Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan (1)

Active
97
rearadmiral (334) 07-20-12  10:34am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Huge collection dating back five years
- One of the few sites available that photo fans and video fans can both enjoy
- Standard-setting production values
- Site has a Ďpersonalí feel thanks to the models and staff
- Site is simple, but user-friendly
- Exclusive content (not found elsewhere)
- Unique content (nothing else like it on the Ďnet)
- Bills through CC Bill
- Excellent value
- Allows download managers with no obvious timeouts
- Offers HD in multiple formats
Cons: - None. Seriously, none.
Bottom Line: ALS Scan is a site that I shouldnít like because I generally have little interest in solo girl, masturbation scenes and girl-girl scenes. But even though thatís all that ALS Scan offers, the site is certainly in my top-five favourite sites and a site that I go back to regularly.

I wonít go into a lot of detail about the technical specs of the site because those have been addressed before by me and others in earlier reviews. The site continues to offer HD video in both MP4 and WMV. I didnít bother to comment on that in a previous review because I didnít realize how rare that is. Due to size restrictions, many sites only offer HD in MP4 format and leave those of us who still prefer WMV to live with a lower-resolution file or go with MP4. This would appear to show the level of customer support that the site has if they take this extra step to keep a few of us happy.

Iíve said before that for me to really like a site it has to excel at three things: 1) the content has to be good, 2) the site design needs to be effective and user-friendly, and 3) the material needs to be easily accessed by the members either by streaming or download. A lot of sites score high on two of those, but few score high on all three of those. ALS is one of the sites that does well on all three. They certainly knock two of them out of the park and do better than average on another.

First the content: like any site, if you donít like the content youíre not going to like the site regardless of how great the technical aspects are. In this respect prospective members really need to know that ALS Scan isnít a Ďnormalí porn site. There is no hardcore b/g here at all. Thereís no b/g stuff period. There is mostly solo and g/g material. If youíre not into that, the site might seem a bit dull, but they add some unique character by having lots of behind-the-scenes stuff too. I call it BTS, but only because I canít think of a better term for it. Some people donít like this, but some like me do, and thatís having the camera rolling during a photo shoot. Iím not sure why I like it, but I do and this stuff is very well done. ALS Scan may be best known, however, for their location shoots in the Caribbean, which seem to occur annually. These are a lot of fun to watch and take place at a villa and on the beach. For a site that shoots so much outdoor material the production values are incredible. These guys have the technical aspects of lighting, sound, camerawork and editing down solid. They should teach others these skills. The site offers hundreds, perhaps thousands of exclusive videos and all of them have a unique and personal feel to them. Itís like the staff are making porn that they like with no concerns about commercial value Ė except that what they make is so good it has exceptional value.

In terms of content, one thing that hasnít been posted in several years and I really wish theyíd shoot more of is European public nudity and body painting. Iím a big fan of this stuff and when the staff at ALS Scan did it they applied their usual high standards and made some of the best public nudity scenes available on the Ďnet. (So if an ALS Scan staffer happens to read this, please, please, please shoot more public nudity!)

As for site design, it can be best described as Ďprimitive.í But while that might be a problem for many other sites it really isnít here. Given the narrow focus of the site having a search function really wouldnít add a lot of value. As it is, you can sort for photos or videos and you can sort by model. Beyond that not much is really needed. I think a fair contrast with the site design here might be to Videobox which had a simple, effective and plain-looking site. Then the marketers decided to make it look pretty to attract new members but in doing so they made it less user-friendly. The ALS Scan site probably looks like it did way back when they started, and since it works I hope they donít see the need to make the site flashier at the expense of utility.

As for accessibility the site scores high here too. Downloads are fast, the site allows download managers, there appears to be no timeouts on downloads and there are no download limits. It seems that the site owners sat down and thought what theyíd like if they were the customer and then did it.

Another rare attribute is that the site caters to both photo and video collectors. They offer high quality regardless of what youíre looking for. Iím not normally a photo collector, but this is one site that I make an exception. The photo quality is incredible.

Obviously I highly recommend ALS Scan, with the caveat on content. Even if you really have limited interest in the stuff they offer Iíd still recommend giving them a try. The content is playful, personal and erotic thanks to the models and staff and the site lets you access it easily. That makes the site an excellent value.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (10)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Claypaws (44)
Webmaster
What an excellent and comprehensive review! And I speak as someone who has joined this site several times despite not much liking its content. Like it or not, I have to agree that it does what it clearly sets out to do, with photographic and video quality standards that are possibly unmatched.
07-20-12  01:11pm

Reply To Message

2

Claypaws (44)
Webmaster
And a question. The biggest solvable problem I had with the site was that they shoot a load of sets with a model and then take months or years to release them. Are they still doing the updates in this way?
07-20-12  01:29pm

Reply To Message

3

elephant (65) Great review as always Rearadmiral

Yeah I've said before this site is awesome if you like photos and vids of solo girls and not many sites are good at both. Myself though I just couldn't get into lots of the videos because they tended to be photoshoots and I didn't like that, seemed a waste to me that the 2 girls were there and performing lesbian action but kept stopping and posing for the camera, I prefer much more to see an actual lesbian scene. I know the site has them too but just not that many to justify me joining and I'm not really into solo girl stuff unless they are super hot.

Still I never rule the site out of a future join and if they did a deal for $19.99 or less I'd for sure consider it as I bet there is some stuff I'd really like with the normal shot lesbian and group girl scenes.

07-21-12  03:00am

Reply To Message

4

rearadmiral (334) REPLY TO #3 - elephant :

Thanks for the comments, elephant. As a regular subscriber to the site I get email offers from them fairly regularly. They usually don't lower the price but they pair the membership with another site. The offer I joined under this time gave me a Nubile membership too. I'm not sure if you can get added to their mailing list, but if you can that might be a good way to get better value.
07-21-12  12:48pm

Reply To Message

5

rearadmiral (334) REPLY TO #2 - Claypaws :

Thanks for your comments. As far as I can tell, the site continues to release shoots and scenes over a long period of time. I can't be 100% certain since they don't give the date of the shoot. It's also possible that because they have a roster of regular models that it may just appear that they're releasing stuff over an extended period.
07-21-12  12:54pm

Reply To Message

6

Claypaws (44)
Webmaster
REPLY TO #5 - rearadmiral :

Thank you RA. That is then something of a deal breaker for me. I found it so frustrating on previous memberships. I think the explanation is not a revisit of a regular model because they have named repeat visits explicitly - e.g. Faye Runaway shoot 2. But then the contents of a "shoot" took months and months to appear. And the same was true of a new model. I can never get enough of Kiera Winters. I see she has just appeared. I would join when she has 5 or more shoots up. And that is despite the fact that I hate toys and insertions. ALS usually have a few good shots without toys in each series and it is worth joining just for those and ignoring all the cucumbers. But if she has just one set up, I might be joining for 5 images, which is not the best value. I guess they do it because they think members will stay longer to wait for the updates. I just stay away while I wait for the updates :-(

Thanks again for the info. I guess I will need to wait a year before joining again.

07-21-12  05:12pm

Reply To Message

7

Denner (233) One of the best...and what I consider most important: helpful reviews, I've seen here for some time.
Never really got hooked on ALS Scan for many reasons, but according to this review....maybe I should take one more look. Apparently things are going the right way...

07-22-12  08:12am

Reply To Message

8

rearadmiral (334) REPLY TO #7 - Denner :

Thanks Denner. This site really does everything right and are worth a look.
07-22-12  08:16am

Reply To Message

9

BadMrFrosty (56) I should really consider re-joining this site and after reading this excellent review I think I will. ALS Scan was the very first porn site I ever joined way back in I think 96-97, seems like a lifetime ago!
07-29-12  05:16am

Reply To Message

10

rearadmiral (334) REPLY TO #9 - BadMrFrosty :

The good thing is that you'll likely find re-mastered versions of what you downloaded back then. The site posts new material regularly but also re-masters older stuff. I was first a member maybe three or four years ago but I still like seeing models from the 90s.
07-29-12  12:21pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.