| User Reviews (3) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A wide selection a different porn channels. Many typical like "sex for grades" others niche like "chubby sistas".
I am only grading massive access on the Teen sites because that what stimulates me.
Recent upgraded design.
Lots of DVDs have been added to site recently.
HD videos are easy to find. |
| Cons: |
Small videos download quickly but large files (GB) are slowed after 2-3 minutes of downloading time. |
| Bottom Line: |
I enjoy the content so it keeps me a mulit-month subscriber. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Large collection of sites
- Extremely diverse for a mainstream network
- TBP / PU discount (see note below and my comment from November 18, 2011)
- Multiple formats / resolutions available
- Streaming available
- Supports download managers
- Decent download speed
- Seems to be updating
- Good value |
| Cons: |
- Doesn’t bill through one of the better known billers (Safebilling)
- Many older videos aren’t offered in multiple formats
- Optimistic in reporting number of scenes and some scene resolutions
- Photos are not available as zips
- No anal-themed site |
| Bottom Line: |
I’m not normally a fan of mega-sites, but the discount on this one made it interesting and I wanted access to a few of the niche sites so it made sense to join. My overall impression is that it is a good site, but it over-promises and under-delivers. Not by much, and not enough for me to tell you to avoid it, but it does have some weaknesses.
It is a large network with a reported 107 sites on the covering the broadest range of fetishes I’ve ever encountered. The majority of the sites are b/g hardcore though there are scenes featuring BBWs, Black BBW, fucking machines, animated porn, food sex, midgets, MILFs, women over 60 and hairy women. There are also 13 sites featuring transsexuals. Interestingly, there are five sites of gay scenes too, which I don’t think I’ve ever seen on a primarily straight network, but given the broad range of interests they cover these don’t really seem out of place. If there could be a complaint about the diversity of sites it might be that it’s trying to be too diverse. I joined to get access to some relatively mainstream porn with attractive young lasses doing nasty things. Each midget scene (no offence meant to those of less stature) means one less scene with a more mainstream interest. The one ‘niche’ missing is anal sex. There are anal scenes scattered around, but no anal site.
You can select a tab that tells you how many scenes are in each site but unless I’m missing something their counts seem wildly optimistic. Matrix Models, for example, boasts of 1726 scenes but I only see a little over 300. That’s not bad, but to be off by a factor of six seems a bit odd. Other sites show the same optimism when giving stats on the number of scenes. It isn’t that big a deal though because there is still a lot of material here.
Videos can be streamed in three qualities and in many cases in HD. I didn’t use the streaming so I can’t comment on it. Most videos can be downloaded in either wmv or MPEG4 format. MPEG4s are offered in several resolutions, ranging from iPod quality to HD (320x210, 540x500, 640x480 and 1280x720). I prefer wmv format and most videos are offered in that format at a decent, though not stellar, resolution. One issue I have is that like the number of scenes in each site, the resolutions reported for some wmv files are a bit optimistic. I checked this with several files to make sure I just didn’t stumble on a lone file in a vast collection and found it repeatedly: the site says you’re downloading a 720x540 video but what you’re getting is 640x360 at 2100kb/s. That isn’t a huge difference, but it is enough to be noticeable and it is misrepresenting the file. I don’t download mp4 or MPEG4s usually and I didn’t much of those here either but with the MPEGs that I did download they seemed to more accurately labeled for file size.
One beef I had was that a lot of the older videos with stars I like to collect were not available in wmv format. The vast majority of material is offered in wmv – it’s mostly the stuff that was made a decade or more ago.
Pictures are also available, but they aren’t available as zips so I didn’t download any. They appeared to be mostly screencaps.
A lot of the content here is not exclusive. I found many scenes that I have from various well-known porn DVDs. If you have a huge collection of porn, particularly DVD porn, you’ll likely find some overlap. But… there is still a lot of material here but I don’t think much of it is actually exclusive. If I’m wrong I hope someone corrects this in a comment.
I’m not saying that this is good or bad, but a lot of the scenes had a watermark from Porn.com. I’m not familiar with that site but Googling it makes me think it’s a tube site. I don’t know if that is true or not, but Massive Access is definitely a membership driven site. I have no idea what, if any, connection exists between the sites.
The site appears to updating with new scenes added daily. I see in his earlier review here that Robbi81 stated that he thought the dates of scenes were being manipulated to give the impression that the site was updating when it isn’t. He didn’t explain that comment, but I have no reason to believe that the site is dormant. Even if I’m wrong, the site is worth a membership given the price and size.
Speaking of price, neither TBP or PU mention a discounted price on the Massive Access page. I’m not sure if there is a discount if you join through the main network page but I joined through one of the specific sites, My Stepdaughter Ate My Ass (yes, I’m a pervert, but so are you!) and was offered a discount that gave me access to what appears to be everything. Even if it isn’t everything, it’s still a great value.
For the few flaws the network has I’d still recommend it because at the TBP/PU discount it’s a good value. The videos aren’t exclusive and they resolutions aren’t great, but there is a lot of interesting porn here. |
| Respond: |
4 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (7) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
