Soft Content Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
No Sites Found.
|
|
Most Active
No Sites Found.
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |
1. Fetish Pros (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ An interesting take on BDSM and exploring kinks
+ I believe some or even most of these models are known outside the genre
+ The videos are involved and surprisingly fun
+ The site is basic and that is a pro for me. It is very simple to use.
+ Fills a mostly empty spot between hardcore BDSM and mainstream BDSM
+ No men that I have seen. |
| Cons: |
- No men, I believe it is a pro and con.
- No downloads, not even pictures |
| Bottom Line: |
I very rarely join a site without included downloads. Fetish Pros captured my interest when I noticed the models are all females and some are from the more mainstream side of porn. I find the no-men approach to be both interesting and possibly new and exciting. One of the most common complaints with BDSM and fetish sites is the reliance on gender roles. I am reviewing another BDSM site that casts the males in a submissive light. The gender roles become almost as stale as just common sex.
There is good news and bad news. The good news is the scenes take on a more playful and fun tone than typical BDSM scenes. That can be important as fetish and BDSM can be intimidating for females. The void I believe this site fills is not as extreme as saying fits between hardcore and mainstream BDSM. The more hardcore sites can be off-putting even to the most interested. The mainstream BDSM sites can be so vanilla it causes the viewer to forget there is a kink or fetish being explored. This site hits you with the obvious kink being explored, but does not take it to any extreme.
It is a letdown that downloads are not available. I am just not sure if this site is a site downloads would help. These scenes are entertaining to watch, but because the scenes are not hardcore, strict on the fetish or accessible and boring, maybe it is better to just watch/stream the scenes and move on. While I listed no men as both a pro and con, I am more on the con side of it. I do get tired of gender roles being a focal point in BDSM porn, but I see two or even three women in bondage as being playful and exploratory with each other. It seems like every positive has a negative.
The streaming videos are good quality and the pictures are good quality to look at. The site is very basic in navigation and that makes me happy. I get lost with all the tags and search terms on most sites.
I do think it is a safe join for the interesting take on fetish porn. Having all women makes the fetishes less threatening and in some cases, the women do look to be having fun and enjoying themselves. Which is another part of BDSM porn I believe goes overlooked. You could be watching a hardcore BDSM scene and not notice either person enjoying it or having fun because they try so hard to sell the pain and dominance of the fetish. This site tiptoes around that and just delivers a fairly good example of different kinks and fetishes while giving the viewer plenty of pretty nude women to look at. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
2. Femjoy (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots of content – 10,000+ photo galleries, 800+ videos, nearly 2,000 models
Daily updates, sometimes a couple extra each week. 1 video each week
They replaced their more-annoying-than-most captcha with what looks like a Cloudflare to show you are human. I use Firefox for my browser and have never had an issue with this.
The site is quite stable and download speeds are solid. |
| Cons: |
Still some technical glitches, although much better than for the review I wrote a while ago. Several models have no thumbnail on the model page, even though all their sets and videos appear to be fine.
I don’t think they have any videos in 4K, which is fine with me as I usually download at 720, but that could be a drawback for some of you. All the more recent videos have at least 1080 as an option |
| Bottom Line: |
I last reviewed this site in 2017. It hasn’t really changed that much since then, except for adding many more photos, videos and models since that time.
I’ve signed up for the annual membership several times over the years, and have always been quite happy with my purchase. I just finished my most recent year and I’m still a happy camper, and I will be back again soon. I wish they offered a lifetime membership, but unfortunately they don’t. The annual price of $79.95 is quite reasonable. The regular monthly charge is $29.95 but there are frequent sales for $14.95 per month.
This is a very solid soft core site, with excellent photography and videography. The archives contain many beauties that are simply breathtaking. I felt that in the past 12 months the number of OMG sets was not as high as in other years, but of course a lot of that depends on personal taste. Every girl on the site is at minimum beautiful. Out of the nearly 2000 models on the site, I added 334 to my Favorites and downloaded every photo gallery and video of each of these ladies onto my hard drive.
If you like soft core you definitely want to spend at least one month on this site. For me, whenever I do sign up I do the annual sub, and I have never regretted it. I’d rate Met Art a little higher just on volume alone, but this is an outstanding site in the soft core genre.
Gamma manages the site now, and cancellation was quite easy. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
3. Erotic Beauty (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
5694 Photo Sets, 2393 Models, 199 Artists – there is a lot of content here
Generally high quality photography
Many of the models are gorgeous
Wide variety of settings and styles |
| Cons: |
Only 2 updates per week
No videos at all
Considerable overlap with DOMAI, Goddess Nudes, and Errotica-Archives
Most models have only one or two sets
Occasional clunkers in the sets |
| Bottom Line: |
I last reviewed this site in 2018. The general style of the site has not changed much at all, but the update frequency has dropped sharply, down to 2 updates per week, on Saturday and Sunday.
Erotic Beauty is a sister site in the Met Art network. It was previously named Met Art Models. The updates on the current incarnation of the site date back to 2005. Its core competency is soft core nude photography.
Back in the day, each of Erotic Beauty, DOMAI, Goddess Nudes, and Errotica Archives were somewhat distinctive. But the original owner of DOMAI and Goddess Nudes is no longer with us, and while Erro is still photographing for Met Art, the site named after him is no longer exclusively posting his work. So each of these four sites is now posting only twice a week, and there is no theme to distinguish one site from the next.
Erotic Beauty generally has a feeling of being a landing spot for sets that, for whatever reason, were not placed on Met Art itself. This does not mean that the content isn’t good, although overall I would say the stuff on Met Art averages out to higher quality than the stuff on Erotic Beauty. There are fewer models you’d rank a 9 or 10 on EB as opposed to MA. Maybe more at EB would be called ”pretty” than “gorgeous”. But my absolute favorite photo gallery, with Lisabelle, is found on Erotic Beauty.
One issue I have is the considerable overlap with DOMAI, which has now extended to Goddess Nudes and Errotica Archives. For example, say a photographer goes out with a model and takes 500 pictures at a single shoot. Then maybe 50 or 60 of those will be posted on DOMAI in a set. Then a few months later, a slightly different 50 or 60 photos from the same shoot will be posted on Erotic Beauty. (Sometimes EB gets them first, sometimes DOMAI. And now there might be a third set on Goddess Nudes and a fourth set on Errotica Archives). This can actually be a good thing if you really loved a particular shoot with a model, since it gets you more photos of that girl. But it does feel a bit like you are being taken advantage of when you come across something like this.
EB would also sometimes post 40 pics from one shoot, and then later 40 more from the same shoot, and sometimes even a third posting from the same shoot. This was quite common a few years ago, but is pretty rare now from what I can tell.
While the site does not loudly proclaim itself as an all-natural site, the covers for their photo sets all bear the mark “EroticBeauty.com Naturally Beautiful Amateur Nudes”. And I think there are very few models with breast enhancements on this site.
The site navigation and style is very similar to Met Art, which in my opinion is excellent. Favorites, comments, all the stuff you would expect. Browsing and download speeds are good.
I’ve seen other reviews mention something about the navigation, and not being able to paginate through easily when browsing. One way to get around this is once you see something like ‘page01’ at the end of the URL, you can replace the 01 with any page number you want and so jump to the middle of the series.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
I’ve also seen them offering specials on lifetime memberships, such as $200 for a site, so if you can get on their mailing list that might also happen (or might not). I’ve also seen them offer most of the MA network (10 sites, excluding Rylsky Art, Eternal Desire, ALS Scans and Stunning 18) with a lifetime membership of 699.99. Again, no idea if this will ever come up again.
Regular pricing for Erotic Beauty is 29.99 per month, or 99.99 per year. The PU discount brings it down to 19.99 per month. Right now there is a July 4 special going for 9.99 per month. These types of discounts usually occur around holidays. The next one might be Labor Day, or possibly not until Thanksgiving.
The bottom line is there is more than enough content here to keep you busy for a month. If you enjoy softcore content, this is a site you should give a look. After you have already joined the flagship Met Art site. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
|
