Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Met Art

Met Art (4)

Newbie
55*
omberman (0) 10-06-12  10:10am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (5)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Obviously a very professionally run site. Nothing to complain about the nuts and bolts
Cons: One man's meat is another man's poison. This is undoubtedly true but all men know a beautiful woman when they see one and they are going to see very few of them on this website. I have never seen so many average-looking females thrown together. Most are plain, many are almost ugly and what is worse few are genuinely sexy. The whole set-up is more reminiscent of nudism in the 1960s than modern erotica or porn. It beats me why anyone should want to see these plain janes without their clothes on.
Bottom Line: The models are neither beautiful nor sexy. Many look so incredibly softcore that it is doubtful that they would know what to do with a penis if they ever came across one.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

RagingBuddhist (63) "...all men know a beautiful woman when they see one and they are going to see very few of them on this website."

I would seriously like to know what you consider to be a beautiful woman. I joined this site last year and, while not all the women were to my taste, I sure as hell couldn't rate them all down to the point where I'd give a 55 to the site.

10-06-12  05:16pm

Reply To Message

2

elephant (64) For me the site does lack something, maybe just too many girls, it could take months to go through it all. But that said certainly I think it has some of the most beautiful girls I've ever seen, most of my fav models have done sets here.

Each to their own I guess, we all have different tastes.

10-07-12  12:49am

Reply To Message

3

Drooler (218) "It beats me why anyone should want to see these plain janes without their clothes on." Well, that's quite a beating indeed, considering the popularity of the site and of the models, plenty of whom appear at many other sites.

Which site are you going to trash next, I wonder? I guess you've got your work cut out for you.

BTW, it IS a softcore site.

10-07-12  06:19am

Reply To Message

4

slutty (111) Curious review omberman, like others I think it is a site full of quite attractive ladies, but I guess you must have different tastes than mine. I would agree that the site in general is lacking perhaps in "sexiness" in favor of "artfulness", your score does seem overly harsh and perhaps just didn't have what you were looking for?
10-09-12  12:14am

Reply To Message

5

luv lickn clit (19) Omberman, I gotta criticize you too, when you say that there aren't many attractive models on Met-Art. Seriously dude, do you need glasses? Not every model there is a 10, but you would be hard pressed to find any girl there that's less than a 7. There are many, many girls there who are in the 8, 9, 10 category.
12-18-12  01:49am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.