Glamour Models Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
No Sites Found.
|
|
Most Active
No Sites Found.
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |
1. Stunning 18 (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large site with frequent updates.
1255 Models, 3694 Photo Galleries, 1202 videos.
Met Art management and tech support, which is always excellent. |
| Cons: |
Mix of both old and new content. Quality varies, especially with the older content. New content is from Thierry Murrell.
The stuff being recycled from justteensite.com isn’t as high quality as the newer stuff, or the stuff originally posed on this site before the changeover from Antonio Clemens to Thierry Murrell. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is run and supported by MetArt (but not a part of MetArt Network) and where all the material provided here is from Thierry Murrell. When it started up, it was all material sourced from Antonio Clemens.
Updates are quite frequent, ranging from 1 to 4 updates per day. Mostly softcore stuff, but occasional boy-girl and girl-girl. The solo sets are mostly just stripping and posing nude, but some masturbation also appears. To me, the solo, just nude stuff is the best part of the site. But YMMV.
A lot of these sets are clearly older. Models that are now in their 40s are appearing with new sets and looking as young as they did in their first appearances. I’ve been able to confirm that a lot of these sets first appeared on justteensite.com, a site that went under a few years ago. But there is also newer stuff coming in.
“Antonio Clemens” is a pseudonym for Alexander Ovchinnikov. When Stunning 18 first started up, all the stuff appearing on this site was from Antonio Clemens. This guy’s work also appeared elsewhere under the Henry Sharpe pseudonym and Thierry Murrell pseudonym. It’s also true that not everything published under those names was photographed by Alexander Ovchinnikov – so they are sort of an agency name for multiple photographers. (Antonio Clemens is only Alexander Ovchinnikov).
I reviewed this site back in 2018, and was quite a fan of it. Then suddenly, all the new postings stopped, without warning or explanation. A few years later I was looking at the blog on AntonioClemens.com. Around that time in 2018 he posted a screed accusing Met Art (which publishes Stunning 18) of improper behavior and threatening legal action. I assume that legal action did not lead anywhere based on how things have proceeded since then.
So all that stuff up above I’m pretty sure is factual. The following stuff is my speculation. I think when justteensite went under, MetArt bought the content, and is now re-publishing it here at Stunning18. I believe Thierry Murrell was a primary source for the stuff published on justteensite.com. I’m guessing that Alexander Ovchinnikov wanted to be compensated again by MetArt for the stuff purchased from justteensite.com and MetArt countered that no, you got paid the first time, so we don’t need to pay you again. That led to the final rift between Antonio Clemens and MetArt and the site’s new direction.
Anyhow, back to the current situation. Ladies with the most appearances: Martina A (186), Isabella (64), Brigitta F (57), Nicole (56), Yana F (50), Natasha S (49), Irene (48), Melena A (42), Avril A (42), Olya N (36), Anoushka E (33), Annett A (31), Delilah G (30), and Anjelica (28). Irene is a personal favorite of mine who only has a small handful of appearances on any other site.
The standard monthly price is $29.99, and annual are $99.99. The PU discount brings the monthly down to $19.99. Around holidays you can expect to find discounted pricing down to $9.99 a month.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
With any of these satellite sites in the MA network, the general recommendation is to join Met Art first, since it is the flagship site. But if just Met Art alone isn’t enough for you, then Stunning18 would be a highly recommended addition to your subscription package. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
2. Goddess Nudes (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Beautiful girls, beautifully photographed.
All the good navigation and tech support you can expect from a Met Art network site.
A very fine soft core site.
More than enough good stuff to justify a monthly membership |
| Cons: |
Recent changes make it indistinguishable from the sister sites DOMAI, Erotic Beauty, or Errotica-Archives.
Only 2 updates a week, on Monday and Friday. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a very enjoyable soft core site. I last reviewed this site in 2018, and not a lot has changed. The biggest change is the less frequent updates, but the overall style of the site is basically the same.
Years ago, this was a sister site to DOMAI, which was run by Eolake Stubblehose. DOMAI was a very tame site, basically the tamest site you could have with full nudity. Goddess Nudes was largely created as a place to show some of the slightly more explicit shots, where the girls opened their legs. As Eolake’s health failed, he sold both sites to Met Art. For a few years the 2 sites continued following that pattern, and both sites updated 5 days a week.
At some point, this changed. Updates went down to 2 per week on each site. In addition, the four sister sites of DOMAI, Goddess Nudes, Errotica-Archives, and Erotic Beauty became indistinguishable from each other. Then during Covid, the four sites were used to post some older stuff that had never made it to being published. That wasn’t a bad thing, because a lot of these sets were more than good enough for publishing. But then they would push out some other photos from the same shoot to a different site. Sometimes that even happened a third time. At least each time they published the photos were slightly different from each other, but this was really milking it, in my opinion.
If you’ve never joined here before, there is a lot of good stuff to peruse. No download limits or DRM, and good speeds most of the time. (Some times the sites will slow down and even stop, but after an hour or two everything is back to normal).
3,110 photo galleries, 1,279 models, 162 artists
No videos at all, except for the “Staff Selections”, which are an extra charge.
Met Art does offer lifetime memberships on its company owned sites (including Goddess Nudes), running from $500 per site. You do need to join one of the network sites first to be presented this option – it never appears on the general sign-up page. But once you have joined one site you can either upgrade that one to lifetime or pick a different one. As an incentive they also will throw in a one-year membership to any other site in the network.
Monthly memberships run $29.99, and annual memberships are $99.99. The PU discount is typically $19.99. During holiday periods (like Christmas, Valentine’s Day, Easter, etc.) the site is usually discounted to $9.99 a month. For 10 bucks this is a worthwhile join for anybody that likes this content. 30 bucks a month is pricey for the value. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
3. MPL Studios (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Stunningly beautiful women. Really stunning.
Very high quality photography
Lots of variation in locales. Many of the pictures would be interesting on their own even if there wasn’t a beautiful naked woman also in the picture.
Billing is via ccBill. PayPal is also an option.
480,211 images and 811 videos. |
| Cons: |
Updates are only every other day. Also, some shoots are divided in 2, so it kind of feels almost like they are 4 days apart. |
| Bottom Line: |
One of the best softcore sites anywhere, with a large catalog. The models are all stunningly beautiful. Almost all of them probably come from Eastern Europe.
They must be doing something right to keep their models happy, as some of them have really large portfolios, and several of the ones on this list are still active. For example: Stefani (226 photo sets, 16 videos), Karissa Diamond (102 phot sets, 128 videos), Anya (177 photo sets, 13 videos), Alisa (137 photo sets, 46 videos), Talia (166 photo sets, 7 videos), Avery (143 phot sets, 10 videos), Lana Lane (135 photo sets, 6 videos), Lilya (138 photo sets, 5 videos), Aristeia (134 Photo Sets, no videos), Maria (129 photo sets, 1 video), Mila (96 photo sets, 18 videos), Aria (105 photo sets, no videos. You might know these ladies by other names – this site seems to select names that are unique to this site (that is more true for the models that appeared earlier in this site’s history).
All the videos since 2011 are available in 1920x1080. Older videos are in lower resolution, but would have been state of the art at the time they were released. The oldest set on the site dates from 9/9/2003, so there is a lot to look at here.
If I had to pick one site as having the very best photography, this would be the one. It only updates about 1/8 as much as Met Art, or half as much as Femjoy, but on a one-picture-at-a-time basis I’d give this one the top marks.
I do wish they had daily updates, or if not that, at least stop splitting a shoot into two posts.
Pricing starts at $29.95 for one month, $59.95 for 3 months, or $99.95 for a year. I have not seen any deviation from that pricing for quite some time. So if you’re waiting for a discount I’m not sure that one will ever come.
Going to daily updates would bump their score to 95. But even as it now stands, I am quite happy with my annual membership and plan to renew when the time comes. |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
|
