Glamour Models Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
No Sites Found.
|
|
Most Active
No Sites Found.
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |

1. Eternal Desire (0)
Pay |
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Large amount of content – 258 models, 1551 photo galleries, 362 videos
Updates come every third day, so usually you get 10 per month
The Babes are gorgeous
Very high quality photography
A little more explicit than Met Art |
Cons: |
I’d really like to see this get back to every-other day for content – every third day feels kind of light
Full page ad on each logon – easy enough to click past |
Bottom Line: |
I reviewed this site back in 2018, and this is my first time back since then. The site has grown a lot in terms of numbers, about double what it was back then. But it is still a site featuring the photographer Arkisi. The models are still gorgeous, the network still runs very efficiently, the navigation is still good. Really nothing to complain about.
The site is maintained by Met Art, but technically it is not part of the Met Art Network. So if you join the full Met Art Network, you get 10 sites, but not this one. (That also applies to Rylsky Art, Stunning 18, and ALS Scan – the editorial content is controlled by the artist for those sites, while the technical part of running and maintaining the site is done by Met Art)
I think the content is still slightly more explicit than that on Met Art – a little more spreading, a little more fingering, a few more toys. It is 99% solo content.
There isn’t a lot of striptease action on this site – I’d say more than half of the photo sets begin with the model fully nude. The videos do start with a little more clothing, but even if they have some clothes on, it isn’t a lot – like just a bathrobe or just pjs.
The models with the most appearances include: Mila (66), Nancy A (40), Gloria Sol (38), Loretta A (34), Elina (31), Serena Wood (29), Nika N (29), Keira B (28), Lisa Dawn (28), Dita V (27).
The regular monthly price is $29.99. The standard PU discount runs at $19.99, and there are fairly frequent specials for $9.99 for a month, followed by $19.99 recurring. Billing is with Rocket Gate, but PayPal is also an option. It is very easy to cancel when the time comes. Annual is $99 per year, and a lifetime sub is offered at $500 (which also includes a bonus where you can select a second site in the MA network to get a 1-year sub).
If you enjoy soft core glamour photography you should absolutely pick up a one month subscription when it is offered for $10. |
Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|


2. Love Hairy (0)
Pay |
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
All of these models have appeared on one or more of the Met Art sites. So you can be sure that they are extremely beautiful.
You get all the benefits you would expect from any other site in the MA network. Technical support via email is excellent. I also have not needed a lot of tech support either. I’ve never had an issue with their billing. Navigation is identical to the main Met Art site, as are comments, tags, etc.
Solid amount of content – 196 videos, 1487 galleries, 548 models, 155 artists.
I simply adore the pic of Eddison that is usually displayed on the site’s home page. |
Cons: |
Some of these might qualify as “barely hairy” – so if you’re into a really full bush you won’t find a lot of that here. Even a small tuft of unshaven hair is enough to get added to this site. Most of the women have trimmed pubic hair, and a small percent have armpit hair.
Updates are infrequent and irregular. For January 2025 they came on Jan 2, Jan 3, Jan 5, Jan 7, Jan 22, and Jan 25. Next month it was Feb 2, Feb 5, Feb 9, Feb 12, Feb 26. The oldest photo set on the site is dated 5/4/2001, although this site didn’t appear as a stand-alone site until well after that.
The standard price for Love Hairy used to be quite reasonable, but now it matches any other MA site most of the time. At the time of this posting, the PU “discount” is $29.99 – I would never pay that much for this site. So wait for a holiday discount. |
Bottom Line: |
Love Hairy is one of the sites in the Met Art network. I don’t believe any of the content is exclusive to Love Hairy – in fact you can usually tell from the cover photo where it appeared originally on one of the other MA sites. The set is identical to the one posted on the originating site – exactly the same number of pics, same photo size options, same everything.
Even before joining, you can do a good amount of reconnaissance on the site. On the Models page, you can sort by Top Rated, Newest, Alphabetical, Most Viewed, Most Favorited, or Most Appearances. And if you click on the model herself, it will take you to a page where you can see which movies and which photo sets she appears in. Then you can get a page of thumbnails or usually a short clip of the video.
Old timers like me generally prefer the natural (unshaved) look for a grown woman. This site gives us the chance to see all the lovelies that appear on the MA network with their pubes intact, all in one place. If you’ve already joined multiple MA sites, you’re going to see very little new content here. But it is a convenient option when you really miss the good old days.
The best time to join is almost always on a holiday – most Met Art sites will offer discounts where it costs between $5 and $10 for a month. I got in at $7.99 for a month, and I think at that price this is an excellent value.
I doubt anybody would take out a long term membership to this site. But if’s definitely worth joining if you appreciate the natural look and can get it at a discounted price. |
Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|


3. Watch 4 Beauty (0)
Pay |
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
It is a staggeringly beautiful site
Classy but also knows when to be sensual
The models are all attractive
Excellent variety of models which is unusual in the glamour genre
Videos and photo zips are downloadable
It is still updating to an already gigantic collection |
Cons: |
The constant scrolling feature can be annoying
While not as softcore as many glamour sites, it still is softcore compared to popular sites these days |
Bottom Line: |
I was having a conversation with another porn fan and made a comment I thought could be taken as me being negative about Watch4Beauty. I said it is so good, it often leaves me wanting more. That is easily misconstrued and is more ambiguous than I usually am when discussing porn.
I understand my comment could make the clearly glamour site be stereotyped. Sites like Watch4Beauty were known for having gorgeous models posing in not so provocative poses. But that was not what my comment was about. Quite the contrary even. The models on Watch4Beauty have no problem showing you every inch of their feminine bodies. They will even give you close-up views and spread open angles. Once into the videos, they will even show you how those orifices work.
While the more risque content has not always been common on Watch4Beauty, it has been the norm for at least 10 years. There was a time when the content was even softer than it is now, but like other glamour sites, Watch4Beauty started showing more and using more. This created a dilemma. Showing pink was usually teased on glamour sites. Once it became common, there was a need for more.
Sites like Watch4Beauty including Met Art, Hegre and dozens of others nearly all started showing pink around the same time or roughly. I feel confident saying Watch4Beauty did more with showing pink than other glamour sites. I have even wondered how much the settings affected the comfortableness of the models. The models look to be on a vacation or holiday in their videos and pictures for Watch4Beauty. There is a more natural advancement from their models than from other glamour sites. These young models looked to step naturally from showing their body, but not their pink – stepped smoothly to not just showing their pink, but also showing how they use it and play with it and enjoy it.
There is a fine line in porn and I think all can agree with that. There is that moment that we – the viewer – may sigh a little and think the model is now just doing it for the money. I do not feel that way ever on Watch4Beauty. These models give off the feeling they love showing their bodies so much, it arouses them and they must touch themselves and show the viewer what they are touching.
The masturbation is believable and not drawn out for video length sake. It is very believable that these models have an orgasm or two or even three before they stop. That separates Watch4Beauty for me from the other glamour sites.
The site does feature the mobile friendly, forever scrolling feature and that feature is great if you are viewing the site on a cellphone or tablet, but it makes the site somewhat annoying to deal with on a desktop computer or laptop. It is a very minor annoyance for me. Maybe it helps that I find every single model to be very attractive? The videos are in great quality as are the photos. I like the photos from Watch4Beauty as much as any other site. The only other con for some could be that the content is 2024 softcore. Which is much different than 2005 softcore, but if you’re used to hardcore right from the start of a scene, this content will be a little softer than what you are used to.
Personally, I love the site, the models, the download options and yes, the settings. Most of these models do not look like what I picture when I think of a porn model. That too is a major plus.
My review does leave the question of what it is Watch4Beauty leaves me wanting more of? I am still waiting on a couple of the models to show up under my Christmas tree! It’s a site that does nearly everything right and the models are sexy enough, you may find yourself penning your first letter to Santa to ask for a couple of their models for yourself. |
Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
|