Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Matt\'s Models

Matt's Models (0)

Denner (233) 09-22-07  10:37am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (80), NO (0)

A 90,8 for this site?????????

Honestly, friends at TBP!
I don't get it. From a users point of view - how can you guys at TBP honor this site with an average of 90,8?
The content should be in the 70...and that's better than fair...

The photos are not swell and most of the videos are just bad/average.

This is one of the FEW situations at TBP (and thank you!) where I have just a slight idea of somethings are not right.
This site is NOT worth the high points at TBP - 90,8- for me it looks like an inflation in points....
Don't you guys wonder why it's so much less among us users????
I'm with DigglerFL on this one: Poor photos and poor videos.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (11)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

DigglerFL (17) Its business. Notice they have a special price?

The concept that Matt's "couldn't be better" is patently absurd, so getting 4 90s completely discredits EVERY ONE of TBP's reviews. They should consider what these deal's are doing to the integrity of their site. A good review site MUST be detached from doing business with the sites they are reviewing. While getting special deals for their readers is a good thing, the price they pay: the believability of their reviews, might be a bad financial move in the long run. They should learn a lesson from Rodney.

09-22-07  11:23am

Reply To Message

2

Drooler (218) Here, here! I don't get that 90.8 either. The folks at TBP have explained why, but you know, I still just don't get it.

I do wonder if Matt himself is reading this stuff. I've just gone through some of his exchanges with some other people who've been critical of his site. He tends to take a rather hard tone with them! He really trashed Mudman's review, for instance. I think it says a lot about the guy (Matt, I mean). Talk about having a chip on the shoulder! Whew!

I won't be rejoining it anyway. I just don't care for the one thing about it that matters most: the quality of the content. And no Matt, should you be reading this, I won't go into detail to support that statement. Wouldn't be worth my time. If you don't get it by now, what difference would it make?

09-22-07  11:26am

Reply To Message

3

Denner (233) REPLY TO #1 - DigglerFL :

Well, DigglerFL - I'm with you all the way.
And your word here is: Integrity.
I hope your point of view is heard by our hosts!

09-22-07  12:55pm

Reply To Message

4

Denner (233) REPLY TO #2 - Drooler :

Wauw - Drooler is sharpening his pen! (again)

What a reply!

09-22-07  01:01pm

Reply To Message

5

jd1961 (95) REPLY TO #2 - Drooler :

You can see his reply to "Ragingbuddhist" right here at PU. I don't need to be giving my money to someone who treats the paying customer like sh1t.This old school porn business attitude of "you'll take it and like it" is pathetic. It's no wonder that porn sites are so hit and miss.
09-22-07  06:39pm

Reply To Message

6

Drooler (218) REPLY TO #5 - jd1961 :

I read through that exchange with RagingBuddhist, too. Matt said that the problems RagingBuddhist was having should just have been communicated with the support at Matt's site, rather than the review statements (e.g., about slow navigation) being posted ahead of that.

Excuse me? It's like saying, "Don't you know that that's the only way it should be done?" I don't see it written anywhere at PornUsers that we're always supposed to contact support about problems before we write reviews. Like it or not, that's not the only way it IS done.

And Matt asserted, with a seemingly absolute conviction, that the navigation problems were user-related. How the hell would he know that? He didn't know what kind of system and internet connection RagingBuddhist had.

Anyway, all Matt had to do was say, in a friendly tone, "Please contact us about the problems you're describing and we'll work with you." Instead, he got very belligerent and badgered the shit out of, well, one of US!

If the exchange is going to be like that out in public, how would it be privately? Friendly? Supportive? Patient? Somehow, I have doubts.

09-22-07  07:16pm

Reply To Message

7

jd1961 (95) REPLY TO #6 - Drooler :

I always compare the webmasters to the guy at Babelicious. He appreciates the paying customer.
09-22-07  07:22pm

Reply To Message

8

PinkPanther (44) REPLY TO #7 - jd1961 :

Good point - High praise is due to Shap at Twisty's and the Captain at Nubiles as well.
09-24-07  08:28pm

Reply To Message

9

Matt Frackas (5)
Webmaster
""I don't get it. From a users point of view - how can you guys at TBP honor this site with an average of 90,8?"

The answer to this question is The Best Porn and all the other review sites that rate Matt's Models so highly, review hundreds if not *thousands* of sites. That's their JOB.

They've seen the good, the bad, the rip offs, fraud and everything under the sun. They know they're business. They have an unbiased perspective.

They rate Matt's Models comparatively & objectively to the entire scope of adult pay sites on the net.

They don't base their reviews on a handful of sites they might have joined, a technical problem, personal taste, or the temperament of the owner :)

- Matt

09-24-08  03:16pm

Reply To Message

10

Denner (233) REPLY TO #9 - Matt Frackas :

Sorry it took some time to reply to this:
First: It's been quite some time since I wrote my review based on a membership way back.
I did not get back again - simply because the site did not appeal to me - at that time.
Maybe things have changed radical and may it's time to take another look....

09-30-08  06:50am

Reply To Message

11

drranger (1) I am confused. I have never been apprised of a download limit for this site and today my IP was blocked until tomorrow because of bandwith usage. There is nothing on the site indicating bandwith usage limits.

While I am not a fan of the navigation, the quality of the wmvs, or the puny pics, I did like the cheap price to look at amateur talent.

But how the heck is any site worth it when the block you with no notice. Even Reality Kings has let the reviewers and the users know that their is a limit and I can't stand Reality Kings.

04-30-09  01:07pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.