Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Niche - Photography The category portal for a specific niche.

Nude Photography Reviews & Comments

Top Sites

Top rated and most active sites in the niche.

Top Rated

No Sites Found.
Most Active

No Sites Found.

New Reviews

Latest 3 user reviews in this niche.

Visit FTV Girls

1. FTV Girls (0)

Pay
Newbie
97*
HairyPotter (0) 09-08-26  09:27am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: A massive site with decades of content
Attractive, girl next door models who sometimes become pro models
Excellent video and image download options
Bigger than most networks
Mostly solo content
Easy to use and intuitive site
Perceived innocence lost premise to some scenes
Cons: The price and fact there is a sister site you don't have access to could put some off
Bottom Line: FTV Girls is based on amateur women being filmed for the first time, hence, FTV for First Time Video.

I have to think the likelihood of a pretty female never being filmed before has greatly reduced these days with smartphones and their video recording capability. But that's not something to gripe about.

This site stands out about as much as a solo site can. The women are what I would call, “everyday dressed” when the scenes and images start. I do not even think us porn fans notice how many models are dressed for a porn shoot. One look through FTV and the scenes look like a portfolio for a shopping center, not a porn site.

There are no download limits and the videos are downloadable in great quality, even the older and much older scenes are still a watchable quality. The images are some of my favourites. It is possible the use of normal, everyday clothing makes the pictures look even better.

You will not have a problem finding models you like. If you are like me, you will have a bigger problem finding models to skip over. I return to the shooting style and use of everyday situations and settings as a factor. Anytime I see a model outside or in a store in their preview, I have to check it out to see what's going on in the scene.

The site works okay at first, but after getting used to their search icons, I can say it has one of the most effective and useful navigational systems I have seen. You will appreciate the search icons when looking for a specific action or setting. Otherwise, you will be spending quite a bit of time scrolling through pages of models and updates – with at least one or two, catching your attention and making you forget what you were searching for in the first place.

My one listed con is more than likely a sign of the times more than a con. You do only receive access to FTV Girls. There is also a FTV MILFs which is very similar in style, format and shooting style but you have to pay to access it. I have joined FTV Girls 4 times in the last couple years and each time was able to get a week access to FTV MILFs as a “trial” when signing up to FTV Girls, not to slight FTV MILFs, but a week has been enough for me to keep up with the site.

FTV Girls would be recommended for anyone who is not put off by the majority of the content being solo. I do not see anything else as a negative or potential negative.

This is one of the biggest collections of amateur models I know of. The content often goes beyond just masturbation. There are many fetishes and niches covered on the site. The first time I joined it, I was shocked by how hardcore some of the solo scenes are. FTV even has their own special sex toy for the more daring models to try.

For me it's a must join site multiple times a year and there's no reason to believe that is going to change.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit MetArt

2. MetArt (0)

Pay
Newbie
99*
LadyLover (0) 02-28-26  10:58am
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: Frequent updates, 4 per day, with an extra 2 updates on the first of each month.

The women are gorgeous.

Tech and billing support is outstanding.

Navigation is extremely good, you can make ratings or favorites and leave comments.

Huge catalog – 4,888 models, 312 artists, 28,888 photo galleries, 2,280 videos.
Cons: Some of the commenters get annoying when they complain about not enough pussy shots. They need to learn that a woman is more than just the stuff that surrounds a vagina.

Because of the complaining mentioned above, recent years have focused more on pussy shots, with the girls contorting themselves into strange positions to grant the desired view.

This is a softcore or glamcore site, so you are getting very little beyond close-ups (which are not in every scene)
Bottom Line: I’ve already reviewed a number of sites in the MetArt network, but surprisingly I’ve never reviewed the flagship site. So here’s my take.

If you like looking at beautiful, naked women, this is the site for you. Everything about this site is excellent. The women are beautiful, the photography and videography are high quality, navigation is good, tech support is good. All softcore sites should aspire to be like this one.

Ladies with the most appearances: Suzanna A (139), Candice B (100), Zelda B (85), Anna AJ (82), Clarice (81), Sybil A (81), Sapphira A (79), Mia Sollis (79), Nikia A (77), Sharon E (74). The latest videos are available in 4K, the oldest (from 2000) Top out at 360p SD. For photos, the largest top out at 6720 on the long end.

The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.

NOTE: RABBITS REVIEWS IS CURRENTLY OFFERING A LIFETIME MEMBERSHIP FOR $199. I paid $500 for my lifetime membership in 2017 and couldn’t be happier with it.

Regular pricing for MetArt is $29.99 per month. The standard PU discount is usually $19.99 per month. During the holiday season they are offering a $9.99 special, and that will almost certainly be offered again during major holidays. Over on RR the special price as of today is $5.00 per month.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Restrained Elegance

3. Restrained Elegance (0)

Pay
Newbie
92*
PalmTrees (0) 02-10-26  06:44pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Engaging and desolate at the same time
+ Every scene and photo set is different
+ Well-trained actresses – believable
+ The models are attractive physically and mentally
+ You will not likely ever find content like this on other sites
+ Everything is exclusive to the site
+ Unique experience which is rare in porn
Cons: - While there are frequent updates, some are just older scenes that were archived
- Non-BDSM fans or newcomers might not enjoy the humiliation
Bottom Line: There seems to be many phases of BDSM in porn. Mainstream BDSM can be entertaining, but is rarely convincing. Some sites then take the violence and degradation to every extreme possible. Restrained Elegance does an exceptional job of not only living up to their name, but exemplifying it.

The videos are good at pushing close to an extreme but not quite reaching extremes. The actresses are clearly into BDSM and not just because the site wants to try BDSM scenes. I do believe the BDSM actresses are just like any fetishist and they are highly capable of delivering a performance matching their passion and interest in BDSM.

With that said, Restrained Elegance is not like the typical porn site. There are updates and some of the updates are just older scenes they have archived. There is a full explanation on their site that explains it would not be cost-effective to them to store all the scenes to be downloaded and streamed. I am not technical-savvy enough to know how realistic that is, but the way the site updates does not bother me in a negative way.

I do believe some of the humiliation could be stronger than most porn fans are used to, but I believe fans are getting smarter and more understanding about fetishes. There is an audience and room for new audience members. It just could be off-putting for some. One thing I appreciate about Restrained Elegance is you will never see a model look like she hates what is happening or like she does not want it to happen. This is a fine line that I believe separates Restrained Elegance from other BDSM sites.

The pictures are a major part of the site. These picture sets can be downloaded and show everything from the beauty of the models to the bondage contraptions in still photography. There are stories being told in both the pictures and videos. It truly makes for a unique experience in the BDSM genre. The videos are HD quality when downloaded and are enjoyable if you are into BDSM.

The site itself is a bare-bones site. Depending on the user, that can be good or indifferent. The site does make me feel like they are more dependent on the quality of the content than bells and whistles. Though, bells and whistles may show up as bondage accessories.

I do consider myself a BDSM fan and join this site about once a year. If you really like the content, a more frequent subscription could be the choice for you since it will open up more of the archived sets to you. Did I miss on making the analogy of the name Restrained Elegance in comparison to the way they update with archived scenes, kind of restrained but the scenes are always elegant.

It is a very good site. The biggest complaint against it is you do not get all their scenes.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

View All:  New Reviews

New Comments

Latest 3 user comments in this niche.

Visit FTV Girls

1. FTV Girls (0)

Pay
PinkPanther (0) 12-15-25  07:51pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

Current Videographer Is The Worst

I decided to check out this site again, not having been on in a while. Beware, because apparently the long-time videographer left and the current videographer doesn't know how to work a camera - I have yet to find a recent video that isn't blurred and washed-out looking garbage. The girls might be great looking, I can't tell because the current stuff is so badly shot. I had a complaint previously about recycled material but now recycled material is what you should wish for until they get someone that knows how to operate a video camera.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit MetArt Network

2. MetArt Network (0)

Network
CaloNord (0) 11-29-23  03:28am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

Please Add Actress Name to Movie File Names

MetArtNetwork really needs to add Actresses Names to their filenames for media files (movies).

Cataloging is Horrendous if I Have to create a sub folder myself for each actress because the website does not include actress names in their file names.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit FTV Girls

3. FTV Girls (0)

Pay
PinkPanther (0) 03-23-23  07:52am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

Recycling Content

I glance at this site every once in a while to see if they have any hot new girls. Their latest update is a tall beauty named Roxanna. I googled Roxanna FTV Girls to see if they had any mini-promo sets of her up. I found more than I was expecting and the date on them was 2016. So apparently FTV Girls is recycling 7 year old content and putting it on their site as though it's new. Good to know.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


View All:  New Comments


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Related Niches
1. Glamour (0)
2. Softcore (0)

View All : Niches


Photography @ TBP
1. MetArt 95.5
2. FTV Girls 95.0
3. Erotic Beauty 93.5
4. The Life Erot... 92.0
5. Errotica Arch... 91.5
6. Digital Desir... 91.0
7. Watch 4 Beaut... 90.0
8. Femjoy 90.0
9. MPL Studios 89.0
10. Explicite Art 89.0
11. Amour Angels 88.0
12. Nude Muse 88.0
13. Morey Studio 87.5
14. Holly Randall 87.0
15. Eternal Desir... 85.0

View All : Photography Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2026 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.07 seconds.