Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls (2)

IKnoPorn (22) 09-04-07  10:36pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (24), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Very high quality videos
* Major reality: personal model comments, real performances, they claim to be just being themselves
* Unmistakable, professional style
* A TON of content: 100's of models, 30 minutes video on average per model
* Original site design: Each model has her own descriptive magazine cover
* Comments from videographer are humorous, especially when he describes his difficulty controlling himself
* Some famous models in a different light then you would see them elsewhere
Cons: * Photo sets are small compared to other sites, and are often just recaps of the videos
* A bit too kinky for some: speculums, cucumbers, squash, fruit, shoes, panties, bottles, garden hoses...pregnancy?
* Some model comments are a little too real, some attitudes are a real turn off in my opinion
* Some might find some shoots boring: Going out to dinner, talking, shopping...hey, I'm not on a date here!
* The same video formula followed for many models
* Could use more international women
Bottom Line: It's difficult to say something new about FTV girls: High quality content, hot models, original ideas, very professionally done, weird object insertions...

I've had my eye on this site for years, but never joined. With all due respect to the site, the parade of panty stuffing, fruit and vegetable experiments, shoe heels (ouch!), bottles, garden hoses, gynecologist's office examinations, and even the occasional pregnancy I think cross over the line from arousing and end up more in the fetish/circus category. Obviously the subscribers like it, it is always tastefully done. You can tell the models would never do anything they didn't want to, so perhaps I'm just being old fashioned. To each his own I guess.

Also questionable is the several minutes of video of each model walking around, flashing, going shopping, eating... Personally I find this boring, but again to each his own.

However, there is a TON of awesome solo content more in line with conventional tastes. The models masturbate "as they would at home" and this is where the site really shines, letting the models do what comes naturally. Often they wear their own clothes and have input into how the sets are photographed and filmed.

Just like some dates don't go well, some models have an attitude problem! This may be a turn off for some, but hey, you still get to see her naked.

Bottom line: Grab some tissues and get ready for reality. Check your glamour fantasies at the door. High speed connection a must.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


apoctom (145) I second the comments about it being more fetish than glamour. However, that's part of the attraction: that you can find glamour-type photos and movies of insertions and pregnant girls.
09-05-07  09:00am

Reply To Message


IKnoPorn (22) REPLY TO #1 - apoctom :

Thanks for the comment. Yes you are right - this site is very original and appeals to a variety of tastes.

Trouble is, the site becomes extremely repetitive. As kinky and outrageous as it gets, it does the same things over and over again: interview, makeup, go shopping, panty stuffing, masturbation, maybe some weird object insertions, then go on to the next model and find the same thing again. Even in the same actual locations! Resorts in Arizona, or that living room with the bar and the chair, or that shower. How many models have been in the exact same surroundings?

I don't mean to sound negative, but this is the first site I've joined like this that I actually got bored with about half way through the site. Usually I go through an entire site in a month, downloading what I like and saving it for later. This time however, I went through 2 of the 4 alphabetical model indexes, and I'm done. I'm going to cancel.

Maybe I'll join again one day, I guess it's just not my thing.

Which is sad, the site is very professional and well done, but between the kink and the repetition of the same kink with almost every model, I'm done.

09-11-07  10:34pm

Reply To Message


apoctom (145) REPLY TO #2 - IKnoPorn :

I completely understand your frustration. You are right: there is a lot of repetition in locale and activities between models. It has been a while since I was a member, so the situation could have gotten worse.
09-12-07  07:29am

Reply To Message


williamj (9) I was a memeber for two months and really explored the site. If I was to write a review my thoughts would have been similar to all the other reviewers. FTV is worth a look but its a once and done site. The pic's are good but they need to use better equipment. Alison is annoying with her non-BI attitude and simple dislike of being in front of the cmaera with other models. 'She really is not all that.' Why join in with the girls if its not really your thing? Overall IKnoPorn review is true and to the point just like the other reviews and replays.
09-30-07  12:44am

Reply To Message


williamj (9) REPLY TO #2 - IKnoPorn :

I agree with your comments. I would not rank a 92 like the reviewer did. I would say a 82 is more realistic.
10-02-07  04:02am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.02 seconds.