Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Holly Randall

Holly Randall (1)

cjd2004 (0) 01-25-13  05:23am
Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (0)

HollyRandall.com to be Managed by Met-Art

Holly revealed earlier this week that she has finalised a deal with Met-Art to become part of their network:
http://xbiz.com/news/158750

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (5)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

otoh (54) Interesting news indeed! I've been a member of her site before, and whereas it's more glam-porn-y than my usual taste, I do have a fondness for it. Seems Met Art are definitely branching out into more racy material... which can only be a good thing IMHO, given the banality (purely subjective!) of the main site.
01-25-13  06:29am

Reply To Message

2

lk2fireone (194) I'm currently a member of Metart. Years ago it was just Metart and Metmodels. I knew they had added a few other sites recently, but didn't realize how many they have added. I hope it increases the financial stability of the Metart site itself, which is my favorite site for softcore photography. A lot of sites fall on hard times, and either go out of business or become archive sites that no longer update.

And now, Metart is not just a mega-site by itself, but is becoming a mega-network.

01-25-13  07:41am

Reply To Message

3

luv lickn clit (19) Thanks for the link cjd. Holly Randall is definitely something different for Met-Art. It will be interesting to see how they redesign the site. Did you also see they are now managing ALS Scan and Viv Thomas? I had never heard of xbiz.com--very cool site.
01-25-13  05:27pm

Reply To Message

4

Drooler (218) Holly Randall has good content, but for me it hasn't had the same draw as MetArt. Hopefully, this affiliation will give the Holly Randall content a boost. Two things would help in the process. One is to make sure that the HR site (or sites) are as web-friendly as the MetArt sites are. Just look at the difference between them. MetArt has a nice, subdued visual approach, whereas the Holly Randall site is garish and cluttered. They clearly speak in two very different visual languages.

The second is to make the approach to the photography, especially the types of poses, more consistently like MetArt's as well.

01-26-13  04:00pm

Reply To Message

5

PinkPanther (44) REPLY TO #4 - Drooler :

They seem to be taking their re-design of sites slowly. It's been several months since ALS Scan announced their partnership with MetArt, which was to include a complete re-design. There has been very little change in ALS Scan's site since then.

I'd be very surprised - and disappointed - if MetArt got involved enough in Holly's site to start dictating the posing of the models.

Holly's a pro, she certainly knows what she wants to do with her models. Teaming with MetArt will give Holly the greater financial resources that they can contribute.

The main reason I like it is the nice-sized non-Manwin firewall being built around a group of high-quality sites.

01-26-13  11:13pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.