Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Aunt Judy\'s

Aunt Judy's (0)

messmer (137) 09-05-12  11:25am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (75), NO (1)

Some flaws showing up!

Updates are below par for ATK sites and just as unimaginative as the later Aunt Judys/Older Women ones. You may take the unimaginative with a grain of salt. Not everyone has my taste.

There are also careless mistakes like labeling a video of a 33 year old woman as that of a 21 year old MILF.** Okay, that is nit picking but still indicates to me that not enough care is taken when it comes to descriptions etc.

** Added 5pm ADT: Just found out, after downloading said video, that it does not deserve the label HD. Picture may be 1080p but is way too soft and blurry.

Streaming no longer works even though you can still click on it but it will do nothing but buffer forever without going anywhere. This is not a glitch but was done on purpose in order to help increase server download speed.

Download managers are forbidden.

Site has potential. I love how they have changed it to the same look as that of all the other ATK sites. I love that videos are now available at 1080p, but seeing that all the old AJ/OW videos were technically inferior and the updates of videos are relatively slow compared to other mature sites I would give this "new site" a few months before I joined, to allow them to build up a reasonable inventory. I am sure, given ATKs record, that it will be an excellent site eventually.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (6)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Advent (35)
Webmaster
Thank you Messmer for your comments. I will send them to Kim, Matt and Luke right away. I know we had some issues with the ages but we are working on a filter that will solve that problem.

I do not have all of the answers for you right now but I want you to know that we are working on getting the site in good working order and we of course are listening to the members and future members.

I hope you will give us a shot to prove to you that we will take care of this site as we do our others. If you need anything just let me know.

Advent/Melissa

09-05-12  03:03pm

Reply To Message

2

messmer (137) REPLY TO #1 - Advent :

Thanks as always for your courteous response to some of my beefs, Melissa. This is exactly how I feel, that you are "still working on getting the site in good working order." I have started to look at it as a work in progress and, as I wrote, expect nothing but the best down the road.

However in the meantime, there are other glitches as well that I didn't mention: Yesterday I tried to create a custom zip .. in vain .. because I had to give up after five minutes of waiting. Trying to open a picture in High Resolution also took ages. Still having server problems?

But there is nothing but good will here so I just tell myself that you are busy fine tuning things and don't normally get irate over it.

I think my discontent behind the comment is, more than anything, rooted in my disappointment with the updates since ATK took over.

Not the quality so much, even though today's video disappointed me because it was so blurry, but because there has been nothing that even comes close to my favorite niche, which happens to be a nice leisurely strip out of more than just three - four items of clothing.

I somehow expected to see dresses and lots of lingerie and stockings etc. on mature women, yet most appear to dress like young girls .. casual and commando!

Anyway, I realize that's MY taste and if others like what's being presented then I'll lay off and let them have their fun without any more whining.

Thanks again for taking the time to reply.

09-05-12  06:51pm

Reply To Message

3

Advent (35)
Webmaster
REPLY TO #2 - messmer :

Hey Messmer I just wanted to give you a little more information.

We receive all of our content, including Aunt Judy's, in HD. We receive it via tape, disk and ftp.

All videos that go up on the sites with the exception of archives have a HD version.

mobile 852x480 @ 1mbps
SD 852x480 @ 2.2mbps
HD 1920x1080p @ 6mpbs
WMV 852x480 @ 2.2mpbs

852x480 is the resolution you see when you watch a DVD presented in widescreen.

Looking at our competitors, no others offer both true 1080p with such a high frame rate.

We get content from many different providers so depending on their own equipment movies will not look or feel the same from one model to the next.

We do not limit downloaders. We used too a couple years ago when we were with a different company but we are no longer with them so you should have no issues with us limiting how much you download. I am sure you have a good internet connection but that connection would be the only thing that would present limits to you.

I hope this gives you a little more information and as always I am here to answer any questions or concerns you have. I will also pass on your interest in lingerie and more slowly undressing.

09-10-12  08:36am

Reply To Message

4

messmer (137) REPLY TO #3 - Advent :

Thanks,as always, Advent.

You are right I did not take into consideration that you receive your material from various providers when I wrote my complaint about a blurry 1080p video.

All the specifications were exactly as you described but the end result was not true HD, at least not to the eye. This videographer should be told to either adjust his focus or get himself a new camera or some software that allows him to sharpen a video after the fact. If there is such a thing.

I also agree with you about the matter of reducing speed during a download. It hasn't happened again and I've happily downloaded at my usual 2.34 MB/s.

The problems of navigating within the site were real enough, though. I've had an extremely slow server on more than one occasion.

Thanks again, and, as usual, it is a pleasure to be able to voice misgivings without a webmaster getting defensive over it. You are in the right spot. May they always keep you (if you are an employee rather than an owner) and give you regular raises!

09-10-12  11:53am

Reply To Message

5

Advent (35)
Webmaster
REPLY TO #4 - messmer :

I am glad I was able to help. Thank you for the kind words, I am not an owner but I do love it here. I do not get upset over comments I just try to make sure that the information out there is correct.

I will be the first to admit when we have issues and make sure they get corrected. Thanks again Messmer, it has been a pleasure.

09-10-12  12:08pm

Reply To Message

6

messmer (137) REPLY TO #5 - Advent :

Just a parting remark, Advent: I have removed all references to the reducing speed in my comment. No answer required.
09-10-12  12:22pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.