Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Niche - Softcore The category portal for a specific niche.

Soft Content Reviews & Comments

Top Sites

Top rated and most active sites in the niche.

Top Rated

No Sites Found.
Most Active

No Sites Found.

New Reviews

Latest 3 user reviews in this niche.

Visit DOMAI

1. DOMAI (0)

Pay
Newbie
85*
LadyLover (0) 02-18-24  08:07pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: 2 updates every week on Monday and Thursday
Lots of smiling in the photo sets - I like seeing happy girls
BOTD Archive - still accessible for free off the legacy site (legacy.domai.com) - updated daily, 15 beauties are rotated through
Lifetime memberships are offered
Navigation and site layout has been updated to match the style of MA (although the old legacy style is still available)
Site response is generally quite good - good download speed, good refresh from page to page, etc.
Picture quality is superb
More girl-next-door types here
Lots of nature sets, because nudity is natural, and nature is natural, so what better place to do your first nude photo shoots than in nature? These do seem to be the first photo shoots for a large number of these models.
The emphasis is on beauty, not sex. The girls are beautiful and the settings are beautiful.
The site uses TLS 1.2 so passwords, etc are secure in transit
Part of the Met Art network – customer support is superb
Cons: Only two updates per week
Pictures only - no videos
Price for monthly is up to $29.99 (it’s not hard to find discounts to $19.99), even though the legacy site still mentions $9.99 as the price - and the price is the same whether you join from the legacy site or the updated version. There typically also sales for all the sites in the MA network around holiday times (like Valentine's Day) for $9.99 - so definitely look for those.
Most girls have only a small number of photo sets (like one or two or three), so if you really like a girl you may not get to see that much of her
Model info is really minimal here, and in many cases non-existent.
DOMAI started up in 1997, but very little of the pre-2005 content is available
Very little striptease action, which goes along with the idea of “just the nudes ma’am”
The emphasis is on beauty, not sex. This is a very tame site.
Bottom Line: Some stats:
1533 Models
161 Contributing Photographers
3916 Galleries

Long one of my favorite sites, I’ve been a member of this site for years, and ponied up for a lifetime membership in 2017. The focus here is quite simply pictures of beautiful nude women. In fact the founder of the site referred to the philosophy being “simple nudes”, and that is still the governing idea here.

While full nudity is throughout the site (most of the sets the model is completely nude starting at picture 1, so not a lot of striptease here), Domai sticks to the tamer side of things. In fact, a few years back, the original founder of Domai (Eolake Stubblehouse) added a sister site called Goddess Nudes to allow them to show more private parts.

There is a lot of overlap between Goddess Nudes and Domai, with some sets appearing on both sites and only a couple of pictures added or removed. Since both of the sites have been acquired by Met Art, the sites appear to be a little more distinct than in the past, but even Goddess Nudes isn’t remotely hard core, and Domai is no longer afraid of open leg shots.

There are 3 other sister sites in the Met Art network that are very similar to DOMAIErotic Beauty, Goddess Nudes, and Errotica-Archives. Each of them now updates twice a week, and there is considerable overlap between the models and the photographers. They are also not nearly as distinct from each other as they used to be when they started out. It’s also not unusual for a set for a girl appearing on one of the sites, and then a bit later a second site will pick up the same set, although with a slightly different selection of photos

The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on all of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Morey Studio

2. Morey Studio (0)

Pay
Newbie
80*
HairyPotter (0) 02-12-24  09:14pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: This is my guilty pleasures site
Exceptional photography site
Lovely models throughout, and all three of my favourite models
Easy to use site
Fantastic yearly price of $49.95
Cons: Daily download limit of 7.5 GB, but I have never reached it
It’s not for video lovers. There are videos, but those are not the focus of the site
Other photography sites have bigger collections and better resolution photos
Bottom Line: It’s not often that a site provides all three of my favourite models, but Morey Studios does. With that said, admittedly, I seem to still mainly focus on those three models. It’s not that the other models are unattractive, quite the contrary, I don’t think there’s an unattractive model on Morey. It’s just my favourite models have some truly scrumptious photo sets on Morey.

My three favorite models include Tea aka Tea Jul/Tea Mint. She was the first porn model, I remember seeing a lot of content of and it was love at first sight. She has 28 photo sets and 7 videos on this site. I believe that is the largest collection of Tea, especially sexually explicit content.

Second is Billy aka Billie Raise, pretty well-known from other photography sites. It’s not as big of a collection as Tea, but still 10 photo sets and 10 videos.

Last but certainly not least is Wildy aka Wildy A at Met Art and others. She has over 150 photo sets and 60 videos. Much like Tea, Wildy was love at first sight for me.

I feel my score is unbiased. I know those three models make this site a lot better for me than it may for someone who isn’t familiar with the models. If, however, you do like those three, this really is a great site.

I see Morey as a site for those who are used to, burned out on sites like Met-Art and similar sites. The models on Morey are regularly on Met and its family of sites, but there is a different style to these shoots.

Which is why it matters that the content is 100% exclusive.

The resolution needs to improve, it’s 2000x3000. The videos need to be longer and more provocative or even sexual. The sets are more like you may remember photography sites being. There is and has always been sexual parts and a more sexual style than a lot of the other softcore photography sites, but Morey hasn’t changed much. While others are going all the way to showing more spread legs, Morey is more focused on showing the artistic view of women.

I feel a wee bit of a hankering to admit I hadn’t been a member of Morey since 2019 and can tell you that I “think” it is updating, not recycling, but cannot guarantee it. I was so happy to rejoin my once favorite site at a cheap yearly price, I didn’t look into if the new updates really are new.

But and it’s why I shared this review. It has been worth the cost of the subscription to see and download all my favorites.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit FEMJOY

3. FEMJOY (0)

Pay
Newbie
93*
tangub (0) 01-09-24  01:54pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: PU/TBP discount
Nearly 20 years worth of updates online.
Site still updating with a new photo set nearly every day and a new video at least weekly.
Nearly 2000 models with over 10,000 photo sets and over 1000 videos.
Photo sets with downloadable zips in 4 sizes 800px, 1200px, 2500px & 5500px.
Latest videos come with 4 download options 1920, 1040, 720 & 480.
No download limits encountered and no issues using download manager.
Cancellation was easy enough with immediate email confirmation.
Cons: Watch out for the pre-checked cross sales, you could end up with $80 of charges for unwanted subscriptions if you miss it.
Biggest con for me was the incomplete and shambolic model index, will explain more in bottom line.
I found the videos boring but maybe that's just me, I'm only really interested in the photos.
There's no real description or preview of the videos so you don't really have much idea of the content before you watch or download it.
No file sizes listed for videos or photo zips.
You could probably count the number of Black or Asian models on one hand.
Minimal model info.
Bottom Line: I signed up for Femjoy early December after spotting a Cyber Monday deal on PU/TBP at $5 for the first month, an offer I found too good to refuse. I did have reservations about signing up though as I really don't like the Trust Charge billing company they use and the way they add 20% to the join price allegedly for VAT, not to mention the pre-checked cross sales. Happy to report that no problem with unauthorised charges though and cancellation was relatively straightforward. With the threat of a recurring billing of $36 I was only ever going to stay for 1 month.

The earliest updates on Femjoy date from June 2004 so you have almost 20 years of updates to see here. It's a nude art photography based site similar to MetArt with photo sets outnumbering videos by ten to one. There's almost 2000 models and they are almost all attractive to drop dead gorgeous. The content is nearly all solo with the odd two or three girl sets here and there. You get some brief biographical info of the models such as hair and eye colour, height, weight and breast size. They don't however say where they are from, I'm guessing mostly white Eastern Europeans. There's also something weird going on with the given ages of the models. You can look at a model who might look in her 20s then look at her bio and her age is given as 42. I'm guessing they put the model's age when she first appears on the site then it rises year by year to give her current day age.

The site is easy enough to find your way around, the main headings being home, models, photos and videos. My preferred way to browse a site is via the model index working my way through from A to Z. It was only after going through the models beginning with M it suddenly occurred to me that I hadn't seen Matty, a model I had noticed on the home page due to a recent update, so I checked again and she definitely did not appear in the model index. I then started looking through the photos pages and by the time I had reached page 50 dating back to 2018 I had come across more than 300 more models that do not appear in the model index. This seems to be a major oversight on the part of the site owners not ensuring that models who have debuted on the site in the last few years are added to the model index. You can also sort the model index, photos and videos by most recent and rating although I think sorting by rating is pretty useless as every photo set and video is rated 5/5 and every model apart from 2 on the last page are rated 5/5. There are also several dozen models in the model index who have zero photo sets or videos, I'm assuming these are models who retired and asked to have their content removed. Surely you should also remove them from the model index?

The photo sets are the main strength of Femjoy, they clearly use some of the best photographers in the business. I particularly enjoyed the many photo sets shot in stunning outdoors settings. Thankfully they now produce the photo sets in a decent mid size 2500px option which they haven't always done until recent years and the main reason I had never joined until now. The file sizes of the 2500px zips are mostly nice and compact coming in at between 30 to 100MB although for some reason the updates in the last few months are more like 300 MB. The zip file names include model name, photographer name and set name. Unfortunately they don't include the date so the photo sets won't sit in chronological order in your folder as they do at MetArt. There was no index of photographers that I could find although if you are viewing a photo set you can click on the photographers name and you'll be taken to a page with all their other sets.

I'm not that interested in videos and tend to find them boring on these types of sites. The first one I watched was of a beautiful Asian babe with an infectious smile named Kloyali. She's walking around on a beach in a bikini, removes the bikini and then rolling around naked on the sand and in the sea, you barely get a glimpse of pussy. It's very tame. Not all videos are like that though, I watched one of Caprice masturbating and then one of Anna N called Maid for Pleasure where she's dressed as a French Maid and masturbating with a dildo so there is some more explicit stuff but I'm not sure how much of that you will find. I guess it depends on the model and what she feels comfortable doing.

In conclusion an an excellent site with beautiful models and amazing photography, highly recommended if you have the time and patience to go through it and find all the models that are missing from the model index, thankfully 10 days off work for Christmas meant I had the time. I was tempted to knock points off for the shambolic organisation of the model index but in the end just based my score on the quality of the content.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

View All:  New Reviews

New Comments

Latest 3 user comments in this niche.

Visit FTV Girls

1. FTV Girls (0)

Pay
PinkPanther (0) 03-23-23  07:52am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

Recycling Content

I glance at this site every once in a while to see if they have any hot new girls. Their latest update is a tall beauty named Roxanna. I googled Roxanna FTV Girls to see if they had any mini-promo sets of her up. I found more than I was expecting and the date on them was 2016. So apparently FTV Girls is recycling 7 year old content and putting it on their site as though it's new. Good to know.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit FEMJOY

2. FEMJOY (0)

Pay
elephant (0) 09-30-21  05:33am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

Is Gamma Entertainment safe

I was hoping to join with Epoch or ccbill as it states on subscription pages these two are used cause they are safe and reliable but kept getting this Fame Digital or Gamma Entertainment join page, I'm always a bit wary these days in signing up to some sites that have a payment provider other than the two mentioned, Is Gamma Entertainment a safe one anyone know.

Wish I knew how to get it to the epoch join page as they still list it.

Respond: 11 Replies - Add Reply


Visit ATK Galleria

3. ATK Galleria (0)

Pay
hardog (0) 08-31-21  07:54am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

some issues...

The data base is so bloated and fragmented, the servers can take up to 30 seconds to change between models and 6-15 seconds to open a new set for the model you're currently viewing. Is that an exception to the rule? No, the exception to the rule is the 10% of the time a link switches sets as fast as you'd expect a 500mb connection to move from one set to the next set (likely pulling data from a newer server). Second issue: they are diluting the content of ATK Galleria by taking a very noticible percentage of their photo content and removing it from the "Galleria" site, over to the "Archive" site (and any one of their other sites). Models you use to see with 10/20/30 photo sets are now listed with a few movies only and "0" photo sets. Apparently the business plan is to create more revenue by moving content into other sites and up-charging you if they can draw you into joining one of their sister sites.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


View All:  New Comments


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Related Niches
1. General (0)
2. Glamour (0)
3. Photography (0)
4. Public Nudity (0)
5. Solo Models (0)

View All : Niches


Softcore @ TBP
1. Only All Site... 95.0
2. Cosmid.net 89.0

View All : Softcore Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.27 seconds.