Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
(*)Very attractive, classy-looking ladies
(*)Extra large resolution photos (for recent sets)
(*)No over-the-top post-processing (may not be a positive for some, but suits my tastes)
(*)Unadvertised 3GB 24 hour download limit, cannot even log into the site once you exceed it
(*)Unadvertised LARGE format-only (i.e. no EXTRA) ZIP downloads
(*)Slightly tedious ZIP download process (have to agree to never share)
(*)Softness in a lot of photo sets
(*)Photo sets from before 2009 can have the photos chopped up into separate images to prevent you from downloading the entire image
(*) Site can be slow
Overall, I was both intrigued and disappointed by this site. It features some of the most attractive ladies that I've seen to date, and generally the style suits my tastes greatly (no over photoshopping, no harsh lighting, etc.) But the downsides simply outweigh the pluses for me. For starters, the advertised EXTRA LARGE resolution is NOT available for download in zip. You can certainly open each of them in your browser and download manually, but that is quite cumbersome. Second, once you hit the 2008 and before sets, all those photos of all resolution are chopped up into 6 or more separate images, thereby preventing you from getting the EXTRA LARGE sizes manually. Also there is a 3GB per day quota that they don't tell you about until you hit it, and once you do you're locked out of the site for 24 hours. Not to mention that if you're downloading a few zips at the same time, the site slows down to a crawl. Lastly, the LARGE sizes are really quite pitiful, not even 1920px standard.
This is really disappointing as some of the hottest ladies grace this site, yet some of the best photo sets are pre-2009, meaning that I can't have them in resolutions sufficient for turning into HD wallpapers.
With increases in bandwidth, image resolutions in zip format, and also better lenses to reduce the softness of certain sets, this site could be a real gem. Pity.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (3)
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
This is a softcore teen site. Mainly photos, with a few videos.
So far only 1 review, back in Oct. 2007, by Drooler. He gave a 72 rating, meaning site barely acceptable. Since there are many sites in the 80s and 90s, it's probably not worth joining this site.
A 3-day trial (with full privileges) is $12.99. Since a 1-month membership (recurring) is $19.99, I think it's better to go for the 1-month membership. $12.99 seems expensive for 3 days, especially since I don't have the super-fast download capability of some of the PU members.
What piques my interest in the site are some of the very good-looking models. A few sample photos I've seen of some of the models look yummy.
I realize there are sites in this category that are better value (more content, greater variety of models, probably better site navigation, more frequent update schedule, etc.), but I think the site is probably worth a 1-month membership. That's personal opinion, personal taste.
Would any recent members comment with their opinion on the value of the site, whether they thought the site was worth joining or not? Their likes or dislikes about the site?
Have there been any PU members who joined this site in the last 6 to 12 months?
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.