| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
976
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Review
Your review perfectly encapsulates the real value of Pornusers - that someone with the knowledge of a site's history can weigh in and give an objective view of a site. I could have joined this site and reviewed it but my review would have none of the weight that yours does.
On a semi-related note, I have no idea why a site would remove older material. I can accept that older stuff will be lower quality resolution but I appreciate that it remains available. If the site puts a date on the older stuff then it becomes self-explanatory as to why it is lower quality.
|
02-07-16 05:42am
|
Reply
977
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Review
Excellent review. When I saw your review uploaded I read it hoping that you might see some signs of improvement but you've noted the same flaws I did. They offer some decent porn but they really need to step up several notches on the technical stuff to even match their competitors.
|
02-06-16 10:07am
|
Comment
978
|
My Babysitters Club
(0)
|
|
02-06-16 10:00am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
979
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I've joined some specialty BDSM sites that are quite expensive. I think Infernal Restraints is probably the most expensive. For me, price is only one part of my decision process. If the site is expensive but offers great value then I'll still be likely to join.
|
02-05-16 01:09pm
|
Reply
980
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Reply
Thanks for taking the time to comment on my review. I appreciate your feedback.
I tend to ignore user ratings mostly because they can be so subjective. For all I know someone might give a low or high rating simply because they like or dislike a specific model. I often, but not always, read comments and they sometimes influence whether I'd download a scene or not. For example, I like seeing facials and a comment may say that the scene has an amazing facial. That comment would influence my decision.
And I agree with your general comment on Team Skeet: it had been about a year since I had been a member and this time is seems so much better - and I really liked it all the other times I've been a member there. It's good to hear that I'm not alone in this assessment.
|
02-05-16 01:01pm
|
Reply
981
|
Teens Love Anal
(0)
|
Reply of
rooka's Reply
Thanks for your comment Sir. I appreciate the feedback.
I'm a big fan of Woodman Casting too. It's on my list of sites that I join regularly though I only join it once per year or so because it is fairly expensive. The price is higher for me simply because I always buy a membership to Woodman's other site called Wake Up 'n Fuck. https://www.wakeupnfuck.com/ WUNF isn't listed here so there is no review. It's getting near the time when I should be thinking about rejoining Woodman Casting and WUNF so maybe I'll see of TBP can list WUNF so I can put up a review. Pierre Woodman makes some amazing porn for those of us into anal stuff, and while this is a personal preference, I prefer WUNF to Woodman Casting. But I always buy a membership to both...
I haven't joined WUNF in over a year so I can't say for that this is still the case, but Woodman had a lot more American porn stars on that site and he had a lot of first and rare anals too. The last time I joined WUNF it was specifically to get Asphyxia Noir's first anal scene - and one of only a handful she did.
Sorry to ramble there...
|
02-05-16 12:56pm
|
Reply
982
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Thanks for posting this review. Reading it made me wonder why I haven't rejoined it in over two years because when I was last a member there I really liked it too. And with the TBP discount it is a great value. (Though the main 21 Sextury site doesn't list the discount I did go in through one of the sub-sites and it does appear to still be offered.)
So thanks for posting the review and thanks for refreshing my memory of a great site.
|
02-01-16 05:19pm
|
Review
983
|
Teens Love Anal
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- The missing piece of the puzzle for Team Skeet
- Some great anal scenes with fresh talent
- Many download and streaming options
- Simple and effective site
- Updating
- Access to a great network
- TBP discount |
| Cons: |
- Small site (but growing)
- Lots of ads |
| Bottom Line: |
The first time I reviewed the Team Skeet network one of the few complaints I had was that there was no anal-themed site. The network doesn’t have a lot of anal scenes on any of their sites so it seemed odd that a network would leave such a popular niche unserved. So, if you’ll excuse the pun, Team Skeet has finally filled an empty hole in their network.
Team Skeet has scenes with some of the freshest models working today and that carries through to Teens Love Anal. While they may not get the first anal scenes that a few other sites try for they do offer anal scenes from many models who, at least at this point in their careers, aren’t known as anal queens.
In keeping with the overall network theme, TLA has a teen theme to it. If you’re looking for BBW or MILF models you likely won’t want to join Team Skeet since the entire network features young (18+), fresh and petite models who are in the early days of their careers. There are some more established models here, like Zoey Monroe, who are anal queens but certainly still fit in with the overall teen theme. And who among us would say no to a new Zoey Monroe anal scene?
Each scene has a bit of a set-up to it and then the action begins. As with other Team Skeet sites the production values are great: the lighting, sound and editing are all top-quality.
The site is a bit small right now (it was added in May 2015) with only 22 scenes available. It does update regularly but as the updates for the network are spread across 22 other sites TLA is only updated with one scene every two weeks. You won’t get disagreement from me that the update schedule could be better, but I don’t think it’s a deal-breaker given that you get access to a large teen-themed network with a broad range of porn niches that updates daily. Even I’m not so anally fixated that I can’t appreciate the other themes here.
One advantage to TLA being added recently is that all the videos are offered in HD. The videos are only in MP4 format but are available to be streamed in four resolutions (720p being the highest) and available for download in five resolutions: 640x360 (850kb/s), 854x480 (1700kb/s), 960x540 (2700kb/s), 1280x720 (6000kb/s) and 1920x1080 (12000kb/s). These resolutions and bitrates are up to par with competitive sites (though I think the 12,000 kb/s bitrate for the highest resolution is higher than that offered by most competitors.) I downloaded the 720p scenes and they look good on a monitor and 50” TV.
Photos are available (screencaps and actual photos) but, in my opinion, these are just an added bonus. This is really a video site.
I had no issue using Internet Download Manager to queue-up scenes for downloads. I had no issue with those links timing out too quickly and the download speeds I saw were very high and never wavered.
As a big fan of anal porn it is difficult for me to be objective when considering a recommendation to join or not. If Teens Love Anal was a stand-alone site I don’t think I’d recommend it to anyone but the most diehard anal fan or to someone who just had to have a specific anal scene from a specific model. A stand-alone site with 22 scenes that updates only twice per month wouldn’t be a good value but when you factor in that TLA is part of a large, high quality network the value is definitely there. Adding in the TBP discount only makes the value better. So if you’re a fan of teen porn and an anal fan don’t look at the small size of TLA as an impediment: look at it instead as some great icing on a great cake. The addition of Teens Love Anal makes a great network even better. |
|
02-01-16 05:15pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
984
|
Dark X
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I think you're 100% right.
|
01-31-16 07:31am
|
Reply
985
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
papermarvin's Reply
Thanks for taking the time to comment on my review. I've been a big fan of your site for several years but this most recent time I joined was even better.
|
01-31-16 07:30am
|
Reply
986
|
Dark X
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I think the allure of IR is that it is perceived by some as still being taboo. I have no idea why that is, but it is. Consider all the threads on other forums about which starlets will and won't do IR. It's a major fascination these days for some. I can't fault Mason for wanting in on the craze. If Dark X's success helps fund more Tushy.com scenes then I'm a fan too! Bring on more first anals on Tushy!
|
01-23-16 07:14am
|
Reply
987
|
Dark X
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
More good points...
You're probably right that the TBP discount influenced my decision a bit and that if I had to pay full price I might not have been so generous.
Your contrast of Dark X with Hard X and Tushy is correct too. I paid full price for Tushy because of the three sites that was (is) the one that offers something distinct and valuable. They offer a lot of first anals and I'm willing to pay to collect those.
But Hard and Dark are really much more mainstream and could really be rolled together. I do think that for whatever reason "IR" is popular so Mason wanted to take advantage of that.
|
01-22-16 08:50am
|
Reply
988
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
rooka's Reply
Thanks for taking the time to say that. I get a lot of value out of the TBP and PU reviews so I'm glad to learn that I'm giving other people the same kind of information.
|
01-22-16 08:45am
|
Review
989
|
Team Skeet
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- True network of teen-themed sites
- Sites cover all of the main porn niches
- Some of the freshest models in the business
- Large network
- 23 sites, 2100+ scenes
- Five scene resolutions to choose from
- Photos and screencaps available
- Network and site layout is simple and effective
- Good sorting and searching functions
- Anal site added
- TBP discount
- Network continues to grow and improve |
| Cons: |
- Upsells throughout the network
- Several sites require addition fee |
| Bottom Line: |
It’s been over three years since I last reviewed this network (though I’ve rejoined it regularly) so I figured it might be time for another review. On both an objective and a subjective level this is one of the best networks available for teen-themed porn featuring the freshest porn models.
Team Skeet is a true network in that it is a collection of sites with different themes. The one constant through the entire network is that the models are all young and usually petite. This may be a deal-breaker for some people, and I understand that, but since this is exactly what I look for in porn this network scores high subjectively.
But, more importantly, the network earns high marks objectively too. I’d like to think that even if I didn’t like the porn a site had to offer that I could still recognize a good site design and user-friendliness and objectively give the site the high score it deserved. I think Team Skeet has the attributes of a great site regardless of the fact that I also happen to think they make great porn.
The network is large with almost 2200 scenes available across 23 distinct sites. I’m reasonably sure that with the exception of one or two sites these scenes are all exclusive. 18 of those sites are actively updating while five are not. I know there are those who disagree, but I’m okay with a site not updating as long as that isn't hidden, and it isn't hidden here. There are also four extra-cost sites which are also available as stand-alone sites. I wish I could tell you if joining them through Team Skeet was a good value but I was afraid to click on any link to even check because I’ve been burned on other sites before.
The site is logically laid out with the main page offering several ways to sort what’s inside. You can sort by model, update (popular, recent, etc.) and by site. There is also a list of tags on the left of the screen that allows you to sort for various attributes. The last time I reviewed the site I had problems with this feature but those problems seem to have been sorted out. This is a great feature to have.
Regardless of how you choose to sort and select scenes you eventually end up on a page where that scene is offered. Here you can opt to stream or download the scene or get photos OR screencaps. You can also watch or download a trailer. Unusual is an offer of a ‘best of’ clip. There is also the option of downloading one-minute clips.
Video quality obviously differs depending on when the scene was shot and uploaded. Older videos offer different file types and lower resolutions. Please see my older review for more information on the older files. Current and more recent videos are only offered in MP4 format and these are all offered in five resolutions: 640x360 (850kb/s), 854x480 (1700kb/s), 960x540 (2700kb/s), 1280x720 (6000kb/s) and 1920x1080 (12000kb/s). This is an improvement in bitrates since I last reviewed the network and it deserves credit for that.
The site offers both photos and screencaps as singles and as a zip.
The network updates by adding one scene per day. Some argue that one update per day isn't sufficient, and given the broad range of niches on the network that is a fair argument. To counter that, consider the size of the network already and the quality of the updates. If a network is going to choose between quality and quantity then quality gets my vote – and it seems that the guys and gals at Team Skeet think the same way. The downside to this update schedule is that if you only like one or two of the sites you’ll be waiting a while for updates.
One flaw I was glad to see fixed since the last time I was a member is that they now have a site for the one mainstream porn niche that was conspicuously absent. The addition of an anal-themed site is, in my opinion as a fan of that niche, a welcome addition. I’ll post a specific review of Teens Love Anal soon.
The site supports download managers. I used FDM to queue-up scenes and had no problem with the scenes timing out. The last time I reviewed the network I found their download speeds were a bit lower than you’d find on similar networks but that issue no longer exists and I had fast download speeds all the time. I didn’t experience any kind of a download limit.
There are very few negatives on the network and even those are quite minor. There are a lot of ads and four of the sites require an upgrade. With the upgraded sites, my beef is less that they exist and more that I’d like to find more out about them but I’m afraid to click any links.
So if you’ve read through this far it won’t be a surprise to find that I’m highly recommending Team Skeet. They offer some great porn with some of the freshest models working and they offer that on a network that does all the technical stuff well. This would be a great value at the full price so when you add in the TBP discount Team Skeet becomes one of the best values around. |
|
01-21-16 03:36pm
Replies (6)
|
Reply
990
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
jake88's Review
Carefully consider any decision to add Evil Angel as a premium to VB. It may be that it works for you, but it might not. I know that with a monthly membership the Premium channels are pro-rated so they can be inexpensive if you wait to add them on until later in your monthly membership but I don't know how it works when you have an annual subscription.
The other thing to consider is video quality. I was a VB member a couple of months ago and added Elegant Angel. While it is true that the Premium channels offer 'HD' you can do much better on the actual studio site. It may not make a difference to you, but I'd join Evil Angel at the TBP discount and get true HD instead of adding the EA Premium channel at VB.
I should add that Evil Angel is among my top three favorite studio sites so that may influence my decision too. Your choice may be different, but think about quality and not just price.
|
01-21-16 01:56pm
|
Reply
991
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I prefer street clothes that reveal some skin and curves. For some reason I'm also drawn to women in ball caps.
My preference with street clothes peaked at the time when low-cut jeans and crop tops were in fashion. God I miss those days! I hope to live long enough to see that trend come around again. There was nothing better than a beautiful woman dressed like that with her jeans just above her pubic area and a flat stomach for all to see.
I'd better go now before I drool on my keyboard thinking about this.
|
01-20-16 02:44pm
|
Reply
992
|
Dark X
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I agree 100% that the material for this site could just as easily be uploaded to either Hard X or Erotica X depending on the scene. I gave the site the benefit of the doubt because times are tough in the porn business and if a producer/director can spin off a separate site to generate more earnings then I can live with that - as long as the quality is good, and it is very good on all of Mason's sites.
|
01-20-16 02:40pm
|
Review
993
|
Dark X
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Third site by Mason
- High production values
- A-list stars
- Hardcore without crossing into rough
- Many download and streaming options
- Supports download managers
- Bonus scenes from sister sites
- TBP discount |
| Cons: |
- Small site (but growing)
- Scenes could be made part of existing sites |
| Bottom Line: |
Dark X is the third independent site from the acclaimed director Mason. This site is in addition to her other excellent sites, Hard X and Erotica X. If you’re familiar with either of those sites you’ll know that if Dark X follows in their footsteps it will be a great site.
I don’t want to sound judgmental, but I don’t really understand interracial porn as a stand-alone niche. For one thing, it seems that ‘interracial’ in this context only means a black male with white female. In the real world couples from any race can pair up. But what I don’t understand is why these interracial scenes couldn’t simply have been added to the existing Hard X and Erotica X sites since those two sites do have interracial scenes. But, for some reason, interracial porn seems to be a big thing right now and I can’t fault Mason for wanting to capitalize on that.
The porn itself is up to Mason’s usual high standards: the models are A-list and beautiful. The women are all white but there is some variation in age and body type. The scenes are all well produced with good lighting and editing to best show off the models. I wouldn’t go so far as to say this is couples porn but it isn't misogynistic either. Credit that to having a woman as the director for giving these scenes a lot of heat and still appeal to a broad audience.
There are currently 29 scenes uploaded, but that needs a bit of an explanation. When the site began it added a new scene each day for a short while. That makes sense as it gives members a reason to join. The current update schedule is one scene per week but the overall number of scenes is augmented by the addition of some bonus interracial scenes from Hard X and Erotica X. These are actual bonus scenes in that they don’t count as the weekly exclusive update. As of today there are 21 Dark X scenes, six Hard X scenes and two Erotica X scenes.
For those like me who like anal sex scenes, there are six exclusive anal scenes and an additional four from Hard X.
Like its sister sites, this one is laid out well and is easy to use. There are different ways to sort the scenes and you can choose a specific porn star or common niche. There is a search function but the site is still too small to really test that. I found that just being able to sort by star and niche was sufficient.
Each main page has six scenes with each having a large photo and information on the scene including the model, the scene name and the upload date. Each of those opens into a new page where you’ll have a description of the scene and options to stream or download it. For both streaming and downloading there are a lot of options. Both offer seven different resolutions: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p and 1080p. The downloads are only available as MP4s. I wish other sites would offer this many options. I downloaded the 720p files as those are a good compromise between file size and video quality. The bitrates are just shy of 5000kb/s (though a few were as low as 3500) so they look good on a 24” monitor.
There are some photos available but it is fair to say that these are secondary to the videos. The photos are good quality but there aren't many per set and those appear to be screencaps. I didn’t see a way to download them as a zip.
The site allows download managers and I found the download speeds to be at least as good as other comparable sites.
Some may not see the value in joining such a small (but growing) site even with the TBP discount but that would be missing out on some excellent quality porn. The scenes are all well produced, shot and edited and all of them feature the best stars in the porn industry today. This is definitely a site that I’ll rejoin. |
|
01-16-16 10:12am
Replies (8)
|
Reply
994
|
Porn Mastermind
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Interesting group of sites. I was a member of one of the sites a few years back but I don't remember it being part of a network. If that's new I might need to take another look at this. Access to some select bonus scenes is a big plus too. Thanks for pointing this out.
|
01-16-16 10:11am
|
Reply
995
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Bummsi's Comment
Welcome to Pornusers!
I'm also not able to answer you specific question, but I'm confident that Wittyguy is right. I'm in Canada where the obscenity laws are definitely tighter than in the US and I never have any worries about the sites listed here causing me any problems.
If you join Teen Mega World I think you'll enjoy it. Please be sure to post a review too!
|
01-12-16 05:36pm
|
Reply
996
|
Pissing.com
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Reply
I'm not usually into solo girl peeing, but I'd make an exception for Riley Reid! Let me know if you rejoin and find the scene.
Riley has her own site now and she seems to be doing a lot of stuff that she doesn't do in mainstream DVDs - like more anal. Maybe she'll do some peeing scenes on her own site.
|
01-12-16 05:32pm
|
Reply
997
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I write most reviews off-line and then copy-and-paste them into the site. My first drafts of a review always exceed the limits and there are times I think they're too low. But... I think the limits are just fine. They force me to edit my reviews more than I would if I had no limits and I think those edits keep the review more on point and readable.
My vote is to keep the current limits.
|
01-12-16 05:28pm
|
Reply
998
|
Pissing.com
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Reply
Amen to CC processors losing some of their clout. It bugs me when sites are compelled to self-censor to appease the bankers.
On a semi-related note, I really like finding peeing in scenes where it is unexpected. Last Year Maddy O'Reilly had an incredibly hot scene at Brazzers (http://www.brazzers.com/tour4/scenes/vie.../8361/sex-on-wheels/). The scene was hot anyway but at the end the guy pees on Maddy. I wasn't expecting that and that scene will be a favourite of mine until I can't watch porn any more. I've read that Maddy has since developed a bit of a pee fetish. I should see if I can find more of that.
|
01-10-16 08:46am
|
Reply
999
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I pretty much stick to what I like. I have a bunch of sites that I rejoin on a regular basis so I know what I'm getting. I do occasionally join some sites that are beyond my normal interests. Like BDSM sites at Kink, for example.
|
01-10-16 08:37am
|
Reply
1000
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I like the idea of a 'like' button but I selected 'other' as I think it is a good idea but I'm not so committed to it that I think it warrants an exclamation point. It is definitely something that I'd use though.
|
01-09-16 07:14am
|
