Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan (1)

Active
85
DivBZero (13) 10-17-07  02:10pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: The Image quality on this site is outstanding. In particular resolution and depth of field are stellar. The detail is of 'pore and folicle' at 3506 x 2336.

The predominately 'euro' models are truly gorgeous and well presented in both Solo and Girl-Girl mode.

Some videos are HD at 1280x720 and well encoded.

The update and rentention policy means there is a lot of content available.
Cons: The sets are split into episodes which tend to be short and of varying progression. Sometimes there is a lot of progress and in others there are many similar images.

Sometimes the action is so rude it gets 'gyno' and not erotic. In particular the 'fists and speculum' series can have an almost sterile edge to them.
Bottom Line: This is a technically good site with good fit models and commendable rudeness. It undoubtably deserves praise.

For this reviewer however the "frisson per set" ratio was low and gave an overall feeling of detachment.

More smiles, cheekiness. toys that match the outfits, sets and proportions of the models would be nice. If only Suburban Amateurs could deliver Alsscan's technical image excellence.

This is my honest review, not sure why I made it since I suspect the trust rating will get a bashing from fans!

Cheers DivBZero

Reply To Review

Review Replies (3)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Robare (6) WHAT??? Someone awarded fewer points than I did?!?!? Where's that auto-distrust button?!? :)
Besides, why would you think someone would get mad at you? You are what you are, an illegal operation. I suppose one could blame the programmer, if one must, but you owe your existence to a shoddy code review for which you cannot be faulted. :)
Some sites appeal to some and not to others. What appeals at one point in life can be different than what appeals at another. At least you avoided my current pet peeves so thanks for your input.

10-18-07  04:16pm

Reply To Message

2

PinkPanther (46) REPLY TO #1 - Robare :

This seemed like a fair review to me, though I disagree with it on key points, ALS Scan being a site that I compare all other younger women sites to for excitement factor. I actually find that this site is good at showing the lighter-humored aspects of their models. I don't believe that any other site has ever show-cased Susana Spears as being such a cheerful woman as ALS Scan did, instance.

Their Caribbean 2006 material is just wonderful at showing hot gorgeous women having fun in between the fisting and peeing and all that stuff - they certainly do a better job at this than FTV Girls, from what I've seen of that site's materials.

The excitement factor really is a matter of taste, though, and I wouldn't ding you for having different tastes than I do, since your review was fair and straight-forward.

10-18-07  07:13pm

Reply To Message

3

Robare (6) REPLY TO #2 - PinkPanther :

I agree ALSScan has been doing a good job of portraying some of the more fun aspects. The most recent Caribbean trip is certainly one of the highlights of the work done thus far. I think the fun level has certainly been increasing over the past months. But, I think there's a slightly different focus between the ALS and FTV sites.
For one thing, FTV is oriented predominantly towards presenting the single female. There are occasional interactions between the model and an associate of the site, such as Allison or Lia. And there is a small percentage of girl-girl work presented. But, every model that appears on that site has the opportunity to be presented in real-world contexts: out at a restaurant, park, countryside, etc., in addition to their sexual activity. And, I think the limitation on the amount of girl-girl on FTV has been almost exclusively due to the desires of the models, who are almost all amateurs.
A majority of ALS models are still only presented in their sexual activities. I can say, though, that ALS has been making improvements in this area. And, as for their girl-girl work, it has been largely centered around a core group of girls. This does not tend to diminish the enjoyment of the work for most, and it does tend to increase the fun level due to the dynamics of familiarity between the models. But, that's something FTV is not as well poised to capitalize on as the focus of the site is predominantly amateurs and not the well-ensconced models such as Nella, Jana, Faith, and Carli.
I used the term "improvement" and it's a subjective usage. Some are going to prefer only sexual presentations but I prefer a more well-rounded presentation. Still, I recognize DivBZero gave an honest (if largely subjective) review and, by that I mean, didn't resort to presenting falsehoods in his review. I wish I could say the same about some others on here.

10-19-07  10:57am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.