Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Nubiles.net

Nubiles.net (2)

Active
92
Claypaws (44) 08-06-12  11:48am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (21), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: *1100 teen (18+) models (no silicone), 5700 photo sets (100 ish pics each), 600,000 photos, 5700 videos (10 to 15min). -100% exclusive.
*Many attractive models and lots of total stunners, especially in video.
*Updates every day. 3 new models per week. All model's content on consecutive days. Not dragged out over months. I wish all sites would do this.
*4 softcore photo sets and videos per model plus some bg and gg hardcore.
*Photosets in 1200x800 and 2400x1600 with full zips.
*Videos in WMV 1280x720 3600kb/s approx 400MB, MP4 854x480 1500kb/s, plus some lower resolutions and mobile and streaming. No DRM. Samples of all types available in tour.
*Sample of every video and photoset on site available in tour.
*Good model directory and exemplary search facility.
*Customisable for viewing sizes etc.
*Download manager friendly. No download limit. No timeouts.
*Choose CCBill or Epoch.
Cons: * Too much emphasis on toys and masturbation. Even if you like this in videos, photos would benefit from less. If you hit on these themes, this is not a con.
*Photos less good than videos but still better than most sites which offer good video.
*Few repeat visits from models. Very few deviate from the 4 solo photo + 4 solo vid + bg/gg plan.
*Hardly any non-Caucasian or non-slim. I prefer slim Caucasian so this suits me but might not suit everyone.
*"Themes" such as "Lingerie" or "Uniforms" are incidental, not central. This applies to virtually all sites unless they are specialist fetish sites. Not a con for me.
*Slight discrepancy between what tour quotes for number of sets and videos and what search feature reveals. Figures quoted in pros might not be exact but not far off.
Bottom Line: I have given this site a very high score even though much of its content is not what I want or like. I believe that a score should be based on how well a site delivers what its free tour leads you to expect. An inadequate or misleading tour should detract from the score even when content is good. Excellent delivery following an informative tour should be rewarded.

Nubiles has one of the very best tours around: so good that not everyone might be aware of this. It has access to the full model directory. Click any model and you see exactly what her content is plus two full size pictures and a sample of her video at every resolution and format choice the site offers. If you click "Photos", every set has three free images at 1200x800 and 12 representative thumbs. And every video has a 1 minute streaming sample at a quality good enough to view full screen.

The tour area is the same as the members area but without the actual content. So, when you join, you should be in no doubt what the site has to offer in navigation and content. This is teen girls in mainly solo videos and photo sets with some bg and somewhat less gg. Many of the girls, of course, appear on other sites, including ATK, Femjoy, Karups, MetArt, Twistys and others but the Nubiles content is 100% exclusive. Girls often look younger on Nubiles, even when they were shot later than other sites. This, I believe, is mainly due to subtle makeup and lighting since Nubiles deplores and discourages things like pigtails or holding teddy bears.

You would need to study the tour very carefully, however, to reveal what are the greatest frustrations of the site for me. It has a very strong emphasis on toys and masturbation; and it is geared towards video rather than photos even though it takes a standard 4 solo photo sets and 4 solo videos per model. gg or bg is on top of that.

The webmaster makes his comprehensive instructions to photographers available in the tour. There are some contradictions and ambiguities in it and clarifying those would help the site and its members. Here are a few quotes:

"Videos are just important as pictures." [sic]
"video is more important to members then pictures." [sic]
"At least half of the sets should be fingering and finger masturbation without toys."
"Our favorite content is when a girl plays with toys."
"The best theme is just masturbation and toys, and I dont expect other themes but here are a few ideas." [sic]
"Members do not like toys as they often get in the way of seeing what she is doing down there. Do not give me 4 sets of all toys! "
"No more then 2 sets with toys. Focus on finger masturbation." [sic]

I have joined the site many times (despite my loathing of toys and masturbation content). Using its excellent search feature confirms that the toys and masturbation bias has increased over the past year. I deplore this but some might enjoy it. For me, toys and fingers both get in the way. I wish the webmaster would clarify his intention and ensure that it is clearly described in his instructions to photographers.

The photo sets are genuine photos, not vidcaps. But the webmaster requires that they should mirror the videos. This tends to result in each photo set rather closely being a kind of rehearsal for the video, with less spontaneity and engagement. They are often less well lit, colour balanced and focused than the videos and frequently less good than the same model's photo content on other sites.

I think it would improve the site's content if photos could be freed of the constraint to match the videos. Why not have the toys and masturbation in the videos, where they add interest, and keep them out of the photos, in which they are mainly an obstruction to the view and always look unnatural? That said, the site does have some excellent photo sets too, and some girls have all their photo sets free of toys and even of masturbation. But they are not the norm.

The videos are almost invariably better than elsewhere. Video is technically excellent. 1280x720 wmv is very sharp to view and well lit.

I mentioned the search feature. It is superb. You can search on 15 Attributes (inc boobs, pussy etc), 15 Outfits (inc lingerie, glasses etc), 9 Actions (inc toys, hardcore) and Actions can EXCLUDE too, so I can find photo sets without toys! You can access and even run the live search feature in the tour. WYSIWYG!!!

All photo sets and videos start clothed, even if frequently this just means a bikini or bra and panties, and get fully nude partway through. None start out nude. There is some teasing but probably not enough to satisfy lingerie or tease enthusiasts. It is not a fetish site; the emphasis is on the girls and most of them are hot.

Despite its missing the mark for me, I frequently rejoin. I recommend Nubiles to anyone who enjoys quality teen content, especially if you like toys and masturbation and are aware that, though no slouch in photos or hardcore, its strength lies in its solo video.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (9)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

lk2fireone (194) Excellent or superb review (both adjectives apply).

Can I hire you to ghost write my reviews in the future?

08-06-12  04:06pm

Reply To Message

2

Nubiles Captain (30)
Webmaster
Claypaws,

That is one of the most detailed reviews I have ever written. Thanks for taking the time to give it such an honest opinion.

I am going to take your advice about the photos having to match the videos too much. Just a few days ago I was talking to some of our photographers and I agree that it is making the photos not as good as they can be. That is something we can work on.

I am not sure if we will go as far to keep all toys out of the pictures but I think still can improve on that a ton to where it no longer seems an issue. I hope to find the right balance of also pleasing the members who like to see toys.

You are correct that the photographer notes are outdated. New stuff has been put in there but older stuff not removed. Lately we have been doing a lot more one on one training as well as screencasts and video training. I am hoping there will be some improvement coming up on that.

Thanks
Captain

08-06-12  08:52pm

Reply To Message

3

Claypaws (44)
Webmaster
REPLY TO #1 - lk2fireone :

Thank you lk2fireone. Ghost writing? I struggle to write my own.
08-07-12  03:47am

Reply To Message

4

Claypaws (44)
Webmaster
REPLY TO #2 - Nubiles Captain :

Thank you for replying, Captain, and taking my comments so constructively. It is good to see a webmaster taking note of comment and not just becoming defensive. I feel that, the better a site is, the more useful constructive feedback becomes. Improving an excellent site produces a great one.

I am glad you are taking on board the suggestion to separate the photo set from the shackles of the video.

Regarding toys, please also bear in mind that it is not just toys that annoy some of us. It is finger masturbation too. Both of those obscure the view.

I can appreciate that you might not be able to remove toys and masturbation completely from photo sets. But here are some things that you might consider.

A photo set that includes toys could be a little longer. It could begin with a good tease from fully clothed. You state this in the instructions but many photographers still do not do it. Ensure there are plenty of views of open leg and plenty of spread pussy without fingers obscuring it - spreads with hands coming from underneath the thighs work really well. Plenty of eye contact too. All this before the toy comes out or the fingers go to work. Toy should not appear at all until at least half way through the set, perhaps 2/3 through. Then it would become 1/3 clothed, 1/3 nude including spreading but without toys, masturbation or finger insertion, 1/3 with toy or fingers, where the (simulated) masturbation can happen.

Try to avoid those weird facial expressions where the girl opens her mouth and screws her eyes up the moment she touches herself. They are not convincing - just daft, especially in photos. The Russians do it a lot. Stop it :-)

Another possibility (I would love this but you probably will not) could be to have some extra photo sets. Having the same number of photo sets as vids actually biases in favour of vids if you think about the server storage space and site bandwidth. You could still have the photographers use the same setting for the photos and videos. But for example, they could shoot a toy/masturbation photo set on the bed and a no insertion set on the same bed plus one video there that could include striptease, flaunt and masturbate.

Screencasts and one-one are a brilliant idea too. So would be updating the written instructions on the site. As I more and more contemplate shooting myself, I would find those really useful. So would any potential new photographer. The big problems in the UK are finding models who are not the five or six models everyone else has shot, and a suitable venue to shoot them in. That is why you get so many Americans, Russians and Czechs.

Heck - I hope you read this :-)

08-07-12  04:22am

Reply To Message

5

Nubiles Captain (30)
Webmaster
REPLY TO #4 - Claypaws :

Can I copy what you wrote in the photographer instructions?

Yes I would like to get the photographers to do many of these things. One of the things that is hard is getting the girl to have a natural but sexy look without overdoing it. This is not something every girl can do when they are brand new and excited about shooting but a bit nervous.

You should shoot yourself, we are seeing more models from UK recently!

Thanks
Captain

08-07-12  07:25am

Reply To Message

6

Claypaws (44)
Webmaster
REPLY TO #5 - Nubiles Captain :

Thank you for coming back, Captain.

I would be delighted for you to copy what I wrote in the photographer instructions.

Yes, that natural but sexy look must be very difficult to describe to a girl that does not know how to do it. I suppose, if she has a boyfriend, or girlfriend, the photographer can ask her to think about making love to that person and imagine that the camera is that person. Never having asked, I have no idea if that would work or not :-)

Hmm. I must look into shooting possibilities more seriously if there are more girls coming onto the UK scene. Costs of venues are really prohibitive over here. A suitable apartment can cost hundreds of dollars for a day - plus travel, plus the model and that is not accounting for any equipment the photographer needs to buy. Equipment in the UK is roughly double what it is in the US.

08-07-12  08:21am

Reply To Message

7

Denner (233) Strange....is it co-writing?
The Webmaster of the site says:
"That is one of the most detailed reviews I have ever written."

....LOL....nice review. Keep them coming.

08-10-12  03:22pm

Reply To Message

8

Claypaws (44)
Webmaster
REPLY TO #7 - Denner :

LOL Denner.

I wondered if I had been possessed by his spirit and written it while in a trance. Language is strange. We usually understand what a person means even when it is not what he says.

Thank you for the praise. I also accept chocolate. And I will try to keep them coming.

08-14-12  03:21pm

Reply To Message

9

Thedebilman666 (Suspended) Zipped the whole site, their count is dead on for the number of sets they advertise.
08-20-13  09:45pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.03 seconds.