Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Naughty America

Naughty America (2)

jberryl69 (12) 02-08-13  02:53pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (26), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Thousands of scenes (in excess of 5200) dating back to at least to 2004

They update between one and three a day.

Some of the updates are ReMastered older material but since they put update as the current date, it is impossible to tell how old it is.

$9.95 for first month

Newer scenes (2012) in HD (1080p & 720p)

Vanilla porn
Cons: Older scenes (2007 and earlier) are of the quality equal to the worst tube sites.

Nothing changes except the players putting out Vanilla Porn.

A lot of their scenes in 2011 & 2012 have downloads of 1080p & 720p in a format of f4v which means another player (I think - I didn't pursue it much)

Very little wet oral or anal sex (less than 10% of all videos have anal sex) .
Bottom Line: "Nobody" "Nobody" "Nobody Does it Better"

If you like your porn vanilla by the numbers porn then you need go no further than this site. There is nothing wet or slippery about this site. While each scene is set up as a fantasy, it's nothing more than a set up for the same Old Routine.

Scene setup, oral, reverse cowboy, doggy, missionary, oral, cowboy, pop shot. The only thing that differs are the players. (Without ever joining, SexArt has better fantasy, production quality and looks so much better - and this just from doing the tour.)

The enthusiasm of the players is non existent. No heat. Even though they get a good line up of mainstream performers they don't let them loose.

Frankly I got bored real quick. I downloaded 3 scenes that interested me. The reason I went there to begin with was a scene with Rachel Milan with two guys and that was an anomaly cause that seldom happened - actually 4 times was there any DP.

And of course, for me and my niche, while they claim over 1200 scenes of deepthroating, they are very delusional in making such claims. I found only one worthy of beat material (Kitty Bella & Randy Spears). And, they had some outstanding deep throaters in attendance.

A lot of times I found the camera work wretched - like when the oral is going on, the camera operator pans down away from the action to look at something and back up rather than pulling out from the close up. The perfect example of this is Katsumi throating Bruce Venture and the operator pans down for a shot of her tits. Like, wtf dude?

I quit the site after this continually happened as I found it extremely irritating and totally unprofessional.

That about sums it up. My rating is subjective to my tastes and though I am open to evaluating different sex scenes outside of my niche, I'm parched after spending a couple of weeks on this site.

There might be something for some of our readers (I highly recommend Slutty's review below), but not for me and thus I can't even give it a "might recommend" score.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (14)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


hodayathink (18) FLV is just a flash wrapped mp4 file. Literally any program that can play an mp4 file can play an FLV file. No extra player needed.

Everything else you said is subjective, so I won't say anything else about it. I will agree that if you prefer your porn on the harder side of hardcore, then this definitely isn't the place for you.

02-08-13  05:45pm

Reply To Message


jberryl69 (Disabled) REPLY TO #1 - hodayathink :

I agree - I'm into something with "life" to it - not robots.
02-08-13  07:48pm

Reply To Message


hodayathink (18) REPLY TO #2 - jberryl69 :

I don't need anal or deepthroating or DPs or yelling and screaming for a scene to have "life" in it. Passion doesn't have to mean screwing violently across the room. While I will definitely agree that the sex is vanilla, I would never say that it's primarily lifeless or robotic.
02-08-13  07:56pm

Reply To Message


jberryl69 (Disabled) REPLY TO #3 - hodayathink :

I'm going to have to agree with your reference to screaming and yelling. I especially hate the European Hiss & Awe that tends to permeate their porn and I hate too much noisy crap in American porn too.

My reference to the robotics is that it's porn by the numbers. And when the moke can't keep a boner it's a big indication of no heat.

Though you disagree, I will not make a recommendation to the site though I did encourage people to read slutty's review since it is 180° from mine.

While my feelings about how bad the sex is on this site is adamant, I realize it's subjective to my personal tastes.

As far as what the style that I like, it's more like what Winston & Jonni do in their oral scenes and the scenes that Scott Hancock shoots on Throated. I have yet to join a facial abuse, though it has some pretty good throating, it would require a great deal of editing on my part to put together any valuable material to keep. And a site like Youngthroats is just too much adolescent torture pranking going on.

02-09-13  09:54am

Reply To Message


RagingBuddhist (65) I can't tell you how much I love to see reviews and comments like this. I've been fed up with mainstream, run-of-the-mill porn for years. It's good to see more people getting on board the "we want something else train". Maybe things will change one day. One day...
02-11-13  04:48pm

Reply To Message


jberryl69 (Disabled) REPLY TO #5 - RagingBuddhist :

I know! I have things I'd give my left nut to see.

I was fantasizing about a true spit roast where she gets dp's and does deep throat all the way down - repeatedly - Not some frantic face fucking, but just some slow and deep penetration she can handle - NO ONE does this.

I can think of only one star who actually tried this some - Alicia Angel in a five way... and still they didn't take their time. Oh well, so much for my fantasy of the day.

PS - Blowbangs should be this way too - slow and thorough and not over the top - something where you can focus on the actual blowjob rather than her being passed back and forth. I just saw Jonni Darkko's trailer for Wet Food 4 which is a blowbang and it is way too frantic for me to enjoy. Not that I wouldn't watch, don't get me wrong, but I'd never download it.

This is one of the reasons I don't usually like two on one - the best I ever saw at that was Scott Hancock & Chris Strokes taking individual turns with Rebecca Blue (Throated.com) - nothing rushed about that one!!

02-11-13  05:05pm

Reply To Message


jberryl69 (Disabled) REPLY TO #5 - RagingBuddhist :

Not only that, I also think that most producers, videographers, and performers have no fucking clue about what is hot. Drives me fucking crazy.
02-11-13  07:41pm

Reply To Message


RagingBuddhist (65) REPLY TO #6 - jberryl69 :

"Not some frantic face fucking"
"slow and thorough and not over the top"

Which is why I cherish the classic porn I transferred from VHS to digital. Mostly slower paced and realistic scenes (if you can overlook things like a woman going down on a guy who was threatening to shoot her). The plots may have been out there, but the sex was, for lack of a better word right now, smoother.

02-11-13  08:30pm

Reply To Message


jberryl69 (Disabled) REPLY TO #8 - RagingBuddhist :

Yeah - I'll have to think of a term for it.

I remember a scene with Jamey Robbins and Ron Jeremy where they are playing fuck face with her face and it is delightfully paced - enough where you can see it distinctly sliding back and forth down her throat.

As it is, one of the reasons I edit productions is to slow down the action. I'm not much into anal, but seeing Lily LaBeau squat her asshole down on Mike Adriano's cock needs to be slowed down.

Off topic - do you think Adriano asks girls not to fully throat him, thus giving the illusion that his cock is larger and more unmanageable than it really is? These thoughts have been creeping through my head lately.

I think when the invented Gonzo it equated out to Frantic Maneuvers. I think it only is suppose to mean, NO Plot. There are things I really like about Gonzo with the definition of no plot, inasmuch as plot tends to interfere with the sex.

Though I like the sound and feel of SexArt (lush for a better word) it probably is not a site I would subscribe to.

02-12-13  07:56am

Reply To Message


RagingBuddhist (65) REPLY TO #9 - jberryl69 :

Do I think Adriano asks girls not to fully throat him? I don't think I could name one current porn star. Even if I could, I doubt I'd remember a guy's name.

And yeah, gonzo is definitely all about no plot. But I don't mind there not being a plot nearly as much as I hate the abusive sex that's so common these days. If you're looking for something on the slower side, I'd recommend having a look at Joymii. Artfully done and not crazy fast, wham-bam-without-a-thank-you-ma'am.

02-12-13  08:48am

Reply To Message


MiztaBlu (28) I respect if you didnt like the site, but this is what NA is, for better or worse. They are like the Playboy of hardcore porn. They are straight forward and yes, pretty vanilla, but thats personally how I like it. One of the commenters said that things need to change...in some ways they do, but not everyone wants to see anal and DPs....I personally hate both....so NA is great for my tastes, and for many others as well.

If its not your thing, so be it. There are alot of sites that cater to the things you seem to like.

03-18-13  01:47pm

Reply To Message


jberryl69 (Disabled) REPLY TO #11 - MiztaBlu :

I thought I pointed out in my review that it was my subjective opinion. Plus, since it wasn't such a sterling a review, I directed people to check out Slutty's review since he took the opposite view.

Last paragraph of the review:
"There might be something for some of our readers (I highly recommend Slutty's review below), but not for me and thus I can't even give it a "might recommend" score."

Porn site reviews are similar to movie reviews. As an example, Rex Reed bashed both Silver Linings Playbook AND Jennifer Lawrence (going so far as to say "There's nothing wrong with the overrated Jennifer Lawrence that some serious acting lessons couldn't improve.") I, 92% of the critics on Rotten Tomatoes and apparently the Academy disagreed, but I know that is just Rex Reed.

All in all, I think it was an accurate assessment of the site and my reaction to it. I don't believe I said anything that was untrue.

03-18-13  02:09pm

Reply To Message


MiztaBlu (28) REPLY TO #12 - jberryl69 :

Not sure what you are getting at. I never once claimed what you said wasnt accurate or that you werent entitled to your opinion. I simply said that NA is what it is, and they arent going to change. Ive been a member of NA for years and have requested new things, yet they do everything pretty much the same. Alot of things have improved, but they are still extremely straightfoward, but Id rather have that than a bunch of anal and DP stuff.

And actually, my comment wasnt even directly aimed at your review, but in general based on some of the stuff I read in the comments section.

03-18-13  03:05pm

Reply To Message


jberryl69 (Disabled) REPLY TO #13 - MiztaBlu :

Oh... sorry - I sort of thought it was directed to me since it appeared in my New Replies box. Have a good day.
03-18-13  04:48pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.