| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Daily updates
4701 Photo Sets, 1979 Models, 186 Artists – there is a lot of content here
Generally high quality photography
Many of the models are gorgeous
Wide variety of settings and styles
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2) |
| Cons: |
No videos at all
Considerable overlap with DOMAI
Most models have only one or two sets
Occasional clunkers in the sets
Suffers the same occasional logon glitches as all the sites in the Met Art network. Maybe once or twice a month that can last for a couple of hours. |
| Bottom Line: |
Erotic Beauty is a sister site in the Met Art network. It was previously named Met Art Models. The updates on the current incarnation of the site date back to 2005. Its core competency is soft core nude photography.
It generally has a feeling of being a landing spot for sets that, for whatever reason, were not placed on Met Art itself. This does not mean that the content isn’t good, although overall I would say the stuff on Met Art averages out to higher quality than the stuff on Erotic Beauty. There are fewer models you’d rank a 9 or 10 on EB as opposed to MA. Maybe more at EB would be called “pretty” than “gorgeous”. But then, “A Pretty Girl is Like a Melody”, so pretty is nothing to sneeze at, especially if she’s naked.
One issue I have is the considerable overlap with DOMAI, also in the Met Art network. For example, say a photographer goes out with a model and takes 500 pictures at a single shoot. Then maybe 50 or 60 of those will be posted on DOMAI in a set. Then a few months later, a slightly different 50 or 60 photos from the same shoot will be posted on Erotic Beauty. (Sometimes EB gets them first, sometimes DOMAI). This can actually be a good thing if you really loved a particular shoot with a model, since it gets you more photos of that girl. But it does feel a bit like you are being taken advantage of when you come across something like this.
EB would also sometimes post 50 pics from one shoot, and then later 50 more from the same shoot, and sometimes even a third posting from the same shoot. This was quite common a few years ago, but is pretty rare now from what I can tell.
While the site does not loudly proclaim itself as an all-natural site, the covers for their photo sets all bear the mark “EroticBeauty.com Naturally Beautiful Amateur Nudes.” And I think there are very few models with breast enhancements on this site.
The site navigation and style is very similar to Met Art, which in my opinion is excellent. Favorites, comments, all the stuff you would expect. Browsing and download speeds are good.
I’ve seen other reviews mention something about the navigation, and not being able to paginate through easily when browsing. One way to get around this is once you see something like “page01” at the end of the URL, you can replace the 01 with any page number you want and so jump to the middle of the series.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
Regular pricing for Erotic Beauty is 29.99 per month, or 99.99 per year. The PU discount brings it down to 19.99 per month.
The bottom line is there is more than enough content here to keep you busy for a month. |
|
01-31-18 08:25pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
27
|
Love Hairy
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
All of these models have appeared on one or more of the Met Art sites. So you can be sure that they are extremely beautiful.
You get all the benefits you would expect from any other site in the MA network. Technical support via email is excellent. I also have not needed a lot of tech support either. I’ve never had an issue with their billing. Navigation is identical to the main Met Art site, as are comments, tags, etc.
Solid amount of content – 196 videos, 1487 galleries, 548 models, 155 artists.
I simply adore the pic of Eddison that is usually displayed on the site’s home page. |
| Cons: |
Some of these might qualify as “barely hairy” – so if you’re into a really full bush you won’t find a lot of that here. Even a small tuft of unshaven hair is enough to get added to this site. Most of the women have trimmed pubic hair, and a small percent have armpit hair.
Updates are infrequent and irregular. For January 2025 they came on Jan 2, Jan 3, Jan 5, Jan 7, Jan 22, and Jan 25. Next month it was Feb 2, Feb 5, Feb 9, Feb 12, Feb 26. The oldest photo set on the site is dated 5/4/2001, although this site didn’t appear as a stand-alone site until well after that.
The standard price for Love Hairy used to be quite reasonable, but now it matches any other MA site most of the time. At the time of this posting, the PU “discount” is $29.99 – I would never pay that much for this site. So wait for a holiday discount. |
| Bottom Line: |
Love Hairy is one of the sites in the Met Art network. I don’t believe any of the content is exclusive to Love Hairy – in fact you can usually tell from the cover photo where it appeared originally on one of the other MA sites. The set is identical to the one posted on the originating site – exactly the same number of pics, same photo size options, same everything.
Even before joining, you can do a good amount of reconnaissance on the site. On the Models page, you can sort by Top Rated, Newest, Alphabetical, Most Viewed, Most Favorited, or Most Appearances. And if you click on the model herself, it will take you to a page where you can see which movies and which photo sets she appears in. Then you can get a page of thumbnails or usually a short clip of the video.
Old timers like me generally prefer the natural (unshaved) look for a grown woman. This site gives us the chance to see all the lovelies that appear on the MA network with their pubes intact, all in one place. If you’ve already joined multiple MA sites, you’re going to see very little new content here. But it is a convenient option when you really miss the good old days.
The best time to join is almost always on a holiday – most Met Art sites will offer discounts where it costs between $5 and $10 for a month. I got in at $7.99 for a month, and I think at that price this is an excellent value.
I doubt anybody would take out a long term membership to this site. But if’s definitely worth joining if you appreciate the natural look and can get it at a discounted price. |
|
03-16-25 11:25am
Replies (0)
|
Review
28
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots of content – over 1.7 million photos, over 2,700 videos, over 2,800 models
Big variety of content – solo, boy-girl, girl-girl, multi-girl
Some real gems in the archives
Picture and video quality is decent, but not quite as good as the best sites. |
| Cons: |
No HTTPS is used, so your passwords, etc. are not encrypted in transit. Same is true for all your browsing, which your ISP is now no longer required to keep private. So something to think about.
Download speeds are a little sluggish, but not awful
Streaming of videos at higher resolutions really doesn’t work at all for me – lots of fits and starts
Despite the site’s name, few of the models were still in their teens when appearing on here. It’s not quite a MILF site but the average age is well above teenager.
Has a captcha when logging in – a simple one, so not a big negative in my mind.
Some strange glitches here and there, like no thumbnails being present for a few days.
Somewhat irregular update schedule – there were 13 updates in September. |
| Bottom Line: |
There is a lot of good content here, although it is not as easy to find as it could be. The thumbnails are a little on the small side when browsing the sets, so it’s kind of hard to tell how much you like a girl without going into the actual set.
For me, the archives held more interest than the current stuff, but YMMV. It looks like back in the day this would have been one of my favorite sites, but more recent stuff is just OK. Although they have picked up a few sets of some of the stars you see on other sites, like Nancy A, Gina Gerson, Mila Azul, and Sapphira, and as expected, those are all quite enjoyable.
Picture and video quality is decent, but there are other sites that are better.
I was able to spot a few of my favorite models from years back and enjoyed expanding my collection of those models. The archives date back to 2004, so there is a lot of stuff to look through.
The search function has slightly more than just the basics. You can search on type of action (solo, lesbian, hardcore, amateur or girlfriends), on name, on the first letter of the model’s name, hair color, and breast size.
The schedule for September had 6 videos on 9/6, 9/12, 9/13, 9/19, 9/25, 9/28. The schedule for September had 7 photos on 9/7, 9/11, 9/14, 9/18, 9/20, 9/21, 9/23.
About the gems I mentioned in the “pros” section. If you are a collector of Ariel Piper Fawn (she goes by Gabriella on this site) or Eufrat Mai, this site has some of the earliest sets I’ve ever seen of these two super stars. Like fresh out of high school. Demi A also has some early sets here.
Billing is PureWebPower.net. I haven’t used them before. Seems OK so far.
Bottom line, I am glad I signed up for this site, although I won’t be a long term member. The gems I found (mentioned above) make it worth it just on that basis alone, and there is plenty of other stuff here to keep you occupied for at least a month. |
|
10-02-17 06:59pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
29
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Reply
I would never suggest you change your score or anything else about the review. You are actually one of my favorite reviewers because I can tell they are heartfelt. As for Abby Winters, the blog post doesn't say they will stop updating - they said they will stop doing new photo or video shoots. I'm sure at the time they still had stuff in the archives they could roll out, although I am surprised that 2 years later they are still adding stuff. And at the rate of 1 update a week, they can probably keep going for a while, depending on their backlog.
Anyway you talked me into signing up, and I'm loving what I'm seeing so far.
One thing to mention is on the home page, if you scroll down a bit, there will always be some kind of coupon code available for use. The code changes every 24 hours. I saw one that said get a free month when you buy a sub, so I now have a 2 month subscription.
|
05-31-25 07:40pm
|
Reply
30
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
Sorry if you are unaware KayT, but I'd make sure to download everything you want while you still can. From their forums:
"Sunsetting abbywinters.com
28 June 2023, 10:26 PM
We recently made the difficult decision to stop making new shoots. This is for a few reasons;
Lack of profitability: In the last year we made a significant financial loss, and the next 12 months are looking similar. We had a few projects in the pipeline to increase our sales, but I am not confident they are enough. Unfortunately, some have been cancelled now (though the new Tour is going ahead).
Lack of the right models: We never properly recovered from moving to Europe in 2010. The loss of our backbone of regular Australian models is what we built our reputation on. I think we (and especially the models) did a good job over the last 13 years, but we’re finding it harder and harder to find the “right” models every month.
Time for a change for Garion: It’s been 23 years now, and I don’t look forward to abbywinters.com work like I used to.
We have a bunch of shoots made but not yet released, that we’ll be releasing over the next year or so, at a reduced update schedule or two releases per week from July 1 2023 (we’ve added a note to the signup page, so it’s clear to new subscribers)."
It's a pity, I was strongly considering joining up.
|
05-25-25 03:57pm
|
Reply
31
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
Nice review. Are they back to Australia? That's where they started out, and I loved the site back then, but at some point they moved to Europe and the feel of the site changed a lot, so I haven't joined in years. Their "contact us" lists an address in The Netherlands.
Back in the day, my favorite part was the number of girls who gave off the "I can't believe I'm doing this" vibe, and it was quite charming.
|
05-24-25 01:16pm
|
Reply
32
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
Nice review. I've definitely thought about this site a few times, but the $49 price for a month is pretty high. Any discounts out there that you know of?
|
05-23-25 07:47am
|
Comment
33
|
Nubiles Casting
(0)
|
|
04-20-25 10:19am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
34
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
greg909's Reply
Thanks - also good point on the image sizes. I don't usually download the largest size so don't pay much attention to that myself. But definitely useful information for the PU membership.
|
04-18-25 06:55am
|
Comment
35
|
Mr. Man
(0)
|
|
11-20-24 01:40pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
36
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
|
11-20-24 01:39pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
37
|
Showy Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
2Cigars1Woman's Review
Thanks for this - this site has caught my eye. Based on their similar web site design, I'm thinking Amour Angels and Teen Porn Storage are from the same company. Have you also joined those? and if yes, how do the 3 sites compare?
Thanks!
|
06-23-24 01:16pm
|
Comment
38
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
|
01-01-19 05:31pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
39
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Yes, the photos are available to download in a zip file, even if you are not a VIP member. But I have never downloaded a photo that big as a non-VIP member, so I'd assume that you need VIP to get those larger files. But they don't tell you how much bigger the photos and videos are, just that they are bigger. I haven't actually sprung for the VIP so can't say for sure what the payoff is there.
|
12-18-18 06:07pm
|
Comment
40
|
DOMAI
(0)
|
|
11-23-18 06:36am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
41
|
Girlfriends Films
(0)
|
|
11-21-18 04:43pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
42
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
I had a similar experience recently, both with an issue logging on and getting a quick fix. I think they are trying to unify all the logons, which in the long run will be a good thing, but glitches like this are probably to be expected when they do stuff like this.
|
11-21-18 04:19pm
|
Comment
43
|
MetArt
(0)
|
|
11-21-18 04:16pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
44
|
Photo Dromm
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Thanks for the nice review. I was a member a few years ago and really liked the site and had been thinking about joining up again, so this is timely for me. One thing back then was they had some pretty strict download limits (per day, and also the number of files you could download at once). Did you encounter anything like that?
|
05-25-18 03:18pm
|
Reply
45
|
Stunning 18
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Yes, I had assumed that being part of the Met Art network meant they owned the site, but maybe it's more of an outsourcing / management thing. You (the photographer) provide the pics and have editorial control over what gets posted when, and Met Art handles running the web site, marketing, billing, etc.
It's a pity that the updates slowed so suddenly, because I like the site a lot and would have considered a longer membership if the updates stayed at every-other-day.
|
05-05-18 06:48pm
|
Reply
46
|
Hegre
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Thanks for the suggestion - I will check out that site.
|
02-14-18 06:02pm
|
Comment
47
|
Naked News
(0)
|
|
01-01-18 05:18pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
48
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
|
11-25-17 03:58pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
49
|
Met Art X
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
that's definitely true. I think for some models this is the "next step" before trying a twosome. And some never move beyond the solo sets.
|
09-20-17 03:34pm
|
Reply
50
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I struggled with the score to give, could have gone as low as 85. But the number one job of a nude photography site is to post great pictures of beautiful nude women - and this site does succeed at that.
I'd love for them to read this review, fix the problems, and earn high praise from me in response.
|
08-14-17 04:52pm
|
|
