| User Reviews (1) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+Large, mostly exclusive collection of some very hot Eurobabes going back to April 2004 (daily updates start Feb. 2005)
+zips in 3-4 sizes depending on gallery, largest ranging from 2560, 3264, 3872, 4992px, etc. (Up to April 2005 there are some that max only to 1200; some go much larger.)
+nice autologin (no username or pwd needed!)
+nice preview section in public area |
| Cons: |
-lack of light in too many galleries
-blurriness in photos (too often!)
-other ANNOYING “artistic” (mis-)treatments such as excessive redness, blueness, graininess, etc.
-awkward auto-resizing of the window when you open a gallery; happens every time you return from viewing a single pic! Why not let it be full screen? Plus it always takes you back to the top of the page, not to where you were.
-small number of pics in most galleries recently acquired from former “Max Archives” site |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a purely softcore photography site with no toys. If you’ve never been, you’re in for a real treat with many established Euro-beauties such as Kyla Cole, Tereza Ilova, Veronica/Lola L, Lenka Horokova, Jennifer Max, Kathy (the Czech blond with hee-uge tata’s), Monica Vesela, etc. I do recommend it as such for at least one join.
It has only 48 videos, so that’s not a priority for them. Formats include Windows Media, DivX, and QuickTime in 640x480. No DRM!
It tries to be a kind of “lifestyle” site, including extras such as exchange rates (“Time to buy Euros? Damn, look at that ASS!”), an amusing “news” section (e.g., “Boy Kills Monster Pig Larger Than Hogzilla”), world clocks (NYC certainly isn’t accurate), and insights into photography.
And this brings me to my biggest complaint about it: its artistic pretensions, its greatest and most tragic being that what WE want is to see the models bathed in dark blue light and so forth. After all, it’s “art.” Uh-huh. Well, I’ve been wanting to say this for a long time, and this review is as good as any to say it in:
Fuck art.
I mean, “FUCK!” “ART!”
WE WANT PORN!
There. Enough wasting OUR money so that you can enjoy your lousy “art.” We’re PORN USERS here, not art lovers!
‘kay??? |
| Respond: |
4 Replies
- Add Reply
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (1) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All Pure Beauty Magazine Activity - Pure Beauty Magazine Reviews - Pure Beauty Magazine Comments - Pure Beauty Magazine News
