Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit The Sandfly

The Sandfly (0)

Active
55
BabyGetReal (32) 10-04-12  08:25pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (31), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Occasional videos of real amateurs, really aroused.
- Amusing random clips (but these are rare): clit piercing, wild parties, girl pissing on beach fire, sex on a trampoline, etc.
- Low price: $20 for 4 months.
Cons: - Not much good content -- fair number of clips but most very short and horrible quality.
- Mostly very short videos. Most of the minority that show any excitement end before anyone has a climax.
- Mostly horrible resolution, like an old cell phone video. ALL uniformly small format (about 360 x 400 pixels), and no "full screen" display option.
- Often very amateurish jerky camera work, usually POV.
- Often very poor light -- some so dark you can't see anything.
- The majority of amateur videos are just blowjobs. Next most common is solo girl masturbation but often not to climax. Next is just girls undressing or prancing around, often not even nude. There are a small number of boy-girl fucking scenes.
- Some members have uploaded commercial porn clip that you may well have seen on free sites.
- The video player has no time scale.
- Streaming only, no downloads. You cannot right-click and download the video.
- No search mechanism. No organization for videos.
Bottom Line: The guy who apparently runs this site, "SandFly", takes spy voyeur videos of girls and couples on the beach. Most of these are just women with bare breasts, sometimes nude, sunbathing. Low resolution, jerky, telephoto from a long way away. There are only a handful showing man-woman couples or groups having sex, and most of those end before anything much happens. Actually, you'll find better voyeur spy vids of amateurs on xhamster. There are roughly 110 of these videos.

The other side of this site is user-uploaded videos. You can earn access to the site by uploading videos so a lot of boring or duplicate stuff is uploaded.

There are about 120 "big clips" (a few minutes long instead of less than a minute). And there are more than 1,000 short clips uploaded by users. Both categories suffer from the "cons" listed above. And there are quite a few duplicates within these counts.

There are also still picture sets but I didn't bother to look at them.

Bottom line: for such a cheap price one can hardly complain or expect more, but not worth the time I spent looking thru the videos.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (2)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

CarlitoB (2)
Webmaster
Tut-tut.

A bit harsh there and light on the info.

May I address some of the cons which are inaccurate:

Videos - the amatuer video section has a range of AMATUER clips from phone clips to home-shot HD. Variety of scenario varies dependent obviously on the situation filmed.

The clip sare served out in flash player at 480x384 pixels, the same, if not greater as in major sites like voyeurweb and voyeurcloud.

The clips CAN be adjusted in size - theSandfly uses a better system than straight large screen - instead using the ctrl keyboard button in conjunction with the + or - buttons clips can be scaled to the users preference.

Memebers CAN download the videos, simply using any of the free vidoe downloader programs out there - the site uses the same progressiv edownload system as youtube.

the Sandfly and Karennudist EXCLUSIVE beach voyeur material IS mostly completely nude and filmed at pretty close rang efor the most part. I don't know where you get this 'long-range telephoto' view from - perhaps only on some of the early sandfly clips from a decade ago. The new collections were shot in HD and served out at 720x576 pixels.

There are a HUGE variety of picture sections to comliment the videos. Updating every week.


I believe your review was too shallow - you didn't check out the site stringently enough as it presents excellent value and amateur variety.

You're around 25 points short at least when you compare it to some of the rip-off sites out there.

10-05-12  07:22am

Reply To Message

2

TheMoreYouKnow (4) REPLY TO #1 - CarlitoB :

Members CANNOT download the videos via simply using any of the free vidoe downloader programs, I've tried. However for $49 FLV Spider Pro seems to be able to get the job done, besides the webmaster needs to gain some skills. Also navigation forward/backward buttons and downloadable vids are the norm, seriously seek help...the site is extremely ghetto.
04-26-14  07:47pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.