Amateur Girls Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
No Sites Found.
|
|
Most Active
No Sites Found.
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |
1. U Got It Flaunt It (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Lots of amateurs – few have appeared anywhere else
Visits to the most beautiful beaches
Always fun to see a girl get coaxed out of her top. Even more fun if she is coaxed out of her bottom.
Also fun when a girl needs no coaxing at all – she’s got all the confidence in the world already and is quite happy to flaunt it.
The commenters are quite enthusiastic, especially when a girl finally lets go and really does flaunt it.
Regular updates – every other day.
No download limits as far as I can tell. |
| Cons: |
Many of the videos are kind of grainy
Many photos are out of focus
The models are amateurs, and probably some of the photographers too. So they haven’t developed a full sense of how best to pose for a camera.
Many of the sets make it no farther than Wet T-shirt or hand-bra. There’s plenty of full topless sets, but a lower percentage than you might expect.
Only a small percentage go fully nude.
Search function is quite limited. |
| Bottom Line: |
his site is kind of tough to give a numerical rating to. This site is a lot of fun, I’m very glad I joined, and I will probably make an annual pilgrimage here. But there are enough minor dings that it doesn’t earn a top-shelf score.
One con I mentioned, that many of the girls never go full topless, can also be a bit of a pro. Now when you first go to a set, “will she or won’t she” is a legit question, so it does add some anticipation as you work through a set.
Considering that most of these beaches are well known for ladies going topless, it’s kind of surprising the low-ish hit rate they get in getting the girls to go full topless.
The compensation they offer the girls isn’t that high – a T shirt with the company logo, and digital copies of every photo or video they take of that girl. I suspect that the ones that agree to go back to the apartment for a more extensive photo shoot do get a little more than that.
Videos top out at 1080p, so no 4K yet.
The subscription for one month goes for $24.95, 3 months for about $45 and 6 months for about $70.
I signed up via ccBill which is an excellent biller to work with. Cancellation was very easy.
If you enjoy seeing softcore amateurs, and sometimes very softcore, you will find lots to like at this site. I'd definitely recommmend giving it a whirl |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
2. We Are Hairy (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the best sites for hirsute porn
The genre is great for blending multiple niches in like panties and solo
New content goes with what's trendy and I like that
Easy site to navigate despite the large size
Videos and photos are downloadable
Pictures often are better for showing hairy areas and they excel at pictures |
| Cons: |
This genre isn't for everybody
It's a genre that can get itself in trouble with fans when it keeps trying to go further with hairy areas |
| Bottom Line: |
One of the first porn genres I experienced was hirsute. I rarely see that word used anymore. We Are Hairy’s only real con is they push the limits of what I think even hairy fans want to see. I can handle most of it, but I'm sure I even have my limits.
One of my favourite parts about hairy porn is its reliance on other niches, especially panties. The panties can almost cover the pubic hair or be seen through and give a voyeuristic type view before the model removes her panties. Panties also can be used to show how big the bush is and make it feel like you're getting a look at something that's supposed to be covered.
Solo is also common with the hairy genre. I never really understood why, but when I think about the opposite end of the hairy genre, fully shaven porn, it too is usually solo, letting us know the shaven woman is the focus just like the hairy woman is.
The only reason I see too much hairy being a problem is I generally only find the sexual areas of the body to be sexy when hairy. For example, hairy arms, hairy faces, hairy underarms, are usually things I associate with masculinity or men. I do think that can be a problem. Just because I like hairy porn doesn't mean I want to see masculine ladies.
The site itself is huge and there are new updates. You can download high quality videos and there are downloadable zips for the picture sets. I am a firm believer that pictures or stills are often better for showcasing a model who is showing off their public hair. It can even be artistic.
One area We Are Hairy impresses me with is more younger models. At one time, hairy models were almost always older, but We Are Hairy does a good job of blending in models in their 20s and it's refreshing to see a new generation doing things how they used to be done.
When you combine the photos and videos there are over 20,000 and it's an easy to use site. You get your money's worth.
The site’s layout is clean and uncluttered which for some reason isn't common in this genre.
It is a site that would be worth joining for long-term if you are into the genre. I used to be a regular long-term subscriber, but nowadays, I just join 3-4 times a year for a month at a time. I have most of the back catalog downloaded.
I highly recommend it for fans of hairy porn. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
3. Exploited College Girls (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
1183 Videos, 856 girls
Weekly updates, usually on Thursdays
Videos range from 1 hour in length to sometimes over 2 hours. 90 minutes is about average
Some of the 18 year olds are still in high school when posing
No stupid story. The girls are here to get paid for having sex on camera. The action is all real. And we are here to enjoy that.
All newer videos are available in 4K, 1080, 720 and 480 for downloading. The streaming is done at 720.
Includes access to Backroom Casting Couch and BBC Surprise |
| Cons: |
Very few thunderous orgasms, although plenty of regular orgasms
Almost every scene ends with a facial. Cream pies are rare. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a sister site to Backroom Casting Couch, BBC Surprise, ExCogiGirls and Hot MILFS Fuck, although only the first two are included in this membership. This site started up in 2006 and has had weekly updates since that time, usually on a Thursday.
This review will focus on Exploited College Girls, not BCC or BBC Surprise. As KatyBuffs mentioned in her review, the site is now going by ExCogGirls, and is de-emphasizing the “Exploited” part. Even from the beginning, the Exploited part probably referred mostly to “college girls need money” than “we’re going to make her do stuff she doesn’t want to do.”
Most scenes have 1 boy and 1 girl performing. There are also some Boy-Girl-Girl and Boy-Boy-Girl. Most of the time there is a single studio guy doing the boy duties. For the past 3 or 4 years that dude has been Tyler Nixon. The two previous studio cocks were Jake Adams and Tim Cannon, both of whom passed away suddenly. The site creator, Steve, served this function for the first several years.
The formula starts with an interview with the girl. This usually lasts 5 to 10 minutes, and is almost always clothed. Of course there’s no need to be truthful when answering the questions, but I get the feeling that all of them really are. Especially for any girl that is first sex on camera or shy, there is a lot of giggling during the interview.
Then they get naked, with plenty of giggling to accompany the jiggling. This part usually takes only a minute or two before the girl is totally nude.
There follows the main event, and the sex is quite hot. Each scene since about 2023 has a helpful orgasm count with time stamps in the description, and there is even a count displayed in the video as each one happens. As I noted in the Cons, few of these are thunderous orgasms – some you might hardly notice. They are both self-reported by the girls after the fact, or sometimes reported by one of the members. But since they are not of the Meg Ryan at lunch variety, there is probably less acting going on and more actual releasing.
Finally comes the After Glow and a Shower. With lots of after-action reporting and the girls reliving the best parts of the scene. There is also a zipped photo set with each video.
The tag system is really good. If you go to the advanced filters, all of the tags are displayed so you can easily select one (and also see what options there are). Out of the 1183 videos, here are the counts for some of the tags:
First Anal Ever – 58; First Orgasm – 15; First Sex Toys – 91; Shy – 191; Fisting – 5; High School – 68; Tall – 26; Crying/Tears - 40
They reserve the right to throttle downloading, but I never ran into any restriction, and they don’t specify any. If you sign up via Porn Users, A 2-day trial goes for $1.00. One month is $19.99, rebilling at $19.99. 3 months non-recurring is $75, and one year recurring is $149.99 via PU. ccBill is the payment processor. The addition of two bonus sites makes the value here quite good. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
|
