Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit 18 Only Girls

Visit Site

18 Only Girls

Type: Pay Site


1. Young Adults
2. Amateur Girls

Diesel Media Online, Inc
1 Site Listed
Partner: Diesel Action

Monthly: $29.95 (recurring)
Monthly: $39.95 (non-recurring)
Multi-Mo: $99.95 (150 days, recurring)

View all 18 Only Girls Site Facts at TBP.

Feedback History  (37)

Active Reviews 2
Newbie Reviews 0
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 1
Comments 26
Review by TheBestPorn:

TBP Review

Date: 01-30-13

Type: 2.0

+  Original Content.
+  Video Quality is Really Good.
-  Personality is Lacking.

User Reviews (7)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

joekramer08 (12) 07-29-12  05:27pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: NOTE: I joined this site for the hardcore videos. I'm not a softcore guy or a photo guy, so I'm writing this review from the perspective of a guy looking for hardcore video scenes.

- A lot of hot girls. If you are familiar with the slender, tight look of European porn girls, then you will know the type of girls they feature. Many of the well known European porn girls can be found here...but this may be a bad thing if you're tired of seeing the same European girls from other sites.

- Very functional site design with all of the features you would hope to find on a modern porn site (streaming for each scene, nice search options, clean attractive layout).

- Downloadable files are offered in a nice variety of sizes and the video quality of the downloadable files is quite good.

- Fairly frequent updates...however, there is a problem with the updates, which I will cover in the "cons" below.
Cons: - There can be frustrating camera work (too many closeups and odd camera angle choices that prevent you from seeing the girl or the action).

- Not many hardcore scenes...a large portion of the scenes are softcore masturbation vids.

- They update with new content often, but the problem is that many of the updates are just a photo set with no corresponding video. I have read that Diesel Media often posts the video on their other site Young Legal Porn. This seems like an attempt to get people to subscribe to their other site in order to access the video that goes with the photo set.

- I joined this site hoping to see more "artsy" filming style advertised in the tour, but upon joining I found that many of the hardcore scenes did not have this style. Many of the hardcore scenes on 18onlygirls.com have a VERY similar look to other sites like Teen Mega World, Euro Teen Movs, and First Anal Quest - Same male actors, same girls, same camera work, etc.
Bottom Line: The hardcore scenes on 18onlygirls.com come in 2 filming styles: "artsy" and "traditional". The "artsy" scenes are filmed by 2 directors named Ray Man and Dirk Milton, while the more traditional style porn scenes are filmed by a director named Anton Rusakov.

If you check out the tour, it is clear that 18onlygirls.com advertises itself as an "artsy" site with professional, high-end camera work...but once you join you find that only a portion of their hardcore scenes feature this type of camera work. Once inside, you realize that a lot of the hardcore scenes on 18onlygirls.com are more traditional and appear to come from the same people who film scenes for other European sites like Teen Mega World and First Anal Quest - I can't confirm this, but the scenes look VERY similar to other Euro sites. On 18onlygirls.com, the director of these more "traditional" porn scenes goes by the name of Anton Rusakov. If you're at all familiar with European porn sites, you can instantly recognize the same camera work, same lighting, similar sets, and same males actors from the other European porn sites. I'm starting to wonder if all of the various European sites have their scenes filmed by the same people, then they just lease the content out. At this point I have joined a few different Euro porn networks, and most of these sites look like their scenes come from the same director and crew (scenes on 18onlygirls.com, firstanalquest.com, euroteenmovs.com, & Teen Mega World all look EXTREMELY similar). Many times I have seen the same scene duplicated on completely different European networks. One of the only Euro networks that seems to have their own unique filming style is the Teen Core Club Network.

So, if you have joined some of the popular European porn sites before, the Anton Rusakov scenes will look very familiar. I wouldn't have a problem with all of these European sites looking the same if the camera work were better. Most of these Euro sites suffer from the same frustrating camera angles. If you have read my reviews before, you know that I place a very high importance on camera angles. Camera angles are the most important part of any porn scene, because the camera angles determine if you can clearly see the sex and the girl's body...and I think we can all agree that the reason we watch porn is to see sex and girls' bodies. There's nothing worse than clicking on a new porn scene with anticipation only to be disappointed when the camera man spends large portions of the scene zooming in on just the girl's crotch and stomach, or just focuses on her ass. Then there's the dreaded face closeup. Seriously - what is the point of zooming in on a girl's face in a porn scene? I can see a girls face any time I want by just walking outside of my house. When a naked girl is having sex, I WANT TO SEE HER BODY, NOT JUST HER FACE! Why can't they zoom the camera out to show me her body AND her face at the same time? For some reason most camera men in porn still haven't figured this out. I wish all porn producers would eliminate face closeups completely. Another thing that bothers me is when a girl gives a blowjob, the camera man always feels to need to zoom in on girl's face - why not zoom out and use this opportunity to show off the girls body as she gives the blowjob? (the only site I have seen that zooms out during blowjobs is tryteens.com, so I applaud them for that). So there is some annoying camera work in the Anton Rusakov scenes. Most of these scenes are decent, but not great. There are a few gems, however, where they really nail the camera work.

So I had some frustration with traditional style "Anton Rusakov" scenes, but I found that the "artsy" scenes were actually more frustrating. The solo scenes and "artsy" hardcore scenes are filmed by 2 directors who go by the names Ray Man and Dirk Milton. I was very disappointed by the camera angles in these scenes. The film quality and lighting were excellent, but the annoying camera angles made these "artcore" scenes virtually unwatchable. I found that in these artcore scenes the camera would always be zoomed in and only focused on one part of the girl's body...so you rarely got a good view of the girl's entire figure. This was maddening to me - here you have these beautiful naked girls and they're only showing you her legs or her stomach. What the? In the artsy style hardcore scenes, the camera would often just take a side view and zoom in on just the 2 pelvises of the actors...no view of the penetration and no view of the girl's body. Ugh. You can have all expensive cameras in the world, but if you don't show the viewer what they want to see you are wasting megabytes on these scenes.

There are some decent Anton Rusakov scenes to be found here which are filmed in a more traditional style found on other European sites...but the "high-end" solo scenes and artsy hardcore scenes are almost unwatchable due to the frustrating camera work and baffling camera angles
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

lk2fireone (194) 06-11-12  09:08pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (74), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Long interval before site timeout. Useful if you want to browse site, or download files, and you pause between downloads.
-Tiny, unobtrusive watermark occasionally appears in videos at bottom right corner.
-Tiny, unobtrusive watermark at bottom right corner of some photos. The watermark is so small, you have to examine each photo, to see if it's there or not.
-Soundtrack on most videos, especially the recent ones, is clean, without a lot of extraneous sounds.
-The video quality is some of the best I've seen: great focus, crystal-sharp video, good tracking of the sex action, professional lighting, excellent colors: skin tones, etc.
-There is an alphabetical listing of the models, with a nice-sized thumbnail to show what each model looks like. A really helpful feature that makes searching through the model list so nuch easier.
-Easy site navigation. Helpful, useful hot links to get a model's appearances (videos and photosets).
-The member pages are clean, with no ads.
-No DRM.
Cons: -The cons are basically minor.
-No model biography.
-Occasionally they change the name of a model, but forget to change the title of the video or photoset she appears in. For example, the photoset named "Beata and the mirror", features the model currently named Belka, who was, evidently, named Beata earlier.
-When the models speak in a foreign language, there are no subtitles to translate. But the words spoken don't have a lot of value, anyway. The sex is what counts.
-If you post a comment, I don't see any way to edit it, for typos or whatever.
-The high-quality file size can be large. A video with a runtime of 23 minutes 12 seconds has a high-quality (1080p) size of 1.6 GB in MP4, and
1.9 GB in WMV. So you need a lot of hard drive space if you want to keep the high-quality files.
-The model page is clean, with no ads. But it would be even better if they simplified the layout. Don't post 2 different thumbnails of the model's last appearance. That's just confusing.
Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED):
A single listing of each appearance would be more intuitive and easier to understand. Also, don't put two hot links for posting a comment on tha model page. Keep the comment link at the bottom of the page, but don't put a second comment link near the top of the page: it's not needed, and just gets in the way. Keep the model page simple.

-Some of the photosets and videos may be at other networks. 2 photosets and 1 video from Nubiles were posted at 18OnlyGirls in some sort of cross-
advertising deal.

Also, some photos and videos at 18OnlyGirls were posted earlier at the Teen Mega World network. This is not cross-advertising, but 2 different networks buying the same content from the same supplier.

The video titled "Waiting To Be Ravaged", featuring Anisiya, was posted 2012-06-10 at 18OnlyGirls. The same video was posted on 2011-02-17 at teensexmovs, a Teen Mega World site. At teensexmovs the video is titled "Anisiya". The video at 18OnlyGirls has more definition choices for download, and the runtime was chopped from 24:46 to 23:12 minutes:seconds.

But the video is basically the same.

However, the model is so cute, and the scene is so hot, that I didn't mind getting a higher-definition version of the same video. And they also made the 18OnlyGirls video have better lighting, better colors, in addition to the higher definition.

So I don't think the duplicated content is bad, especially when the content at 18OnlyGirls is better quality.


Site statistics:
Number of videos: 1032
Number of photosets: 1278
Number of models: hundreds

The site preview gives the following statistics:
Number of films: 8,545
Number of images: 384,314
Number of models: 507

I don't know where the site preview is getting it's figures, because I counted the number of videos (movies), and it's far smaller. Also, based on the number of photosets, and the average number of photos in the ones I counted, the number of photos at the site in photosets is far smaller.

Having said that, you still get 1,032 videos, and 1,278 phosets.

-There are two types of live shows: "Diesel Girls Live", and "24/7 Live Channel".
"Diesel Girls Live" features Diesel models who put on a live show. The show is free, and worth watching. Only a few of the Diesel models participate, each show lasts 2 hours, and you get 1, 2 or 3 shows per day.
The "24/7 Live Channel" is a link to models who chat in both public (free) and private mode (paid). The public or free mode is basically worthless. The private (paid) mode is expensive. It's probably cheaper to go to a strip club than to pay for the private shows.

-This is a hardcore teen site. Many of the models are as cute, attractive, even lovely, as you will find anywhere. In the last few years, they have
offered excellent quality videos. The older photosets were not excellent, even when the models were attractive or cute. But the photos I've seen recently are really outstanding, and compare to what you get at Metart or MPL Studios, two sites that specialize in high-quality photos. This is mainly a video site. But if they can post outstanding photosets in the future, as they seem to be doing now, this will be a photo site as well.

I'm giving the site a score of 95. You have some of the most attractive teen models you can find. You have outstanding quality videos. The recent
photosets have improved greatly. The site is easy to navigate. You have fast download speeds. And you don't have to wade through a bunch of junk
to find the worthwhile content: you have great videos and photosets of lovely girls all over the site.
Respond: 13 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!
Archived: lk2fireone wrote 1 review (01-23-11) prior to this. Archived reviews no longer count toward score.

elephant (64) 09-18-11  02:53am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (11 Replies)

slutty (111) 12-08-10  10:06pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (49), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (8 Replies)

Goldfish (67) 10-14-10  04:26pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (45), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Denner (233) 01-11-10  06:53am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (80), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (4 Replies)

OneMan (27) 04-18-09  02:00am
Rookie Badge  Trusted User TRUST USER?   YES (33), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (26)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

Shown : 1-10 of 26 Next Page >

Monahan (38) 04-03-14  10:59pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (56), NO (0)

Lower Price

The site has a price of $29.95, not $34.95 per PU/TBP. If, after launching the preview site, you close it out without signing up, you will be offered a 20% discount to join. That yields a price of $23.96.

The PU price of $34.95 does not show up on the join page.

Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply

RLane (16) 01-24-14  02:36pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (13), NO (0)

Young Legal Porn combined to 18OG?

I noticed that Young Legal Porn link goes to 18 Only Girls, so did they combine YLP to 18OG? I want to know before I sign-up, so if it's the case.

Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Buckhead (13) 05-12-13  08:47pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (12), NO (0)

Update Question

I am debating between this and a couple of other sites (another glamcore and a more "traditional" site) and really like the look of the Diesel scenes, especially since the Wow network is now included. Also, do any of the sites get a little "edgier" with anal, bgg, bbg, etc?

However, it looks like the updates are mainly the same 5-10 girls. Am I getting the wrong impression from the previews or is this the case?

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

lk2fireone (194) 04-07-13  10:36am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (74), NO (1)

A note on Diesel Access Live Shows.

The Diesel Access Live Shows are a live chat that features models who appear on the Diesel Access network and the Wow Girls and Wow Porn sites.

The shows are free with membership to any of the Diesel Access sites, or the Wow sites.

The shows are unusual in that they are not intended to maximize the money that viewing members pay to watch the shows.

1. They do not have an option to watch the show in private mode, by paying extra money.

2. They don't even have a tipping option, where members can tip the models.

3. The models are often not just nude, but perform masturbation on camera. Rarely, a model might even have a boyfriend or stunt cock appear with her.

There were 3 shows today. The one with Mia had her performing nude, mastubating with her fingers and with a cucumber.

Mia also had a stunt cock at the end of the show who gave her a solid fucking. A creampie up her anus.

Worth taking a look, to see if you like what you see. It's free.

This is different from the connection to the commercial live chat shows that Diesel also features.

Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply

lk2fireone (194) 03-08-13  05:38pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (74), NO (1)

New membership access network went online.

I am a member of the Diesel Access network.

Previously, I had to pay separately for access to Wow Girls and Wow porn.

Now I am getting access to those two sites without paying for a separate membership.

I don't know the details of how the program works.

Maybe the webmaster can explain what the rules are, if he sees this post.

Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

lk2fireone (194) 03-06-13  11:48am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (74), NO (1)

Useful facts you might not know.

If you want to watch a live chat show on the internet, and the time is posted in UTC, you might need to convert to your local time zone.

For example:
California is GMT/UTC - 8h during Standard Time
California is GMT/UTC - 7h during Daylight Saving Time

The internet is a wonderful place, that can teach you new tricks.
And google is a good place to find answers.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

elephant (64) 02-23-13  06:30am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)

What happened to the new membership network access

Did I hear wrong but I thought I read a couple of weeks ago on the wow girls profile, Dieselman say that they were bring in a join one site get access to all the Diesel network sites, it would begin that weekend or the next, this was 2 weeks ago but no change on the website when you click join.

Is this still going to happen or did I misunderstand what was posted.

Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

Dracula (5) 02-12-13  08:18pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (14), NO (0)

Wishing they supported Roku

I'd like to subscribe, if only they supported Roku. I'll keep checking.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

rearadmiral (306) 01-30-13  06:35pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (69), NO (0)

What’s up with 18 Only Girls and Diesel Access Network lately?

This may not qualify as a comment, but I thought it made more sense here than on the forum. Apologies if you think I made the wrong choice…

18 Only Girls was reviewed at TBP today and that got me thinking about how the excellent Diesel Access sites used to be one of the best values on the internet. If you recall, if you joined through TBP / PU you not only got a $10 discount from the single-site price, but you got access to every site they had for that lower price. And the webmaster popped in to say hello once in a while.

But things are different today. 18 Only Girls is a stand-alone site with no discount for TBP / PU members. You do get access to Skinny Super Girl featuring Gloria. I’ll admit that.

But if you want access to their other signature site, Young Legal Porn, that’s a separate $30 membership. And, for some strange reason the bonus site here is also Skinny Super Girl.

The same goes for their other sites – they are all now stand-alone and $30 per month. Some don’t even offer a bonus site – not even the same one that is offered with other sites.

To further erode the sense of value, Diesel spun off a separate company with Wow Girls and now Wow Porn that use the same format and even the same models but are stand-alone sites for $30 per month.

I realize that there are some obvious possible answers here, such as their high production costs make this an expensive venture, or now that they’re established they don’t need to offer discounts, but does anyone have any inside information on why this company changed its business model so quickly? They went from being our BFF here to pretending they don’t even know us anymore.

I do realize that some of their sites offer five-month access to “all our 13 sites” but they don’t list the sites. TBP lists 14 from Diesel, so my worry is that buying a $100 five-month membership through 18 Only Girls would exclude the other main site, Young Legal Porn.

Has anyone here tried the five-month, 13-site access who might give some advice?

(Not related to this already long ‘comment,” but in my opinion one of the most sensual (and sexy) photos I have ever seen is the lead photo of Gloria on her Skinny Super Girl site where she is lying face down on a white-covered bed looking back at the camera and giving a sultry look. That photo melts every part of me except one. I only mention this because I saw her model photo on 18 Only Girls and she looks TERRIBLE. Yes she’s thin, but some of us like that. That photo makes her look anorexic. It isn’t flattering. I know she’s not to everyone’s liking, but the webmaster must have been mad at her the day he opted to use that as her promo picture.)

Sorry for the comment that turned into a rant…

Respond: 20 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

bibo (13) 01-13-13  04:55am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)

Preview is NOT what you get!

I just resubscribed to this site because some of the videos in the preview section were looking promising. However....

As serveral users already pointed out, you don't get access to the entire network anymore when you join either younglegalporn or 18onlygirls. Instead, you're getting access to 18onlygirls and superskinnygirl.com. In addition, there is now a loyality program. They give you access to the entire network when you remain a member for two months.

Now, despite the fact that I'm not a big fan of loyality programs anyways, the really annoying thing is, that the preview update section of both sites (younglegal and 18only) are showing the NETWORK updates. So you won't have access to the majority of the preview scenes when you join, because they are from sites you can't access unless you stay for 2 months (or decide to make a separate subscription of course)! Sorry to say this, but this is downright cheating in my books.

Apart from that, the price is not 29$ as stated in the review, but 23$ instead.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Shown : 1-10 of 26 Next Page >

Visit 18 Only Girls

Company Sites Top sites from this company.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. 18 Only Girls (2) 82.5 85.5

View All: Company Sites (1)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.5 seconds.