| User Reviews (1) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Exclusive content
+Quite a few hot babes
+Some of the newer photography is really good: Justine Joli, Michelle Maylene, Nika Noire, Rebecca Linares (though some of it is on her site, too), and Leah Wilde are hot.
+Some galleries have MANY photos (but there are those excessively repeated poses)
+Two subsites included: “Club Sabrina Rose” and “One Time Babes” (this one, mostly videos, is VERY disorganized, though)
+No DRM on the videos |
| Cons: |
-“We guarantee daily high quality super sexy updates,” they say. Nonsense. 6/13, 6/11, 6/06, 6/4, 5/30, 5/28, 5/23, 5/21, 5/16, 5/14, 5/12, 5/09 ... so much for that.
-“(Including Extremely Large PHOTOS compressed in ZIP files available for download),” they say. Phooey, I say. Most newer photos are 1200px. Found only TWO galleries of the “extremely large” (3072px).
-NO ZIPS of ANY photos except for the 2 "extremely large"
-Slideshow feature doesn’t work
-Lists only the last 12 updates. To find the other dates, click on model, then on gallery; the date is under each thumbnail.
-Disorganized! Justine Joli "Fashion 1" gallery pics labeled "Fashion 2" is but one example.
-Some content is really old and looks it; 1024’s, and lower. Example: Jana Cova “Dress Up” from 2003 is 800px.
-Slow video downloads (330Kbps; ISP max is 20Mbps)
-Nominal video sizes can be misleading: Mariah Nelson “Back Alley Noir” 720x480 is actually smaller but matted in those dimensions. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is one of those sites that you like for having exclusive content, but you keep wishing it was in better hands. Pics that are too small, no zips (well, almost), amateurish design, and webmaster incompetence all make it feel like a wasted opportunity. Really, the web design is a joke. You can look at the site and see how it could be to set up in a user-friendly way instead of the sorry state that it’s actually in. Frankly, I’m amazed.
Why not have separate sections for models, photos, and videos, each with their dates posted THERE, for all of the content? This site is organized just by models (these models on page one, these on page two, etc.). And sometimes in a model page you get a video image, but click deeper and there are also photos.
The header on each gallery page of photos takes up so much vertical space that you have to scroll down to see the photo. Go to next photo, repeat ...
You’d almost think the objective was to make this site non- ... no, make that, counter- ... no, ANTI-intuitive and just plain difficult.
Low score, and well deserved, especially for 1. the statement “(Including Extremely Large PHOTOS ...,” which gives the misleading impression that much of the site has such photos, and 2. their “guarantee” of daily updates.
And actually, some content that it used to have is missing! Where are the Madison Doll, Meriah Nelson, and Rebecca Lord photosets? (Have been a member twice before, Dec. ’05 and Nov. ’06.) |
| Respond: |
4 Replies
- Add Reply
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (1) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
RSS Feeds : All Babe Centerfolds Activity - Babe Centerfolds Reviews - Babe Centerfolds Comments - Babe Centerfolds News
