Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn
how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit Nextdoor Models

Visit Site
Nextdoor Models Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Nude Photography
2. Amateur Girls
3. Soft Content

Oliver Klozov Photography
11 Sites Listed
Partner:   Nextdoor Models Partners

Monthly: $24.97 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: $49.94 (3 months, recurring)
Multi-Mo: $100.00 (6 months, non-recurring)

View all Nextdoor Models Site Facts at TBP.

78.0
Feedback History  (3)

Active Reviews 1
Newbie Reviews 0
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 0
Comments 2
Review by TheBestPorn:

78.0
TBP Review

Date: 08-05-08

Type: Express

Spencer
+  Nice photography!
+  Updates come often.
+  Exclusive content.
-  Not a huge site.
-  No model or scene info.
-  All pages open in new window.

User Reviews (1)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Active
78
JBDICK (19) 04-05-08  01:02am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (21), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A Different format to most other sites, but honest about what it has and the girls you see when you click the link in www.pornusers.com are the girls on the site. This site was a one off visit for me because i loved the look of Adrienne, claimed on their link page to have 43 Galleries, hey I counted them so I could tell you she has 46, out of date slightly but the right reason, because they have added galleries. If you take their promotion page at face value and are happy to see girls scantily clad, in sexy girl-next door poses you will get exactly what you've asked for. There are some real exclusive gems, REALLY sexy bikinis, outfits. You get a sense of this being prudish respectable porn. My fav's are Adrienne, Desiree (looks a bit of a slut, we like), Katie (a cracker), Whitney (Boy oh Boy, sexy beyond sexy), Rachael (sexy wet see-thru green onepiece swimsuit) and Bari (please live next door to me)
Cons: There are only 69 Girls, of which approx. 15 are very dull both in looks and photoshoots, and probably do live next door to you, and you've never noticed. After a few days (i'm being kind) you navigated the simple site (2 dimensional) and seen/got what you wanted. Don't get me wrong, most of the girls are beautiful, but their shoots just don't quite make the grade compared to other sites in their category. The largest photos are 1000 x 1504. The navigation is so basic. Now, let me tell you about the real disappointment. WHERE ARE THE VIDEOS. All the videos here (and there aren't many) are suited to be played on cell/mobile phone. I think the large file I found was 60Mb. If they put the equivalent of all their photoshoots in HD-DVD quality format as 500MB-1GB sizes, they would be worthy of a High score and large memberships. They must have these videos, come on. Dissapointing overall.
Bottom Line: Do I regret joining. Not really, I wanted the photoshoots for the girls named above. Don't be enticed by the Amy Reid content 4 galleries in total (and they are so tame for Amy Reid, she probably felt like she was at church, I love Amy but when someone like her can do REALLY FILTHY and you know she loves it, what's the point of doing photoshoots like this, it's like buying a ferrari but never driving it). you know the only reason they have her there is because she will get them membership, when really they best selling point is the fact that most of the girls are Next-Door types, and you'll find it hard to see them anywhere else. Can't get over the lack of Video Quality. Can't understand that a site like this, whilst they only have 69 Girls, has the chance to be superb because of its format, but hasn't taken the opportunity to give us high-bandwidth users what we want.

Would I become a member again. If they put the HD-DVD on, YES, absolutely. caveat, for all the Girls shoots, (you know they have it stored somewhere).

Finally, This is NOT a hardcore site. It is honest about telling you if there 10 Galleries there will be at least that number. GCF. Good Clean Fun.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (2)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

Drooler (176) 06-26-09  11:51pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (59), NO (0)

Some Remarks

I returned to this site after nearly a year. They do have more full nudity than they used to, though clothed and partially nude teasing remains the staple.

One bright spot here is Lena Nicole, who gets fully undressed and shows off her sexy ass in ways I've never seen before. Have seen rather stilted posing from her at some other sites, but here she really comes through. She's put on a bit of weight, but she's still really, really sexy.

There are a couple of big negatives for this site. #1 is the WATERMARK on the photos. It's to-o-o big and gets on the girl, a LOT. Imagine looking at 5 photos in a row of a girl's face and each time having to mentally tune out this WATERMARK that gets in her hair, on her skin, etc.

I know we have to protect our wells, but doing so by poisoning them isn't such a hot idea.

#2 is the past-three-months update list. Everything before that you have to look for by viewing the content by individual model. Obviously, a complete update list, even a text-only one such as they have here, would be better for both users and the site (less server load from people scrounging through the model directory).

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Drooler (176) 06-05-07  02:51am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (59), NO (0)

Info from a former member

I've been to this one twice; last time ended early January of '07. The photo quality was usually rich with color and more recent pics maxed at 1600px. Exclusive pics, too.

Even though it's still only $19.95, I think it's mostly non- or semi-nude, which doesn't suit me, but if you like that, you should probably give it a chance.

Among the few fully nude girls, I recall Amy Reid and Riley Shy, both in very HOT sets, maybe about 3 each. Riley had several bruises (arms, back, legs) in at least one set. Don't know why (rough play? abusive asshole?), but I wish they'd waited to shoot her after giving her a chance to mend. (She really put out the sexual energy and charm, though. She's one of a kind.)

About a year ago, they showed their updates in the public area, but not now. They really ought to show them instead of just saying, "Update Schedule 3 Times / Per Week and sometimes More!" for videos and "Update Schedule 5 Times / Per Week and sometimes More!" for photos. Can't we see what we'll be getting??

Navigation was always kind of difficult, too. It's too complicated to describe, but it was annoying. Hopefully, they will fix/have fixed that.

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

RSS FeedsAll Nextdoor Models Activity - Nextdoor Models Reviews - Nextdoor Models Comments - Nextdoor Models News

Visit Nextdoor Models

Site News Updates and comments from the webmaster(s).
Company Sites Top sites from this company.

Webmaster(s):  OliverK (2)

No site news added yet.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. Nextdoor Models (1) 78.0 78.0
2. Angelie.com (0) N/A 72.0
3. Nextdoor Kristin (0) N/A 71.0
4. Tina Tina (0) N/A 66.1
5. Courtney's Camera (0) N/A N/A
6. Girls Lickin Girls (0) N/A N/A
7. Heather's Hot Spot (0) N/A N/A
8. Naughty Models (0) N/A N/A
9. Oliver's Girls (0) N/A N/A
10. Pink In The Middle (0) N/A N/A

RSS Feed : Oliver Klozov Photography Activity

View All: Company Sites (11)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.12 seconds.