Glamour Models Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
No Sites Found.
|
|
Most Active
No Sites Found.
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |
1. Viv Thomas (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A truly impressive site
The main theme is lesbian
Videos and pictures are high quality and downloadable
Frequent updates
Seamless navigation native to the Met Art Network sites
Some of the models are so pretty when dressed, you might not want them to take their clothes off |
| Cons: |
Older scenes, to me, are of higher performance quality, but not as good technical quality, I’m splitting hairs
I wish some scenes were a little longer and more personal |
| Bottom Line: |
Viv Thomas is a name that I have read a lot about and heard a lot of porn reviewers talk about in a very positive light. I can see why. One of the important parts about the site’s quality is it is in the Met Art family or network of sites. Similar to when a site ends up owned or managed by Gamma – the quality goes up and navigation becomes familiar and very simple. The most commonly used compliment with Viv Thomas’ work is based on his love of beautiful, young but legal women. That is easy to see as soon as you enter the member’s pages.
My lead-in con is the most sincere compliment I can give and still see it as a minus. The older scenes, oftentimes, using the same models, had supreme chemistry between the models. It is clear, Viv had his preferred models and they were happy with being in his preferred group. The newer scenes do – to an extent – lack that chemistry, but I might just be seeing chemistry as production ability. I went through the same feeling on sites like DDF and ALS Scan. The newer scenes are far from bad. I would even venture out and say the scenes still offer more chemistry than the majority of porn sites.
The site has very simple and straightforward navigation, including a tab for videos, a tab for photos and a model index to find your favorite models. Each model, once clicked upon, opens up to a page showing all of the model’s scenes. There are 4K downloads on the majority of scenes over the last 8-10 years. You can also download HD resolutions if you prefer. The site has over 2,600 videos and nearly 4,000 photo sets. The photo sets are as good as any on the Met Art network and would be worth the price of a membership.
Even though I usually prefer sites with amateur models, Viv’s site and models are mostly new to me. Most seem to be from Europe. And despite what looks like a softcore site, do not let the lesbian genre or solo women fool you. These scenes are filled with passion, lust and tongues going everywhere. There is a lot of foreplay, even for a lesbian site. Kissing, toys, fingers, and plenty of scissoring.
It’s sites like this one that show how beautiful and passionate porn can be. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
2. Zishy (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The annual price is very reasonable - $50 and it does not automatically renew
The teasing is very good
Much of the teasing happens in public
Very few pussy shots – some might make that a negative
Quality photography and videos
This is the only site like it that I have ever subscribed to |
| Cons: |
I tend to like more full nudity with my soft core
Not every model is a 10 – for some that might be a pro, more girl-next-door types here |
| Bottom Line: |
After reading some of the very enthusiastic reviews for this site, I had to give it a shot. I’m certainly glad that I did. For me it’s not in my top 5 list of sites, but it is still very good, and this is a unique offering in the world of porn.
This site loves to build anticipation, not just within a set, but across sets. Almost always, the first time a girl appears, she stays clothed throughout, except for some flashes here and there. Now you have to wait if you want to see more – and it’s not a sure thing when the next appearance will be. Sometimes it’s a day or two between sets, and I have seen it go over month before the second set appears.
The vast majority of the models are amateurs, but there are more than a few that have done a significant amount of porn work at other sites, both before appearing here and after. The amateurs can range from shy to outgoing. It’s charming when a girl is really trying to decide whether or not to remove the panties. You can also see her exhilaration once they are off and it’s just her and nothing else.
TBP categorizes the site as Non-Nude, and I don’t think I’d agree with that. There is a significant amount of nudity overall, although many sets have none at all. But that’s usually building the anticipation of waiting for the reveal, and really, that’s one of the charms of the site. It’s the “darn, I wish I could see more of her” and then finally getting the chance to do so.
I think in the early days, non-nude might have been an accurate label, but even the photographer says that has changed over time.
From his About:
“Do all these women get completely naked and show everything?
No. I created Zishy with the focus being on tease. Over the years, I have worked with more and more women who are comfortable with nudity, but I still avoid any explicit open-leg material. Bare vagina is beautiful, I just prefer to leave something to the imagination.” |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
3. Stunning 18 (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large site with frequent updates.
1255 Models, 3694 Photo Galleries, 1202 videos.
Met Art management and tech support, which is always excellent. |
| Cons: |
Mix of both old and new content. Quality varies, especially with the older content. New content is from Thierry Murrell.
The stuff being recycled from justteensite.com isn’t as high quality as the newer stuff, or the stuff originally posed on this site before the changeover from Antonio Clemens to Thierry Murrell. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is run and supported by MetArt (but not a part of MetArt Network) and where all the material provided here is from Thierry Murrell. When it started up, it was all material sourced from Antonio Clemens.
Updates are quite frequent, ranging from 1 to 4 updates per day. Mostly softcore stuff, but occasional boy-girl and girl-girl. The solo sets are mostly just stripping and posing nude, but some masturbation also appears. To me, the solo, just nude stuff is the best part of the site. But YMMV.
A lot of these sets are clearly older. Models that are now in their 40s are appearing with new sets and looking as young as they did in their first appearances. I’ve been able to confirm that a lot of these sets first appeared on justteensite.com, a site that went under a few years ago. But there is also newer stuff coming in.
“Antonio Clemens” is a pseudonym for Alexander Ovchinnikov. When Stunning 18 first started up, all the stuff appearing on this site was from Antonio Clemens. This guy’s work also appeared elsewhere under the Henry Sharpe pseudonym and Thierry Murrell pseudonym. It’s also true that not everything published under those names was photographed by Alexander Ovchinnikov – so they are sort of an agency name for multiple photographers. (Antonio Clemens is only Alexander Ovchinnikov).
I reviewed this site back in 2018, and was quite a fan of it. Then suddenly, all the new postings stopped, without warning or explanation. A few years later I was looking at the blog on AntonioClemens.com. Around that time in 2018 he posted a screed accusing Met Art (which publishes Stunning 18) of improper behavior and threatening legal action. I assume that legal action did not lead anywhere based on how things have proceeded since then.
So all that stuff up above I’m pretty sure is factual. The following stuff is my speculation. I think when justteensite went under, MetArt bought the content, and is now re-publishing it here at Stunning18. I believe Thierry Murrell was a primary source for the stuff published on justteensite.com. I’m guessing that Alexander Ovchinnikov wanted to be compensated again by MetArt for the stuff purchased from justteensite.com and MetArt countered that no, you got paid the first time, so we don’t need to pay you again. That led to the final rift between Antonio Clemens and MetArt and the site’s new direction.
Anyhow, back to the current situation. Ladies with the most appearances: Martina A (186), Isabella (64), Brigitta F (57), Nicole (56), Yana F (50), Natasha S (49), Irene (48), Melena A (42), Avril A (42), Olya N (36), Anoushka E (33), Annett A (31), Delilah G (30), and Anjelica (28). Irene is a personal favorite of mine who only has a small handful of appearances on any other site.
The standard monthly price is $29.99, and annual are $99.99. The PU discount brings the monthly down to $19.99. Around holidays you can expect to find discounted pricing down to $9.99 a month.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
With any of these satellite sites in the MA network, the general recommendation is to join Met Art first, since it is the flagship site. But if just Met Art alone isn’t enough for you, then Stunning18 would be a highly recommended addition to your subscription package. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
|
