Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Polls Daily polls where users can vote and give their opinion!

What is the minimum photo resolution you can possibly enjoy (assuming excellent model and prefect composition)?

Type: Content

Submitted by LPee23 (13)
350x500 0% 0 Votes
640x480 14% 3 Votes
900x600 5% 1 Votes
1200x800 59% 13 Votes
2000x1200 9% 2 Votes
3000x2000 14% 3 Votes

Reply to Poll
Register to Vote!

22 Votes Total

Feb 19, 2014

Poll Replies (4)

Replies to the user poll above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Capn (28) 1200 x 800 is sufficient.

Cap'n :0)

02-19-14  01:04pm

Reply To Message

2

atila9999 (0) 1200x800 enough for me
02-19-14  03:02pm

Reply To Message

3

LPee23 (13) 1200x800 seems to be winning so far. Maybe because that's the size that starts to show up as a full screen on a good sized monitor? Of course, bigger can be much, much better, and I like to see active sites shooting in 3000x2000, but I still enjoy some of my older pics that are much smaller.

I have some older stuff in 900x600 that is among my absolute favorites from the early days that still looks quite good.

The absolute limit for me is 640x480. Actually, 99.9% of stuff at this size is too low res for me to possibly enjoy, but there are a couple of rare shots in my collection that are so amazing in their content that despite this low resolution, they still are enjoyable. It probably helps that I first laid eyes on them back when that resolution was the norm.

Below 640x480, it doesn't really matter what the picture shows, it's really not possible for me to enjoy those. I might look at one and say that it was an interesting shot, and wish it was done in higher resolution, but I just cannot get past the low quality with photos like that. Sure, I still keep what I have from the early days, but with photos this small, it's for "historic value" only. I think I am wise to keep this stuff, because some of it is so old it is impossible to find now.

02-19-14  06:41pm

Reply To Message

4

Drooler (220) I've been really digging the facial expressions of some models, and I like to zoom in them, so I chose 3000x2000. Sometimes a nice expression is in a rather distant shot.

Oh, that's true for other aspects as well.

02-22-14  02:30pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.