Review Replies (1)
|Replies to the user review above.
I was a member there until just a week ago and was a bit surprised to read some of the problems you wrote about in your review.
When I reviewed the site I did note that a lot of the videos are 1920x1080, and they are. But when I went digging around in the site it appears that I missed something. It looks like that back in June 2013 the site stopped uploading the 1920 videos and went with a lower 1280 resolution. In terms of numbers though, I downloaded about 280 scenes and of those 235 were in 1920 resolution and only 32 were in 1280. You wrote that youíve only downloaded around 20 scenes, so if youíre working your way back into the catalogue you wouldnít have hit the 1920 scenes yet. Try going back to the ďVeronicaĒ scene that was uploaded on June 7 and I think youíll find thatís around when they stopped uploading the 1920.
I donít know what to say about the download speeds you experienced because I didnít experience that at all. My download manager is maxed out at 11MB/s and thatís what I saw consistently.
As for the music, Iíve watched 40 to 50 of the scenes and never noticed it at all. I checked again and it is there, but itís pretty faint in the few scenes where I listened for it. Maybe in some of the newer scenes that you have theyíve turned up the volume on that. If so, Iím with you: loud background music is a mood killer.
I also agree that the models faces can be washed out with too much lighting on the close ups. That doesnít happen in every scene, but it does detract when it is there.
I canít dispute some of your other concerns because we just have different opinions. I donít consider the male talent to be below standard, but then the only thing I look for in male talent is the understanding that their job is to show off the female. To me, male talent is part of the set. On that measure, the guys here pass the test. The stroking is annoying, but itís so common in porn that Iíve just learned to accept it. I wish I didnít, and you obviously feel that way too.
I think everyone agrees that the scenes are repetitive. There is a strict formula and it gets followed in 95% of the scenes. Thatís something else Iíve learned to live with in porn. I like massage and BDSM sites and theyíre pretty repetitive too. I deal with that by avoiding watching a bunch in a row.
Finally, as for the lack of amateur talent, most of these women have done a few other scenes, but mot many, so Iím okay with that. The few big-name porn stars that appear at the peak of their career are listed as such so the site isnít trying to pull a fast one. Most of the other stars who appear here look to be very early in their careers. I find that a positive to get an early scene of a girl I like.
Iím glad you added your review to give another side to some of the glowing reviews. No one will ever complain about having too much information before deciding to buy a membership.
Reply To Message
|*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.
- Terms & Rules
- Porn Review
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.
Loaded in 0.01 seconds.