Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Exploited Moms

Exploited Moms (0)

Newbie
55*
delta69 (2) 10-25-07  12:38am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: Unique Niche content.

A handful of hot mature women doing the "dirty deed" with black men.
Cons: Horrible download speeds.

About 20% of the episodes have corrupted files, you won't see the money shot, or you will see it and the episode won't have any sound.

The webmaster will not answer you (nor fix the files) when you point out which files are corrupted.

80% of the woman are so old and unattractive that you won't want to download any episodes for weeks at a time.

If you are locked out of your account, the webmaster will NEVER help you re-gain access to your account.
Bottom Line: Extremely unattractive women dominate the site.
Poor quality of videos.
Broken links mean that 1 in 4 of the episodes are unviewwable or there is no sound.
Completely unresponsive webmaster. Nothing will get fixed and you will be frustrated.
Pay for one month only and RUN!
Check out the Darien Ross episodes or the Anjelica or Mrs. Fun episodes and tell me you're happy with no sound or completely distorted video episodes!

Reply To Review

Review Replies (3)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Jay G (65) Good warning review. Too bad a site like that: where the webmaster doesn't respond to problems there should be a "ZERO" score. Thanks for the warning!
10-25-07  12:30pm

Reply To Message

2

delta69 (2) REPLY TO #1 - Jay G :

This site does not accept reviews below a certain score. I had to bump up the score in order for my review to even be accepted for posting.
10-28-07  09:49pm

Reply To Message

3

host2626 (0) "Extremely unattractive women dominate the site."

I resubscribed recently and this is still the case 2 years later.

The site is called "exploitedMOMs". OK, technically, the term "MOM" goes from the age a woman is able to start procreating (and some porn studios don't mind casting the same girls in what they are calling "MILF" movies then in their next "Teen" release), up to the life expectancy, so technically the site name is not wrong.

Then, maybe I am mistaken, but for me the term "exploitedmoms" conveys a notion of "MILF". Usually this means a woman from 30 to about 50, and the "LF" part of "MILF" entails a certain degree of attractiveness. But for every Syren De Mer and Whitney Wonders there are 20 ugly, fat/obese and wrinkled grandmas that look way over 60. Not my cup of tea, some may like it, but then the site should be clearly targeted and called "exploitedgrandmas". I definitely cannot imagine myself having a running subscription to this site, as looking their update schedule I wouldn't have wanted to download anything from there for the last 6 months or so, and probably one scene every 2-3 months in the prior period.

08-22-09  02:07am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.