Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit Orgasms.xxx

Visit Site


Type: Pay Site


1. Nude Photography
2. Glamour Models
3. Hardcore Sex

Really Useful, Ltd.
14 Sites Listed
Partner: Really Useful Cash

Monthly: $24.95 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: $59.95 (3 months, recurring)
Multi-Mo: $109.95 (6 months, non-recurring)

View all Orgasms.xxx Site Facts at TBP.

Site Clone Notice

This site's members content is identical to Dane Jones. The members area may have subtle differences in navigation/features. We do allow reviews and comments for clones of all types, but we recommend reviewing the source site to keep them in one location.

Feedback History  (3)

Active Reviews 1
Newbie Reviews 0
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 0
Comments 2
Review by TheBestPorn:

TBP Review

Date: None

Type: None
Review Status:

No Plans Yet

There are no plans to review this site at this time.

User Reviews (1)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

slutty (111) 06-30-12  11:29pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (49), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Attractive ladies, I believe entirely european
-Good variety of material, sotfcore, lesbian, some hardcore
-Good download speeds, maxed my 10 Mbps connection
-Okay navigation. Model index, search function, scene ratings.
-Zip downloads of photo sets, in 3 sizes, 1200, 2000, 4000
-Good video quality from a technical standpoint (1920x1080 4000 kbps HD mp4, 960x540 3600 kbps SD wmv, 1280x720 4250 kbps HD wmv)
-Most videos available in 8 formats, wmv, mov, mp4, and flv. I mostly downloaded the mp4s even though it is categorized under the mobile section
-Videography and photography generally pretty well done. Decent lighting, decent focus, good camerawork in my opinon
-I like the style of most of the material, pretty much a euro copy of X-Art.
-In browser streaming works well and buffering is minimal
-Respectable biller, I had CC-Bill
-No issues with billing, no pre-checked cross sales, or problems cancelling
-I believe it is 100% exclusive content
Cons: -No bonus content
-Update frequency somewhat slow: 7 videos and 6 photosets in June
-Small site, 161 videos, 71 photosets, 80 or so female models
-Some videos had odd playback problems, the wmvs had buffering issues which I have never seen before, could be my computer I suppose
-More costly than their direct competitor
-Pop-ups on login
-No user interaction (comments, forum)
Bottom Line: For some reason this site is somewhat hard for me to rate. I feel like the content is pretty good, although it is more or less a direct copy of the style of X-Art (they originally even copied X-Arts website layout), it is reasonably well executed, albeit I dont think they did it as well as X-Art. Given that and the fact that it is a smaller site, has no bonus material, and is more expensive than this site, I feel I should score it a good bit lower, but I probably didnt score X-Art as high as I should have given my current feelings towards that place.

I think they have some really good material, and I like these new sites that feature a more erotic style of porn, and this is definitely one of them. As for the material, you will see many of the typical, perhaps more popular, euro models you see these days, as well as somewhat humorously many of the euro models that X-Art uses. They have a decent mix of somewhat older models such as Zuzana Z, Piper Fawn, Eufrat and some new favorites of mine Pinky, Caprice, Ivy and Abby are all present, although amongst these only Ivy and Zuzana Z do hardcore if that is something you are looking for. Generally speaking I find most of the models to be ranging from attractive to beautiful, with the vast majority being quite lookers. Although the models are pretty much all white (one Asian), and generally the same body type thin, athletic, and small breasted. For me the petite/small breasted part is a positive, but some more ethnic diversity would be nice.

I did not have any interaction with support, so I cannot comment on that.

It may be worth joining now if there are some models here you really like, but the site is rather small at this point so it Id probably just wait a few months to see how it grows. The current breakdown as I counted is, Photos - Solo: 22, Les: 24, HC 25; Videos - Solo:13, Les: 60, HC: 49. With videos especially there seems to be some favoritism towards HC and Les, so if you are particularly into solo videos this is probably not the place to go.

Overall, I think this site is pretty good, decent videos, decent camerawork and photography. I am glad that there are more of these erotic porn sites showing up (even if they are copying each other), and I hope they continue to become more prevalent in the future. If this is the type of site you are interested, I would definitely recommend X-Art above this one, but it is worth considering if you have already been there. If you prefer solo material, broader ethnic diversity, or more gonzo-style porn, Id probably look elsewhere.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (2)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

Drooler (218) 03-26-12  01:17pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (85), NO (0)

Well I'll Be Dane Jones!

Look at the preview shots for Orgasms.xxx. Then look at the ones for Dane Jones. It won't take too long to notice the identical content.

Now, I don't mean to be running to the kitchen to tattle on anyone. The content looks great. I just wonder why one is so much like the other.

Would these be called clones, or just fraternal twins?

Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

elephant (64) 10-15-11  08:16am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)

Now this site looks promising apart from the price difference

Just when I've been bigging up Diesel network for capturing great hardcore eroticism then another new site comes to my notice and looks like it could be very good going off the preview, its new so I might wait a while as its rather expensive if you are from the UK.

Just noticed one thing though now, one thing that bugs me this its $24.95 it says yet when I go on to join its 24.95 that is a heck of alot more, I really don't know how they can get away with doing this, its a rip off. $24.95 should be converted into nearest pound not nearly 10 more for us, why, we are not rich in the UK.

Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Orgasms.xxx

Company Sites Top sites from this company.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. Lesbea (1) 91.0 89.5
2. Massage Rooms (1) 85.0 83.0
3. Orgasms.xxx (1) 79.0 N/A
4. Dane Jones (1) 75.0 N/A
5. Casting.xxx (0) N/A N/A
6. Fake Agent (0) N/A N/A
7. Fake Hospital (0) N/A N/A
8. Fake Taxi (0) N/A N/A
9. Female Agent (0) N/A N/A
10. HD POV (0) N/A N/A

View All: Company Sites (14)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.06 seconds.