialogue just to get to the moment when your favorite actor gets nude, Mr. Man is “fast-forwarding to the good parts” so you don’t have to.
From Hollywood heartthrobs to the latest nudecomers, Mr. Man delivers one-of-a-kind celebrity entertainment experience with Mr. Skin’s signature brand of bawdy, boisterous comedy. If you’ve ever seen a gorgeous actor on-screen and wondered if they’ve done a nude scene, Mr. Man has the answer.
It's a dirty job, but someone's got to do it!”
Navigation is quite good, especially if you can recall the actor’s name (first or last) or the name of the movie. The browse function for celebs also offers a lot of choice (some sites might call this advanced search). For example, some of the filters include: has shown penis (2947 actors yes, 11,106 no), hair color, ethnicity, country, and keyword such as athlete, childhood star, singer/musician, etc.
Downloads are fast - helped by the small file sizes due to short scene length. But browsing and streaming are also pretty snappy.
Mr Skin has offered lifetime memberships off and on for years, I got mine a long time ago for $99. Mr Man also offers them occasionally, but the cheapest price I have seen the past couple of months was $139. If you subscribe to their emails, there will be sales where annual memberships go for $48, or one-month for $5. So if you are considering this site, do sign up for emails first. |
|
09-28-24 06:22pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
45
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
|
11-20-24 01:39pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
46
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
|
11-25-17 03:58pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
47
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The best celeb oriented site I have ever found
If an actress has appeared nude in a movie house movie or broadcast or cable TV, her nude scene is almost certainly going to be here
Weekly reportage of where to find nudity in newly released movies, TV shows, or DVDs
Occasionally offers lifetime memberships for $99.99 – a super deal
Once you’ve joined, they offer some pretty good discounts to some other sites – for example, they offer an annual subscription to Met Art or Sex Art for $72 – I’ve never seen it less than $99 any place else
Video downloads are now offered in h.264 format (MP4)
Newer clips available in 720p for download (older may still be lower quality) |
| Cons: |
Most videos are not HD, and the ones that are top out at 720p
Most clips include only the parts with nudity – so you lose some of the context and build up in the scene. Adding a couple of minutes to get the complete scene would be nice.
Many of the thousands of scenes they show are extremely short – as in a couple of seconds. For some of the super-short ones, they’ll offer a super-slo-mo instant replay. (But if it’s the only nip-slip of your favorite actress in existence, you’ll be glad for this feature).
Nearly all the photos are screen caps
No biographical information
No SSL is used, so your passwords, etc. are not encrypted in transit. Same is true for all your browsing, which your ISP is now no longer required to keep private. So something to think about. |
| Bottom Line: |
Mr Skin has been around for a long time, and may have been one of the first porn sites I ever joined. It’s not the kind of site where you will spend hours there – but it is nice to check in a few times a week and get a glance at a favorite actress’ boobies. Or breaking news about an upcoming appearance of said boobies.
No doubt you have some scenes of nude actresses burned in your mind, especially from your youth – well you almost certainly will find those scenes here and you can watch them as many times as you want. (Jamie Lee Curtis in Trading Places – yum).
Their “About Us” statement is a pretty good summary of what they offer: “MrSkin.com is the world's foremost authority on celebrity nudity, and MrSkin.com is the web's #1 go-to destination for the complete skinny on Hollywood starlets at their hottest. Since 1999, MrSkin.com has grown exponentially, now attracting more than 10 million unique visitors every month who come to experience the site's vast library of sexy celebrity content, including more than 20,000 actress bios, 30,000 movie and TV show reviews and over 200,000 pictures and videos.”
Navigation is quite good – especially if you can recall the actress’ name (first or last) or the name of the movie. The browse function for celebs also offers a lot of choice (some sites might call this advanced search). For example, some of the filters include: “has shown bush” (the most important criterion IMHO), breast size, hair color, ethnicity, along with a count of how many fit that category. So for breast size, we get 4,792 small, 16,248 medium, 4,417 large, 253 X-large.
Downloads are fast – helped by the small file sizes due to short scene length. But browsing and streaming are also pretty snappy.
They have been offering lifetime memberships for $99.99 occasionally – most recently in December 2016. I have no idea what kind of pattern they have or when to expect them to do so again (if ever), but I would recommend signing up for their emails if you are interested in such an offer. Annual memberships are also offered at $48 per year (when on sale), so definitely look for deals for this site. When not on sale, prices are $15 monthly and $79 annual. The PU discounted price is $9.95 per month – not bad. |
|
03-30-17 06:59pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
48
|
Naked News
(0)
|
|
01-01-18 05:18pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
49
|
Nubile Films
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Plenty of Content – 2,000+ Videos, 1,800+ Photo Galleries, 880+ Female Models
Excellent photo and video quality
Most of the models are gorgeous
Each video is accompanied with a photo set from the same episode, but these are actual photos – not screen grabs
Very reasonable pricing – current PU discount is $14.98 for 30 days, (I got it for $9.95, so better discounts do occasionally pop up) and 1 year is available for $84 |
| Cons: |
Updates aren’t that frequent – there were 9 videos posted in April 2025, and 9 matching photo sets
There is a story to each video, but they usually dispense with that within the first two minutes. So if stories matter to you, this probably won’t be satisfying. |
| Bottom Line: |
Nubile Films is a worthy entry in mainstream hardcore porn. There is a huge library of content, the girls are very attractive, the action is quite believable.
Nubile Films is a sister site with Nubiles Porn and Nubiles.net – but the subscriptions are completely separate, and subscribing to Nubile Films does not provide you any access to Nubiles.net. Nubiles.net is one of the biggest and best sites around, so it’s unfortunate you don’t get access to it with this membership. But comparing just Nubiles Porn by itself to Nubile Films, I prefer Nubile Films slightly more. Probably the biggest reason is the presence of Girls Only Porn in the Nubile Films stable – I really enjoy lesbian content.
Nubile Films is a compilation of 5 sites. You can seamlessly move among these sites:
Nubile Films – mostly boy-girl action, and the bulk of the scenes fall under this moniker
Girls Only Porn – lesbian and solo girl content
NF Busty – mostly boy-girl action, but the women all have larger breasts
Hot Crazy Mess – no longer updating (last update 2019) – taboo porn
That Sitcom Show – no longer updating (last update 2019) – parodies of existing sit-coms, complete with laugh track, but with added sex
Videos can be downloaded in up to 4K. Even the oldest video from 2012 is available in Full HD. Photos have a max resolution of 6000x4000 pixels. The oldest photo session from 2012 has a max resolution of 5616x3744. I am not aware of any download limits.
For most people, the absence of Nubiles.net gives Nubiles Porn the edge over Nubile Films.
Cancellation with Epoch is easy. Just keep your sign-up email handy. |
|
06-18-25 03:32pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
50
|
Nubiles Casting
(0)
|
|
04-20-25 10:19am
Replies (0)
|
|
