| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1001
|
Pissing.com
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Reply
I didn't realize that peeing was such a narrow niche. It isn't something I'm into all that much but I'm definitely not opposed to it. I suppose that to someone who is opposed to peeing content might look at my collection which includes past memberships to VIPissy and Pissing.com and wonder why I say I'm not a peeing content collector but I guess I just don't see myself as being on the same level as someone like you.
That's too bad that this seems like a tough niche to crack into.
I wonder if this isn't a sign that we're coming into a time when censorship (including self-censorship) is more in vogue?
|
01-09-16 07:13am
|
Reply
1002
|
Pissing.com
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Reply
Thanks for the detailed answer. It has always baffled me that people bash stuff that is outside their main interest without realizing that there are lot of customers who like specific things. So maybe that particular forum was a bad choice for Kink to discuss the new site since Kink is all about hardcore. The reality too, is that for a lot of BDSM people, watersports can be a big part of D/s play so maybe if Kink marketed the site to a specific audience they could have done better.
But, as you say, they were pushing the limits so this outcome was probably inevitable. I wonder if this is what happened to Water Bondage? But I suspect the risks on that site probably caused them to rethink it.
I can definitely say this though: I'll never delete the Pissing.com scenes I have. Same with Water Bondage.
|
01-06-16 03:28pm
|
Reply
1003
|
Pissing.com
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Comment
I had subscribed there a few times and liked it, but the content certainly had changed. I remember when the site first went up it was much harder than it was when I went back more recently. I didn't follow the site closely enough to see storm clouds though. What happened? What did you notice? Did they go so far as to remove the content?
|
01-05-16 01:55pm
|
Reply
1004
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I have opportunities when I have the house to myself for a couple of days when I'll hibernate and watch a lot of stuff, porn included. I might not make it through 20+ scenes entirely without a little fast-forwarding, but I find this works great for finding gems I may have missed earlier.
|
01-05-16 01:52pm
|
Reply
1005
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Thanks for the clarification. I try hard to not make mistakes in my reviews but I somehow misjudged how old some of the photosets are. They must be mixed in and not in chronological order.
|
12-31-15 02:04pm
|
Reply
1006
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Thanks for the additional information. I really can't confirm the start date for the site because the older videos and photos aren't dated, but I've done more digging and you're definitely right that the site pre-dates 2007. I based my information on going to the oldest video (which gives no date information) and the oldest photo set, which is dated from 2007. But based on what you said I dug around a bit more and I can find photo sets that are 'newer' given their location on the site but date from 2005. If I continue to dig I might even find older stuff.
It seems odd that they have older material that is newer in the update schedule. That might point to recycling content, as you note.
|
12-29-15 05:03am
|
Review
1007
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Beautiful teen models
- Mix of solo, lesbian and hardcore
- Great for both photo and video fans
- 452 videos
- 2356 photo sets
- Site updates regularly
- Supports download managers
- TBP Discount |
| Cons: |
- Video resolutions and bitrates are lower than average
- Bonus sites aren't worth considering in your decision to join
- Photos are lower resolution than many comparable sites |
| Bottom Line: |
I went into this membership with high hopes because the models look to be exactly what I like: young and petite. The site isn't perfect, but it has a narrow focus and it sure does that one thing well: you’ll see some of the freshest porn models here. What I think bugs me most about this site is that it is so good that if the few flaws fixed on a go-forward basis this would be one of the best teen-themed sites on the ‘net.
I think the best thing this site has are the models. There is a mix of up-and-coming porn stars and girls who just dabbled a bit in porn once or twice. There is also a mix of American and Eastern European / Russian models, but the majority are American. The common theme in the models is that they are all petite, just over 18 and, in my opinion, exceptionally hot. I realize that this is entirely subjective, but these are the exact kind of models I prefer. If you share this interest then a membership here is definitely worth considering.
The site has been around since 2007 and has amassed 450+ videos and 2350+ photo sets. The site updates with two photo sets and one video being added per week. Occasionally there will be two videos per week. The videos are a mix of solo, girl/girl and hardcore. This is just a guess, but it seems that for the last few years at least the split is somewhere around 45% solo, 45% hardcore and 10% girl/girl.
The videos don’t follow any specific theme except the setup is intended to showcase the age and freshness of the models. The newer videos are offered with some choice: 1280x720, 640x360, 854x480 in MP4 and 640x360 in WMV. Bitrates are crucial to a video looking good but there isn't any consistency here. Even on the highest resolutions the bitrates can vary quite a bit. I have some scenes with bitrates as low as 1500kb/s. It does appear that the site is now fairly consistent in having bitrates around 3500kb/s. Older videos are WMV only and come in 640x480. Anything older than early 2011 and you will have to be satisfied with lower resolutions and bitrates. It is even later before 1280x720 is offered consistently.
The video quality is obviously the site’s biggest flaw. While 720p videos are my choice as a balance between size and look I realize that others want the highest resolution possible. Maybe 4K won’t happen, but it seems odd in 2015 to not offer 1280p. An immediate improvement could be made by using better bitrates. All isn't lost though, as the newer videos are encoded in a way to take full advantage of their less-than-stellar specs.
Another odd choice that seems to harken back to a decade ago is that the scenes are offered as five-minute clips. Some readers may disagree, but in my opinion the video offerings are outdated. Having 1280x720 as the top download is below what most people expect these days. Offering five-minute clips seems like it’s from a different internet era. Are there people buying porn memberships that still download this way?
Photos are a key part of the site too. This is one of the rare sites where photo collectors and video collectors could both feel the site offers good value. The photos do suffer from the same drawbacks as the videos in that they aren’t very high resolution. The newest photos come in 400x600, 800x1200 and 2000x3000. Older photos are available in a maximum of 768x1200.
The videos are offered in streaming too, and there is an in-browser photo slideshow available.
There are a few minor concerns. The biggest of these is that the search function really doesn’t work well. I did a search for anal scenes and got some scenes that had no anal. To make matters worse, I couldn’t sort those results to get only videos.
Some minor positives are that the site offers a TBP discount and allows download managers. The TBP page says that managers aren't supported but I had no problem using IDM to queue-up scenes. It may be that multiple simultaneous downloads are blocked. I didn’t run into any download limits.
The site offers two bonus sites (Picking Up Pussy and T&A Tryouts) but both of these sites are small and offer what look to be old scenes with new release dates added. You may like the bonus sites, but I wouldn’t use factor them in on a decision to join the main site.
I would definitely recommend this site to anyone looking for videos and/or photos of some of the freshest porn models on the ‘net. With the TBP discount this site offers a great value. The older material is definitely not up to par by 2015/2016 standards, but that’s to be expected. Some minor improvements to the current videos and photos would take this site over the top. I’ll be adding this to my list of sites to join regularly. |
|
12-28-15 11:27am
Replies (7)
|
Reply
1008
|
Tiny 4K
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
Thanks for the comment. Coincidentally I'm thinking that I'll be rejoining soon. I look forward to reading any additional comments you have.
|
12-27-15 12:21pm
|
Reply
1009
|
Blacked.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Roberto281's Comment
I've been a member at both of these sites and you've pretty much summed up the differences between them. Blacked is a more art-like, couples-oriented site where BOB is more typical hardcore porn. There has been a lot of buzz around Blacked since they started and some of that buzz is deserved because it really is high quality stuff. I'll definitely rejoin Blacked because the models are so hot but I prefer the hard-edged stuff at BOB.
|
12-24-15 08:25am
|
Reply
1010
|
N/A
|
Reply of
LPee23's Poll
Less than 300 GB per month of porn downloads would be unheard of. I think if I dropped below that on any month my service provider would check on me to make sure I was okay.
|
12-19-15 04:47am
|
Reply
1011
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
???
|
12-16-15 04:24pm
|
Reply
1012
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
This is an excellent review. Thanks for posting it. I appreciate the level of detail and that you kept your comments objective. I don’t find reviews to be particularly informative if all they say is “I don’t like this site.” I need to know why a reviewer does or doesn’t like a site (or parts of it) because that is often subjective and I may not share those same thoughts. I’d like to think that I could write an objective review of a site that I had zero interest in and still do it well by explaining the pros and cons of the site objectively. That’s what you’ve done here.
The comparison to Videobox is easy to make because they are so much alike. I’m into a VB membership now and based on your review I plan to join Videosz later this week so it’ll be a great opportunity for a comparison.
I’m really glad to hear that Videosz has dropped adding five DVDs per day. I wish VB would do that as well because the current model trades quality for quantity. If sites like Videosz and Videobox want to draw paying customers away from the tube sites they need to offer something that the tube sites don’t and that could be quality.
I’ll be joining Videosz later this week based on your review.
|
12-14-15 02:17pm
|
Reply
1013
|
Playboy.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
Thanks to the staff here at TBP, especially Mike, there was a solution. I didn’t get the refund I was asking for but I was compensated. I still think my request for a refund of the annual membership and me paying for a one-month membership was a reasonable request. As I understand it both Playboy TV and Brazzers are under the same company though the individual sites are owned separately. The parent company obviously couldn’t persuade the Playboy TV site owner to issue a refund so they compensated me with a membership at Brazzers. The parent company didn’t need to do that so I am grateful for their generous offer.
I wouldn’t exclude joining Playboy TV because of my issue. I made a mistake and if I was paying attention I wouldn’t have made that mistake. Think of it as being like not noticing a pre-selected cross-sell. I think the Playboy join page is a little misleading in that the TBP one-month discount is highlighted but the annual membership is pre-selected. But still, I should have paid more attention.
Thanks for asking.
|
12-05-15 07:38am
|
Reply
1014
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
I'm not sure if this means tube sites or not. I only visit free video sites if I'm doing some digging on a site I'm interested in joining and there isn't much information here.
|
11-28-15 07:52am
|
Reply
1015
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
It really would be a combination of several factors, but price is probably the most significant.
On a related note, I'd be much more likely to stay a member on a discounted recurring monthly fee than join for an entire year upfront. It baffles me why many sites don't offer a 'loyalty' discount. take, for example, one of my favourite sites, Amateur Allure. I joined that for a month several years ago and downloaded just about everything. Now I rejoin every four months or so to get the new stuff. I'd stay if they offered a recurring fee less than the full monthly subscription. They upload one new scene per week so that means that if I stay a member each new scene costs me nearly $10. I just wait and rejoin when the cost per scene is lower.
|
11-20-15 05:44am
|
Reply
1016
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
mistacee's Reply
Thanks for your comments on my review. This could be such a great site if they just improved a few things.
|
11-18-15 01:21pm
|
Reply
1017
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Poll
Organizing my collection is important. I have a pretty decent collection and I'd lose track of it if it was organized in some way. I have a folder for each movie or site and then within those folders I have scenes with the name of the woman or women in that scene. I have a Word document with a three-column table where I track the movie or site name, the model's names and then the drive number where this folder is located. I also tag favorite scenes and keep a separate list of those. I guess you could say that I'm anal about organizing my collection.
|
11-08-15 05:26am
|
Reply
1018
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
The first three on the list work for me...
|
11-05-15 06:13pm
|
Review
1019
|
Playboy.tv
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Playboy quality models
- Mostly natural models
- Good mix of niches and themes
- Many download options
- Mostly soft content (some hardcore)
- Photos available
- Allows download managers
- TBP discount |
| Cons: |
- Models are uncredited
- Bitrates are too low
- Username and password are randomly assigned
- Wide variation in video quality even within a series
- Photos don’t seem to have a zip option |
| Bottom Line: |
Before I weigh in on this review it might help if the reader knows that while I’m familiar with the Playboy brand and magazine I’m not familiar with any Playboy videos or any Playboy channel. This is obviously Playboy-produced stuff, but I don’t know if this is run on the Playboy channel or if this is web exclusive. Being affiliated with Playboy would suggest high-quality content and that is what you’ll find here. Locations are great and production quality is great.
Being part of the Playboy brand means that most of the models are beautiful. You will find some fake breasts and tattoos but most of the models are natural. I don’t think I need to explain to any reader what Playboy models look like: that’s what you’ll find here. One problem I found is that in most cases the models aren't credited within any scenes. If you find a model you like good luck identifying her. If you do identify her through, you will be able to source more of her stuff through her model page.
The site gives you access to 92 different ‘shows.’ These range from casting shoots, spring break stuff, strip club stuff to some hardcore material. There is a wide range of niches available. Within each of these ‘shows’ there may be multiple seasons and within each season there are multiple episodes. Given that variation I can’t give an accurate number of how many individual scenes there are but I can say with confidence that this site does have a lot of quantity to offer.
The site is well-organized and it’s easy to find something you’ll be interested in. There is a search function but I didn’t find it to be very useful. But since the site is laid out so well there really isn't a need for much of a search function. Being able to sort by shows and models gives a lot of functionality.
Something I didn’t expect (but probably should have) is that many of the ‘shows’ follow a reality-TV format. I downloaded and watched two series’ that featured strippers and strip clubs. I’m a fan of this niche and was expecting a lot of stripping. There is some of that but most of the series focused on the drama among strippers and between management and the strippers than any actual stripping. This is also the case for most of the other shows too.
There is some hardcore on offer but it is best to think of this as a softcore site with a little hardcore thrown in. Don’t join expecting Playboy-quality models in hardcore scenes because you’ll end up disappointed.
Probably the biggest flaw in the site is the video quality. Most videos are offered in multiple resolutions (with MP4 being the only format) but the focus is on the lower end of the scale rather than the upper end of the scale. Resolutions of 272p, 320p, 368p and 480p are offered with most videos. I may be missing the point here, but it seems to me that offering both 320p and 368p is a bit pointless. If you’re viewing on a phone would there really be that much difference between those two files? The upper end of the scale isn't as well served. On many files the best you can get is 720p. Those come in at 1280x720 which isn't bad but they’re let down by a bitrate of only 2500kb/s so they look pixilated on even a 24” monitor. Some scenes are offered in 720p with a higher bitrate of 4000kb/s but even that is low by today’s standards. Some, but not many, files are available in 1920x1280 with a 6000kb/s bitrate – again, that’s low and should be improved. One thing I found both odd and frustrating was that within a ‘season’ of a show there were variances in the resolutions available. Episode 1 might offer both 720p bitrates and the 1080p while Episode 2 only offers the low-bitrate 720p file as the highest quality. Presumably these scenes were shot and uploaded around the same time so this variance is baffling.
Photos are available but they appear to be screenshots. If there is a way to download the photos as a zip I couldn’t find it. The photos are 1920x1080 but I found the few I downloaded to be fuzzy but that may be intended.
I used a download manager to queue-up files and didn’t experience any problems. The download speeds were average. I didn’t experience any limits or caps.
There is a TBP discount offered but make sure you select that as the annual membership is the default.
A final beef I have with the site is that it randomly assigns a username and password and these are just a random uses of letters and numbers so they aren't likely to be memorized. Further, when you sign in you can select the ‘remember me’ option but that doesn’t work.
I recommend the site as long as any member goes in knowing what they’re getting. Think of this as reality TV with some extra spice thrown in and a bit of hardcore for good measure. The site has a lot to offer but could be greatly improved by offering better bitrates as the ones they offer now are too low. Having a TBP discount makes this site a great value but be careful to make sure you select that option. |
|
11-01-15 08:41am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1020
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
My guess is that it would expire at midnight in their time zone.
|
11-01-15 04:45am
|
Reply
1021
|
N/A
|
Reply of
LPee23's Poll
I've never bought literary erotica.
|
11-01-15 04:44am
|
Reply
1022
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I'm glad to hear that worked out for you. There's no law against having two memberships at the same time :-) If there was I'd be a criminal...
|
10-31-15 02:35pm
|
Reply
1023
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
It was a great offer. I see your email is linked in your profile. If you want, and if it isn't against site protocol I could forward the email to you and you could see if the offer is still valid. Let me know, and if any of the moderators read this and think it breaches policy please let me know and I won't do it.
|
10-31-15 05:31am
|
Reply
1024
|
Finishes The Job
(0)
|
Reply of
bkreidercrhl's Reply
From your questions I think you're right. If they could find a male talent with a cumshot like Peter North that would be my preference too.
|
10-31-15 05:28am
|
Reply
1025
|
Finishes The Job
(0)
|
Reply of
bkreidercrhl's Reply
It's hard to generalize since the network is so big but it's fair to say that in probably 75% of the scenes the guy shoots an average load. There are some scenes where the guy channels his inner Peter North but those aren't really identified.
In a vast majority of the scenes the target is definitely around the girl's mouth, though her nose often gets some too. If the cumshot goes up higher than that - to the eyes, forehead or hair - that's usually just an accident from the guy shooting that far.
I hope that helps.
|
10-29-15 02:53pm
|
