Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Amateur Allure

Amateur Allure (2)

Newbie
65*
xtb500 (2) 02-19-14  02:47pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Video quality, (1280x720@4,5MBit) not great but ok and worth the "HD" label.
Lots of scenes.
Cons: Camera work and light, way to bright on the closeups and very unnatural light.
Downloaded ~20 of the later scenes and so far i am pretty sure i saw most or even all girls already somewhere else.
The "male talents" are below "porn standard".
(No big loads or big dicks but a lot of self stroking instead)

Download speed only ~1,5MB most of the time.

Background music, in most scenes only very silent and no problem but in some it is really annoying.
Bottom Line: The only thing that should be "Amateur" (the girls)is mostly not but the rest is, like male talent and camera work/light.
Not a good combination, also scenes are VERY repetitive.

Maybe some of the older scenes are better but the newer ones are definitely no reason to stay a member for me.

Worst for me is the camera work, i usually like close ups but if they are so bright that the skin of the girls looks like paper they are just annoying, make me want to wear sunglasses in front of my TV.
Combined with weak male performers, slow downloads, background music and boring scenes this site makes more wrong than right.

Edit:
Others write about 1920(1440)x1080@8-12MB Videos.
Best i can download is 1280x720@4,5MB and also 720 is the highest setting for streaming.
Looks not bad but is not the best HD out there.

No idea why others report different, maybe they downgraded or you need to be member for longer to get access to higher quality ?

Reply To Review

Review Replies (1)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

rearadmiral (328) I was a member there until just a week ago and was a bit surprised to read some of the problems you wrote about in your review.

When I reviewed the site I did note that a lot of the videos are 1920x1080, and they are. But when I went digging around in the site it appears that I missed something. It looks like that back in June 2013 the site stopped uploading the 1920 videos and went with a lower 1280 resolution. In terms of numbers though, I downloaded about 280 scenes and of those 235 were in 1920 resolution and only 32 were in 1280. You wrote that youíve only downloaded around 20 scenes, so if youíre working your way back into the catalogue you wouldnít have hit the 1920 scenes yet. Try going back to the ďVeronicaĒ scene that was uploaded on June 7 and I think youíll find thatís around when they stopped uploading the 1920.

I donít know what to say about the download speeds you experienced because I didnít experience that at all. My download manager is maxed out at 11MB/s and thatís what I saw consistently.

As for the music, Iíve watched 40 to 50 of the scenes and never noticed it at all. I checked again and it is there, but itís pretty faint in the few scenes where I listened for it. Maybe in some of the newer scenes that you have theyíve turned up the volume on that. If so, Iím with you: loud background music is a mood killer.

I also agree that the models faces can be washed out with too much lighting on the close ups. That doesnít happen in every scene, but it does detract when it is there.

I canít dispute some of your other concerns because we just have different opinions. I donít consider the male talent to be below standard, but then the only thing I look for in male talent is the understanding that their job is to show off the female. To me, male talent is part of the set. On that measure, the guys here pass the test. The stroking is annoying, but itís so common in porn that Iíve just learned to accept it. I wish I didnít, and you obviously feel that way too.

I think everyone agrees that the scenes are repetitive. There is a strict formula and it gets followed in 95% of the scenes. Thatís something else Iíve learned to live with in porn. I like massage and BDSM sites and theyíre pretty repetitive too. I deal with that by avoiding watching a bunch in a row.

Finally, as for the lack of amateur talent, most of these women have done a few other scenes, but mot many, so Iím okay with that. The few big-name porn stars that appear at the peak of their career are listed as such so the site isnít trying to pull a fast one. Most of the other stars who appear here look to be very early in their careers. I find that a positive to get an early scene of a girl I like.

Iím glad you added your review to give another side to some of the glowing reviews. No one will ever complain about having too much information before deciding to buy a membership.

02-21-14  03:19pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.