| User Reviews (2) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
07-11-09 08:18pm (Update History)
Reason: An update to my intital review of 4 mths ago, see 'bottom line redux'.
|
| Pros: |
-The elephant graveyard of amateur porn.
-Majority of clips have sound.
-Low price.
-Good international mix: just 33% of members are US citizens.
-42,000 movies & 938,000 pics as of 1 March 09.
-Peer review is fair and critical: out of 11K fuck pics, 190 are rated four or more stars on a scale of one to five. Just 38 of 7046 BJ clips are considered worthy of four or more stars. Other site contents are too often rated stellar, the porn version of grade inflation. |
| Cons: |
-No zip files.
-Low res: the number for an average picture sounds like a good golf score. 173 party clips occupies just 1.22 GB. The 597 for beach requires all of 3.92GB. So clarity is rough, almost never good enough to judge eye colour or fordyce spots.
-Search is horrific. More on that in BL.
-Watermarks are of a set size, so it appears large on too many clips.
-"To ensure pics and or movies are not randomly tagged and abuse, we ask you to have at least 250 postings before you can tag." Hence the lion share of images lack tags.
-Many vids are 10 to 20 seconds duration. The camera pans left to reveal a taunt, lithe, naked homewrecker fisting herself... "Now we'll see something.." I think, not without satifaction, and the clip ends. Ugh. |
| Bottom Line: |
This daedal maze would be time consuming even if the search was flawless. Its not. The huge number of images are slotted into a few sections: stripping, dance, facials, etc. These can be search verge to verge by tags or duration. In theory ya can hunt down the top rated 200 of any section, but the best of cute/sexy reveals the same 11 vids. The highest rated 200 fuck pics generates just 66 finds. Two emails to support generated a stock boilerplate response that their tech section is working on the problem.
So...what do boys want? Here its lots of bjs performed by bottle blond females on men who keep their shirts on. No safe sex. Big on threesomes so long as the 3rd person is female. Open to any Race so long as they are White.
This is the site if non-pro smut is your thing & if ya have the hours to devote to its thousands of pages. Dividing the wheat from chaff will probably give me carpet tunnel.
Some great examples of non-pious proclivities reside here but I'm guessing a multi-month m'ship will be require to run them to earth.
The bottom line redux: I'm adding this short ct four months later: this remains the best girl-next-door site, even with the flawed search feature.
Perhaps one pic in every 400-500 is that of a pro model. A good number of Ashley Juggs fotos have slipped in under the radar, but otherwise the site does a class A job of rooting out the non-amateur stuff. I've yet to stumble across any flick that I suspected was from a pro site.
The Euro has gained a bit in value and last month's tab was $14.03. My 1st mth of m'ship was appox twelve bucks. |
| Respond: |
5 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Huge archive, and as we know, size matters.
- If you like it amateur, you'll like it here.
- Some real Gems here [be prepared to dig for 'em]
- Pictures [thousands] of girlfriends who probably had no idea they'd end up on a porn website. Or did they.
- Videos of all lengths and most qualities [there's no hi-def porn here, most is cam shot by amateurs]
- Lots of community-type commenting and interaction [if you care]
- other non-porn stuff like cool cars, stuff that, you know, Boys Want
- 15-odd US bucks for this much stuff is well worth it
- you can actually join by posting your own pics and vids on a point scale |
| Cons: |
- If you're looking for high-resolution video or pics, it ain't here, folks.
- Much if not most of the pics/videos are not that entertaining, you have to dig for the good ones
- search is lacking, not much meta data here, just titles
- you can rate pics, but you can't tag them until you have 250 posts |
| Bottom Line: |
Look, it's all amateur here, and if you like that stuff, and I do, you'll dig this site. Well worth the join for the 3900+ pages of 24 pics each in the "naked babes" section alone (93,907 pics). And that's not to mention the "cute babes" section (139,000), the "Amateur porn" (44,000), and many more.
The videos section is harder to get a handle on. There's a facials section which is mostly short money shot scenes (899 scenes), and a few of them I'd seen before, but most were brand new to me, and some real Gems here. The handjobs section (707 scenes) likewise. The largest video section here by far is the generically titled Amateur Porn section with 9489 scenes of all lengths. Mostly poor quality, but that's what you expect with am-shot scenes many of which are from a few years back.
You can download and watch, or you can sample in browser before downloading, and it works pretty well. The download speeds are OK (200-500 for me).
There's a whole lot of not-that-attractive folks here {but I haven't seen any grandmas or anybody really hideous ... yet), but there are also some real pretty women with what seems to be their boyfriends[/girlfriends]. It's not the kind of site where you can just spend a couple of nights, and download everything, there's way too much. But that's kind of the Fun of it too. Digging through looking for those gems.
Anyway, I give it a hearty recommend if you like amateurs, and can get over the quality issues. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (2) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All What Boys Want Activity - What Boys Want Reviews - What Boys Want Comments - What Boys Want News
