|User Reviews (1)
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
||-The only reason I am writing pros is because PU wants a balanced review. But basically, this site has little or no value. Anyone who subscribes to this site is wasting their time and money.
-Long time before site timeout.
-DownThemAll manager works at this site.
-Good download speeds. I get 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed.
-Some videos can be downloaded as either MPG or WMV files. Some videos only have a WMV option.
||-Zip file for each photoset downloads with the default filename of "gallery.zip". So you have to rename the zip to know what photoset you have downloaded.
-Video files download with a generic default filename. So you have to re-write the filename to know what the video is. And since the model is not usually identified, and there is no description of what the action is, you make up your own description if you want to save the file.
-No streaming option to view the video before downloading it. So, you have to download each video and play it, before you can decide if the video is worth viewing or saving.
-But there are only 13 videos at this site, and none of them are worth saving. Or even viewing.
-Only have one option for the videos and photosets for definition. No high, medium or low choices.
-The photosets and videos are very low definition.
-This is an archive site. No updates in years.
-Tiny site. 13 videos. 55 photosets.
-Navigation is primitive.
-No posting date for videos or photosets.
-No model bio data.
-No models are named in any of the photosets.
-A few models are named in a few of the videos. But most of the models in the videos are not named.
-The video files are very low definition.
Number of videos: 13
Video size: 320x240 352x240 720x480
Total bitrate: 712 kbps 1628kbps
Different video files will have their own specifications. You don't get a choice of specifications. Most of the videos have the low 320x240 size. A few have 720x480, but even then, the video is poor, maybe from lack of focus or other factors.
Number of photosets: 55
Photo dimensions: 768x1152p or 1024x683p
Number of photos per set: 33 to 141
This is a hardcore teen site.
This is an archive site. The content was made years ago.
You get better looking photos at archive sites like My Precious Vigins and Teen Stars Magazines, as well as better looking models at those other sites.
If you like this style of photography, Amour Angels is a site that is still updating, and has superior photography and more attractive models, as well as superior site design.
There are some cute models at this site, and their photosets are OK. Not great, but OK. And if you're already a member, it's pobably worth saving some of their sets for completeness.
The videos are worthless, because of the low definition. Even if some of the models are cute, the picture is so poor no PU member would waste his time watching these videos.
Because of the small amount of content, the poor quality of the content, poor site design, most PU members would give this site a miss.
- Add Reply
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|User Comments (0)
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
Be the first to comment on Pearl Teens!